throbber
Case 1:14-cv-01153-SCJ Document 133 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
`ATLANTA DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01153-SCJ
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`MICROWAVE VISION, S.A.,
`MVG INDUSTRIES, SAS, and
`MVG, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ETS-LINDGREN INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`DEFENDANT ETS’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
`MEMORANDUM AND STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF
`NO ENHANCED DAMAGES
`Based on the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Halo Elecs., Inc. v.
`
`Pulse Elecs., Inc., 579 U.S. ___, 2016 WL 3221515, *7 (June 13, 2016) and the
`
`Court’s inherent authority to control this case’s schedule, Defendant ETS-Lindgren
`
`Inc. (“ETS”) seeks leave to file the attached Supplemental Memorandum in
`
`Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment of No Enhanced Damages
`
`(“Supplemental Brief”), along with the attached Supplemental Statement of
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01153-SCJ Document 133 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 5
`
`Undisputed Material Facts (“SUMF”) and accompanying supporting
`
`documentation.1
`
`On March 30, 2016, ETS moved for summary judgment of no enhanced
`
`damages. 2 On June 13, 2016, after the conclusion of briefing on ETS’s summary
`
`judgment motion, the Supreme Court entered its decision in Halo. As MVG noted
`
`in its “Notice of Very Recent Supreme Court Precedent Impacting Enhanced
`
`Damages” (Dkt. 132, hereinafter “Notice”), the Halo decision changes the standard
`
`for awarding enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`Given this intervening change in the applicable legal standard, supplemental
`
`briefing is warranted because it will allow ETS to apply the facts of this case to
`
`this new Supreme Court precedent and respond to the arguments in MVG’s Notice.
`
`Jones v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 12-cv-01887-SCJ, 2013 WL 11088186 (June
`
`28, 2013) (granting leave to file supplemental summary judgment briefing
`
`following an intervening decision by the Georgia Supreme Court). Accordingly,
`
`ETS requests leave to file the accompanying nine-page supplemental brief, along
`
`with an additional six statements of material fact.
`
`1 ETS’s proposed Supplemental Brief is attached as Exhibit A. ETS’s proposed
`Supplemental SUMF is attached as Exhibit B, and the evidence supporting the
`SUMF is attached as Exhibits C–E.
`2 ETS’s March 30, 2016 Motion also sought summary judgment of patent non-
`infringement and no lost profits damages. This Motion and the attached exhibits
`do not impact those two aspects of ETS’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01153-SCJ Document 133 Filed 06/24/16 Page 3 of 5
`
`Dated: June 24, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Douglas Robinson
`RUDOLPH A. TELSCHER, JR. Pro Hac Vice
`DOUGLAS A. ROBINSON, Pro Hac Vice
`JOEL R. SAMUELS, Pro Hac Vice
`HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.
`7700 Bonhomme Ave., Suite 400
`St. Louis, MO 63105
`Phone: (314) 726-7500
`Fax: (314) 726-7501
`rtelscher@hdp.com
`drobinson@hdp.com
`jsamuels@hdp.com
`
`CHRISTOPHER P. GALANEK
`Georgia Bar No. 282390
`JOHN C. BUSH
`Georgia Bar No. 413159
`BRYAN CAVE, LLP
`One Atlantic Center, 14th Floor
`1201 West Peachtree St., N.W.
`Atlanta, GA 30309-3488
`Phone: (404) 572-6600
`chris.galanek@bryancave.com
`john.bush@bryancave.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant ETS-Lindgren Inc.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01153-SCJ Document 133 Filed 06/24/16 Page 4 of 5
`
`L.R. 7.1D CERTIFICATION
`I hereby certify that the above document has been prepared with Times New
`
`Roman 14-point font, one of the font and point selections approved by the Court in
`
`L.R. 5.1(C).
`
`Dated: June 24, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Douglas A. Robinson
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01153-SCJ Document 133 Filed 06/24/16 Page 5 of 5
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`It is hereby certified that on June 24, 2016 I caused a copy of the foregoing
`
`
`
`document to be served on the following counsel of record via the Court’s
`
`electronic filing system:
`
`
`
`Dale Lischer, dlischer@sgrlaw.com
`Matthew P. Warenzak, mwarenzak@sgrlaw.com
`Smith, Gabrell & Russell, LLP
`Promenade, Suite 3100
`1230 Peachtree Street N.E.
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3592
`Telephone: (404) 815-3500
`
`Charles P. Kennedy, Pro Hac Vice
`CKennedy@lernerdavid.com
`Robert B. Hander, Pro Hac Vice
`RHander@lernerdavid.com
`Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP
`600 South Avenue West
`Westfield, NJ 07090
`Phone: (908) 654-5000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs Microwave Vision, S.A.,
`MVG Industries, SAS, and MVG, Inc.
`
`
`
`Dated: June 24, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Douglas Robinson
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket