throbber
Case: 1:20-cv-00512 Document #: 39 Filed: 04/17/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:183
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`DAVID MUTNICK, for himself and others
`similarly situated,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`CLEARVIEW AI, INC., et al.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 20 C 512
`
`Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman
`
`Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL FACTUAL INFORMATION IN
`SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
`
`Plaintiff David Mutnick, through his attorneys, respectfully notifies the Court that on April
`
`
`
`16, 2020, it was disclosed that Defendant Clearview AI, Inc. (“Clearview”) recently experienced
`
`another serious data security breach, providing further grounds for Plaintiff’s requested
`
`preliminary injunction (Dkt. 31-32). In his preliminary injunction motion, Plaintiff Mutnick
`
`predicted that “given Defendants’ lack of concern for data security and their new-found notoriety,
`
`it is extremely likely that Defendants will experience additional and more severe data breaches,
`
`further injuring those whose data they wrongfully acquired in the first place.” Dkt. 32 at 13. He
`
`was right.
`
`
`
`According to Tech Crunch – a top online source for breaking technology news – a
`
`cybersecurity expert recently revealed that Defendant Clearview had a “misconfigured server” that
`
`“exposed the company’s internal files, apps and source code for anyone on the internet to find.”
`
`Exhibit 1 at 1.1 As a result of the security breach, anyone could run Defendant Clearview’s
`
`
`1 Zack Whittaker, Security Lapse Exposed Clearview AI Source Code, Tech Crunch (Apr. 16, 2020),
`https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/16/clearview-source-code-lapse/ (last accessed on Apr. 16, 2020).
`1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00512 Document #: 39 Filed: 04/17/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:184
`
`application software and access its biometric database that contained the biometric identifiers and
`
`information of over 3 billion individuals, including Plaintiff and Class Members. See id. at 1-2.
`
`Moreover, the security breach revealed that Defendant Clearview’s server had 70,000 videos of a
`
`lobby in a residential building that showed residents entering and leaving the building. Id. at 3.
`
`
`
`Upon being confronted about the security breach, Defendant Hoan Ton-That conceded that
`
`Defendant Clearview “‘experienced a constant stream of cyber intrusion attempts . . . .’” Id. at 2.
`
`While Defendant Ton That contended that Defendant Clearview was investing in increased
`
`security, Tech Crunch reported that Defendants sought to conceal the security breach at issue by
`
`offering to pay the cybersecurity expert in return for a nondisclosure agreement. See id. at 2-3.
`
`
`
`Based on Defendant Ton-That’s above-described statement and Defendant Clearview’s
`
`attempt to conceal the security breach, it is clear that the biometric identifiers and information of
`
`Plaintiff and Class Members that Defendants unlawfully collected and possess are not safe or
`
`secure. Accordingly, the Court should grant Plaintiff the requested preliminary injunction which
`
`seeks, among other things, that the Court preclude Defendants from continuing to possess the
`
`biometric identifiers and information of Illinois residents without taking adequate and reasonable
`
`measures to ensure the security of the identifiers and information.
`
`Dated: April 17, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Scott R. Drury
`SCOTT R. DRURY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Arthur Loevy (arthur@loevy.com)
`Michael Kanovitz (mike@loevy.com)
`Jon Loevy (jon@loevy.com)
`Scott R. Drury (drury@loevy.com
`LOEVY & LOEVY
`311 N. Aberdeen, 3rd Floor
`Chicago, Illinois 60607
`312.243.5900
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-00512 Document #: 39 Filed: 04/17/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:185
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Scott R. Drury, an attorney, hereby certify that, on April 17, 2020, I filed the foregoing
`
`document using the Court’s CM/ECF system, which effected service on all counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Scott R. Drury
`One of David Mutnick’s Attorneys
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket