throbber
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY,
`
`FLORIDA
`
`KENSON HENRY
`
`CASE NO: 50-2024DR-002411oof.
`Div. F2
`
`PETITIONER/FATHER
`
`Vs.
`
`JOSETTE PREMILUS
`
`RESPONDENT/MOTHER
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`RESPONDENT’S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`Comesnow,respondentJosette Premilus, the mother of the minor child Kendley Josenardo
`Kenderlson Henry Premilus files this answer on this lawsuit received from the father. As the
`mother of the child, respondent made the following.allegations. 1) The father is an abandon
`father and he abandonedthe child since the child‘wasNiving in Chile. 2) The father FAILED to
`pay anychild support for many months while he wasliving in child. The Court in Chile granted
`the mother full custody of the child and the father deem as an unfit father. 3) The child cannot
`live well becausehe is afraid and crying/‘whenever he seeshis father. The Court in Chile already
`made a decision on this case and the father lost rights of visitation because he placed the
`mother’s life in danger in Chile. Moreover, the father failed to even exercise his visitation rights
`when the court granted him the opportunity. The evidenceis clear and the father is not a good
`father and does not care about the‘child. The court in Chile made the right decision and that
`decision is in the best interest of the child. The Governmentor the state has to look for the best
`interest of the childeand the best interest of the child is that mother hasfull custody.It is
`evident, the child isnot love by his father because as the father there are certain obligations
`you should have toward your children. First you should love your child, second you should
`provide for your child, third, you should help your child with safety and you should be part of
`the childseducation. However, the father neglected all these requirements and did not provide
`any support for the child. Therefore, the mother Josette Premilus, asked the Court from Chile
`the right to travel with the child and that request was granted. The mother as a concern parent
`had to do whatwasthe right thing for her child safety. The father is a person of bad moral
`character and someone who doesnot care aboutthe right of human beings. Granted the father
`any visitation rights will place the child in harm’s way and the Court from Chile already seen the
`evidence and made the decision. The father is an unfit father and the Court made the right
`decision to protect the child. The evidence from from the Chile’s Court is enclosed and
`overwhelming.
`
`FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK 04/10/2024 09:10:37 AM
`FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK04/10/2024 09:10:37 AM
`
`

`

`<=
`
`im
`
`
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`REPUBLIC OF CHILE
`
`Atthe serviceofall peopte
`
`|.-That, the protective request filed by the parent in favor of the child Kendley Josenardo Kenderison Henry
`Premilus, RUN 25.458.401-0,is rejected becausehis rights have not been seriously violated in accordance with what has
`been consideredin this hearingtrial and this ruting.
`
`\l.-Any type of precautionary measureordiligence decreedin favor of the child on the océasionof this case is void.
`
`Il!.-The conservatorship is relieved of continuing to represent the child based on what has already been resolved
`
`\v.-It is suggested that the parent join a program to be able to enhancehis or her parenting skills, solely as a
`guideline to be able to carry out a communication regime of direct and regular nutritionabrelationship with his or her child,
`taking into accountthatit is already regutated by the child. San Miguel FamiiyCourtiin case C-687-2020, a communication
`regime.
`
`V.-The child Kendley Josenardo Kenderlson Henry Premilus, RUN)25.458-401-0, is kept in the PASMI program of
`Cesfam Raul Branes, the motheris guided to keep him in said program.
`
`The parties are informedthat with the entry into force ofLaw 2. 886, which establishes the digital processing of
`judicial procedures, ALL their requests can be made directlyifronmthe Virtual Judicial Office, which is accessed from the
`portaldefjudicial power www.poderjudicial.cl, making use of the Unique Code that mustbe obtainedfrom the Civil Registry
`Service, and more information can be obtained at www.tramitacionelectronica.cl.
`The parties are personally notified, to be present at‘the hearing, in accordance with the provisions of article 23 of
`Law 19,968.
`Notify the requested person by email.
`THE HEARING RESOLVED AND‘CONDUCTED BY DONA ELIANA GARAY HERRERA, PRIMARY JUDGE OF THE
`FAMILY COURT OF SAN BERNARDO, WHO/’INDIVIDUALIZES HERSELF THROUGH AN ADVANCED ELECTRONIC
`SIGNATURE.
`
`NOTEA:This record only constitutes'’a@ summary of what was done and resolvedat the hearing. The arguments presented
`by the parties and the basis for the resolution are found entirely in the audio record.
`
`"In compliance-with thepprovisions of the fourth paragraph of article 60 bis of Law 19,968 and prior to the
`beginning of this hearing, the identity of the appearing parties identified in the preceding record wasverified,
`and they exhibited.their identity cards.”
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`| have certified that | am competent
`Spanish/English translator.
`This document has been truthfully.
`translated from
`riginal version and done
`
`ledge and myabilities.
`
` Translator
`
`
`"Bonded through National Notary Assn.
`
`JEANTIVE CHARLES
`7
`*; Notary Public - State of Florida
`SF
`Commission # HH 087840
`My Comm.Expires Feb 9, 2025
`
`OF
`
`AS
`
`

`

`At the serviceofall people
`
`
`
`RECORDOFHEARINGOFPROTECTIONMEASURETRIAL:DICTIONINGOF
`SENTENCE
`Octobersix, two thousand twenty-two
`20-2-1791536-9
`P-71-2021
`ELIANA GARAY HERRERA
`TERESA TORREALBA RIQUELME
`FRANCOFRITIZ VILLAGRA
`09:05
`09:29
`2021791536-9-1310/ TEAM ROOM 1
`KENDLEY JOSENARDO KENDERLSON HENRYPREMILUS, RUN
`25.458.40100. (29/07/2016)
`GLORIA VALESKA FUENZALIDA GALLARDO
`KENSON HENRY PREMELUS, RUN25.288.879-9, REGISTERED AT
`AVENIDA AMERICO VESPUCIO NO 3568, CITY OF ESPEJO, PHONE
`99279147, KendykensO2@hotmail.com
`HUGO ANDRES NAVARRO MORENO
`JOSETTE PREMILUS,/RUN 25.342.266-1, DOMICILIED IN EERNESTO
`RIQUELMEN 1051, APT 7, CITY OF SAN BERNARDO, PHONE
`996860452, Jesettepremiluss5O@gmail.com
`si
`NO
`ORD
`x
`1
`xX
`2
`xX
`3
`X
`4
`X
`5
`Xx
`6
`x
`7
`
`LAWYER AND ATTORNEY (Via Zoom)
`REQUIRED PARTY (Mother) Does Not Appear
`
`ACTIONS CARRIED OUT
`WHETHERIT HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT OR NOT
`INDIVIDUALIZATION OF PARTS
`AD-LITEM CURATOR STATEMENT
`INCORPORATE OPD REPORT
`TECHNICAL ADVISOR OPINION
`AD-LITEM CURATOR OPINION
`DICTIONING OF SENTENCE
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`pa
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`REPUBLIC OF CHILE
`
`DATE
`R.U.C.
`RIT
`IN-PRESENT MAGISTRATEin Court
`TECHNICAL ADVISOR(Via Zoom)
`MINUTES MANAGER(Via Zoom)
`START TIME
`END TIME
`N AUDIO/ROOM RECORD
`CHILD AND/OR ADOLESCENT
`
`AD LITEM CURATOR (Via Zoom)
`requesting party In-person in Court
`
`San Bernardo, October 6, two thousand twenty-two.
`It is noted that in response toithe National Health contingency caused by COVID 19,in order to guaranteethe right
`to defense of the parties and ensure ad@quate administration of justice, this hearing was carried out through video
`conference,with participants having participated in this wayall the interveners.
`(.- INCORPORATES OPD REPORT: Technical advisor of the Court incorporates report issued by the San Bernardo
`
`OPD.
`
`1V.-DICTIONINGOFSENTENCE:
`San Berriafdo, October6, two thousand twenty-two
`Taking into account the provisions established in article 62 of Minute 71-2016 "Agreed order that regulates the
`operation oftcourts that process electronically" issued by Excma. Supreme Court on June 16, 2016, precedesthe delivery
`of an oralisenténce ordering the extraction of only its operative part, without prejudice, which appears in full form in the
`audio record
`
`And in accordancewith the relevant legal regulations, Family Court Law andinternational convention on the rights
`of the child, BE IT RESOLVED:
`
`| have certified that | am competent
`Spanish/English transiator.
`This document has beentruthfully.
`translated from the
`nal version and done
`
`edge and myabilities.
`
`
`“Bonded through National Notary Assn.
`
`JEANTIVE CHARLES
`4: Notary Public - State of Florida
`S?
`Commission # HH 087840
`we) My Comm. Expires Feb 9, 2025
`
`

`

`Hi
`PODER JUDICIALyodet
`ACT
`
`D
`
`DA
`OD
`SENTENCIA
`
`: DICTACION
`
`-EECHAcones uets... |Seisdeoctubree.deldos milveintidés
`“Bir
`“paZ0n
`a neene|
`"MAGISTRADOPresencialenTribunal.| ELIANAerrHERRERA —‘“‘C;C;C~;S
`|CONSEJEROTECNICO(ViaZoom)~1TERESATORKEALEARIQUELME
`
`_ENCARGADODEACTA(ViaZoom) = FRANCOFRITIZVILLAGRA=it
`-HORADEINICIO =
`=—— (a is «9105 a
`“HORADETERMIN"gg
`N°REGISTRODE AUDIO/SALA |:2021791536-9-1310/EQUIPOSALA |
`_NINO YiO ADOLESCENTE
`'KENDLEY
`JOSENARDO
`KENDERLSON|
`
`! RUN\25.458.401-0.|‘HENRY PREMILUS,
`
`
`| (29/07/2016)
`“CURADORA AD-LITEM(ViaZoom)_ GLORIAVALESKAFUENZALIDAGALLARDO.|
`' PARTE REQUIRENTE Presencialen ‘KENSON
`HENRY,
`"RUN
` 25.288.879-9,|
`: Tribunal.
`| DOMICILIADO.(
`EN,
`AVENIDA
`AMERICO |
`|
`- VESPUCIO N°3568, COMUNA DE LO ESPEJO,
`|
`: FONO99279147.kendykensO2@hotmail.com.
`:ABOGADAY APODERADO(ViaZoom),HUGOANDRESNAVARRO MORENO.
`“JOSETTE “PREMILUS,
`RUN 25.342.266-1,|
`PARTE REQUERIDA(Madre) No
`Comparece.
`‘DOMICILIADA
`EN
`ERNESTO
`RIQUELME|
`UN?1051,7 DPTO 17,
`COMUNA DE
`SAN|
`( BERNARDO,
`FONO
`996860452.
`)_losetiepremilusso@amallcocom netity veeceeae
`;
`"ACTUAGIONESEFECTUADAS:_
`ne.
`‘Si NOORD|
`|(HECHO.DE HABERSE EFECTUADO, ONO)—
`_e___INDIVIDUALIZACIONPARTES
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`- ~DECLARACION CURADORAAD-Litem”boonennn cen meh cfs mnmanebageemrmnn
`
`(0 DECLARACIONAPODERADOREQUIRENTEXB
`(2_INCORPORAINFORMEOPD ssGK
`leOPINIONCONSEJERATECNICA
`xX 5
`beOPINIGN'CURADORAAD-LITEM
`['e_DICTAGION)DESENTENCIA
`nea
`San Bernardo,seis de octubre de dos mil veintidés.
`Sedeja constancia que atendida la contingencia de Salud Nacional originada por el
`COVID™9,a fin de garantizar el derecho a defensa de las partes y propender a una adecuada
`administracién de justicia esta audiencia fue llevada a cabo a traves de video conferencia,
`habiendo participado detal forma todos los intervinientes.
`I- INCORPORA INFORME OPD: Consejera técnica de! Tribunal
`evacuado por la OPD San Bernardo.
`IV.- DICTACION DE SENTENCIA:
`San Bernardo, seis de octubre del afio dos mil veintidos.
`Teniendo presente las disposiciones establecidas en al articulo 62 del Acta 71-2016
`“Auto acordado que regula el funcionamiento de tribunales que tramitan electronicamente”
`dictado por Excma. Corte Suprema con fecha 16 de junio de 2016, se procede a dictar
`
`
`
` 2 : iva. sin periuicio, de que consta en
`
`incorpora informe
`
`

`

`
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`REPUBLIC OF CHILE
`
`At the serviceof all people
`
`|.-That, the protective request fited by the parent in favor of the child Kendley Josenardo Kenderlson Henry
`Premilus, RUN 25.458.401-0, is rejected becausehis rights have not been seriously violated in accordance with what has
`been consideredin this hearingtrial and this ruling.
`
`tL.-Any type of precautionary measureor diligence decreedin favor of the chitd on the occasion of this caseis void.
`
`li!.-The conservatorship is relieved of continuing to represent the child based on what has already been resolved
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`lV.-It is suggested that the parent join a program to be able to enhance his or her parenting skiils, solely as a
`guideline to be able to carry out a communication regime of direct and regular nutritional relationship with his or her child,
`taking into accountthatit is already regulated by the child. San Miguel Family Court in case C-687-2020, a communication
`regime.
`
`V.-The child Kendiey Josenardo Kenderltson Henry Premilus, RUN 28.458.401-0, is kept in the PASMI program of
`Cesfam Raul Branes, the motheris guided to keep him in said program.
`
`The parties are informed that with the entry into force of'Law 2 886, which establishes the digital processing of
`judicial procedures, ALL their requests can be made directly from the Virtual Judicial Office, which is accessed from the
`portal defjudicial power www. poderjudicial.cl, making use of the Unique Code that mustbe obtainedfrom the Civil Registry
`Service, and more information can be obtained at www.tramitacionelectronica.cl.
`The parties are personally notified, to bepresent atthe hearing, in accordance with the provisions ofarticle 23 of
`Law 19,968.
`Notify the requested person by email,
`THE HEARING RESOLVED AND CONDUCTED BY DONA ELIANA GARAY HERRERA, PRIMARY JUDGE OF THE
`FAMILY COURT OF SAN BERNARDO, WHO”INDIVIDUALIZES HERSELF THROUGH AN ADVANCED ELECTRONIC
`SIGNATURE.
`
`NOTEA: This record only constitutes.a summary of what was done and resolved at the hearing. The arguments presented
`by the parties and the basis for the resolution are found entirely in the audio record.
`
`"In compliance_with the provisions of the fourth paragraph of article 60 bis of Law 19,968 and prior to the
`beginning of this hearing, the identity of the appearing parties identified in the preceding record wasverified,
`and they exhibited their identity cards.”
`
`thave certified that | am competent
`Spanish/English translator,
`This document has beentruthfully.
`
`translated from the origina)
`version and done
`to the best of,
`edge and myabilities.
`
`
`
`
`(es NotaryPublic-StateofFlorida
`__JEANTIVE CHARLES
` Translator
`
`
`735:
`Commission # HH 087840
`a
`§ e My Comm. Expires Feb 9, 2025
`
`
`“nutssnded through National Notary Assn.
`
` mige,
`
`

`

`tr)
`
`PODER JUDICIAL
`
`I.- Que, se rechaza el requerimiento proteccional interpuesto por el progenitor en favor
`del nifio Kendley Josenardo Kenderlson Henry Premilus, RUN 25.458.401-0, por no
`encontrarse gravemente vulnerado en sus derechos de conformidad con lo que se ha
`ponderado enesta audiencia de juicio y el presentefallo.
`
`li.- Se deja sin efecto cualquier tipo de medida cautelar o diligencia decretada en favor
`del nifio con ocasién de esta causa.
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`lli.- Se releva la curaduria de seguir representando al nifio en razén délo ya résuelto.
`
`IV.- Se sugiere al progenitor incorporarse en un programa para poder potenciar sus
`habilidades parentales, unicamente a modo de orientacion pafa poder llevar a cabo un
`régimen comunicacional de relacion directa y regular nutricio con Su,hijo en atencién a que ya
`Se encuentra regulado por el Juzgado de Familia de SandVliguel en la causa C-687-2020, un
`régimen comunicacional.
`
`V.- Se mantiene al nifio Kendley Josénardo Kenderlson Henry Premilus, RUN
`25.458.401-0, en el programa PASMI de! Cesfam*Ratil Brafes, se orienta a la madre a fin que
`lo mantenga en dicho programa.
`
`Se hace presente a las partés, que con la entrada en vigencia de la Ley 20.886 que
`establece fa tramitacién digitak de.
`loS procedimientos judiciales. TODAS sus solicitudes
`pueden ser efectuadas diréctamenté desde la Oficina Judicial Virtual, a ia que se accede
`desde el portal del poderjudicial www.poderjudicial.cl, haciendo uso de la Clave Unica que
`debe obtener en el
`\Semicio de Registro Civil, pudiendo obtener mayor informacion en
`www. tramitacionelectronica.cl.
`
`Las partes quedan personalmente notificadas, por encontrarse presente en la
`audiencia, atendido lo dispuesto en el articulo 23 de la Ley 19.968.
`
`Notifiquese a la requerida mediante correo electronico.
`RESOLVIO Y DIRIGIO LA AUDIENCIA DONA ELIANA GARAY HERRERA, JUEZ
`
`TITULAR DEL JUZGADO DE FAMILIA DE SAN BERNARDO, QUIEN SEINDIVIDUALIZA
`
`MEDIANTE FIRMA ELECTRONICA AVANZADA.
`
`NOTA: La presente acta solo constituye una relacién resumida de lo obrado y resuelto en
`audiencia. Los argumentos vertidos por las partes y la fundamentacidn de la resolucién se
`
`encuentran integramente en el registro de audio.
`
`“Dando cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el inciso cuarto del articulo 60 bis de la Ley 19.968 y previo al
`
`inicio de la presente audiencia, fue constatada la identidad de los comparecientes individualizados en el
`
`acta precedente, exhibiendo éstos su cédula de identidad’.
`
`

`

`am
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`REPUBLIC OF CHILE
`At the service of all people
`
`
`
`RECORDOFHEARINGOFPROTECTIONMEASURETRIAL:DICTIONINGOF
`SENTENCE
`Octobersix, two thousand twenty-two
`20-2-1791536-9
`P-71-2021
`ELIANA GARAY HERRERA
`TERESA TORREALBA RIQUELME
`FRANCO FRITIZ VILLAGRA
`03:05
`09:29
`2021791536-9-1310/ TEAM ROOM 1
`KENDLEY JOSENARDO KENDERLSON HENRY PREMILUS, RUN
`25.458.40100. (29/07/2016)
`GLORIA VALESKA FUENZALIDA GALLARDO
`KENSON HENRYPREMELUS, RUN'25!288.879-9, REGISTERED AT
`AVENIDA AMERICO VESPUCIQ\NO 3568, CITY OF ESPEJO, PHONE
`99279147. KendykensO2@hotmail.com
`HUGO ANDRES NAVARRO MORENO
`JOSETTE PREMILUS; RUN)25.342.266-1, DOMICILIED IN EERNESTO
`RIQUELME.N 1051, APT 17, CITY OF SAN BERNARDO, PHONE
`996860452 lesettenremilus5O@gmail.com
`SI
`NO
`ORD
`x
`41
`x
`2
`x
`3
`x
`4
`xX
`5
`x
`6
`x
`7
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`DATE
`R.U.C.
`RIT
`IN-PRESENT MAGISTRATEin Court
`TECHNICAL ADVISOR (Via Zoom)
`MINUTES MANAGER(Via Zoom)
`START TIME
`END TIME
`N AUDIO/ROOM RECORD
`CHILD AND/OR ADOLESCENT
`
`AD LITEM CURATOR (Via Zoom)
`requesting party In-person in Court
`
`LAWYER AND ATTORNEY (Via Zoom)
`REQUIRED PARTY (Mother) Does Not Appear
`
`ACTIONS CARRIED OUT
`WHETHERIT HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT OR NOT
`INDIVIDUALIZATION OF PARTS
`AD-LITEM CURATOR STATEMENT
`INCORPORATE OPD REPORT
`TECHNICAL ADVISOR OPINION
`AD-LITEM CURATOR OPINION
`DICTIONING OF SENTENCE
`
`San Bernardo, October 6, two thousand twenty-two.
`It is noted that in responseto the National Health contingency caused by COVID 19,in order to guaranteethe right
`to defense of the parties and_ensure adequate administration of justice, this hearing was carried out through video
`conference,with participants havingyparticipated in this way all the interveners.
`1.- INCORPORATES OPD REPORT:Technical advisor of the Court incorporates report issued by the San Bernardo
`
`OPD.
`1V.-DICTIONINGOFSENTENCE:
`San Bernardo) October6, two thousand twenty-two
`Takingjinto account the provisions establishedin article 62 of Minute 71-2016 "Agreed order that regulates the
`operation of courts'that processelectronically" issued by Excma. Supreme Court on June 16, 2016, precedesthe delivery
`of an oral.senteénce ordering the extraction of only its operative part, without prejudice, which appearsin full form in the
`audio record
`
`And in accordancewith the relevant legal regulations, Family Court Law and international convention on the rights
`of the child, BE IT RESOLVED:
`
`| have certified that | am competent
`Spanish/English translator.
`This document has beentruthfully.
`translated
`
`to the best
`
`
`Translator
`
`"Bonded through NationalNotary Assn.
`
`JEANTIVE CHARLES
`
`Boe ei Notary Public - State ofFlorida
`Commission # HH 087840
`33:
`Ag’
`Fore e My Comm,Expires Feb 9, 2025
`Pres
`
`ink
`
`

`

`<>
`
`oO
`PODER JUDICIAL
`
`ACTA DE AUDIENCIA DE JUICIO DE MEDIDA DE PROTECCION: DICTACION DE
`SENTENCIA
`
`" CURADORAAD-LITEM (Via Zoom)
`PARTE REQUIRENTE Presencialen
`Tribunal.
`
`Seis de octubre del dos mil veintidés
`FECHA
`20- 2-1791536-9.
`RUC
`P-71-2021
`RIT
`ELIANA GARAY HERRERA
`_MAGISTRADOPresencial en Tribunal.
`TERESA TORREALBARIQUELME |
` CONSEJERO TECNICO(Via Zoom)
`FRANCO FRITIZ VILLAGRA
`ENCARGADODEACTA(Via Zoom)
`09:05
`‘ HORA DEINICIO
`|
`09:29
`HORA DE TERMINO
`-2021791536-9-1310 / EQUIPO SALA!
`_N° REGISTRO DE AUDIO / SALA
`KENDLEY
`JOSENARDO
`“\KENDERLSON
`_ NINO Y/O ADOLESCENTE
`
`HENRY PREMILUS,.RUN|25.458.401-0.
`(29/07/2016)
`GLORIA VALESKA FUENZALIDA GALLARDO.
`KENSON
`HENRY.
`“RUN
` 25.288.879-9,
`DOMICILIADO<
`EN)
`AVENIDA
`AMERICO
`VESPUCIO N°3568, COMUNA DE LO ESPEJO,
`FONO 99279147.\kendykensO2@hotmail.com.
`-ABOGADA Y APODERADO(Via Zoom) HUGO.ANDRES’‘NAVARRO MORENO.
`PARTE REQUERIDA (Madre) No
`JOSETTE
`“PREMILUS,
`RUN 25.342.266-1,
`' Comparece.
`D@MICILIADA
`EN
`ERNESTO RIQUELME
`N°1051,7> DPTO COMUNA DE_SAN17,
`
`
`BERNARDO,
`FONO
`996860452.
`josettepremilussO@gmail.com
`SI
`
`NO
`
`ORD
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`“ ACTUACIONES EFECTUADAS:
`_(HECHO DE HABERSE EFECTUADO ©NO)
`e
`INDIVIDUALIZACION-PARTES
`*
`DECLARACION CURADORA AD-LITEM
`*
`DECLARACION APODERADO REQUIRENTE
`INCORPORA INFORME OPD
`OPINION CONSEJERA TECNICA
`e
`OPINION CURADORAAD-LITEM
`_¢
`DICTACION DE SENTENCIA
`*
`San Bernardo) seis de octubre de dos mil veintidés.
`Se“deja constancia que atendida la contingencia de Salud Nacional originada porel
`COVID 19,afin de garantizar el derecho a defensa delas partes y propender a una adecuada
`administracién de justicia esta audiencia fue llevada a cabo a través de video conferencia.
`habiendo participado de tal forma todoslos intervinientes.
`I.- INCORPORA INFORME OPD: Consejera técnica del Tribunal
`
`X
`xX.
`X
`X
`X
`x
`X
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`incorpora informe
`
`evacuadopor la OPD San Bernardo.
`
`IV.- DICTACION DE SENTENCIA:
`
`San Bernardo, seis de octubre del afio dos mil veintidos.
`Teniendo presente las disposiciones establecidas en el articulo 62 del Acta 71-2016
`“Auto acordado que regula el funcionamiento de tribunales que tramitan electrénicamente”
`dictado por Excma. Corte Suprema con fecha 16 de junio de 2016, se procede a dictar
`sentencia oral ordenandose extractar solo su parte resolutiva. sin perjuicio, de que consta en
`
`forma integra en el registro de audio:”
`
`

`

`First Family Court of San Miguel
`Alvarez de Toledo 1020, San Miguel, Tel: 227684500
`E-mail: jfsanmigue1@pjud,cl
`
`a)
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`REPUBLIC OF CHILE
`At the service ofall people
`
`First Family Court of San Miguel
`Alvarez de Toledo 1020, San Miguel, Tel: 227684500
`E-mail: jfsanmigue1@pijud.cl
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`REPUBLIC,OF CHILE
`At the serviceofall people
`
`Codeof Civil Procedure, this resolution and the request. Comply with the notification
`center.
`
`Notify the applicant and the guardian ad-Litem via email
`RIT P-27-2020
`Resolution issued by the Judge of the First Famity Court of
`San Miguel, which is identified in the image ofcthe electronic signature stampedin this
`resolution.
`
`Carolina Andrea Fuentes Garrido
`
`Juez
`PJUD
`
`Marchthirteenth, two thousand twenty-three
`14:23 UTC-C3
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`}have certified that ! am competent
`Spanish/English translator.
`This documenthasbeentruthfully.
`translated from theoriginal version and done
`
`to theb fmyKnowledge and myabilities.
`
` Translgtor
`
`
`
`
`wae3 Ye,
`
`JEANTIVE CHARLES, sda
`
`3 Rie Commission#HH087840
`S26; Notary Public - State of
`Flo
`ae "My Comm.Expires Feb 9, 2025
`"Bonded through National Notary Assn.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Primer Juzgado de Familia de San Miguel
`alvarez de Toledo 1020, San Miguel, Tel: 227684500.
`
`emait:
`
`st
`
`Primer Jus;
`de Familia de San Miguel
`Alvarez de as 1090, San Miguel.
`Tel 22 788 45 ch
`Mail: s
`.
`i a ud.c:
`
`PODER juDI Cc TAL
`j
`.
`i a
`a on
`cw tbe
`AY servicin Sh todty lay personas
`
`Oo
`:
`os
`PODER I DICIAL
`L
`ate api Hee Ted te
`
`Cédigo de Procedimiento Civil, de la presente resolucién y del requerimiento.
`Ciimplase por fa central de notificaciones
`
`Notifiquese a la requirente y al curadar ad-Litem via correo electronico
`RIT P- 27-2020
`
`Resolucién dictada peor el Juez o la Jueza del Primer Juzgado de Familia de
`
`San Miguel, que se individualiza en la imagen de firma electronica estampada eri
`
`la presente resolucién.
`
`
`:i;
`4
`
`i
`‘
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`
`
`
`
`Carolina Andrea Fuentes Garrido
`Juez
`
`PJUD
`Trece de marzo de dos mil veintitrés
`
`1 14:23 UTC-3
`
`
`
`
`‘ratermanrtinsiprenenctmcemanerarisintnieseenntsabbrmn baccarat |
`
`

`

`First FamilyCourt ofSan Miguel
`
`AlvarezdeToledo1020,SanMj ‘Tel:227684500
`
`
`IVDICIALPOWER
`
`alHannitululeRPALIALIAOFQHILE
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`First Family Court of San Miguel
`Alvarez de Toledo 1020, San Miguel, Tel: 227684500
`E-mail: jfsanmigue1@pjud.ct
`
`At theserviceofall people
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`REPUBLIC OF CHILE
`At the service of all people
`
`San Miguel, January seven, two thousand twenty
`Itis considered that a case has beeninitiated regarding a MEASURE OF PROTECTIONin favorof the child KENDLEY
`JOSENARDO KENDERLSON HENRY PREMILUS, under the warning ofarticle 21 of Law 19,968.
`Schedule a preparatory hearing for February 14, 2020, at 1:00 p.m., to the requesting party JOSETTE PREMILUS
`and the requested Mr. KENSON HENRY, which willbe held in this First Family Court of San Miguel, located at 1020 Alvarez
`de Toledo Street, commune of San Miguel:
`Those mentioned must appear personally at this hearing so thatthey can point out whatis pertinent regarding the
`lawsuit filed, which will be held with the parties who attend, affecting the failure to comply with all the resolutions issued
`therein, without the need to subsequentNotification. In the event that the Court has the necessary means of conviction, it
`is noted that a sentence may betissued immediately.
`In accordancewith the provisions ofarticle 19 of taw No. 19,968, it is designated
`Ad Litem Conservatorof the child in the proceedings to the SENAME Attorney Mr. Jorge Saldana.
`Mayheservethis resolution as a sufficient and attentive sending document. Pleaselog in to the SITFA Centerin
`order to notifyyou ofthis resolution by email. Caution:
`As providediin article 71 letter | of Law 19,968, the following precautionary measureis provided:
`Theyprohibition on leaving the country for the child subject of the petition for protection KENDLEY JOSENARDO
`KENDERLSON'HENRY PREMILUS, RUN 25.458.4501-0, born on July 29, 2016, whose father is KENSON HENRY, RUN
`25.288.879-9 and mother donates JOSETTE PREMILUS, RUN 25.342.266-1, a measure thatwill remain in force until the date
`of the preparatory hearing decreed above.
`Please inform the Departmentof international Police Border Control, of the Chilean Investigation Police, in order
`to communicate the precautionary measure decreed onthis date.
`This resolution servesas a sufficient and attentive sending document. (Official Letter No. 84-2020)
`Notify the person requested personally or in accordancewith the provisions of
`Article 23, paragraph 2 of Law No. 19,968,in relation to Article No. 44.
`
`}have certified that | am competent
`Spanish/English translator.
`This document has been truthfully.
`translated from theoriginal version and done
`
`
`
`JEANTIVE CHARLES
`3
`
`
`J. sotary Public - State of Florida
`
`
`Yas:
`Commission # HH 087840 ;
`e My Comm. Expires Feb 9, 202
`
`
`Bonded through National Notary Assn.
`
`

`

`Primer Juzgado de Familia de San Miguel
`PODER JUDICIAL
`AWvarez de Toledo 1020, San Miguel, Tel: 227684500.
`
`“mail: ifsanmigueli@pjud.clTER URL LCR OF Omg
`te
`on
`tot
`AU geri lee ote tras lay persone,
`
`0
`as
`,
`>
`PODER JUDICIAL
`PET mba at as
`
`1
`Primer Juzgado de Familia de §
`Alvarez'de Toledo 1020, San Migue! nel 22 768 $8 G6
`Maul jEanmiguel Bord.ci
`San Miguel, siete de enero de dos mil veinte.
`Téngase poriniciada causa sobre MEDIDA DE PROTECCIONa favor del nifio
`KENDLEY JOSENARDO KENDERLSON HENRY PREMILUS, bajo apercibimiento del
`articulo 21 de la Ley 19.968.
`Citese a audiencia Preparatoria pare ef dia 14 de febrero de 2020, a las
`13:00 horas, a fa requirente JOSETTE PREMILUS y al
`requeridao don KENSON
`HENRY,
`la que se realizard en este Prine: Juzgado de Familia de San Miguel,
`ubicado en calle Alvarez de Toledo N° 1620, comuna de San Miguel.
`Los citados deberan comparecer personalmente a esta audiencia a fin de
`que sefialen fo pertinente en cuanto a fa demanda interpuesta, la cuale celebrara
`con las partes que asistan, afectandole a
`ta gue no concurra todas
`tas
`resoluciones que se dicten en ella, sin necesidad de ulteriot_notificadén. En ef
`evento que el Tribunal cuente con las medios de conviccion necesarios, se hace
`presente que se podra dictar sentencia inmediatamente,
`Conformeio dispuesto en eal articulo 19 de ta ley'N719.968, se designa
`Curador Ad Litem de} nifio de autosal Abogado de SENAME don Jorge Saidafia.
`Sirva la presente resolucién como suficiénte yatento oficio remisor. Ingrese
`al Centro al SITFA a fin de notificarle la presente reselucion por correo electrénico.
`Medidz
`4
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`Conforme fo dispone ef articuto 71 letra t de ta Ley 19.968, se dispone ta
`siguiente medida cautelar:
`
`nitio sujeto de la peticién de
`La prohibicidn de safir del paix para det
`proteccion
`KENDLEY -JOSENARDO
`KENDERLSON
`HENRY
`PREMILUS,
`RUN
`25.458.4501-0, nacido el 29) de julio de 2016, cuyo padre es KENSON HENRY,
`RUN 25.288.879-9 y madrestiotia JOSETTE PREMILUS, RUN 25.342.266-1, medida
`que se mantend¥apvigente hasta la fecha de la audiencia preparatoria decretada
`precedentemente;
`
`Oficiese al Departamento de Policia internacional Control Fronteras, de la
`Policia deUnvestigaciones de Chile, a tin Je comunicar
`la medida cautelar
`decretada con esta fecha.
`
`Sirva la presente resalucion de suficiente y atento oficio remisor. (Oficio N°
`84-2020)
`
`Notifiquese al requerido personalmente o de conformidad a fo dispuesto en
`
`el articuio 23,
`
`inciso 2° de la Ley N° 19 968, en relacion al articulo N° 44 del
`
`is
`ots
`BXNYNXXXSL
`
`

`

`First Family Court of San Miguel
`Alvarez de Toledo 1020, San Miguel, Tel: 227684500
`E-mail: jfsanmigue1@pjud.ct
`
`<>
`
`
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`REPUBLIC OF CHILE
`At the serviceof all people
`
`San Miguel, March thirteenth, two thousand twenty-three.
`On page 13:
`
`As requested, given the current status of the case, the measure decreed on
`January 7, 2020, consisting of the prohibition of leaving the country forthe child subject
`of the protection request, be annulled KENDLEY JOSENARDO KENDERLSON HENRY
`PREMILUS, RUN 25.458.4501-0, born on July 29, 2016, whosefather is KENSON HENRY,
`RUN 25.288.879-9 and mother JOSETTE PREMILUS, RUN 2 5:342.266-1.
`Communicate the resolution to the Department of Jnternational Police Border
`Control, of the Chilean Investigation Police.
`
`This resolution serves as a sufficient@ndattentive sending document.
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`Notify yourself by email
`statement.
`
`RIT P-27-2020
`
`if provided or, failing that, by the electronic daily
`
`Resolution issued by*the’ Judge of the First Family Court of San Miguel that is
`identified in the image Ofithe electronic signature stamped at the bottom of the page./dgg
`
`I have certified'that 1 am competent
`Spanish/English translator.
`This documenthas beentruthfully.
`4 7
`transtated from the original version and done
`JEANTIVE CHARLES
`wih.
`to the bes#
`pf
`nowledge and myabilities.
`f3/°SSe. Notary Public - State of Florida
`130 JS?=Commission # HH087840-HE
`
`
`“Shree My Comm. Expires
`Feb
`9,
`Translat
`
`“Bonded through National Notary Assn.
`
`

`

`Primer Juzgado de Familia de San Miguel
`Alvarez de Toledo 1020, San Miguel, Tel: 227684500.
`E-mail: jfsanmiguel4@pjud.cl
`
`PO DE R J uD I clAL
`wf
`aoe f
`:
`AE gervic she. todas {us personas
`
`San Miguel, trece de marzo de dos mil veintitrés.
`
`A folio 13:
`
`Como se pide, atendido e} estado actual de Ja causa, déjese sin efecto la
`
`medida decretada el 07 de enero de 2020, consistente en la prohibicién de salir
`
`del pais para del nifio sujeto de la peticidn de proteccidn KENDLEY JOSENARDO
`KENDERLSON HENRY PREMILUS, RUN 25.458.4501-0, nacido el 29 degulio de
`
`2016, cuyo padre es KENSON HENRY, RUN 25.288.879-9 y madre dona JOSETTE
`
`PREMILUS, RUN 25.342.266-1.
`
`Comuniquese lo resuelto al Departamento de Policia internacional Control
`Fronteras, de la Policia de Investigaciones de Chile.
`
`Sirva la presente resolucién de suficiente y aténto oficio remisor.
`
`Notifiquese por correo electrénico en caso\de haberse proporcionado o en
`su defecto por el estado diario electronico,
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`RIT P-27-2020
`
`Resolucién dictada por e\Juez Ola Jueza del Primer Juzgado de Familia de
`San Miguel que se individualizaven Ja imagen de firma electrénica estampada a pie
`de pagina./dgg
`
`

`

`ll-DILIGENCES
`-Ask theOPD SAN BERNARDOto send a descriptive report of violation of the rights of
`the child KENDLEY JOSENARDO KENDERLSON HENRY PREMILUS RUN 25.458.401-
`
`JUDICIAL POWER
`CHILE
`
`0, who resides with his mother JOSETTE PREMILUS, RUN 25.342.266-1 , at Ernesto
`Riquelme N° 1051, apartment 17, city of San Bernardo, phone 996860452,
`josettepremilusS5O@gmail.com, stating whether the child presents indicators of
`violation of rights and regarding the parenting skills of the parents, informing which of
`them presents better conditions for their care, authorizing coofdination with the
`child's educational and health establishment.
`
`- The Court is ordered that prior to the trial hearing, it must verify receipt of the
`report requested from the OPD SAN BERNARDO,otherwise, the present hearing
`must be rescheduled, and must exhort and notify the parties with due advance
`notice.
`
`- It is ordered to inform the Police of Investigations In.order to report on the entries
`and exits from the country of Mr. KENSON HENRY, RUN 25.288.879-9.
`The correspondingparties are notified atthe hearing. Notify Father KENSON HENRY,
`RUN 25.288.879-9, ADDRESSED AT AVENIDA AMERICO VESPUCIO N° 3568, CITY OF
`ESPEJO.
`
`DIRECTED AND RESOLVEDBY THE JUDGE OF. THE FAMILY COURT OF SAN BERNARDO WHICH IS
`
`INDIVIDUALIZED IN A DIGITAL<SIGNATURE STAMPED AT THE FOOT OF THE PRESENT
`
`RESOLUTION.
`
`NOTE: This record only coristitutes a summary of what was done and resolvedat the hearing. The
`arguments presented by the parties and the basis for the resolution are found entirely in the audio
`record.
`
`ranslat
`
`bay
`
`“““““Ronded through National Notary Assn.
`
`JEANTIVE CHARLES
`fyiPi,
`SS6RS6. Notary Public - State of Florida
`:
`P3 S?
`Commission # HH 087840
`*
`OF xa
`“So

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket