throbber
Filing# 153647958 E-Filed 07/19/2022 04:42:54 PM
`
`IN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR
`BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
`Case No: 22-013591 COINX 61
`
`PETER F. MERKLE, MD, PA,
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`VS.
`
`USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE
`COMPANY,
`
`Defendant.
`
`1
`
`PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTITLEMENT OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND
`COSTS. REOUEST FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT WITH RESERVATION
`OF JURISDICTION, AND REOUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING TO
`DETERMINE OUANTUM OF PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS
`
`Comes now, Plaintiff,PETER F. MERKLE, MD, PA, by and through the
`
`undersignedattorney and pursuant to F.S. §§627.428, and 627.736 and Florida R. Civ.P.
`
`1.525, hereby moves for Entitlement of Attorney'sFees and Costs, Request for Entry of
`
`Final Judgment with Reservation of Jurisdiction,and Request for Evidentiaryhearingto
`
`Determine Quantum of Plaintiffs Attorney'sFees and costs pursuant to Defendant's post
`
`suit payment of outstandingmedical benefits mailed on or about July 1,2022, constitutinga
`
`confession ofjudgment,and in support thereof states:
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`1. This is an action for failure to pay No-Fault and Medical Payments benefits in
`
`accordance with Florida's No-Fault Statute and the policyat issue.
`
`*** FILED: BROWARD COUNTY, FL BRENDA D. FORMAN, CLERK 07/19/2022 04:42:54 PM.****
`
`

`

`2. On March 12, 2022, the Plaintiff,Peter F. Merkle,MD, PA filed its Complaint
`
`aginst the Defendant, USAA Casualty Insurance Company, wherein it
`specificallysoughtpayment for overdue medical benefits,overdue medical
`
`payments benefits and statutoryinterestpursuantto Section 627.736,Fla. Stat.,
`as same was due and owing in connection with the amount demanded by the
`
`Plaintiffin it'sPre-suit demand letter dated January21, 2022. Please see copy of
`
`Pre-suit demand letterattached hereto as Exhibit"A".
`
`3. On February19, 2022, a draft was received in the amount of $251.68 from the
`
`Defendant representingoverdue penalty,postage and interest. Please see copy
`
`ofDraft attached hereto as Exhibit"B".
`
`4. However, no Draft was received by the Plaintiff or it's counsel for the
`
`outstandingmedical benefits due for services providedto the patientby the
`PlaintifffromNovember 5,2021 throughand includingDecember 13,2021.
`
`5. Plaintiffwas left with no choice but to file suit in the instant matter.
`
`It was not until after suit was filed that Defendant correctlymailed the Medicals
`
`6.
`
`draft to the proper address for the Plaintiff's attorney,Law Offices of Michele
`Muir, PA, 15673 Southern Blvd.,Suite 107-342,Loxahatchee,FL 33470.
`7. In particular,a draft in the amount of $2,731.06was received in an envelope
`postmarkedJuly 1, 2022, accompaniedby an insert indicatingthat,"The
`enclosed was returned to USAA by the post Office. If we've reached you at a
`new address,pleasecontact USAA and updateyour address. We cannot change
`your address unless we hear from you." The mailingaddress listedon the Insert
`is Peter F. Merkle,MD c/o Michele E. Muir PA Law, 7251 W Palmetto Park Rd
`
`

`

`Ste 100, Boca Raton FL 33433-3487. Please see copy of draft,envelopeand
`
`Insert attached hereto as Exhibit "C".
`
`8. The Defendant failed to mail the medicals Draft to the correct address provided
`
`in the Plaintiff'sdemand letter.
`
`9. Despiteknowing it owes additional outstandingstatutoryinterest,Defendant
`refuses to comply with its obligationsunder Section 627.736, Fla. Stat.,and its
`
`own policy,which incorporatesthe No-Fault Statute.
`
`10. After receiptof the Medicals Draft,counsel for the Plaintiffcontacted counsel
`for the Defendant regardingstipulatingthat its post-suitpayment was a
`
`confession,that Plaintiffis entitled to attorney'sfees and that Plaintiffis entitled
`
`to additional statutoryinterest. However, no agreementshave been reached.
`
`MEMORANDUM OF LAW
`
`A. Post-suit payment of medicals
`The determination of whether attorney's fees are awardable in an action
`based upon Florida' s Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law is governed by Florida Statute
`627.736(8)(627.736(8)is a part of Florida's Motor Vehicle No-Fault law and
`specificallyincorporatedin all personalinjuryprotectionpoliciespursuant to
`Florida Statute 627.7407(2))and 627.428. These statutes state as follows:
`Upon the rendition of a judgment ["withrespect to any disputeunder the
`provisionsof ss. 627.730-627.7405 between the insured and the insurer,or
`between an assigneeof an insured's rightsand the insuref'Iby any of the
`courts of this state againstall insurer and in favor of any named or
`omnibus insured or the named beneficiaryunder a policyor contract
`executed by the insurer,the trial court or, in the event of an appealin
`which the insured or beneficiaryprevails,the appellatecourt shall adjudge
`or decree againstthe insurer and in favor of the insured or beneficiarya
`
`

`

`reasonable sum as fees or compensationfor the insured's or beneficiary's
`attorney prosecutingthe suit in which the recovery is had.
`
`Florida Statute 627.428 and [FloridaStatute 627.736(8)is cited in the brackets].
`"Dispute,"as contemplatedby Florida Statute 627.736(8),is very broad and includes
`"any dispute."There is no limitation on the type of disputesor the type of recovery that
`must be had. The onlyrequirementis the rendition of a judgment.The Florida Supreme
`Court in Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 So. 2d 679,684 (Fla.2000) acknowledgedthe
`
`breadth ofthis statute when it held:
`
`Florida law is clear that in any dispute" which leads to judgment
`againstthe insurer and in favor of the insured, attorney'sfees shall be
`awarded to the insured. See §§ 627.736(8),627.428(1);see also
`Dunmore, 301 So.2d at 503. That is,under PIP law,the focus is outcome-
`oriented. If a dispute arises between an insurer and an insured,and
`judgment is entered in favor of the insured, he or she is entitled to
`attorney'sfees. ... It is clear to us that the purpose of this provisionis to
`level the playingfield so that the economic power of insurance companies
`is not so overwhelmingthat injusticemay be encouragedbecause people
`will not have the necessary means to seek redress in the courts.
`The Third District Court of Appeals in Amador v. Latin Am. Prop. & Cas. Ins.
`rd DCA 1989) held:
`
`Co., 552 So. 2d 1132, 1133 (Fla.3
`
`The trial court has no discretion to deny a reasonable attorney'sfee to the
`prevailingplaintiffwhere the insurance company first disputesthe claim
`and then settles the case after a lawsuit is filed. § 627.428(1),Fla.Stat.
`(1987) (upon rendition ofjudgmentagainstan insurer the trial court shall
`adjudgeagainstthe insurer and in favor of the insured or beneficiarya
`reasonable sum as attorney fees).
`
`and the Fourth District Court of Appealsin State Farm Florida Ins. Co. v. Lime
`Bay Condominium, Inc., 187 So.3d 932 (Fla.4th DCA 2016) held:
`When an insured moves for attorney'sfees under statute entitlinginsured
`to reasonable attorneyfees upon rendition ofjudgmentagainstinsurer,the
`underlyingissue is whether the suit was filed for a legitimatepurpose, and
`whether the filingacted as a necessary catalystto resolve the disputeand
`force the insurer to satisfyits obligationsunder the insurance contract.
`
`

`

`"The purpose of Section 627.428 is not one of punishmentbut to
`encourage the prompt payment of valid claims." Universal Underwriters Ins. Co:
`v. Gorgei Enterprises,Inc.. App., 345 So.2d 412 (1977)."The purpose behind
`section 627.428 is plainlyto place the insured or beneficiaryin the place she
`would have been if the carrier had seasonablypaid the claim or benefits without
`
`..
`
`causing the payee to engage counsel and incur obligationsfor attorney fees.
`Travelers of Florida v. Stormont, 43 So.3d 941 (Fla.3d DCA 2010) and Federated
`Nat. Ins. Co. v. Esposito,937 So.2d 199 (Fla.4thDCA 2006). See also the 17t,th
`circuit appellateopinionin USAA General Indemnityv. Cohen Chiropractic,23
`Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 522e, (Fla.Cir. Ct. AppellateDivision,17th Cir. 2015)
`wherein the court awarded appellateattorney'sfees to the medical providerwho
`
`successfullydefended a trialcourt's award of unpaidpenalty:
`Sections 627.736(d)and 627.736(c),Florida Statutes,entitle Cohen to
`statutorypenaltyand postage. See 627.736(10)(d),Fla. Stat. (2008);
`627.736(10)(c),Fla. Stat. (2008).These provisionscontemplatea scenario
`where the insurer partiallypays a claim upon receiptof a pre-suitdemand
`letter. In that instance,the insurer is obligatedto pay "a penaltyof 10
`percentof the overdue amount paid by the insurer,subjectto a maximum
`penalty of $250" and "postalcosts if requestedby the claimant in the
`Id. Giving the statue its plainand obvious meaning,USAA is
`obligatedto pay the statutory penaltyand postage costs related to USAA S
`pre-suitpartialpayment of benefits. ... The county court ultimatelyruled
`in favor of Cohen and awarded Cohen the statutorypenaltyand postage
`related to USAA's pre-suitpartialpayment of benefits. ... Appellee's
`Motion for AppellateAttorney'sFees is hereby GRANTED with the
`amount to be determined by the county court upon remand.
`
`notice."
`
`It is well settled that the payment of a previouslydenied claim followingthe
`
`initiationof an action for recovery, but priorto the issuance of a finaljudgment,constitutes
`the functional equivalentof a confession ofjudgment.Johnson v. Omega Ins.Cq.200 So.3d
`1207, 1215 (Fla.2016).When an insurance company has agreedto settlea disputedcase, it
`
`

`

`has,in effect,declined to defend itspositionin the pendingsuit. Thus, the payment of the
`claim is,indeed,the functionalequivalentof a confession ofjudgmentor a verdict in favor
`
`of the insured. Wollard v. Lloyd'sand Companies of Lloyd's,439 So.2d 217,218 (Fla.
`
`1983).
`The Fourth DCA has held that when an insurer pays an amount claimed by an
`
`insured after suit was filed but before the rendition of a judgment,the payment is a
`
`confession ofjudgmententitlingthe insurer to an award of attorneys'fees pursuant to F.S.
`
`Section 627.428:
`
`Where an insured prevailsin litigationagainstan insurance company, the
`
`insured is generallyentitled to reasonable attorney'sfees. Section 627.428(1),Fla. Stat.
`
`(2009). Likewise,where an insurance company pays on a claim after the insured files suit
`but before judgment is rendered, the payment constitutes a confession of judgment or
`
`verdict in favor of the insured,therebyentitlingthe insured to attorney'sfees. Florida Ins.
`
`ith DCA 2011),rev. denied,88 So.3d 148
`Guar. Ass'n v. Ehrlich,82 So.3d 849,850 (Fla.4L
`
`(Fla.2012).
`
`Trial courts have no discretion to deny fee entitlement where an insurer confessed
`judgment;it is mandatory.Losiscco v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 588 So.2d 681. 682 (Fla.3d
`DCA 1991);Avila v. Latin Am. Prop.& Cas. Ins. Co., 548 So.2d 894, 895 (Fla.3d DCA
`
`1989).
`
`B. Payment/MailboxRule
`The Plaintiff anticipatesthat the Defendant will allegethat "paymenf' of the
`
`outstandingmedicals was made on or about February11, 2022 and that it properlymailed
`the medicals draft. However, it is unclear as to what address the draft was allegedlymailed
`
`

`

`to. The address listed on the draft is "Peter F Merkle MD C/O Michele E Muir PA Law,
`15673 Southern Blvd.,Ste 107-34,Loxahatchee Groves FL 33470-9218. This address lacks
`
`the correct suitenumber for the Counsel's office.
`
`Payment is defined as "The performanceof a duty,promise,or obligation,or
`dischargeof a debt or liability,by the deliveryof money or other value." Black's Law
`nd Ed. It is the transfer of money, goods,or services in exchange for goods
`Dictionary,2?
`and services in acceptableproportionsthat have been previouslyagreed upon by all
`
`partiesinvolved. https://www.Investopedia.com.
`In this matter, there was no "payment"until after the medieals draft was received
`
`in July,2022. Mailinga check to an incorrect address for the debtor does not constitute
`payment simplybecause the Post Office might have been able to deliver the draft. In this
`case, it is clear there was no payment in February,2022 as the USPS returned the Draft to
`
`the Defendant,USAA, due to the mailingaddress error.
`
`It is clear that the draft was never received by the Plaintiff or it'scounsel until after
`
`This is evidenced by the fact that USAA acknowledgedin its July 1,2022
`
`July 1,2022.
`mailingthat the check was returned to USAA by the post office. The insert included in the
`July 1,2022 envelopefurther listsan address of: Peter F. Merkle,MD c/o Michele E. Muir
`PA Law, 7251 W Palmetto Park Rd Ste 100,Boca Raton FL 33433-3487.
`Regardlessof which address USAA used, neither of these addresses are the correct
`mailingaddress,per the pre-suitdemand letter. The Plaintiff should not be punishedfor the
`
`Defendant's failure to properlyaddress and mail the Draft.
`
`

`

`The Defendant should not be permittedto utilize the "Mailbox Rule.
`
`"
`
`It appears
`
`that whatever documents USAA allegedlymailed on or about February 11, 2022 where
`
`not correctlyaddressed and were returned to USAA by the USPS.
`
`Pursuant to Florida law, there exists a presumptionthat "a letter properly
`addressed,stamped and mailed is presumed to have been received by the addressee."
`Brown v. Griffen Industries. Inc.,281 So.2d 897 (Fla. 1973); Home Insurance Co. V. C
`& G SportingGoods, Inc.,453 So.2d 121 (Fla.1StDCA 1984) and Berwick v. Prudential
`,rd DCA 1983).
`Property& CasualtyAssurance Co.,436 So.2d 239 (Fla.3'
`
`USAA is not entitled to a presumptionin this case because the letter was not
`properlyaddressed and, as a result,was returned to USAA by the USPS.
`
`The mailbox rule is a rebuttable presumptionstatingthat "when somethingis
`mailed by a business,it is presumed that the ordinarycourse of business was followed in
`mailingit and that the mail was received by the addressee. Camerota v. Kaufman, 666
`So.2d 1042, 1044 (Fla.4.th DCA 1996). The key is that the presumptionis rebuttable
`and, in the instant case, it is rebutted by the incorrect address listed on the draft and the
`Insert accompanying the July 1, 2022 envelope showing that the USPS was not able to
`deliver the mail and it was returned to USAA since the address was incorrect.
`
`Bare testimony as to the Defendant's practiceof its mailing out to each
`insurer's amending the uninsured liabilitylimit
`policyholdera notice of the
`instant action
`additional evidence that the plaintiffin the
`of...policy...without
`specificallyreceived such notification,does not constitute sufficient proof of notice. For
`proof of practice,habit. or custom, alone, does not constitute proof of performanceof an
`act on a specificoccasion;there must also be some proofthat the practicewas followed
`in the particularinstance in issue. Bernstein v. LibertyMutual Ins. Co., 294 So.2d 2d 63
`(Fla.3d DCA 1974.
`
`

`

`Further,a presumptionestablishedprimarilyto facilitatethe determination of an
`See
`action isa rebuttable presumptionaffectingthe burden of producingevidence.
`Stat. (1981). Such a presumptionrequires the trier of fact to
`Section 90.303 Fla.
`assume the existence of the presumed fact unless credible evidence sufficient to sustain
`a findingof the non-existence ofthe presumedfact is introduced. See Section 90.302(1),
`Fla. Stat. (1981);C. Erhardt,supra, at Section 302.1; see generallyLadd, Presumptions
`in Civil Actions, 1977 Ariz St. L.J,275 (1977).
`The July 1, 2022 documents sent by the Defendant show that the Defendant's
`Mailbox Rule "presumption"is not applicableand has been rebutted due to the
`insufficientaddress on the mailingenvelope.
`
`C. Additional Interest due
`
`Pursuant to F.S. Section 627.736(10(d),USAA was requiredto pay overdue
`Interest when it issued the payment in response to the Plaintiffs pre-suitdemand letter.
`On or about February11, 2022, after receiptof the Plaintiff s pre-suitdemand
`letter,USAA issued a draft in the amount of $251.68 representingpenaltyof $220.80,
`This draft was not cashed/depositedas the
`postage of $7.73 and interest of $23.15.
`medicals draft was not received at the time. The postage, penalty and interest draft
`remains outstanding.Please see copy attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
`The medicals draft was not received by the Plaintiffuntilafter July 1,2022. As a
`In particular,the Defendant owes statutory
`result,additional statutoryinterest is due.
`interestof $44.52 ($0.31800dailyrate at 140 days from 2-11-22 to 7-1-22).
`In this matter, the Plaintiff,as assigneeof the subjectinsured's rights,disputesthat
`
`the Defendant paid the correct amount of interest. The Defendant owes additional interest
`
`for the periodofFebruary11, 2022 throughJuly 1,2022.
`To date,USAA has made no attempt(s)to issue additional interest due in response
`
`to the Plaintiff'spre-suitdemand letter and the additional overdue interest payment
`
`remains outstanding.
`
`

`

`D. Attorney'sfees and costs due for overdue Statutoryinterest
`
`In this matter, the Plaintiff,as assigneeof the subjectinsured's rights,disputesthat
`
`the Defendant paidthe correct amount of interest. The Defendant owes additional interest
`for the periodfrom February11,2022 throughand includingJuly1,2022. As a resultofthe
`Defendant's failure/refusalto timelypay the overdue interest during the statutorygrace
`
`period,the Defendant also owes Attorney'sfees and costs to the Plaintiff.
`
`The purpose of Section 627.428 is not one ofpunishmentbut to encourage
`Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Gorgei
`
`the prompt payment of "valid claims."
`Enterprises.Inc., App., 345 So.2d 412 (1977). "The purpose behind section 627.428 is
`plainlyto placethe insured or beneficiaryin the placeshe would have been if the carrier
`had seasonablypaid the claim or benefits without causingthe payee to engage counsel
`and incur obligationsfor attorneyfees." Travelers of Florida v. Stormont,43 So.3d 941
`(Fla.3d DCA 2010) and -FederatedNat. Ins. Co. v. Esposito,937 So.2d 199 (Fla.4?
`DCA 2006).
`The Plaintiff is entitledto attorney'sfees and costs for litigatingPlaintiffsrightto
`
`,th
`
`interest under F.S. Section 627.736. See MagneticImagingSys.,I,Inc. v. Prudential Prop.
`& Cas. Ins. Co., 847 So.2d 987 (Fl.3dDCA 2003) (Insurer'stender of interest payment
`post-suitentitled the assigneemedical providerto attorney fees under section 627.428,
`
`Florida Statutes (2002).).
`
`The Court must look at the plainlanguageof the applicableFlorida Statutes.
`
`Section 627.736(8),Florida Statutes (2021),provides:
`APPLICABILITY OF PROVISION REGULATINO ATTORNEY FEES.-With
`respect to any disputeunder the provisionsof ss.627.730-627.7405 between the
`insured and the insurer,or between an assigneeof an insured'srightsand the insurer,
`
`

`

`the provisionsof ss.627.428 and 768.79 apply,except as providedin subsections
`
`(10)and (15),and except that any attorneyfees recovered must:
`
`(a)Comply with prevailingprofessionalstandards;
`(b) Not overstate or inflate the number of hours reasonablynecessary for a case of
`
`comparableskill or complexity;and
`(c) Representlegalservices that are reasonable and necessary to achieve the result
`
`obtained.
`
`Under the plainlanguageof this section on attorney'sfees,the section appliesto
`
`"any dispute"under section 627.736,and the provisionsof 627.428,Florida Statutes (2021),
`
`govern.
`
`Section 627.736(10)(d),Florida Statutes (2021),providesa statutoryrightto interest
`
`on any overdue claim:
`If,within 30 days after receiptof notice by the insurer,the overdue claim specified
`in the notice is paidby the insurer togetherwith applicableinterest and a penaltyof
`10 percent of the overdue amount paidby the insurer,subjectto a maximum penalty
`
`of $250,no action may be broughtagainstthe insurer. Id.
`
`In this matter, the Plaintiffasserts that the overdue claim for services rendered to the
`patientfrom November 5, 2021 throughDecember 13,2021 was not paidby the Defendant
`until July 1, 2022. The payment was not issued "togetherwith" applicableinterest. The
`failureto pay applicableinterestconstitutesa disputeunder F.S. Section 627.736(8).
`A post-suitpayment of a claim in an insurance case is the functional equivalentof a
`
`confession of judgment or verdict entitlingthe claimant to attorney'sfees.
`
`Wollard v.
`
`

`

`Lloyd's& Cos. OfLloyd's,439 So.2d 217 (Fla.1983);Losicco v. Aema Cas. And Sur. Co.,
`588 So.2d 681 (Fla.3dDCA 1991).
`
`It is clear from the language of F.S. Section 627.736(10)(d)that the legislature
`
`intended for providersto be permittedto sue insurers if theydo not pay the PIP claim
`togetherwith the applicableinterest. The statute does not stop with failure to pay the claim
`and does not requirethat the insurance contract contain a provisionallowingfees for
`
`interest.
`
`Courts must not interpreta statute that would lead to an absurd or unreasonable
`
`result. Dep't of Highway Safetyand Motor Vehicles v. Patrick,895 So.2d 1131 (Fla.5'
`DCA 2005). Words also many not be excised from the statute and must be enforced. See
`Haworth v. Chapman, 113 Fla. 591,595 (Fla.1933) (A Statute must be read to take all parts
`
`.th
`
`into consideration and givethem all effect.).The legislaturedid not intend to authorize
`insurers to withhold applicableinterest and a penaltywith impunity;an action may be
`broughtif they do not pay them. Angelsl)iagnosticGroup, Inc., v. United Auto. Ins. Co.,
`
`Case No. 2021-001220 SP 25 (Fla.Miami-Dade County Ct. July 13,2021).
`
`E.
`
`Conclusion
`
`For the foregoingreasons, the Plaintiffis entitledto recover statutoryinterest,and
`
`attorney'sfees and costs pursuant to Sections 627.428 and 627.736, Fla. Stat.
`
`WHEREFOR.E, the Plaintiff,Peter F. Merkle, MD, PA, respectfullyrequests this
`Honorable Court enter an Order grantingFinal Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff,enter an
`
`Order grantingPlaintiff'sentitlement to attorney'sfees and costs, set an evidentiaryhearing
`
`

`

`to determine the amount of same, and any such other relief as this Court deems justand
`
`proper.
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of foregoingdocument was
`served upon the followingby electronic deliverythis 19 day of July,2022.
`
`MFPero@MI)WCG.com;
`FtLaudPIPService@mdwcg.com
`
`LAW OFFICES OF MICHELE E. MUIR, PA
`15673 Southern Blvd., Suite 107-342
`Loxahatchee Groves, Florida,33470
`Phone (561)368-6360
`micheleemuj,@yahoo.com
`
`BY: ,-- .
`
`Michele Muir, Esq.
`Florida Bar No. 0028150
`
`

`

`LAW OFFICES OF MICHELE E. MUIR,P.A.
`
`15673 Southern Blvd.,Suite 107-342
`Loxahatchee Groves, Florida 33470
`Office: (561)368-6360
`
`Date mailed:January21,2022
`
`USAA CasualtyInsurance Company
`Attn.: Vivian Jones
`9800 FredericksburgRoad
`San Antonio,TX 78288
`VIA certified Mail-Return ReceiptRequested-70192970 0000 7403 4148
`
`Dear Ms. Jones:
`
`DEMANI) LETTER
`
`This is a demand letterpursuant to Fl. Statute Section 627.736(10)
`
`HEALTHCARE PROVIDER: Peter F. Merkle,MD, PA.
`INSURED: Sedat Celik
`CLAIMANT: Sedat Celik
`CLAIM NUMBER/POLICY NUMBER: 011027634-006-000
`ITEMIZED STATEMENT: See attached HCFA 1500 Form and/or ledger.Demand is
`herebymade for each and every billnot paid.
`Exact amount: $5,640.00billed,$2,019,42paid.Amount appliedto a deductible is
`unknown. If policyprovidesfor payment at 80%, exact amount due is $2492.58 plus
`BA amount of $19,83 for a total of $25].2.41 plusall applicableinterest,penaltyand
`postage if 80% policy, Ifpolicyprovidesfor payment at 100%, exact amount due is
`$3,620.58plusall applicableinterest,penaltyand postage.
`Provider does not know if the policyprovidesfor payment at 80% or 100% (exceptfor
`BA codes)and does not know if there is an applicabledeductible.
`
`In particular:
`
`Billed $5,640.00for 11-5-21 to 12-13-21, $2,019.42paid, If the policypayment
`provisionsare for 80% (exceptfor BA codes)and the policydoes not have an applicable
`deductible: lf payment is at 80%, then amount due is as follows: $5,640.00less $0.00
`appliedto a deductible is $5,640.00@ 80% = $4512.001ess $2019.42 paidis $2492,58
`plusatl applicableinterest,penaltyand postage due.
`Additionally:Billed $200.00 for 11-8-21,and 11-10-21 CPT Code 97163. Provider
`If payment is at 80% of Allowable amount,
`believes the allowable amount is $206,88.
`then amount due is as follows: $413.76 less $0.OOappliedtoadeductibleis $413.76 less
`
`Exh,5,+A
`
`

`

`$400.00 allowed is $13,76@ 80%==$11,01 less $0.00 paidis $11.01 (BA difference
`amount) plusall applicableinterest,penaltyand postage due.
`
`Additionally:Billed $180.00 for 12-2-21, CPT Code 99213. Provider believes the
`allowable amount is $191,02. If payment is at 80% of allowable amount, then amount
`due igag follows: $191.02legg$180,00is$11.02@ 80%=$8.821esspaidof $0.OOis
`$8.82 (BA difference amount) plus all applicableinterest,penaltyand postage due.
`
`Billed $5,640.00 for 11-5-21 to 1 2-13-21, $2,019,42paid. If the policypayment
`provisionsare for 100% and the policydoes not have an applicabledeductible:
`If
`payment is at 100%, then amount due is as follows: $5,640.00 less $0.00 appliedto a
`deductible is $5,640.00 @ 100% = $5640.00 less $2019.42 paid is $3620.58 plus all
`applicableinterest,penaltyand postage due.
`
`Additionally,statutory interest is overdue.
`A copy of the patient'sreport for DOS 11-5-21 was previouslyprovided to USAA.
`Another copy is attached hereto.
`
`Dates of Treatment at issue: 11-5-21 to 12-13-21
`
`Services or Accommodation: See attached HCFA 1500 Form and/or ledgerand/or
`explanationof benefits.
`Type of benefit claimed: PIP-See above, attached HCFA 1500 Form and/or ledgerand/or
`explanationof benefits,
`
`REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT: 'I?his is a demand letter under F. S. Section
`for the-crtofIt?lifitftf}t?and
`627.736(10).Thisis areq-Igst?o?
`reimburseme?
`letter in the ainount of $ 7 -1'1 , to be made payableto Law offices of Michele E.
`Muir, PA, only.A copy of the agkignmentof benefits is attached.
`
`NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: Please be advised that the medical providerhas assigned
`and Law offices of Michele E. Muir, PA has acceptedan Assignment ofthe Statutory
`Interest,StatutoryPenaltyand postage from the medical provider.Any and all interest,
`penaltyand postage payments shall be made payableto Law Offices of Michele E. Muir,
`PA.
`
`Please be advised that Law Offices of Michele E. Muir, PA has been retained by the
`above-listed providerin their claim for overdue PIP benefits. Please refrain from any
`further contact with our client regardingthis matter.
`
`The Health care providerasserts standingpursuant to the attached copy o f the
`Assignment of Benefits, pursuant to F.S. Section 627.736(10),
`
`Demand is hereby made for payment of medical services provided to the above-named
`patientfor dates of service listed on the attached HCFA 1500 Form. Payment for these
`services is overdue as of the date ofthis letter,
`
`

`

`Statutoryinterestand penaltypayment as permittedby Florida law is herebydemanded to
`be made payableto Law Offices of Michele E. Muir, PA only,
`
`Provider is not in possessionof an IME/Peer review report,
`
`Demand is also hereby made for a copy of the unredacted PIP payout sheet, explanation
`of benefits for each bill which has not been paidand/or reduced,insurance declaration
`sheet and the policyof insurance. If you have a good faith basis for non-
`payment/reduction,pleaseexplainwhy the billswere not paid,and/or reduced. Failure to
`respond to this letter shall result in a count for breach of contract, declaratoryrelief
`and/or specificperformance.
`
`Demand is further requestedfor El listingor other record that comprisesthe following:
`a. Date of receiptof each and every claim presentedto the insurer with respect to the
`subjectclaimant and this motor vehicle accident;
`b. The amount claimed (withoutreduction for any reason);
`c, The amount shown as billed (whetheror not reduced for some reason);
`d, The amount allowed for each claim;
`e. The date ofpayment of each claim;
`The completedispositionofeach claim;
`f
`g. The remainingavailable undistributed benefits and;
`h. The identityof the claimant or assignee.
`
`If there is no substantial compliance with the requestand if there is an underpaymentof
`anythingwithout a rational basis we will file an action seekingthe documents and
`determination of our rights.
`
`As you know, Florida Statutes requirethat ifpaymentof the overdue amount is made
`within thirty(30)days after receiptof notice by the insurer,the insurer must include the
`applicableinterest and a 10% penaltyof the overdue amount paid,subjectto a maximum
`penaltyof $250.00. Failure to make payment within the allocated 30-day periodmay
`result in the immediate institution o f a civil suit for damages, attorney's fees and costs
`that were incurred unnecessarilyas a result of the failure to respond to this demand letter
`may result in further litigationfor which we would seek payment of our attorney'sfees
`and costs.
`
`Law Offices of Michele E, Muir, PA has an interest in any pre suit payment. Please
`make all checks payable for the medical expenses to the providerand for the interest,
`postage and penaltyto Law Offices of Michele E. Muir, PA. The tax ID number is
`264395171. Mail directlyto: Law Offices of Michele E. Muir, PA, 15673 Southern
`Blvd., Suite 107-342, Loxahatchee,FL 33470.
`
`Any contact regardingthis demand letter with the Health care providerlisted above shal]
`be considered a tortuous interference with a contractual agreement between Law Offices
`of Michele E. Muir, PA and the Health Care providerlisted above. Please do not contact
`
`

`

`the Health Care Provider regarding this demand letter. Do not mail any drafts for
`medical benefits, postage, statutory penaltyand statutory interest to the Health Care
`Provider as they are representedby Law Offices of Michele E. Muir, PA. Thank you for
`your immediate response,
`
`VeryTrulyYojrg,
`
`Michele Muir, Esq.
`Enc.
`
`

`

`01/14/22
`
`PATIENT FINANCIAL HISTORY BY DT SERVICE
`PETER F. MERKLE, M.D.,P.A.
`Accounts 170020 - 170020
`All DateS
`
`Page
`
`1
`
`Acct
`
`Date
`
`Dep Il Name
`
`170020 CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK, SEDAT
`
`OELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK, SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`11/05/21
`
`11/06/91
`
`11/05/21
`
`11/05/21
`
`11/05/21
`
`11/05/21
`
`11/08/21
`11/OB/21
`
`11/08/21
`
`11/08/21
`
`O
`
`6
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`11/08/21
`
`0
`
`Dr#
`
`Procedure
`
`Ref Dt
`
`Diag
`
`Units
`
`AmOUn t
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`
`6
`
`G
`
`G
`
`6
`
`6
`
`99204
`
`72050
`
`73030
`
`73030
`
`80215
`
`E0860
`
`97163
`
`94760
`
`97010
`
`97140
`
`G0283
`
`Previous Balance :
`
`NEW PATIENT (45 MIN)
`
`4 VIEWS -CERVICAL -
`
`X-RAY, SHOULDER - CO
`X-RAYr SHOULDER - CO
`
`CERVICAL TRACTION -
`PHYSICAL THERAPY EVA
`PULSE OXYGEN READING
`THERAPY - HOT/COLD P
`
`ELECTRICAL STIM--UNA
`
`213.4XXA
`
`S13.4XXA
`
`843.491A
`
`S43,492A
`843.492A
`S13.4XXA
`
`S46.01LA
`
`S46.011A
`SSG.011A
`S46,011A
`S46,011A
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`0.0.
`
`450.00
`
`250,00
`
`200.00
`
`200.00
`
`150,00
`150.00
`
`200.00
`
`40.00
`75.0
`
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CGLIK, SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`11/08/21
`
`11/10/21
`
`ll/10/21
`
`.l/10/21
`
`ll/la/21
`
`11/10/21
`
`11/10/21
`11/15/21
`
`11/15/21
`
`11/15/21
`
`11/15/21
`
`11/15/21
`
`11/15/21
`
`11/15/21
`
`11/17/21
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Q
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`G
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`G
`
`?
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`97112
`
`97163
`
`94760
`
`97010
`
`97140
`G0283
`
`97112
`94760
`
`97010
`
`97110
`
`97140
`
`G0283
`
`97112
`
`97035
`
`94760
`
`PHYSICAL THERAPY EVA
`PULSE OXYGEN READING
`THERAPY - HOT/COLD P
`
`ELECTRICAL STIM--UNA
`
`PULSE OXYGEN READING
`THERAPY - HOT/COLD P
`THERAPY-THERAPEUTIC
`
`ELECTRICAL STIM--UNA
`
`S46.011A
`S 13.4XXA
`
`S13.4XXA
`
`S13.4XXA
`Sll,4XXA
`S13.4XXA
`S13,4XXA
`Slj,4XXD
`S 13.4XXD
`
`S13,4XXD
`S13.4XXD
`Sl].4XXD
`313.4XXD
`
`S13.4XXD
`
`S13,4XXD
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`7S.00
`
`200,00
`
`40.00
`
`75.00
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`40 00
`7500
`75,00
`
`75.00
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIX,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`CEI,IK, SEDAT
`CELIA, SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`
`CWLIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`
`CELIX,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAQ'
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`11/17/21
`
`11/17/21
`11/17/21
`
`1L/17/21
`
`11/17/21
`
`11/18/21
`
`11/18/21
`
`11/18/21
`
`11/18/21
`
`11/18/21
`
`11/18/21
`
`ll,/22/21
`
`11/22/21
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`6
`
`6
`
`?
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`G
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`97010
`
`97110
`
`97140
`G0283
`
`97112
`
`94760
`
`97010
`
`97110
`
`97140
`
`00283
`
`97112
`
`94760
`
`97010
`
`ULTRASOUND--15 MIN
`PULSE OXYGEN READING
`THERAPY - HOT/COLD P
`TLIERAPY-TJIERAPEUTIC
`
`MOBILIZATION/MAN:IPUL
`ELECTRICAL STIM--UNA
`
`PULSE OXYGEN READING
`THERAPY - HOT/COLD P
`
`ELECTRICAL STIM--UNA
`
`PULSE OXYGEN READING
`THERAPY - HOT/COLD P
`
`S 13,4XXD
`913.4XXD
`
`S 13.4XXD
`
`S13,4XXD
`S 13,4XXD
`
`S 13.4XXD
`
`S13.4XXD
`
`S13.4XXD
`
`813,4XXD
`Sll.4XXD
`
`S13.4XXD
`
`1.CO
`
`1,00
`
`1,00
`
`1,00
`
`1,00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`1,00
`
`1.00
`
`1.00
`
`1,00
`
`75,00
`40.00
`
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`40,00
`
`75,00
`7500
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`75.00
`
`40.00
`
`11/22/21
`
`11/22/21
`
`11/22/21
`
`11/22/21
`
`12/02/21
`
`12/06/21
`
`12/06/21
`
`12/06/21
`12/06/21
`
`12/06/21
`
`12/06/21
`12/08/21
`
`12/08/21
`
`12/08/21
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SRDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIX,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK,BEDAT
`CELIK,SEDAT
`
`CELIK, SEDAT
`CELIK, SEDAT
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`4
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`G
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`
`97110
`
`G0283
`
`97140
`
`97035
`
`99213
`
`94760
`
`97010
`
`97110
`97140
`
`G0283
`
`97112
`
`947G0
`
`9701

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket