`
`Case Number: CACE-2l—009293 Division: 09
`
`IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH
`
`JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR
`
`BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
`
`JOEL SCHUTTE, JR.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CASE NO:
`
`VS.
`
`as
`FITZROY FLETCHER, DEV MOTWANI,
`General Partner of CHIEFTAIN ATLANTA, LP, a
`Georgia Limited Partnership and STATE FARM
`MUTUAL
`AUTOMOBILE
`INSURANCE
`
`COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`/
`
`PLAINTIFF’S RE UEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT STATE FARM
`
`MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
`
`PURSUANT to Rule 1.370, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant is hereby
`
`requested to admit the truth of these matters hereinafter set forth within forty-five (45) days after
`
`service hereof by answering in writing and admitting or denying the following:
`
`1.
`
`At all times material to the Complaint, Defendant was and is a foreign corporation
`
`licensed to do business in the State of Florida and engaged in the business of
`
`automobile insurance.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant maintains agents in Broward County, Florida, for the transacting of its
`
`customary business in Broward County, Florida.
`
`3.
`
`Defendant
`
`insured NON-PARTY, PETER Y. YAN under an automobile
`
`insurance policy which provides UM coverage for the subject accident.
`
`4.
`
`The above-described automobile policy issued by the Defendant was in full force
`
`and effect for the subject accident of and provides UM coverage for bodily
`
`injuries sustained by the Plaintiff in the subject accident.
`
`5.
`
`Venue lies in BROWARD, Florida for this action.
`
`*** FILED: BROWARD COUNTY, FL BRENDA D. FORMAN, CLERK 05/07/2021 04:02:07 PM.****
`
`
`
`The above-styled Court, in and for BROWARD, Florida, has jurisdiction over the
`
`claim of the Plaintiff against Defendant.
`
`Defendant has no coverage defense to Plaintiff’ s UM claims except
`
`that
`
`it
`
`maintains its policy does not provide UM coverage for any punitive damages
`
`awarded Defendant.
`
`Defendant has not denied coverage except to claim that
`
`its policy does not
`
`provide UM coverage for any punitive damages awarded against, Defendant.
`
`Plaintiff’ s policy with Defendant is required to conform to all requirements of
`
`Florida Statute 627.727.
`
`Plaintiff’ s policy with Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
`
`Company is required to provide all coverage described in Florida Statue 627.727.
`
`Plaintiff’ s policy with Defendant, even if it does not by its own terms comply
`
`with the requirements set forth in Florida Statute 627.727, is deemed to provide
`
`insurance for the payment of the required coverage and should be interpreted to
`
`meet the other requirements set forth in the Florida Statute 627.727.
`
`Under the Plaintiff’ s policy with Defendant the provisions of Florida Statue
`
`627.428 apply to any dispute between Plaintiff and Defendant concerning the
`
`coverage pursuant to Florida Statutes 627.727 (8).
`
`Shortly after the date of the accident Defendant was furnished with written notice
`
`of loss and the UM claims herein were otherwise timely made.
`
`Defendant
`
`denies that there is UM coverage under its policy for punitive
`
`damages.
`
`Florida public policy does not preclude insurance coverage of punitive damages
`
`when the insured is not personally at fault, but is merely vicariously liable for
`
`another’s wrong.
`
`The word “compensatory” was stricken from 627.727 effective October 1,
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`1989 after it had been added but before an earlier amendment took effect.
`
`Chapter 89-243, Section 1, Laws of Florida amended F.S. 627.727.
`
`F.S. 627.727(1)(1989) applies to the instant case since it involves an accident that
`
`occurred on November 9, 2017.
`
`F.S. 627.727 (1)(1989) provides in its relevant part (emphasis supplied):
`
`uninsured motor vehicle coverage is provided therein or supplemental
`
`thereto for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally
`
`entitled to recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured
`
`motor vehicles because of bodily injury, sickness, or disease, including
`
`death, resulting therefrom.
`
`The insurance code, as well as insurance policies, will be construed in
`
`favor of the insured and insurance coverage.
`
`If the plain meaning of F.S. 627.727(1)(1989) is doubtful in any way, this
`
`Court should apply a meaning that results in broader UM coverage.
`
`A remedial statute must be construed to protect the insured (or victim)
`
`rather than the insurer.
`
`F.S. 627.727(1)(1989) is a remedial statute.
`
`Defendant has procedures for pursuing reimbursement for uninsured motorist for
`
`any and all damages it must pay under its UM coverage.
`
`Defendant is assiduous in its pursuit of reimbursement for uninsured motorist for
`
`any and all damages it must pay under its UM coverage.
`
`Defendant is diligent in its pursuit of reimbursement from uninsured motorist for
`
`any and all damages it must pay under its UM coverage.
`
`Defendant is organized in its pursuit of reimbursement from uninsured motorist
`
`for any and all damages it must pay under its UM coverage.
`
`
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`Defendant encourages its adjusters financially in its pursuit of reimbursement
`
`from uninsured motorist for any and all damages it must pay under its UM
`
`coverage.
`
`Defendant has staff attorneys who are qualified to take action on its behalf in its
`
`pursuit of reimbursement from uninsured motorist for any and all damages on its
`
`behalf in its pursuit of reimbursement from uninsured motorist for any and all
`
`damages it must pay under its UM coverage.
`
`Defendant has legal expertise in its pursuit of reimbursement from uninsured
`
`motorist for any and all damages it must pay under its UM coverage.
`
`Defendant is competent in its pursuit of reimbursement from uninsured motorist
`
`for any and all damages it must pay under UM coverage.
`
`Defendant is thorough in its pursuit of reimbursement from uninsured motorist for
`
`any and all damages it must pay under its UM coverage.
`
`Defendant has claims adjusting expertise in its pursuit of reimbursement from
`
`uninsured motorist for any and all damages it must pay under its UM coverage.
`
`Defendant provides training materials to its adjusters on subrogation in its pursuit
`
`of reimbursement from uninsured motorist for any and all damages it must pay
`
`under its UM coverage.
`
`Defendant has been successful in obtaining reimbursement of subrogation money
`
`in its pursuit of reimbursement from uninsured motorist for any and all damages it
`
`must pay under its UM coverage
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished
`with the initial service of process to STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
`COMPANY.
`
`GED LAWYERS, LLP
`Attorneys for Plaintifl
`7171 North Federal Highway
`Boca Raton, FL 33487
`Telephone: (561) 995-1966
`
`
`
`Facsimile: (561) 241-0812
`Primary Email: litlaw@gedlawyers.com
`
`
`/s/Mark Packo
`
`Mark Packo, Esq.
`Florida Bar No.: 47546
`
`



