throbber
Filing # 109399831 E-Filed 06/25/2020 01:16:14 PM
`
`IN THE COUNTY COURT, OF THE
`NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
`FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
`
`CASE NO: 2019-SC-014080-O
`DIVISION: 70
`
`KISSIMMEE INJURY CLINIC, LLC a/a/o
`WILLIAM MALDONADO,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
`INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
`Defendant.
`
`/
`
`DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT
`
`Defendant, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
`hereby files this Notice of Filing of an Affidavit of Denisha M. Lich, MS, RHIA, HRM.
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 25th day of June, 2020, a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing was sent to Eduardo Rodriguez, Esq., Pardy & Rodriguez, P.A., PO Box 3747,
`
`Orlando, FL 32802 erodriguez@pardyrodriguezlaw.com; piplegal@pardyrodriguezlaw.com
`
`through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal system.
`
`MIMI L. SMITH & ASSOCIATES
`
`BY:
`
`(Original signed electronically by Attorney.)
`SHALISA FRANCIS, ESQ.
`Florida Bar No. 58921
`390 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 1700
`Orlando, FL 32801
`Telephone: (407) 872-2498
`Facsimile: (855) 561-8864
`E-mail for service (FL R. Jud. Admin. 2.516):
`flor.law-pip.501o19@statefarm.com
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Attorneys and Staff of Mimi L. Smith & Associates
`are Employees of the Law Department of State
`Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
`
`2
`
`

`

`IN THE COUNTY COURT, OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
`INAND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
`
`KISSIMMEE INJURY CLINIC, LLC a/a/o
`WILLIAM MALDONADO,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
`INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
`CASE NO: 2019-SC-014080-O
`DIVISION: 70
`
`Defendant.
`|__m=spt—“C—CCC
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF DENISHA M. LICH, MS, RHIA, HRM,
`
`STATE OF FLORIDA
`
`)
`
`COUNTY OF PINELLAS)
`
`the undersigned authority duly authorized to take oaths and
`Before me,
`acknowledgments, personally appeared Denisha M. Lich, who after being duly swom,
`states:/
`
`1.
`
`My nameis Denisha M. Lich and | am overthe age of eighteen and | am competent
`
`to testify.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`| have personal knowledge of the matters containedin this affidavit.
`
`My testimony is based upon sufficient facts and data. My testimony is the product
`
`of reliable principles and methods.
`
`| have applied the principles and methods
`
`reliably to the facts of this case.
`
`4.
`
`! am a Registered Health Information Administrator by the American Health
`
`Information ManagementAssociation.
`
`5)
`
`| possess specialized knowledge of coding based on AMA guidelines. A true and
`
`1
`
`

`

`correct copy of my current CV detailing my knowledge and experience is attached
`
`as Exhibit 1.
`
`| have reviewed the documentation received for date of loss 5/8/15, more
`
`specifically the KissimmeeInjury Clinic, LLC’s medical records, corresponding CMS
`
`1500 forms and Explanation of Reviews (EORs)pertaining to the electrodes supply
`
`submitted with electrical muscle stimulation services for 5/11/15 date of service and
`
`the modality service submitted for 5/27/15 date of service. Exhibit 2
`
`| have reviewed the Office of Inspector General’s Compliance Program for
`
`Individual and Small Group Physician Practices, 2015 HCPCS LevelI! Coding
`
`Manual, American Medical Association (AMA) 2015 CPT Manual, AMA CPT
`
`Assistant, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid website and the Medicare Physician
`
`Fee Schedule related to the coding andbilling of the following HCPCSLevelII and
`
`CPT codes:
`
`-
`
`A4556
`
`(Electrodes
`
`(eg.,
`
`Apnea
`
`monitor),
`
`per
`
`pair);
`
`G0283 (Electrical stimulation (unattended) to one or more areas for
`-
`indication(s) other than woundcare, as part of a therapy plan of care);
`
`-
`
`97010 (Application of a modality to 1 or more areas; hot/cold pack).
`
`The Office of Inspector General (OIG) Compliance Program for Individual and Small
`
`Group Physician Practices states the following,
`
`
`
`“... The OIG has developedalist of four potential risk areas affecting
`physician practices. These risk areas include: (a) Coding and billing; (b)
`reasonable and necessary services; (c) documentation... This list of risk
`areasis not exhaustive, or all encompassing...”
`
`In the area of Coding andbilling, the OIG notes,
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`“The following risk areas associated with billing have been among the
`most frequent subjects of investigations and audits by the OIG...Billing for
`items or services not rendered or not provided as claimed; Submitting claims
`for equipment, medical supplies and services that are not reasonable and
`necessary,Billing for non-covered servicesas if covered; Unbundling(billing
`for each componentof the service instead ofbilling or using an all-inclusive
`code)...”
`
`The OIG also notesin the area of Medical Record Documentation,
`
`“In addition to facilitating high quality patient care, a properly
`documented medical record verifies and documents precisely what services
`were actually provided... (a) the site of the service; (b) the appropriateness
`of the services provided; (c) the accuracy ofthe billing; and (d) the identity
`of the care giver...” Exhibit 3
`
`KissimmeeInjury Clinic, LLC., inappropriately unbundled electrodes, submitted as
`
`HCPCS code A4556 when separately billing with electrical stimulation therapy,
`
`HCPCScode G0283 for 5/11/15 date of service.
`
`10.
`
`Review of the Patient's Progress and Treatment notes dated 5/11/15 underthe
`
`Plan/Recommendation section, shows that
`
`in addition to other services,
`
`the
`
`provider checkedthe line items representing the following,
`
`“G0283 — Electrical Stimulation and A4556 — Electrodes.” Please see
`Exhibit 2
`
`Electrodes are a necessary component in the delivery of the electrical
`
`stimulation services submitted as HCPCS Level Ii Code G0283 in this case. The
`
`electrode supplies were furnished as an integral part of the physician's course of
`
`treatmentof the injury performed in the physician'soffice.
`
`11.
`
`As noted in the above paragraph, the documentation shows that the provider
`
`performed electrical stimulation services, submitted as HCPCS Level
`
`Il code
`
`G0283, during the same encounter. There is no documentation to indicate that the
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`patient purchased a take-home TENSunit and that the electrodes were given to
`
`the patient as take-home and/or replacement supplies for the TENS unit that has
`
`been purchased. Rather, review of the documentation showsthat the electrodes
`
`were issued specifically for use with the electrical stimulation services performedin
`
`the office during the same and future encounters.
`
`12.
`
`Electrodes are a necessary componentin the delivery of the electrical stimulation
`
`services, in this case submitted as HCPCSLevelII Code G0283. The electrodes
`
`were furnished as an integral part of the physician's course of treatment,
`
`the
`
`electrical stimulation service, performed in the physician's office. Therefore, the
`
`electrodes supply would not be billed separately. The payment for the electrodes
`
`supply is already included within the payment of the Electrical Stimulation
`
`procedure, HCPCSLevelI! code G0283.
`
`Based on the guidelines and documentation received, the provider was not
`
`compliant with the coding and billing guidelines when submitting HCPCS Level Il
`
`code A4556for disposable/re-usable electrodes for 5/11/15 date of service.
`
`13.
`
`The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) assists providers by
`
`defining the HCPCScoding system asseenin the following,
`
`
`
`“... HCPCSis divided into two principal subsystems, referred to as
`level | and levelII of the HCPCS. Level | of the HCPCSis comprised of CPT
`(Current Procedural Terminology), a numeric coding system maintained by
`the American Medical Association (AMA)... Level
`Il of the HCPCSis a
`standardized coding system that
`is used primarily to identify products,
`supplies, and services not included in the CPT codes, such as ambulance
`services and durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies
`(DMEPOS) whenusedoutside a physician's office. Because Medicare and
`other insurers covera variety of services, supplies, and equipmentthat are
`not identified by CPT codes, the level {I HCPCS codes were established for
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`submitting claims for these items.”
`
`The 2015 HCPCSLevel Il Coding Manual describes HCPCS code A4556
`
`as,
`
`“Electrodes (eg. Apnea monitor), per pair’.
`
`The Manualfurther states under the code description,
`
`“If “incident to” a physician’s service, do notbill.” Exhibit 4
`
`Therefore, when the electrodes are incidental to the physicians service,in
`
`this case the electrical stimulation service, they are not separately payable. The
`
`electrodes were furnished as an integral part of
`
`the physician's personal
`
`professional service in the course of treatment performed in the physician'soffice.
`
`14.
`
`A Review of the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) pertaining to HCPCS
`
`Level Il code A4556 was doneto assist with the determination of the Procedure
`
`Status Code/ Code Status of this code. The Procedure Status Code/ Code Status
`
`indicates whetherthe respective codeis in the physician fee schedule and whether
`
`it is separately payableif the service is covered.
`
`The detail information for the 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule is no
`
`longer available for HCPCS Level II code A4556 therefore, a review of the 2016 fee
`
`schedule was reviewed to ascertain the detail information for the respective code.
`
`The 2016 MPFS showsthat the HCPCS code A4556 has a Procedure Status Code
`
`indicator of “P” which states,
`
`“Bundled/exciuded codes. There are no RVUs and no payment
`amounts for these services. No separate paymentis made for them under
`the fee schedule.If the item or service is covered asincident to a physician
`service and is provided on the samedayas a physician service, paymentfor
`
`5
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Bn
`
`it is bundled into the payment for the physician service to whichit is
`incident (an example is an elastic bandage furnished by a physician incident
`to a physician service).” Exhibit 5
`
`As noted above, the payment for the electrodes, submitted as A4556,is
`
`bundied into the payment for the electrical stimulation services, submitted as
`
`HCPCS Code G0283. The electrodes are a necessary componentin the delivery
`
`of the electrical stimulation services submitted as HCPCS LevelIl Code G0283for
`
`the respective date of service. The electrodes were furnished as an integral part of
`
`the physician's personal professional service in the course of treatmentof the injury
`
`performed in the physician's office. Therefore, no separate paymentis made.
`
`15.
`
`|The CMS’ website also contains the Medical Learning Network (MLN)to assist with
`
`the educational needs of the health care professional community. This Network
`
`provides free educational resources with the assistance from clinicians, billing
`
`experts and CMS subject matter experts to cover CMS programs,policies, and
`
`initiatives.
`
`CMS’ MLN Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Fact Sheet — ICN 006814-
`
`December 2014 shows how the payment
`
`rate for an individual service is
`
`determined. This documentfurther provides the description of each component
`
`within the formula. One of the componentsis the Relative Value Unit (RVU). There
`
`are three RVUs associated with the calculation of the allowed amount, one of which
`
`is the Practice Expense (PE) Relative Value Unit (RVU) as seen below.
`
`“PE RVUreflects the costs of maintaining a practice (for example,
`renting office space, buying supplies and equipment, and staff costs).”
`Exhibit 6
`
`
`
`

`

`The paymentof the electrical stimulation therapy represented in this case as
`
`HCPCS Level
`
`I! code G0283, already reflects and includes the cost of the
`
`electrodes used when performing the service. Therefore, separately billing for
`
`electrodes used when performing the electrical stimulation service would be
`
`considered unbundling resulting in duplicate payment.
`
`16.
`
`The is also seen upon review of the CMS website under the Physician Fee
`
`Schedule section- PFS Federal Regulation Notices Items - Details fortitle: CMS-
`
`1612-FC which provides a spreadsheetcontaining the descriptions of various items
`
`included in the calculation of the practice expense (PE) relative value units. Per
`
`CMS,the sourcesof these direct PE inputs are from oneofthe following:
`
`1. Clinical Practice Expert Panels (CPEPs) convenedin 1995 to develop
`estimates of the different types of resource inputs necessary to perform
`medical services;
`
`2. A crosswalk to a related service developed based upona clinical
`Opinion by CMS;
`
`3. The AMA’s Relative Value Update Committee (RUC)2;
`
`4. Refinement of the CPEP inputs by the AMA’s Practice Expense
`Advisory Committee (PEAC)or the Practice Expense Review
`Committee (PERC) (which replaced the PEAC in September2004) or
`the RUC Practice Expense Subcommittee (which took over the PERC’s
`role in September 2007).
`
`5. CMS; or
`
`6. A medical specialty society.” Exhibit 7
`
`Following are the items/inputs usedin the calculation of HCPCS code
`
`G0283.
`
`
`
`

`

`_hepes
`
`source
`
`category
`
`|
`cms_ |
`code s
`
`__ description
`
`unit
`
`Table 1 — Excerpt of CMS-1612-FC_PUF_SUPPLY
`
`
`io | satin
`| Of,
`|quanit! global_ireference
`ruc_
`ual
`code me
`
`
`
`G0281
`G0283
`
`G0283
`
`RUC
`RUC
`
`RuC
`
`Office Supply, Grocery
`Gown, Drape
`
`SKO68
`$B022
`
`Accessory,Procedure
`
`SDO055
`
`item
`pair
`
`item
`
`0.389
`0.084
`
`1312
`
`1
`1
`
`2
`
`xX
`OX
`
`mx
`
`razor
`gloves, non-sterile
`electrode, electical
`stimulation
`tape, surgical paper1in
`G0283
`OX
`6
`0.002
`inch
`(Mkropore)
`Wound Care, Dressings SGO79
`RUC
`G0283
`OX
`1
`0.016
`electrolyte coupling ge! mi
`Pharmacy, NonRx
`$J024
`RUC
`G0283
`XXX
`1
`0.013
`swab-pad, alcohol
`item
`Pharmacy, NonRx
`$J053
`RUC
`G0283
`OX
`1
`0.389
`razor
`tem
`Office Supply, Grocery
`SKO68
`RUC
`G0329
`
`
`
`RUC SB044ssunderpad 2ftx3h(Chux)Gown, Drape item 0.23 1 OX
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As noted in Table 1 above,electrodes, regardless of whether they are re-
`
`usable or not, are included within the calculation of the of the PE RVU for the
`
`electrical stimulation service performed in non-facility settings such as a physician
`
`office. Therefore, the paymentfor the electrodes is included within the paymentof
`
`the electrical stimulation service, submitted as HCPCS Level
`
`Il code G0283,
`
`performed during each encounter. Separate billing for the electrodes used during
`
`the performance of the electrical stimulation service would be considered
`
`unbundling resulting in duplicate payment.
`
`17.
`
`Per Medicare guidelines referenced above, the use of electrodes is considered an
`
`integral part of the physician professional services and therefore would not be
`
`separately payable.
`
`Furthermore, as referenced in paragraph #14, the Procedure Status Code
`
`for A4556 is “P” which signifies that no separate paymentis madefor this under the
`
`fee schedule andif the item or service is covered as incident to a physician service
`
`and is provided on the same day asa physician service, paymentforit is bundled
`
`into the payment for the physician service to whichit is incident. Therefore, the
`
`
`
`

`

`payment for the electrodes is included within the payment of the electrical
`
`stimulation services, HCPCS Level
`
`Il code G0283 for the respective dates of
`
`service.
`
`18.
`
`The Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 12 - Physicians/Nonphysician
`
`Practitioners 20.3 - Bundled Services/Supplies provides further clarification of
`
`bundled supplies as seen below,
`
`“There are a number of services/supplies that are covered under
`Medicare and that have HCPCS codes, but they are services for which
`Medicare bundles paymentinto the payment for other related services. If
`carriers receive a claim that is solely for a service or supply that must be
`mandatorily bundled, the claim for payment should be denied bythe carrier.
`Separate paymentis never made for routinely bundled services and
`supplies. The CMS has provided RVUs
`for many of the bundled
`services/supplies. However, the RVUs are not for Medicare payment use.
`Carriers may not establish their own relative values for these services.”
`Exhibit 8
`
`Therefore, when the electrodes were given to the patient for use with
`
`electrical stimulation services performedin the physician’soffice, they are incidental
`
`to the electrical stimulation procedure and are not separately payable. The payment
`
`of the electrical stimulation therapy represented in this case as HCPCS LevelIl
`
`code G0283, already reflects and includes the cost of the electrodes used when
`
`performing the service. Separately billing for electrodes used when performing the
`
`electrical stimulation service would be considered unbundling resulting in duplicate
`
`payment.
`
`19.
`
`Further
`
`review of
`
`the Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 12 -
`
`Physicians/Nonphysician Section 20.4.4 — Supplies of the Manual showsthat there
`
`
`
`are specific circumstances where separate payment for supplies furnished in
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`connection with a procedure may occur. Per the Manual,
`
`for supplies furnished in
`“Carriers make a separate payment
`connection with a procedure only when oneof the two following conditions
`exists:
`
`A. HCPCS code A4300is billed in conjunction with the
`appropriate procedure in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Data
`Base (place of service is physician’s office). However, A4550,
`A4300, and A4263 are no longer separately payable as of 2002.
`Supplies have been incorporatedinto the practice expense
`RVU for 2002. Thus, no payment may be madefor these
`supplies for serviced provided on or after January 1, 2002.
`
`B. The supply is a pharmaceutical or radiopharmaceutical
`diagnostic imaging agent (including codes A4641 through A4647);
`pharmacologic
`stressing agent
`(code
`J1245); or
`therapeutic
`radionuclide (CPT code 79900). Other agents may be used which do
`not have an assigned HCPCScode...” Please see Exhibit 8
`
`Review of the documentation received does not support the conditions noted
`
`above. Rather, the documentation showsthat the electrodes were providedforin
`
`office use. The electrodes were an integral component in the delivery of the
`
`electrical stimulation service performed in the physician’s office for the respective
`
`dates of service. As referenced above,
`
`“Supplies have beenincorporatedinto the practice expense RVU
`for 2002. Thus, no payment may be made for these supplies for
`serviced provided on or after January 1, 2002.” Please see Exhibit 8
`
`Therefore, the paymentfor the electrodesis already included in the Practice
`
`Expense RVUusedin the calculation of the MPFS allowed amountfor the electrical
`
`stimulation service submitted as HCPCS Level I! code G0283 for 5/11/15 date of
`
`service.
`
`20.
`
`It is important to note that the documentation received does notindicate that the
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`patient purchased a take-home TENS unit and that electrodes were given to the
`
`patient as take-home and/or replacementsupplies for the TENS unit that has been
`
`purchased. Rather, the documentation shows that the electrodes were issued
`
`specifically for use with the electrical stimulation services performedin the office
`
`during the same and future encounter.
`
`Electrodes are a necessary component in the delivery of the electrical
`
`stimulation services submitted as HCPCS Level || Code G0283. The electrode
`
`supplies were furnished as an integral part of the physician's course of treatment,
`
`the electrical stimulation services, performed in the physician's office. Therefore,
`
`they are incidental to the services and are not separately payable.
`
`Again, the paymentof the electrical stimulation therapy represented in this
`
`case as HCPCSLevelIl code G0283, already reflects and includes the cost of the
`
`electrodes used when performing the service. Therefore, separately billing for
`
`electrodes used when performing the electrical stimulation service would be
`
`considered unbundling resulting in duplicate payment.
`
`21.
`
`Based on the medical record documentation and the guidelines referenced in the
`
`paragraphs above, the provider was not compliant when coding and separately
`
`billing HCPCS code A4556 for 5/11/15 date of service.
`
`Paymentfor the electrodes supply was already included within the PE RVU
`
`calculation for the paymentof the electrical stimulation procedure performed during
`
`the same encounter for which they were used. Additional payment would be
`
`considered unbundling and result in duplicate payment.
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`22.
`
`As previously mentioned, there is no evidence within the documentation received
`
`that the shows the patient was given the electrodes to take home as a Durable
`
`Medical Equipment (DME) supply for use with an at home TENS unit. Furthermore,
`
`there is no documentation to indicate that the patient has a DME TENS unit at
`
`home.
`
`Whencoding andbilling for DME supplies the following guidelines apply.
`
`23.
`
`The Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 20 - Durable Medical Equipment,
`
`Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS) Durable - 10.1.1 - Durable Medical
`
`Equipment (DME) defines what is considered a Durable Medical Equipmentin the
`
`following.
`
`“DME is covered under Part B as a medical or other health service
`(§1861(s)(6) of the Social Security Act [the Act]) and is equipmentthat:
`a.
`Can withstand repeated use;
`b.
`Is primarily and customarily used to serve a medical purpose;
`c.
`Generally, is not useful to a person in the absenceof an
`illness or injury; and
`is appropriate for use in the home.
`
`d.
`
`All requirements of the definition must be met before an item can be
`considered to be durable medical equipment.” Exhibit 9
`
`Again, there is no documentation to support that the patient had a DME —
`
`TENS unit at home and that electrode supplies were needed for DME use. The
`
`provision of the electrodes in this case does not meet the requirements of a DME
`
`supply.
`
`24.
`
`The DME Jurisdiction C Provider Manual Chapter 9 does cover the Durable Medical
`
`Equipment benefit category when applicable as seenin the following.
`
`“All Medicare Part B covered services processed by the DME MAC
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`fall into one of the following benefit categories specified in the Social
`Security Act (§1861(s)):
`
`1. Durable medical equipment (DME)...” Exhibit 10
`
`The Manual also states that necessary supplies are covered underspecific
`
`circumstancesin the following.
`
`“Supplies and accessories that are necessary for the effective use of
`medically necessary DME are covered. Supplies may include drugs and
`biologicals that must be put directly into the equipment in order to achieve
`the therapeutic benefit of the DME or to assure the properfunctioning of the
`equipment.” Please see Exhibit 10
`
`Again, there is no documentation to support that the patient had a DME —
`
`TENSunit at home and that electrode supplies were needed for DME use. The
`
`provision of the electrodes in this case does not meet the requirements of a DME
`
`supply.
`
`25.
`
`Review of Chapter 5, DMEPOS Fee Schedule Categories, of the Manual also
`
`states,
`
`“Reimbursement for most durable medical equipment, prosthetics,
`orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS)is established by fee schedules. Payment
`is limited to the lower of the actual charge or the fee schedule amount. See
`Chapter 10 of this manual for more information about fee schedules and
`pricing. The fee schedule classifies most DMEPOSinto one of the six
`categories explained below:
`
`¢ Inexpensive or other routinely purchased DME (IRP)
`* Items requiring frequent and substantial servicing
`* Customized items
`* Other prosthetic and orthotic devices
`* Cappedrental items
`¢ Oxygen and oxygen equipment” Exhibit 11
`
`In order to determine in which category a specific HCPCS codeis classified
`
`the Manualdirects the provider to see Appendix-A HCPCSlocated at the end of
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`the manual. Appendix - A, shows HCPCSLevelII code A4556 with a Payment
`
`category of “13” indicating supplies and that the codeis not valid for Medicare as of
`
`11/1/1996. Exhibit 12
`
`26.
`
`Although the review of the DME fee schedule showsan allowed amount for HCPCS
`
`LEVELli code A4556 as a DME supply,the provision of the electrodesin this case
`
`does not meet the requirements of a DME supply. Therefore, the DME allowed
`
`amountis not applicable in this case. Exhibit 13
`
`Furthermore, per the DME Manual referenced above in paragraphs #26,
`
`HCPCS LevelIl code A4556is not a valid code for DME MAC.
`
`27.
`
`The Manual also provides direction as to the appropriate method of submitting
`
`claims for DME supplies as seen below.
`
`beneficiary-owned
`and accessories used with
`supplies
`“For
`equipment (equipmentthat is owned by the beneficiary, but was not paid for
`by the DME MAC/fee-for-service Medicare), all of the following information
`must be submitted with the initial claim in Item 19 on the CMS-1500 claim
`form or in the NTE segmentfor electronic claims:
`
`* HCPCScodeof base equipment
`
`¢ A notation that this equipment is beneficiary-owned
`
`* Date the patient obtained the equipment
`
`Claims for supplies and accessories mustinclude all three pieces of
`information listed above. Claims lacking any one of the above elementswill
`be denied for missing information. Medicare requires that supplies and
`accessories only be provided for equipment that meets the existing coverage
`criteria for the base item.
`In addition,
`if the supply or accessory has
`additional, separate criteria, these must also be met.
`In the event of a
`documentation request from the DME MACor a redetermination request,
`you should provide information justifying the medical necessity for the base
`item and the supplies and/or accessories. Refer to the applicable Local
`Coverage Determination(s) and related Policy Article(s) for information on
`
`14
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`the relevant coverage, documentation, and coding requirements at
`http:/Awww.cgsmedicare.com/jc/coverage/LCDinfo. html.”
`Please see
`Exhibit 11
`
`28.
`
`As directed in the above guideline, a review of the CMS Local Coverage Decision
`
`for
`
`(LCD)
`
`for Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulators (TENS)
`
`(L5031)
`
`guidelines, effective for services performed on or after 10/31/14 was performed.
`
`The LCD provides specifics as to the coverage, documentation and coding
`
`guidelines for supplies associated with the use of a DME TENS unit used at home.
`
`Per the LCD,
`
`“Supplies
`
`Separate allowance will be made for replacement supplies when
`they are reasonable and necessary and are used with a covered TENS.
`Usual maximum utilization is:
`
`2 TENS leads - a maximum of one unit of A4595 per month
`4 TENS leads - a maximum of two units of A4595 per month.
`
`If the use of the TENSunit is less than daily, the frequencyofbilling
`for the TENS supply code should be reduced proportionally.
`
`Replacementof lead wires (A4557) more often than every 12 months
`would rarely be reasonable and necessary.
`
`...Reimbursement for supplies is contingent upon use with a
`covered TENS unit. Claims for TENS supplies provided whenthere is
`no covered TENS unit will be denied as not reasonable and necessary.
`
`Effective for claims with dates of service on or after June 8, 2012
`supplies provided for use with a previously covered TENS unit used for
`CLBP (not as part of an approved study) are not eligible for reimbursement.
`These supply claims will be denied as not reasonable and necessary.”
`Exhibit 14
`
`
`
`
`
`Again, there is no documentation to support that the patient had a DME —
`
`TENS unit at home and that electrode supplies were needed for DME use. The
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
`provision of the electrodesin this case does not meet the requirements of a DME
`
`supply.
`
`29.
`
`In addition,
`
`review of the LCD’s Article for Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve
`
`Stimulators (TENS)- Policy Article - Effective October 2014 (A37064) states,-
`
`“A TENS supply allowance (A4595) includes electrodes (any type),
`conductive paste or gel (if needed, depending onthe type of electrode), tape
`or other adhesive (if needed, depending on the type of electrode), adhesive
`remover, skin preparation materials, batteries (9 volt or AA, single use or
`rechargeable), and a battery charger(if rechargeable batteries are used).
`
`Codes A4556 (Electrodes, [e.g., apnea monitor], per pair), A4558
`(Conductive paste or gel), and A4630 (Replacement batteries, medically
`necessary TENS ownedby patient) are not valid for claim submission to
`the DME MAC. A4595 should be usedinstead.
`
`For code A4557, one unit of service is for lead wires going to two
`electrodes. If all the lead wires of a 4 lead TENS unit needed to be
`replaced, billing would be for two units of service.
`
`There should benobilling and there will be no separate
`allowancefor replacement electrodes (A4556), conductive paste orgel
`(A4558), replacementbatteries (A4630), or a battery charger used with a
`TENS unit.” Exhibit 15
`
`Again, although the review of the DME fee schedule shows an allowed
`
`amount for HCPCS LEVEL II code A4556 as a DME supply, the provision of the
`
`electrodes in this case does not meet
`
`the requirements of a DME supply.
`
`Therefore, the DME allowed amountis not applicable in this case.
`
`Furthermore, per the DME Manual referenced in the paragraphs above,
`
`HCPCS Level Il code A4556is not a valid code for DME MAC.
`
`30.
`
`Lastly, the 2015 DME MACJurisdiction List for DMEPOS HCPCS Codestates for
`
`HCPCScode A4555 — A4558 Electrodes; Lead Wires; Conductive Paste, shows,
`
`16
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`“Local Carrier if incident to a physician’s service (not separately
`payable).
`If other DME MAC’Exhibit 16
`
`The electrode supplies were furnished as an integral part of the physician's
`
`course of treatment, the electrical stimulation services, performed in the physician's
`
`office. Therefore, they are incidentalto the services and are not separately payable.
`
`31.
`
`As previously mentioned, review of the Initial Evaluation notes dated 5/11/15 shows
`
`that there is no documentation to indicate that the patient purchased a take-home
`
`TENS unit and electrodes were given to the patient as take-home and/or
`
`replacement supplies for the TENS unit that has been purchased. Rather, the
`
`electrodes were issued specifically for use with the electrical stimulation services
`
`performedin the office during the same encounter.
`
`Electrodes are a necessary component in the delivery of the electrical
`
`stimulation services submitted as HCPCS Level Il Code G0283.
`
`In this case, the
`
`electrodes were furnished as an integral part of the physician's course of treatment,
`
`the electrical stimulation services, performed in the physician's office. Therefore,
`
`the electrodes supply would not be billed separately. The payment for the
`
`electrodes supply is already included within the payment of the Electrical
`
`Stimulation procedure, HCPCSLevelIl code G0283.
`
`As noted abovein paragraph #13,
`
`“If “incident to” a physician’s service, do notbill.” Please see
`Exhibit 4
`
`Again, the paymentof the electrical stimulation therapy represented in this
`
`case as HCPCSLevelII code G0283, already reflects and includes the cost of the
`
`17
`
`

`

`
`
`electrodes used when performing the service. Therefore, separately billing for
`
`electrodes used when performing the electrical stimulation service would be
`
`considered unbundling resulting in duplicate payment.
`
`32.
`
`As referenced above in paragraph #8, one of the potential risk areas affecting
`
`physician practices under Coding and Billing is Unbundling. The OIG further
`
`defines Unbundling as,
`
`“,..the practice of a physician billing for multiple components of a
`service that must be includedin a single fee...”
`
`The payment for the electrodes is included within the payment of the
`
`electrical stimulation service, submitted as HCPCS Code G0283, performed during
`
`each encounter. Again, separate billing for the electrodes used during the
`
`performance of the electrical stimulation service would be considered unbundling
`
`resulting in duplicate payment.
`
`33.
`
`Based on the guidelines and documentation received,
`
`the provider was not
`
`compliant with the coding and billing guidelines when submitting HCPCS LevelI!
`
`code A4556for disposable/re-usable electrodes for 5/11/15 date of service.
`
`There is no documentation to indicate that the patient purchased a take-
`
`home TENSunit and electrodes were given to the patient as take-home and/or
`
`replacement supplies for the TENS unit that has been purchased. Rather, the
`
`electrodes were issued specifically for use with the electrical stimulation service
`
`performedin the office during the same encounter.
`
`Electrodes are a necessary componentin the delivery of the electrical
`
`stimulation services submitted as HCPCSLevelII Code G0283. The electrodesin
`
`18
`
`

`

`
`
`this case, were furnished as an integral part of the physician's course of treatment,
`
`the electrical stimulation services, performed in the physician's office. Therefore,
`
`the electrodes supply would not be billed separately.
`
`Electrodes provided for sanitary reasons does not negate the fact that they
`
`are still a necessary componentto the electrical stimulation procedure performed
`
`during the encounter. For example, manyphysician practices use various supplies
`
`for sanitary reasons suchasthe use of thermometercovers on thermometer probes
`
`when taking patients temperature, new syringes used for injections,
`
`individual
`
`specimen cups,disposable paper c

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket