`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`Case No. 22-cv-23753- MOORE/BECERRA
`
`
`EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of
`themselves and all other similarly situated,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/
`
`NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Michele D. Johnson of the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP
`
`appears as counsel for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal, and requests that all papers served in this case
`
`also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below.
`
`Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and
`
`Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Ms. Johnson was previously admitted
`
`to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen
`
`and states that all information provided in support of her initial pro hac vice motion remains current
`
`and correct, including the sponsoring co-counsel.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 8, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.
`255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
`Coral Gables, Florida 33134
`Telephone: (305) 476-7400
`Facsimile: (305) 476-7444
`
`By: Roberto Martínez
`Roberto Martínez
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 182 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 2 of 2
`
`Florida Bar No. 305596
`Email: bob@colson.com
`
`
`
` Attorney for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
