throbber
Plaintiff,
`M
`
`VS.
`
`iDefendant CSX’ Transportation, Inc.’s
`Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
`
`'
`
` Thomas,.l;.('
`
`
`
`
`
`,Defe
`
`9: SX Transportation, Inc. (“CSXT”) submits its expert disclosr
`
`accordance
`
`
`
`
`
`Ce Court’s pretrial orders and the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure
`
`l.
`
`$XT may offer testimony at trial fromzone or more witnesses under
`
`Florida Statutes section 90.702. These Witnesses arei’
`
`-
`
`A.
`
`-.
`._
`,
`Abass Alavi, M.D.
`Penn Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
`3400 Spruce Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19104.
`
`Dr. Alavi is a medical doctor who specializes in radiology. He is the Chief of
`Radiology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, and his expertise as
`it relates to this matter is forensic radiology and SPECT application and
`interpretation. Dr. Alavi is a defense expert, and his testimony to a large extent
`will be determined by the evidence offered by the plaintiff, and in particular
`plaintiff s expert Michael Foley, M.D. Generally, however, Dr. Alavi is
`anticipated to testify in rebuttal of any evidence offered by plaintiff regarding any
`SPECT imaging ofplaintiff s brain, and to testify about the limitations of SPECT
`in discemingfiand attributing causation as to purported brain abnormalities. Dr.
`Alavi'wiy testify on the basis of his education, experience, and review of
`pertineflWaterials. The facts that form the basis of his opinions will be the
`plai _ tiffis‘j‘ieleVant medical and social history as revealed by discovery and
`invesfififiiin this litigation, and in particular the complete records of Dr. Foley
`regarding the plaintiff. CSXT will provide a CV for Dr. Alavi and will coordinate
`a deposition of Dr. Alavi at a mutually convenient date if plaintiff so requests.
`
`'9?
`
`

`

`.
`
`,, ,‘
`
`
`Case No. 04-15179 CA(10)
`
`
`$31 R. Diaz, M.D.
`1;,
`..
`
`i
`for Occupational Psychiatry0% i:
`,
`
`7 7450N. Kendall Dr. Suite 416
`”i
`fiMiami, FL 33156
`
`'
`
`'da
`
`Dr. Diaz is a medical doctor who specializes in psychiatry. He is the Medical
`Director of the Center for Occupational Psychiatry of Florida, and his expertise as
`it relates this mattepisrforensic psychiatry. Dr. Diaz is a defense expert, and his
`testimony to a large extent will be determined by the evidence offered by the
`plaintiff, and1n particularanytestimony on psychiatricissues by plaintiffs expert
`Walter Afield M.D; Generally, however, Dr. Diaz’ anticipated testimony is as
`refleeisdin hisreportregarding his examination ofthe plaintiff, which has
`already been produced toplaintiffs counsel. Dr. Diaz will testify on the basis of
`his education, experience, review of pertinent materials, examination of the
`plaintiff, and anya'dditional bases identifiedin his previously referenced report.
`The facts that form the. basis of Dr. .Diaz’ opinions will be the plaintiffs relevant
`medical, psychiatri-c,_and social history as revealed by discovery and investigation
`in this litigation, and his examination of the plaintiff. The plaintiff can access a
`: CV for Dr. Diaz at www.falconitservices.com; plaintiff has requested and CSXT
`- is coordinating a deposition of Dr. Diaz at a mutually convenient date.
`
`C.
`
`Richard A. Hamilton, Ph.D.
`1570 Madruga Avenue — Suite B
`Coral Gables, FL 33146
`
`W-‘“W
`Dr. Hamilton1s a neuropsychologist1n clinical and forensic practice, and his
`expertise as it relates to this matter is forensic neuropsychology. Dr. Hamilton1s
`a defense expert, and his testimony to a large extent will be determined by the
`evidence offered by the plaintiff, and in particular any testimony on
`neuropsychological issues by plaintiff’ 5 expert Walter Afield, M.D. Generally,
`however, Dr. Hamilton’s anticipated testimony will be reflected in his
`forthcoming report regarding his examination and testing of the plaintiff, which
`will promptly be produced to plaintiffs counsel. Dr. Hamilton will testify on the
`basis of his education, experience, review of pertinent materials, examination and
`testing of the plaintiff, and any additional bases identified in his previously
`referenced report. The facts that form the basis of Dr. Hamilton’s opinions will
`be the plaintiffs relevant medical, neuropsychological, and social history as
`revealed by discovery and investigation in this litigation, and his examination of
`the plaintif1‘I.’:»l'CSX"'§I will provide a CV for Dr. Hamilton; plaintiff has requested
`and CSXTis:fibnrciinating a deposition of Dr. Hamilton at a mutually convenient
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`p ‘
`
`§unset Drive
`4
`
`_. 339 ~ Miami, FL 33143
`..,»,,}_,.Q.
`..
`,
`.
`,
`
`
`
`Case No. 04-15179 CA (10)
`
`
`
`Dr. Ledford is an academic and forensic economist. He is a professor at the
`University of Miami and his expertise as it relates to this matter is forensic
`economics. Dr. Ledford is a defense expert, and his testimony to a large extent
`will be determined. by‘the evidence offered by the plaintiff, and in particular any
`testimony on economic issues by’_'plaintiff’s expert Bernard Pettingill, Ph.D..
`Generally, however, Dr. Ledford’s anticipated testimony will be in rebuttal of
`evidence offered by tlieplaintiff as to future economic damages and their present
`valuefiDrf’Ledford willfteStify on the basis of his education, experience, and
`review of pertinent materials. The facts that form the basis of Dr. Ledford’s
`opinions Willbe the'i'plaintiff’ s relevant social and economic history as revealed by
`discovery and investigation in'this litigation. CSXT will firovide a CV for Dr.
`Ledford, and will coordinate a deposition of Dr. Ledford Sfibsequent to CSXT’s
`deposition of Dr. Pettingill if plaintiff so requests.
`_
`'5
`
`E.
`
`Ray Lopez, M.D.
`Neuroscience Consultants
`7330 sw 62nd Place, Suite 310
`Miami, FL 33143
`
`Dr. Lopez is a medical doctor who specializes‘in neurology. "His expertise as it
`relates to this matter is forensic neurology. Dr. Lopez is afiéfense expert, and his
`testimony to a large extent will be determined by the evidence offeredby the
`plaintiff, and in particular any testimony on neurological issues by plaintiff’s
`expert Walter Afield, M.D. Generally, however, Dr. Lopez’ anticipated testimony
`will be reflected in his forthcoming report'regarding his examination and testing
`of the plaintiff, which will promptly be produced to plaintiffs counsel. Dr. Lopez
`will testify on the basis of his educatiorf’, experience, review of pertinent
`materials, examination of the plaintiff, and any additional bases identified in his
`previously referenced report. The facts that form the basis of Dr. Lopez’ opinions
`will be the plaintiff’s relevant medical, neurological, and social history as
`revealed by discovery and investigation in this litigation, and his examination of
`the plaintiff. CSXT will provide a CV for Dr. Lopez; plaintiff has requested and
`CSXT is coordinating a deposition of Dr. Lopez at a mutually convenient date.
`5»
`
`3&3 ‘ a...
`5". "
`w
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case No. 04—15179 CA (10) '
`
`: rd Souviron, D.D.S.
`hambra Circle
`‘‘(forai’eables FL 33134
`
`1. ‘
`
` ir‘m Dr. SouvironIS a dentist; his expert1se as it relates to this matter is forensic
`dentistry and TMJ1ssues. Dr. SOuvirOn1s a defense expert, and his testimony to a
`large extent will be determined by the evidence offered by the plaintiff, and in
`particular any testimony on neurological1ssues by plaintiffs expert Robert
`Chung, M.D. Generaiiy, however, Dr. Souviron’ s anticipated testimony is
`reflected1nhisreport regarding his examination and testing of the plaintiff, which
`’has been produced top1a1nt1ff’s counsel. Dr. Souviron will testify on the basis of
`‘hlstedficatron, experienCe, review of pertinent materials, examination of the
`plaintiff, and anyadditionalbases identified1n his previously referenced report.
`The facts that form the basis of Dr. Souviron’ s opinions are the plaintiff‘s relevant
`medical, dental; and sOcial history as revealed by discovery and investigation in
`this litigation, and his examination of the plaintiff. CSXT will provide a CV for
`Dr. Souviron; plaintiff has requested and CSXTIS coordinating a deposition of
`Dr. Souviron at a mutually convenient date.
`,
`
`1.
`
`‘G.
`
`Richard E. Strain, Jr., MD.
`1150 N. 35 Avenue, Suite 390
`Hollywood, FL 33021
`
`a
`‘
`
`Dr. Strain is a medical doctor who specializes in orthopedic medicine. He is an
`orthopedic surgeon in clinical practice, and his expertise as it relates to this matter
`is forensic orthopedics. Dr. Strain is a defense. expert, and his testimony to a large
`extent will be determined by the evidence offered by the plaintiff, and in
`particular any testimony on orthopedic issues by plaintiff s treating doctor Bryce
`Epstein, M.D. Generally, however, Dr. Strain’ s anticipated testimony is reflected
`in his report regarding his exammatlonrof the plaintiff, which has been produced
`to plaintiff’s counsel. Dr. Strain Wiil testify on the basis of his education,
`experience, review of pertinent materials, examination of the plaintiff, and any
`additional bases identified in his previously referenced report. The facts that form
`the basis of Dr. Strain’s opinions will be the plaintiff’s relevant medical,
`orthopedic, and social history as revealed by discovery and investigation in this
`litigation, and his examination of the plaintiff. CSXT will provide a CV for Dr.
`'
`'
`i has requested and CSXT1s coordinating a deposition of Dr. Strain
`
`3,
`
`rement date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`ow.
`
`,
`
`,
`~ .
`
`o _,
`
`CaseNo.04-15179CA(10)
`
`
`L,Woodrich, Ph.D
`’3 ,finglewood Lane
`
`Tallahassee FL 32309
`5; Dr.‘ Woodrich is Va,;vocationa._l“rehabilitation counselor in clinical and forensic
`practice; his expertise as it relates'fo’itliis matter is forensic vocational rehabilitation
`and life-care planning-D-r. WoodnCh1s a defense expert, and his testimony to a
`large extent will beadetermmed by the evidence offered by the plaintiff, and1n
`particular any testimony on vocatiOnal rehabilitation and life——care planning1ssues
`by plaintiffs expertvNicholasFidanza Generally, however, Dr Woodrich is
`
`anticipated to ”esti
`buttal of any evidence offered by plaintiff on vocational
`
`rehabl‘htationfan
`fe— lanning1ssues Dr. Woodrich will testify on the basis
`of his education experience, and review of pertinent materials. The facts that
`form the basisof DrWoodnch’s opinions will be the plaintiff’ 5 relevant medical,
`vocational, and socialhistory as revealed by discovery and investigation in this
`litigation. CSXT will provide a CV for Dr. Woodrich, and will coordinate a
`deposition of Dr. WOOdrich subsequent to CSXT’s deposition of Mr. Fidanza if
`plaintiff so requests.
`
`2.
`
`CSXT reserves the right to amend this disclosure by withdrawing any of
`
`the experts disclosed above, and by adding expert withses upon notice or with leave.
`*
`3.
`CSXT additionally reserves the rightto eticit opinion testimony from any
`expert witnesses permitted to testify for theplaintiffat trial, and angiperson who provided
`any form ofmedical or psychological care to the plaintiffat any time. This reservation of
`
`rights is without prejudice to CSXT’s prerogative to challenge the qualification of any
`
`expert and the admissibility of any opinion testimony offered by any of plaintiff.
`
`~
`
`1. C
`
`
`
`1
`{4?
`
`Garzfon flargrove e‘Z James, Q’fl.
`Attorneys for CSX Transportation, Inc.
`2400 E. Commercial Blvd., Suite 1100
`Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308
`Telephone: 954-958-2513
`
`Fax: 954—9?8-2513
`By:
`.‘J 4/M
`Kenneth W. Waterway
`Florida Bar No. 0994235
`
`Reid A. Cocalis
`Florida Bar No. 0724114
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`0
`
`.
`
`'
`
`”a.
`
`Case No.04-15179 CA (10)
`
` Certificate of service"
`
`I
`
`wThisJiI
`J;
`Howard A. Spier, Esq., Rossman Baumbeé'gEr Reboso & Spier, Attorneys for Plaintiff, 44
`
`‘ e'was served by fax and United States mail on August 30, 2005 to
`
`,
`
`West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33130-1868 (fax no. 305-577-4370).
`
`J
`
`,.
`
` ‘5
`
`‘_ Gordon Hargrove GZJames, Qfl.
`._,_
`’_._>Attorneys for CSX Transportation, Inc.
`
`By: M
`
`Co nsel
`
`r
`
`Ag?
`‘23;
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`CSXT will provide a CV for Dr. Alavi
`
`
`
`082011-000047 / 365 / slk
`
`

`

`
`
` Slatryfllflonda '
`_- : .ff center Edi;abicflbéiifiwl;;_ 9"
`
`
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`Dadeland Medical Building 7400 North Kendall Drive Suite 416 Miami, FL 33156
`
`Tel (305) 670-4609 Fax (305) 670—3815 E—Mail copof@aol.com
`
`www.copot.com
`
`Angel Rafael Diaz, M.D.
`
`CurricUlum Vitae
`
`Expenence
`
`Feb.1996—Present
`
`Medical Director for the Center of Occupational Psychiatry of Florida.
`
`May 1995-July 1997
`
`Co-Chairman Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine at South Miami Hospital.
`
`July 1996-Oct.1996
`
`Medical Director, New lmage/Wellcare Partial Hospitalization Program.
`
`April 1994-June 1996
`
`Nov.1993-March 1994
`
`June 1993-July 1994
`
`June 1988—May 1993
`
`Aug. 1991-July 1996
`
`July 1988—June 1989
`
`Feb. 1988-March 1990
`
`Nov. 1986-Feb. 1988
`
`Medical Director, American Day Treatment Center, Miami, Florida.
`
`Adult Program medical Director. American Day Treatment Center, Miami, FL.
`
`Consultant Psychiatrist for the Pain Management Center at Deering Hospital,
`Miami, Florida.
`
`Consultant Psychiatrist for the Pain Clinic at Baptist Hospital, Miami. Florida.
`Member of the Board of Governor, Larkin General Hospital, Miami, Florida.
`
`Chairman, Department of PsychiatryélLarkin General Hospital, Miami, Florida.
`Consultant Psychiatrist to the Metropolitan Correctional Center, Miami, Florida.
`
`Medical Director of South Florida Reception Center. Crisis Stabilization Unit,
`Miami, Florida.
`
`1986-1995
`
`Member of the Medical Vendor Panel, Office of Disability Determinations, State
`of Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services as Psychiatrist.
`
`April 1986-Aug.1987
`
`Consultant Psychiatrist for the Rader Institute of Eating Disorders.
`
`1981—2002
`
`Private practice of general Psychiatry with hospital privileges at most General and
`Psychiatric Hospitals in the Dade county area.
`
`July 1998-Present
`
`Member of the Board of Director Chamber of Commerce of Puerto Rico in South Florida.
`
`1985-Present
`
`1981-1983
`
`19814983
`
`1980~1982
`
`Workmen's Compensation and Forensic Evaluations for private community attorneys.
`
`Conducted mental status examination, medical follow—up, psychotherapy crisis
`intervention and staff supervision, twenty four hours per week, at the Community
`Mental Health Center of South Dade.
`
`Consultant Psychiatrist to mentally retarded living at Mac Town, Inc., and Pioneer
`Boarding Home.
`
`Geriatric Consultant for several nursing homes in the Miami Beach area.
`
`ASSIstant Professor, The Miami Institute of Psychology, Caribbean for Advanced Studies.
`
`

`

`Angel Rafael Diaz, M.D.
`
`Educaflon
`
`Doctor of Medicine, Autonomous University of Guadalajara, Mexico (1972-1976).
`
`Fifth Pathway Program. School of Medicine of Puerto Rico (1976-1977).
`
`First year of Family Practice, R.E. Thomason General Hospital, El Paso, Texas (1977-1978)
`
`Residency in Psychiatry, University of Miami School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital (1978-1981).
`
`School of Public Administration. University of Puerto Rico, 45 credits accumulated for M.P.A. (1970—1972).
`
`Bachelor of Arts in Natural Science, University of Puerto Rico (1965-1969).
`
`Licenses and Certificates
`
`American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, 1983.
`
`Federal Licensure Exam (FLEX), license to practice in Florida, 1981.
`
`Puerto Rico Board of Medical Examiners, licenSe to practice in Puerto Rico, 1987.
`
`Expert medical Advisor- Division of Worker's Compensation, September 17. 1997.
`
`Diplomate of the American College of Forensic Examiners. 2000.
`
`Awards
`
`Resident of the Year, "Juan Bellovar Memorial Award", Department of Psychiatry,
`
`Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1979.
`
`Society Memberships
`
`'. Academy of Organization and Occupational Psychiatry.
`
`Interamerican College of Physicians and Surgeons.
`
`American College of Forensic Examiners.
`
`Employee Assistance Professionals Association (EAPA).
`
`Chamber of Commerce of Puerto Rico in South Florida.
`
`References will be furnished upon request,
`
`

`

`Sac“ .Vang
`LECP
`CENTER. Foe OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHIATRY OFEJLORIDA
`
`
`
`AngelR. Din, MD.
`MedicalDirector
`
`Diplomats, American Board
`ofPsychiatry and Neurology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7400N.KendanD'rive
`Suite416
`
`mmpmfidasslss
`
`Ofl'lce (305) 670-4609
`Fax(305) 670-3815
`www.copof.com
`

`
`Stafl'Members afCOPOF
`
`Juan DeLosV Santos, A.R.N.P
`
`Maria DeLos Santos, A.R.N.P
`
`Jorge Bustamante, LCSW
`Psychotherapist
`
`Daniel R. Mesch, MS, LMHC
`Biofeedback, Psychotherapist
`
`
`
`'August 15, 2005
`
`Kenneth W. Waterway, Esq.
`
`2400 East Commercial Boulevard
`Suite 1100
`
`Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308.
`
`- Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`September 26, 1977
`Date of Birth:
`Social Security Number: —
`Date of Accident: April 27, 2004
`
`Dear Mr. Waterway:
`
`seen in my office for
`The above captioned individual was
`the first time on August 11,
`2005 for the purpose of an
`independent psychiatric evaluation.
`'
`
`I had the opportunity
`the preparation of this report,
`For
`to interview Mr. Kearns as well as to review the following
`medical records, specifically:
`
`-
`—
`—
`
`—
`
`Records from Raulerson Hospital.
`.
`Records from Diane Poliakoff, Psy.D.
`including an
`Records
`from. Walter Afield, MD,
`initial evaluation, dated December 17,
`2004,
`as
`
`well as follow—up notes through April 12, 2005.
`A. neurobehavioral assessment, dated December 7,
`2004,
`and a
`computerized brain mapping,
`dated
`December 7, 2004.
`
`Continued
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 2
`
`-
`
`—
`
`~
`
`Evaluation
`
`of
`
`records
`
`and
`
`case
`
`coordination
`
`prepared by Dr. Walter Afield, dated April
`2005.
`
`1,
`
`Evaluation from Robert Chuong, MD, dated December
`14, 2004.
`Radiological/imaging reports.
`
`opportunity to review the
`the
`also had
`I
`deposition transcripts, specifically:
`
`following
`
`
`
`—
`
`-
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`
`taken on March 14, 2005.
`Suzanne Leitner, LCSW,
`LEETEEE‘UT“?EEEE§T°EUEEEEITT7s nfither,
`taken on
`July 7, 2005.
`p
`Thomas Kearns, plaintiff’s father,
`taken on July
`7, 2005.
`taken on November
`Thomas M. Kearns, plaintiff,
`30,
`2004,
`as well
`as
`a video tape of
`this
`
`deposition.
`Mr. Thomas Kearns’ arrest on December 16,
`secondary to a DUI.
`”
`I also reviewed.
`records
`fron1 the Department of
`
`2004
`
`Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, County of
`Broward,
`filing' date of
`January 26,
`2005
`and
`arrest date of December 16, 2004.
`
`from. Dawson Brian High School, Clayton
`Records
`College and State University.
`
`involved ‘in a
`is a 27—year-old. male who was
`Mr. Kearns
`work—related accident on April 27, 2004.
`At that time, he
`was working as a railroad engineer
`for a company by the
`name of
`CFX.
`.
`The patient describes his
`accident
`as
`
`“I was working in the Okeechobee area around 4:00
`follows.
`I
`stepped
`over
`a
`latch and
`I
`fell
`from
`a.m. when
`approximately 15 feet high and landed on the left side of
`my body and head”.
`The patient is not sure if he had loss
`of
`consciousness,
`and
`he
`added,
`“I
`only know that
`I
`couldn’t breathe,
`and
`I was
`taken via
`rescue
`to the
`
`Regional Hospital in Okeechobee”.
`
`Mr. Kearns stated that he had different tests,
`
`including x—
`
`rays, and he was released the same day.
`
`Continued
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 3
`
`reviewing
`history by
`corroborate. Mr. Kearns’
`could
`I
`medical records from Raulerson Hospital where he was
`seen
`
`There is
`on the day of the accident at the emergency room.
`that
`the
`a description. of
`the accident 'where
`it
`stated.
`patient fell on to the ground hurting his back and that he
`threw up two times
`and he was brought via EMS with a
`cervical collar.
`It also stated that upon arriving to the
`emergency
`room,
`he was
`alert
`and oriented x
`3,
`and
`according to the report, “he denies LOC”.
`
`It is noted that the patient had a Glasgow-Coma Scale of 15
`‘(a score of
`12 or
`less
`indicates possible neurological
`insult).
`There
`is also a notation that under
`initial
`
`the patient denied any dizziness or blurred vision.
`visit,
`He had a C—spine and LS—spine x—rays as well as a CT scan
`of the head.
`The clinical impression was contusion of head
`and back.
`The CT scan of the head was normal as well as
`
`chest x—ray, cervical spine and lumbar spine.
`
`Mr. Kearns stated that he was referred to see an orthopedic
`
`physician by the name of Dr. Bryce Epstein approximately a
`week after his
`accident.
`“At
`that
`time,
`I
`had pain
`everywhere, and I thought I had broken ribs”.
`
`The patient stated that Dr. Epstein’s intervention included
`physical
`therapy, analgesic medication and EH1 MRI of
`the
`left shoulder was alSo performed,
`and he was told “that
`I
`might have a rotator cuff
`tear and.
`a bulge on. my back,
`nothing major”.
`(Apparently, Dr. Epstein also sent him for
`an MRI of his
`lumbar
`spine, but
`I do not have medical
`records from this physician to review).
`
`for
`Epstein
`Dr.
`saw
`he
`that
`stated
`patient
`The
`approximately six months,
`and he acknowledged improvement
`from this
`intervention,
`although he made clear
`to me,
`
`“anything that I take over my shoulder is painfulmsome days
`I do better than others”.
`
`For his physical problems, he is currently not seeing any
`physician or
`taking any medication.
`He claimed that
`for
`his pain he
`takes
`over—the—counter medication,
`such as
`Tylenol ES or Aleve.
`
`Continued
`
`

`

`
`
`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 4
`
`Mr. Kearns stated that after the accident, “I was stressed
`
`out because I could not go back to workmmy mother wants me
`to see a neurologist”.
`
`to
`Mr. Kearns stated that around December of 2004, he went
`see a neurologist
`in the Tampa area by the name of Dr.
`Walter Afield.
`He
`stated that
`he
`saw Dr. Afield
`
`approximately five times,
`the end of last year.
`
`and that he began to see him at
`‘
`
`records from Dr. Wilter AfiEId,
`
`dated
`assessment,
`neurobehavioral
`a
`also performed
`He
`this
`December 7, 2004,
`and under summary, “the results of
`test are indicative of an individual who places within the
`low average
`range
`in
`terms
`of
`general
`intellectual
`ability”.
`Dr. Afield noted that Mr. Kearns was reading at
`the high school level and spelling at the 8u‘grade level as
`well as doing arithmetic at
`the 5th grade level.
`He
`then
`added,
`“he
`is
`severely depressed,
`nervous,
`angry
`and
`suspiciousmfeeling
`of
`persecution,
`reference
`and
`maltreatment
`are
`notedmhe
`is
`confused
`and
`
`I had the opportunity to review medical
`includifigflhi§_initial evaluation that was on
`
`December 7, 2004, and his diagnoses are contained in his
`report,
`and among
`them included “a concussion,
`rule—out
`organicity,
`rule—out
`seizure
`disorder,
`TMJ’
`disorder,
`depression,
`severe,
`anxiety, possible panic—attacks
`and
`post traumatic disorder”, and this was related to the April
`27, 2004 accident. Dr. Afield recommended a TMJ evaluation
`
`as well as psychometric testing as well as psychotherapy
`treatment ASAP.
`He stated, “the patient is not suicidal at
`this point, but he may become suicidal
`if not properly
`treated”.
`Dr. Afield felt that the patient had suffered a
`severe concussion.
`
`Dr. Afield sent Mr. Kearns for a SPECT brain scan, and the
`conclusion
`stated,
`“multiple. moderate
`sized
`profusion
`defects are noted as discussed above,
`including bilateral,
`frontal,
`left parietal
`and
`right
`posterior parietal
`occipital regions” and clinical correlation is recommended.
`This brain scan was done on April 17, 2005 and was read by
`Michael Foley, MD.
`
`disorganizedmsevere levels of anxiety and tension may make
`simple routine life tasks impossiblemagitated rumination,
`fearfulness,
`obsessions,
`compulsions
`and
`phobias
`are
`present”.
`
`Continued
`
`

`

`i
`
`
`
`
`
`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 5
`
`He then ended by saying, “these results are indicative of a
`post
`traumatic stress.disorder”.
`Throughout
`the time that
`Dr. Afield saw Mr. Kearns,
`there is documentation that the
`
`severely disabled and
`is
`patient
`confused and disorganized.
`
`that
`
`the patient
`
`is
`
`is referred to see Dr. Poliakoff, Psy.D., who
`Mr. Kearns
`January 26,
`2005
`for
`the
`first
`time,
`and
`saw him on
`according to the initial
`intake,
`“the patient presented
`complaining-of decreased memory for daily activities that
`he cannot concentrate”.
`He was
`takin no medication,
`and
`according to Dr. Poliakoff, he rated him with a GAF of 50
`and
`prognosis
`“guarded”.
`_He
`recommended
`cognitive
`behavioral
`therapy _as well
`as
`supportive
`and
`anger
`management. Mr. Kearns denied to Dr. Poliakoff alcohol or
`‘substance abuse.
`
`On a note of February 22, 2005, under drug/alcohol history,
`it stated, “sober and at AA since 1% years”.
`
`sold his
`the patient
`is an indication that
`There
`recently, and he was also demoted at his Work.
`
`home
`
`Mr. Kearns stated that he continues under
`
`treatment with
`
`referred there by Dr.
`“I was
`and stated,
`Dr. Poliakoff
`Afield”, and he is seeing her on an average of every week.
`He stated,
`“although.
`there was
`a period. of
`time that
`I
`didn't see her”.
`He also stated that he was
`referred by
`Dr. Poliakoff
`to see a psychiatrist by the name of Dr.
`Maiser,
`“he wanted to put me on medicine, but
`I refused”.
`Upon
`further
`questioning,
`he
`stated that Dr. Maiser
`prescribed medication and he filled the prescription, but
`he is not
`taking the medication.
`He cannot
`remember
`the
`name of the medication.
`(This information, about seeing Dr.
`Maiser,
`could not
`be corroborated by
`reviewing medical
`records).
`
`from an
`been doing
`has
`asked how he
`Mr. Kearns was
`replied,
`“I
`just want
`to
`emotional
`standpoint,
`and he
`return to worka want my job back".
`then immediately
`He
`started complaining about
`the fact
`that he has been sent
`for evaluations to different places.
`He complained about
`having to go up to Tampa to see Dr. Afield.
`He claimed
`that he has to bother a friend to drive him up there.
`
`Continued
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 6
`
`to
`He also complained about having to come down to Miami
`see
`me
`here
`today
`and
`that
`he
`has
`to
`see
`other
`professionals in this area.
`He stated,
`“I
`am sick and
`tired of all of this”.
`
`When I asked him about depressive symptoms, he replied, “do
`I
`look depressedmI
`ant a happy' guy”.
`He was also asked
`about memory problems, and he replied, “I don’t think so”.
`
`PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORX:
`
`
`
`
`any past psychiatric history.
`He denies
`any
`He denies
`history of violent behavior or suicide attempt.
`
`SUBSTANCE ABUSE HISTORY:
`
`He was asked about alcohol or substance abuse or if he has
`
`ever had any problem with the law because of alcohol,
`including DUI's,
`and
`he
`denies
`it.
`Upon
`further
`questioning,
`I asked hiHl about
`a DUI
`two times,
`and he
`denies it.
`He claimed that a couple of years ago, he saw a
`rehab therapist, “I was
`there by nwself”.
`He
`then added
`that he has been sober after 2002, but later, he did admit
`
`is interesting
`It
`that on occasions, he drinks alcohol.
`that at this point, he became very upset and guarded about
`my questioning about alcohol intake.
`
`LEGAL HISTORX:
`
`He denies having problems with the legal system.
`ever being incarcerated.
`
`He denies
`
`MEDICAL AND SURGICAL HISTORY:
`
`Other than a hernia, he did not elaborate and claims to be
`unremarkable.
`
`There are no known allergies.
`
`SOCIAL HISTORY:
`
`He claimed to be living in
`Mr. Kearns was born in Ohio.
`the last
`five years.
`He
`is
`the South Florida area for
`single and has never been married.
`
`Continued
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 7
`
`a girlfriend,
`has
`he
`recently
`that
`claimed
`He
`is renting a
`He
`two months.
`the last
`specifically for
`house, and he stated, “she is there all the time”.
`He did
`acknbwledge that he used to own a house that he sold around
`February of 2005,
`“I
`sold it
`for a guofit and now I
`am
`renting”.
`
`had
`
`He
`His parents live in Ohio, and he has an older sister.
`claims to have few friends, and he stated that his closest
`
`
`
`background
`educational
`. His
`recently.
`friend married
`
`entails of a high school diploma and he attended a railroad
`SC 001 for one month.
`'
`
`WORK HISTORY:
`
`He worked for a railroad company by the name of CFX for
`seven years.
`He claimed that during those seven years, he
`was a conductor
`for one year,
`and for six years, he has
`been an engineer.
`He stated that after the accident, he
`was out of work for approximately' eight months ‘and then
`returned and worked for two or three weeks, but
`then he was
`suspended from his job because “they accused me of stealing
`time, and I am in appeal”. Mr. Kearns elaborated a little
`bit more about this incident and stated, “I feel it is not
`right, engineers are not required to do time—keeping”.
`
`DAILY LIVING ACTIVITIES:
`
`He can feed,
`He can drive his car without difficulties.
`does not
`look
`bathe,
`dress
`and undress himself.
`He
`neglected.
`He
`is right—handed.
`He can handle his own
`economical affairs.
`He can communicate.
`
`MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION:
`
`He
`Mr. Kearns came to the interview situation by himself.
`drove from the Hollywood area where he lives by himself.
`He was cooperative.
`-He was alert and oriented X 4.
`His
`speech was coherent.
`He was in no acute distress.
`He was
`
`He was wearing a baseball cap.
`well dressed and groomed.
`He was walking without
`the help of any device.
`There was
`no presence of pain behavior. His thought content revolved
`mostly around the fact that he is very upset because he has
`been going to different doctors for evaluations.
`
`Continued
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 8'
`
`He also stated that apparently he has been put under
`surveillance,
`“they
`are
`following
`me
`around”.
`Interestingly,
`somatic complaints were not present.
`He
`also verbalized that he is willing and eager to return to
`work, and that he has been actively looking for a job, “I
`have applied to different companies in the Pacific area,
`I
`might move
`there if I
`land a job”.
`Thought process was
`goal oriented.
`There was
`no
`evidence of perceptual
`disturbances,
`Such as auditory or visual hallucinations,
`and no delusional
`thought content.
`His mood was mildly
`anxious and, again, upset at times, but
`in general, he was
`
`
`
`pleasant.
`He would
`smile
`spontaneously.
`He
`denies
`or
`or
`suicidal
`homicidal
`ideations,
`active
`passive.
`Cognitively, he was intact.
`I could not detect any memory
`or concentration problems. His history of present illness
`could be corroborated by reviewing medical
`records.
`His
`judgment was also fairly intact.
`
`PSYCHIAERIC IMPRESSION:
`
`AXIS I:
`
`AXIS II:
`
`AXIS III:
`-
`
`AXIS IV:
`
`AXIS V:
`
`‘
`
`l.
`
`Adjustment Disorder with Mixed
`Emotional
`Features,
`Chronic
`according to the DSM—IV.
`Substance Abuse dependence (alcohol).
`2.
`Deferred.
`
`Type
`
`1.
`
`Status post closed-head and lumbar
`trauma, resolved.
`
`2.
`
`to left
`trauma
`Status post
`rotator cuff tear by history.
`Psychosocial
`Stressors:
`Not
`worried about his occupational
`current litigious process.
`GAF:
`75 (Present)
`
`shoulder,
`
`working,
`future and
`
`Mr. Kearns sustained a work—related accident on April 27,
`2004 where he sustained multiple body trauma,
`including a
`closed—head trauma,
`for which he received initial treatment
`at
`the local emergency room with essentially unremarkable
`findings.
`Apparently,
`the patient
`had
`some
`cognitive
`complaints,
`for which his mother
`referred him to
`a
`neurologist to be evaluated.
`
`Continued
`
`

`

`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 9
`
`according to the deposition of Letitia
`Apparently and
`Kearns around June of 2004,
`she noticed that her
`son had
`
`some irritability and shortness in attention span, and for
`this reason,
`she recommended him to see a neurologist.
`In
`that
`same deposition,
`she acknowledged that Mr. Kearns was
`referred to a neurologist
`by Mr.
`Spier,
`who
`is
`the
`plaintiff’s attorney.
`
`r l
`
`I mentioned above, Mr. Kearns was evaluated by Dr.
`As
`Afield
`who
`believes
`that
`the
`patient
`has
`severe
`symptomatology as a cnnsequence of
`this accident,
`and he
`referred. hiHl
`to Dr. Poliakoff, who
`is currently 'treating
`him.
`
`
`
`it was
`from Dr. Afield,
`records.
`reviewing medical
`Upon
`noted that althougthr. Afield feels that
`the patient has
`severe symptomatology,
`including cognitive and significant
`mood symptoms, Mr. Kearns was able to engage in real estate
`transaction,
`selling his house
`and
`supposedly making a
`profit.
`During that
`same period of
`time, Mr. Kearns has
`been able to perform activities of daily living without any
`major interruption.
`'
`
`the
`in spite of
`that
`is also interesting to note
`It
`severity of the symptoms described by Dr. Afield,
`there is
`no
`documentation
`' of
`any
`inpatient
`psychiatric
`hospitalization or psychotropic medication prescriptions to
`alleviate such symptoms.
`
`Although Mr. Kearns denied to Dr. Poliakoff and myself any
`alcohol
`intake,
`there is evidence that he had a DUI arrest
`in December of 2004.
`In Dr. Afield’s notes,
`there was no
`notation about that incident in particular,
`in spite during
`that
`same period of time, he has been seen by Dr. Afield.
`There was no notation that he had a history' of alcohol
`abuse, which I
`could corroborate,
`and it
`is very well
`documented in the deposition of Suzanne Leitner, who is an
`LCSW,
`and who treated Mr. Kearns after he was mandated by
`his employer
`to see her when he failed a breathalyzer test
`around 2002.
`
`Continued
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`W”—-————_“‘"
`
`Patient:
`
`Thomas M. Kearns
`
`Page 10
`
`found it interesting that, although Dr. Afield had been
`I
`documented
`constantly
`the
`severity
`of Mr.
`Kearns’
`psychiatric symptoms, on a note written by him, under
`the
`title of Evaluations of Records
`and Case Coordination,
`dated April
`1,
`2005, Dr. Afield acknowledged that
`the
`all

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket