throbber
Case: 1:16-cv-08637 Document #: 8048 Filed: 11/06/25 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #:694307
`
`United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
`
`Case Title: Plantiff(s)
`IN RE BROILER CHICKEN ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`VS.
`
`This Document Relates To: All Actions Defendant(s)
`
`Case Number: 1:16-cv-08637 Judge: Hon. Thomas M. Dunkirk
`
`i, Benjamin N. Levin hereby apply to the Court
`
`under Local Rule 83.14 for permission to appear and participate in the above-entitled action on behalf of
`
`Defendants George's Inc. and George's Farms, Inc. by whom I have been retained.
`
`[ am a member in good standing and eligible to practice before the following courts:
`
`Title of Court Date Admitted
`Supreme Court for the State of Missouri 9/28/2017
`United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri 10/24/2023
`
`[ have currently, or within the year preceding the date of this application, made pro hac vice applications to this
`Court in the following actions:
`
`Date of Application
`Case Number Case Title (Granted or Denied)*
`
`*1f denied, please explain:
`(Attach additional form if
`necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 1:16-cv-08637 Document #: 8048 Filed: 11/06/25 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #:694308
`
`Has the applicant ever been:
`
`censured, suspended, disbarred, or otherwise disciplined by any court? Yes No V
`e
`
`or is the applicant currently the subject of an investigation of the
`applicant’s professional conduct? Yes No ‘/
`
`transferred to inactive status, voluntarily withdrawn, or resigned from the
`
`bar of any court? Yes No ‘/
`denied admission to the bar of any court? Yes No ‘/
`held in contempt of court? Yes No ‘/
`
`NOTE: If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, please attach a brief description of the incident(s) and the applicant’s current
`status before any court, or any agency thereof, where disciplinary sanctions were imposed, or where an investigation or investigations
`of the applicant’s conduct may have been instituted.
`
`I have read the Rules of Professional Conduct for the Northern District of Illinois and the Standards for Professional Conduct within
`the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, and will faithfully adhere to them. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`correct.
`
`November 5, 2025 g, Benjamin N. Levin
`Date Electronic Signature of Applicant
`Last Name First Name Middle Name/Initial
`Applicant’s Name . L
`PP Levin Benjamin N.
`
`Applicant’s Law Firm Stinson LLP
`
`Street Address Room/Suite Number
`Applicant’s Address .
`ppricant's Address 7700 Forsyth Boulevard Suite 1100
`City State ZIP Code Work Phone Number and Email
`. ben.levin(@stinson.com
`St. Louis MO 63105 (816) 691-3399
`
`(The pro hac vice admission fee is $150.00 and shall be paid to the Clerk. No admission under Rule 83.14 is effective until such
`time as the fee has been paid.)
`
`NOTE: Attorneys seeking to appear pro hac vice may wish to consider filing a petition for admission to the general bar of this Court.
`The fee for admission to the General Bar is $181.00 The fee for pro hac vice admission is $150.00. Admission to the general bar permits
`an attorney to practice before this Court. Pro hac vice admission entitles an attorney to appear in a particular case only. Application for
`such admission must be made in each case; and the admission fee must be paid in each case.
`
`Rev. 08/16/2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket