throbber
Filing # 140249207 E-Filed 12/13/2021 01:04:33 PM
`
`IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
`11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
`MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
`
`
`CARLOS SANTANA,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`vs. Case No.:
`
`
`
`
`
`THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF
`MIAMI-DADE COUNTY d/b/a
`JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`_____________________________________/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff, CARLOS SANTANA (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), by and through the undersigned
`
`counsel, hereby sues Defendant, THE PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
`
`d/b/a JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (hereinafter “Defendant”), and in support avers as
`
`follows:
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`1. This is an action by the Plaintiff for damages exceeding $30,000 excluding attorneys’ fees
`
`or costs for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief and damages under the Florida Civil
`
`Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), and Florida Statute Section 760 to redress injury done to
`
`Plaintiff by the Defendant for discriminatory treatment on the basis of race, color, national
`
`origin, and retaliation. This is an action brought under Chapter 760, Florida Statutes,
`
`2. Plaintiff was at all times relevant to this action, and continues to be, a resident of Miami-
`
`Dade County, Florida, within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court.
`
`3. Plaintiff was an employee of Defendant, performing the duties of a Senior Enrollment
`
`Specialist in Miami, Florida.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`4. Defendant was a “person” and/or an “employer” pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act
`
`of 1992, Fla. Stat. Section 760.01, et seq., since it employs fifteen or more employees for
`
`the applicable statutory period; and it is subject to the employment discrimination
`
`provisions of the applicable statute, the FCRA.
`
`5. Defendant is a “person” within the purview of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla.
`
`Stat. Section 760.01, et seq.
`
`6. At all times material hereto Defendant was an “employer” within the meaning of the
`
`Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla Stat. Section 760.01, et seq..
`
`7. At all times material hereto, Plaintiff was an “employee” within the meaning of the Florida
`
`Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla Stat. Section 760 , et seq..
`
`8. Venue is proper in Venue is proper in Miami-Dade County because all of the actions that
`
`form the basis of this Complaint occurred within Miami-Dade County and payment was
`
`due in Miami-Dade County.
`
`9. Plaintiff is a White, Hispanic, male individual of Cuban national origin and is a member
`
`of a class of persons protected from discrimination in his employment under the Florida
`
`Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA), Florida Statute Section 760.
`
`10. Plaintiff previously filed a timely charge of employment discrimination with the Equal
`
`Employment Opportunity Commission, the agency which is responsible for investigating
`
`claims of employment discrimination.
`
`11. On December 3, 2019, the EEOC issued a “Notice of Right to Sue” notice to Plaintiff and
`
`suit was instituted timely.
`
`12. All conditions precedent for the filing of this action before this Court has been previously
`
`met, including the exhaustion of all pertinent administrative procedures and remedies.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS
`
`13. Plaintiff was employed by Defendant from on or about September 8, 2008, until on or
`
`about October 18, 2019.
`
`14. Throughout his employment with Defendant, Plaintiff performed the essential functions
`
`of his job duties and responsibilities, and at all relevant times, performed his job at
`
`satisfactory or above satisfactory levels.
`
`15. During his employment, Plaintiff was subjected to derogatory comments and negative
`
`treatment based on his race, Hispanic, and national origin of Cuba.
`
`16. Throughout the duration of his employment with Defendant, Plaintiff was subjected to
`
`discriminatory treatment, primarily by three (3) managers and/or supervisors: Angelique
`
`Williams (Black, African American), Sheryl LaFranse (Black, African American), and
`
`Dorothy Martin (Black, African American).
`
`17. On or about 2013, Plaintiff, along with other co-workers filed EEOC complaints against
`
`Defendant and its managers, agents, and representatives for maintaining and failing to
`
`address a racially discriminatory, hostile work environment.
`
`18. Following Plaintiff’s involvement with the EEOC complaint, Defendant caused Plaintiff’s
`
`working conditions to become unconscionably unsafe and unsanitary by permitting or
`
`Plaintiff’s work environment to become rife with health hazards, including, but not limited
`
`to, cockroaches, lizards, cockroach feces and rat feces found on his desk, and exposed
`
`electrical wires.
`
`19. Plaintiff believes that his working conditions were allowed to deteriorate to the level stated
`
`above because Defendant, through its managers, agents, and representatives, were
`
`retaliating against him for his involvement with filing the EEOC complaint against them.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`20. In 2017, Plaintiff made a request for leave to one of his supervisors, Angelique Williams,
`
`so he could handle some personal, family matters. Despite having accumulated over 150
`
`hours of vacation time to satisfy his leave request, Williams denied Plaintiff’s request for
`
`leave, threw his request form at him, punched Plaintiff in the upper shoulder, and then
`
`proceeded to ask Plaintiff a flurry of inappropriate, personal questions.
`
`21. Plaintiff believes that his request for leave would not have been denied, nor would he have
`
`been subjected to such inappropriate treatment but for his race and involvement in filing
`
`an EEOC charge against Defendant. Upon information and belief, Black, African
`
`American employees did not face nearly as harsh resistance when requesting leave from
`
`Angelique Williams or other managers and/or supervisors.
`
`22. On or about late July 2018, while Plaintiff was taking his lunch break, Angelique Williams
`
`made a discriminatory comment in the presence of and loud enough to be heard by
`
`Plaintiff and other Hispanic and non-Hispanic employees, stating “the Spanish speaking
`
`employees are the slowest and laziest employees.”
`
`23. On another occasion, Angelique Williams falsely accused Plaintiff, saying he did not
`
`accomplish his work tasks. Following Williams’ accusation, Plaintiff became extremely
`
`stressed to the point of needing to be rushed to the emergency room where he was
`
`diagnosed with high blood pressure and suffered a permanent red eye as a result of the
`
`stress to which his supervisor subjected him.
`
`24. Plaintiff had to endure constant backlash, predicated on race-based animus, from
`
`Angelique Williams, which affected him both personally and professionally. Notably,
`
`Plaintiff became a target for vulgar comments in-person and over email, verbal and
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`physical harassment, and negative performance evaluations that were not reflective of the
`
`quality of his work.
`
`25. On multiple occasions, another of Plaintiff’s supervisors, Sheryl LaFranse, would call
`
`Plaintiff by the wrong name, and every time Plaintiff would correct her mistake, LaFranse
`
`would reply, “all of you Hispanics look the same to me.”
`
`26. Another of Plaintiff’s supervisors, Dorothy Martin, on one occasion, asked Plaintiff to
`
`come see them. Plaintiff was in the middle of doing another task, so he told Martin to give
`
`him two (2) minutes so he could finish what he was doing. Martin responding by saying,
`
`“oh, okay, we will call you the two (2) minute man, now.”
`
`27. Plaintiff has consistently raised concerns and brought complaints to Human Resources
`
`regarding the unfair treatment he was experiencing at the hands of his managers and/or
`
`supervisors; however, nothing was done to address and abate the misconduct.
`
`28. Plaintiff believes that several other Hispanic co-workers have left his work site and
`
`stopped working for Defendant because Defendant has permitted and/or not meaningfully
`
`addressed the persistent racially discriminatory treatment being perpetuated by its Black,
`
`African American managers and/or supervisors, creating a hostile work environment for
`
`Hispanic employees.
`
`29. Due to the discriminatory treatment endured by Plaintiff at the hands of his supervisors,
`
`Plaintiff has been diagnosed with severe depression, for which he had to take four (4)
`
`months of FMLA leave between on or about December 2018 until on or about April 2019.
`
`30. On or about October 18, 2019, Plaintiff had his employment with Defendant terminated
`
`in retaliation for raising complaints regarding his discriminatory treatment by Defendant’s
`
`agents and representatives, and any other reason is a mere pretext.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`31. Plaintiff has retained the undersigned counsel in order that his rights and interests may be
`
`protected and thus has become obligated to pay the undersigned a reasonable attorney’s
`
`fee.
`
`COUNT I.
`DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE IN VIOLATION OF THE FLORIDA CIVIL
`RIGHTS ACT
`
`32. Plaintiff re-adopts each and every factual allegation as stated in paragraphs 1-31 of this
`
`complaint as if set out in full herein.
`
`33. At all times material hereto, Defendant failed to comply with the Florida Civil Rights Act
`
`of 1992 Florida Statues Section 760.10 which in its relevant section states it is an unlawful
`
`employment practice for an employer to discriminate or discharge or otherwise to
`
`discriminate against any individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or
`
`privileges of employment, because of such individuals race, color, or national origin.
`
`34. The applicable statute, FCRA, prohibits an employer from making employment decisions,
`
`or from taking any personnel action, affecting the terms, conditions and privileges of one’s
`
`employment, based upon race considerations or reasons.
`
`35. The Plaintiff is a White, Hispanic, male individual of Cuban national origin and he
`
`possessed the requisite qualifications and skills to perform his position with Defendant.
`
`36. The Plaintiff was subjected to disparate treatment in the workplace, in that similarly
`
`situated, non-Hispanic employees were allowed better work opportunities by not being
`
`subjected to a hostile work environment rife with unsafe and unsanitary conditions,
`
`discriminatory treatment, and racial epithets.
`
`37. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant unlawful acts, Plaintiff has suffered
`
`great and irreparable economic harm and other associated losses such as emotional
`
`distress, humiliation, embarrassment, and economic losses.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`38. Moreover, as a further result of the Defendant unlawful race-based discriminatory
`
`conduct, the Plaintiff has been compelled to file this action and he has incurred the costs
`
`of litigation.
`
`39. Plaintiff was qualified for his position with Defendant.
`
`40. Defendant violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA) by discriminating against
`
`Plaintiff because of his race in the terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.
`
`41. Defendant retaliated against Plaintiff after complaints of race discrimination and failed to
`
`address complaints of discrimination.
`
`42. The Defendant’s actions were malicious and were recklessly indifferent to the Plaintiff’s
`
`rights pursuant to Florida Statute Section 760, protecting a person from discrimination
`
`because of race and national origin.
`
`43. The aforementioned actions of Defendant were done wantonly, willfully, maliciously, and
`
`with reckless disregard of the consequences of such actions.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter
`
`judgment against the Defendant; find that the Defendant indeed violated the FRCA, and in
`
`addition, order the following additional relief:
`
`A. Declare that the acts complained of herein are in violation of the Florida Civil
`
`Rights Act;
`
`B. Award PLAINTIFF compensatory damages for emotional distress, embarrassment
`
`and humiliation;
`
`C. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining the DEFENDANT, its officers, successors,
`
`assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in
`
`any employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race;
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`D. Reinstate PLAINTIFF to the same position he held before the retaliatory personnel
`
`action, or to an equivalent position;
`
`E. Reinstate full fringe benefits and seniority rights to PLAINTIFF;
`
`F. Order DEFENDANT to make PLAINTIFF whole, by compensating PLAINTIFF
`
`for lost wages, benefits, including front pay, back pay with prejudgment interest;
`
`G. For a money judgment representing prejudgment interest;
`
`H. Grant PLAINTIFF’s costs of this action, including reasonable attorney’s fees;
`
`I. Grant PLAINTIFF a trial by jury;
`
`J. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`COUNT II.
`DISCRIMINATION BASED ON NATIONAL ORIGIN IN VIOLATION OF THE
`FLORIDA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
`
`44. Plaintiff re-adopts each and every factual allegation as stated in paragraphs 1-31 of this
`
`complaint as if set out in full herein.
`
`45. At all times material hereto, Defendant failed to comply with the Florida Civil Rights Act
`
`(FCRA) of 1992 Florida Statues Section 760.10 which in its relevant section states it is an
`
`unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate or discharge or otherwise
`
`to discriminate against any individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or
`
`privileges of employment, because of such individuals race, color, or national origin.
`
`46. The applicable statute, FCRA, prohibits an employer from making employment decisions,
`
`or from taking any personnel action, affecting the terms, conditions and privileges of one’s
`
`employment, based upon race considerations or reasons.
`
`47. The Plaintiff is a White, Hispanic, male individual of Cuban national origin and he
`
`possessed the requisite qualifications and skills to perform her position with Defendant.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`48. The Plaintiff was subjected to disparate treatment in the workplace, in that similarly
`
`situated, non-Hispanic employees were allowed better work opportunities by not being
`
`subjected to a hostile work environment rife with unsafe and unsanitary conditions,
`
`discriminatory treatment, and racial epithets.
`
`49. The Plaintiff was terminated as a result of his national origin and the reasons given by
`
`Defendant, if any, for Plaintiff’s termination are mere pretext for illegal discrimination.
`
`50. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant unlawful acts, Plaintiff has suffered
`
`great and irreparable economic harm and other associated losses such as emotional
`
`distress, humiliation, embarrassment, and economic losses.
`
`51. Moreover, as a further result of the Defendant unlawful national origin-based
`
`discriminatory conduct, the Plaintiff has been compelled to file this action and he has
`
`incurred the costs of litigation.
`
`52. Plaintiff was qualified for his position with Defendant.
`
`53. Defendant violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 (FCRA) by discriminating against
`
`Plaintiff because of his national origin in the terms, conditions, and privileges of
`
`employment.
`
`54. Defendant retaliated against Plaintiff after complaints of national origin discrimination
`
`and failed to address complaints of discrimination.
`
`55. The Defendant’s actions were malicious and were recklessly indifferent to the Plaintiff’s
`
`rights pursuant to Florida Statute Section 760, protecting a person from discrimination
`
`because of race and national origin.
`
`56. The aforementioned actions of Defendant were done wantonly, willfully, maliciously, and
`
`with reckless disregard of the consequences of such actions.
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter
`
`judgment against the Defendant; find that the Defendant indeed violated the FRCA, and in
`
`addition, order the following additional relief:
`
`A. Declare that the acts complained of herein are in violation of the Florida Civil
`
`Rights Act;
`
`B. Award PLAINTIFF compensatory damages for emotional distress, embarrassment
`
`and humiliation;
`
`C. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining the DEFENDANT, its officers, successors,
`
`assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in
`
`any employment practice which discriminates;
`
`D. Reinstate PLAINTIFF to the same position he held before the retaliatory personnel
`
`action, or to an equivalent position;
`
`E. Reinstate full fringe benefits and seniority rights to PLAINTIFF;
`
`F. Order DEFENDANT to make PLAINTIFF whole, by compensating PLAINTIFF
`
`for lost wages, benefits, including front pay, back pay with prejudgment interest;
`
`G. For a money judgment representing prejudgment interest;
`
`H. Grant PLAINTIFF’s costs of this action, including reasonable attorney’s fees;
`
`I. Grant PLAINTIFF a trial by jury;
`
`J. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`COUNT III
`RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF THE FLORIDA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
`
`57. Paragraphs 1-31 are hereby realleged and reincorporated as if set forth in full herein.
`
`58. Defendant is an employer as that term is used under the applicable statutes referenced
`
`above.
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`59. The foregoing allegations establish a cause of action for unlawful retaliation after Plaintiff
`
`reported unlawful employment practices adversely affecting him under Chapter 760,
`
`Florida Statutes.
`
`60. The foregoing unlawful actions by Defendant were purposeful.
`
`61. Plaintiff voiced opposition to unlawful employment practices during his employment with
`
`Defendant and he was the victim of retaliation thereafter, as related in part above.
`
`62. Plaintiff is a member of a protected class because he reported unlawful employment
`
`practices and was the victim of retaliation thereafter. There is thus a causal connection
`
`between the reporting of the unlawful employment practices and the adverse employment
`
`action taken thereafter.
`
`63. As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing unlawful acts and omissions, Plaintiff
`
`has suffered mental anguish, emotional distress, expense, loss of benefits, embarrassment,
`
`humiliation, damage to reputation, illness, lost wages, loss of capacity for the enjoyment
`
`of life, and other tangible and intangible damages.
`
`64. These damages are continuing and are permanent.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, the PLAINTIFF prays that this Court will;
`
`A. Declare that the acts complained of herein are in violation of the Florida Civil
`
`Rights Act;
`
`B. Award PLAINTIFF compensatory damages for emotional distress, embarrassment
`
`and humiliation;
`
`C. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining the DEFENDANT, its officers, successors,
`
`assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`any employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race and/or national
`
`origin and/or gender and/or pregnancy;
`
`D. Reinstate PLAINTIFF to the same position he held before the retaliatory personnel
`
`action, or to an equivalent position;
`
`E. Reinstate full fringe benefits and seniority rights to PLAINTIFF;
`
`F. Order DEFENDANT to make PLAINTIFF whole, by compensating PLAINTIFF
`
`for lost wages, benefits, including front pay, back pay with prejudgment interest;
`
`G. For a money judgment representing prejudgment interest;
`
`H. Grant PLAINTIFF’s costs of this action, including reasonable attorney’s fees;
`
`I. Grant PLAINTIFF a trial by jury;
`
`J. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`Plaintiff demands trial by jury of all issues triable as of right by jury.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Dated: December 13, 2021____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Peter M. Hoogerwoerd, Esq.
`Peter M. Hoogerwoerd, Esq.
`Fla. Bar No.: 0188239
`pmh@rgpattorneys.com
`Corey L. Seldin, Esq.
`Fla. Bar No.: 1026565
`cseldin@rgpattorneys.com
`Remer & Georges-Pierre, PLLC
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Courthouse Tower
`44 West Flagler Street
`Suite 2200
`Miami, Florida 33130
`Telephone: (305) 416-5000
`Facsimile: (305) 416-5005
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket