throbber
Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 196 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2023 Page 1 of 5
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`MIAMI DIVISION
`
`Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA
`
`
`EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of
`themselves and all other similarly situated,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`v.
`
`SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/
`
`
`OPPOSITION BY DEFENDANTS THOMAS BRADY, GISELE BÜNDCHEN,
`UDONIS HASLEM, WILLIAM TREVOR LAWRENCE, KEVIN O’LEARY,
`SHAQUILLE O’NEAL, AND DAVID ORTIZ TO PLAINTIFFS’ EXPEDITED MOTION
`FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY, AND TO AMEND
`THEIR COMPLAINT WITH ANY FACTS ARISING FROM SUCH DISCOVERY
`
`Defendants Thomas Brady, Gisele Bündchen, Udonis Haslem, William Trevor Lawrence,
`
`Kevin O’Leary, Shaquille O’Neal, and David Ortiz (the “Remaining Non-FTX Defendants”) file
`
`this brief opposition to Plaintiffs’ Expedited Motion for Leave to Conduct Jurisdictional
`
`Discovery, and to Amend Their Complaint with Any Facts Arising from Such Discovery (“Motion”;
`
`ECF 163).
`
`Plaintiffs’ Motion seeks “jurisdictional” discovery from Defendants Stephen Curry, Larry
`
`David, Golden State Warriors, LLC, Shohei Ohtani, and Naomi Osaka (collectively, the “Non-
`
`Resident Defendants”). See ECF 163 at 1. The Motion also, however, seeks to upend the existing
`
`schedule for briefing the motions to dismiss filed by the Remaining Non-FTX Defendants and the
`
`Non-Resident Defendants (ECFs 139, 154 & 156-59) – collectively, the “Motions to Dismiss” –
`
`which briefing schedule the Court set over two weeks before Plaintiffs filed the Motion. See ECF
`
`132. Plaintiffs request leave to file an amended pleading “within twenty (20) days after completing
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 196 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2023 Page 2 of 5
`
`that brief jurisdictional discovery, so Plaintiffs may incorporate any additional facts that support
`
`personal jurisdiction over these FTX Non-Florida Defendants and address arguments raised in all
`
`Defendants’ motions to dismiss.” Motion at 1. Granting the request, of course, would require re-
`
`briefing of the Motions to Dismiss.
`
`For all of the reasons stated in the opposition filed by the Non-Resident Defendants (“Non-
`
`Resident Defendants’ Opposition”; ECF195), the Motion should be denied. Because the Motion
`
`does not seek leave to take discovery from the Remaining Non-FTX Defendants, they do not
`
`formally adopt Section I of the Non-Resident Defendants’ Opposition, although they submit that
`
`the arguments are well taken.
`
`However, as to Plaintiffs’ request to file a further amendment – and, correspondingly,
`
`change the existing briefing schedule for and require re-briefing of the Motions to Dismiss – the
`
`Remaining Non-FTX Defendants adopt Section II of the Non-Resident Defendants’ Opposition.
`
`Plaintiffs have already amended their pleading once as of right in this action, when they more than
`
`doubled the size of initial pleading (ECF 1), going from 41 pages to 97 pages, plus appending a
`
`19-page “expert” report as an exhibit. See ECF 16.1 Given the incurable deficiencies in Plaintiffs’
`
`existing Amended Complaint, which are not “technical pleading deficiencies” but incurable legal
`
`flaws, see Motions to Dismiss, the Remaining Non-FTX Defendants believe that no amendment
`
`should be allowed, if at all, until the Court rules on the Motions to Dismiss, which should be
`
`briefed on the schedule the Court set on April 11, 2023 (ECF 132).
`
`
`1 Plaintiffs also amended their pleading in action styled Podalsky v. Bankman-Fried, No. 22-cv-
`
`23983-KMM (S.D. Fla.). See Podalsky ECF 4.
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 196 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2023 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`COLSON, HICKS, EIDSON, P.A.
`255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
`Coral Gables, Florida 33134
`(305) 476-7400
`
`
`By: /s/ Roberto Martinez
`Roberto Martínez
`Florida Bar No. 305596
` bob@colson.com
`Stephanie A. Casey
`Florida Bar No. 97483
` scasey@colson.com
`Zachary Lipshultz
`Florida Bar No. 123594
` zach@colson.com
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`Andrew B. Clubok (pro hac vice)
` andrew.clubok@lw.com
`Susan E. Engel (pro hac vice)
` susan.engel@lw.com
`Brittany M.J. Record (pro hac vice)
` brittany.record@lw.com
`555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
`Tel: +1.202.637.2200
`Fax: +1.202.637.2201
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`Marvin S. Putnam (pro hac vice)
` marvin.putnam@lw.com
`Jessica Stebbins Bina (pro hac vice)
` jessica.stebbinsbina@lw.com
`Elizabeth A. Greenman (pro hac vice)
` elizabeth.greenman@lw.com
`10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 1100
`Los Angeles, California 90067
`Tel: +1.424.653.5500
`Fax: +1.424.653.5501
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`Michele D. Johnson (pro hac vice)
` michele.johnson@lw.com
`650 Town Center Drive, 20th Floor
`Costa Mesa, California 92626-1925
`Tel: +1.714.540.1235
`Fax: +1.714.755.8290
`Attorneys for Defendants Thomas Brady, Gisele
`Bündchen, and Shaquille O’Neal
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 196 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2023 Page 4 of 5
`
`DIMOND KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A.
`Offices at Grand Bay Plaza
`2665 South Bayshore Drive, PH-2B
`
`Miami, Florida 33133
`Telephone:
`(305) 374-1920
`Facsimile:
`(305) 374-1961
`By: /s/ David A. Rothstein
`
`David A. Rothstein, Esq.
`Fla. Bar No. 995762
` DRothstein@dkrpa.com
`Alexander M. Peraza, Esq.
`Fla. Bar No. 107044
` APeraza@dkrpa.com
`Eshaba Jahir-Sharuz, Esq.
`Fla. Bar No. 1038846
` Eshaba@dkrpa.com
`MCANGUS GOUDELOCK & COURIE LLC
`2000 Market Street, Suite 780
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`(484) 406-4334
`By: /s/ Eric A. Fitzgerals
`Eric A. Fitzgerald (pro hac vice)
` eric.fitzgerald@mgclaw.com
`Hillary N. Ladov (pro hac vice)
` hillary.ladov@mgclaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant William Trevor
`Lawrence
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AKERMAN LLP
`350 East Las Olas Boulevard – Suite 1600
`Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
`Tel.: 954-463-2700
`Fax: 954-468-2454
`
`By: /s/ Christopher S. Carver
`Christopher S. Carver, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 993580
` christopher.carver@akerman.com
`Jason S. Oletsky, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 9301
` jason.oletsky@akerman.com
`Katherine A Johnson, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 1040357
` katie.johnson@akerman.com
`Attorneys for Defendant David Ortiz and
`Udonis Haslem
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 196 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2023 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`MARCUS NEIMAN RASHBAUM
`& PINEIRO LLP
`100 Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 805
`Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394
`Tel: (954) 462-1200
` South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2530
`Miami, Florida 33131
`Tel: (305)-400-4260
`By: /s/ Jeffrey Neiman
`Jeffrey Neiman
`Fla Bar. No. 544469
`jneiman@mnrlawfirm.com
`Jeffrey Marcus
`Fla. Bar No. 310890
`jmarcus@mnrlawfirm.com
`Michael Pineiro
`Fla. Bar No. 041897
`mpineiro@mnrlawfirm.com
`Brandon Floch
`Fla. Bar No. 125218
`bfloch@mnrlawfirm.com
`
`BERK BRETTLER LLP
`9119 Sunset Boulevard
`West Hollywood, CA 90069
`Tel.: (310) 278-2111
`Andrew B. Brettler (pro hac vice)
` abrettler@berkbrettler.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Kevin O’Leary
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket