throbber
Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. _______________
`
`McLANE COMPANY, INC.,
`McLANE/MID-ATLANTIC, INC.
`McLANE/MIDWEST, INC., McLANE
`MINNESOTA, INC., McLANE NEW
`JERSEY, INC, McLANE/EASTERN,
`INC., McLANE/SUNEAST, INC.,
`McLANE OHIO, INC.,
`McLANE/SOUTHERN, INC.,
`McLANE/WESTERN, INC., McLANE
`EXPRESS, INC., KINEXO, INC.,
`McLANE FOODSERVICE
`DISTRIBUTION, INC., and McLANE
`FOODSERVICE INC.’s COMPLAINT
`AND JURY DEMAND
`
`McLANE COMPANY, INC., d/b/a
`McLane/Southwest, McLane/Southeast,
`McLane Southeast, McLane/Northwest,
`McLane/Southeast – Dothan, McLane/ High
`Plains, and McLane/North Texas;
`McLANE/MID-ATLANTIC, INC., d/b/a
`McLane/Carolina and McLane Mid-Atlantic;
`McLANE/MIDWEST, INC., d/b/a
`McLane/Cumberland, McLane/Midwest,
`McLane Midwest, and McLane/Ozark;
`McLANE MINNESOTA, INC.; McLANE
`NEW JERSEY, INC; McLANE/EASTERN,
`INC., d/b/a McLane/Northeast,
`McLane/Northeast-Concord, and McLane PA;
`McLANE/SUNEAST, INC., d/b/a
`McLane/Pacific, McLane/Southern
`California, McLane/Sunwest, McLane
`Sunwest, McLane/Suneast, and McLane
`Ocala; McLANE OHIO, INC.;
`McLANE/SOUTHERN, INC.;
`McLANE/WESTERN, INC.; McLANE
`EXPRESS, INC., d/b/a C.D. Hartnett
`Company, Inc.; KINEXO, INC; McLANE
`FOODSERVICE DISTRIBUTION, INC.;
`and, McLANE FOODSERVICE INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION;
`KOCH FOODS, INC.; JCG FOODS OF
`ALABAMA, LLC; JCG FOODS OF
`GEORGIA, LLC; KOCH MEAT CO., INC.;
`TYSON FOODS, INC.; TYSON CHICKEN,
`INC.; TYSON BREEDERS, INC.; TYSON
`POULTRY, INC.; SANDERSON FARMS,
`INC.; SANDERSON FARMS, INC. (FOOD
`DIVISION); SANDERSON FARMS, INC.
`(PRODUCTION DIVISION); KEYSTONE
`FOODS, LLC; KEYSTONE FOODS
`CORPORATION; EQUITY GROUP
`EUFAULA DIVISION, LLC; EQUITY
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:2
`
`
`
`GROUP KENTUCKY DIVISION LLC;
`EQUITY GROUP – GEORGIA DIVISION
`LLC SANDERSON FARMS, INC.; HOUSE
`OF RAEFORD FARMS, INC.; SIMMONS
`FOODS, INC.; SIMMONS PREPARED
`FOODS, INC.; GEORGE’S, INC.;
`GEORGE’S FARMS, INC.; MARJAC
`POULTRY, INC.; MAR-JAC POULTRY
`MS, LLC; MAR-JAC POULTRY AL, LLC;
`MAR-JAC AL/MS, INC.; MAR-JAC
`POULTRY, LLC; MAR-JAC HOLDINGS,
`LLC; PERDUE FARMS, INC.; PERDUE
`FOODS, LLC; WAYNE FARMS, LLC; O.K.
`FOODS, INC.; O.K. FARMS, INC.; O.K.
`INDUSTRIES, INC.; PECO FOODS, INC.;
`HARRISON POULTRY, INC.; FOSTER
`FARMS, LLC; FOSTER POULTRY
`FARMS; CLAXTON POULTRY FARMS,
`INC.; NORMAN W. FRIES, INC.;
`MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INC.;
`MOUNTAIRE FARMS, LLC; MOUNTAIRE
`FARMS OF DELAWARE, INC.; AMICK
`FARMS, LLC; THE AMICK COMPANY,
`INC.; AMICK-OSI BROILERS, LLC;
`AMICK-OSI PROCESSING, LLC; CASE
`FOODS, INC.; CASE FARMS, LLC; CASE
`FARMS PROCESSING, INC.; FIELDALE
`FARMS CORPORATION; AGRI STATS,
`INC.; UTRECHT-AMERICA HOLDINGS,
`INC.; RABO AGRIFINANCE LLC
`RABOBANK; USA FINANCIAL
`CORPORATION; and UTRECHT-
`AMERICA FINANCE CO.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:3
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs McLANE COMPANY, INC., d/b/a McLane/Southwest, McLane/Southeast,
`
`McLane Southeast, McLane/Northwest, McLane/Southeast – Dothan, McLane/ High Plains, and
`
`McLane/North Texas; McLANE/MID-ATLANTIC, INC., d/b/a McLane/Carolina and McLane
`
`Mid-Atlantic; McLANE/MIDWEST, INC., d/b/a McLane/Cumberland, McLane/Midwest,
`
`McLane Midwest, and McLane/Ozark; McLANE MINNESOTA, INC.; McLANE NEW
`
`JERSEY, INC; McLANE/EASTERN, INC., d/b/a McLane/Northeast, McLane/Northeast-
`
`Concord, and McLane PA; McLANE/SUNEAST, INC., d/b/a McLane/Pacific, McLane/Southern
`
`California, McLane/Sunwest, McLane Sunwest, McLane/Suneast, McLane Ocala; McLANE
`
`OHIO, INC.; McLANE/SOUTHERN, INC.; McLANE/WESTERN, INC; McLANE EXPRESS,
`
`INC., d/b/a C.D. Hartnett Company, Inc.; KINEXO, INC.; McLANE FOODSERVICE
`
`DISTRIBUTION, INC.; and McLANE FOODSERVICE, INC. (collectively “McLane”) bring this
`
`action for treble damages under state and federal laws against Defendants identified below.
`
`McLane alleges as follows:
`
`1.
`
`McLANE COMPANY, INC., d/b/a McLane/Southwest, McLane/Southeast,
`
`McLane Southeast, McLane/Northwest, McLane/Southeast – Dothan, McLane/ High Plains, and
`
`McLane/North Texas is a leading supply chain services company providing grocery and
`
`foodservice supply chain solutions to convenience stores, discount retailers, wholesale clubs, drug
`
`stores, military bases, and restaurants throughout the United States. McLANE COMPANY, INC.
`
`is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Temple, Texas. It, along with its
`
`subsidiaries and affiliates, purchased Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the
`
`Relevant Period, as described in the allegations contained in the Direct Action Plaintiffs’
`
`Consolidated Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial [ECF Nos. 3924, 3922], filed in In re Broiler
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:4
`
`
`
`Chicken Antitrust Litigation, 1:16-cv-08637 (N.D. Ill.) on October 23, 2020,1 and suffered injury
`
`as a result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`2.
`
`McLANE/MID-ATLANTIC, INC., d/b/a McLane/Carolina and McLane Mid-
`
`Atlantic, is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-
`
`owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It purchased Broilers directly from one or more
`
`Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered injury as a result of the violations alleged in
`
`this Complaint.
`
`3.
`
`McLANE/MIDWEST, INC., d/b/a McLane/Cumberland, McLane/Midwest,
`
`McLane Midwest, and McLane/Ozark is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business
`
`in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It purchased
`
`Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered injury as a
`
`result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`4.
`
`McLANE MINNESOTA, INC. is a Texas corporation with its principal place of
`
`business in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It
`
`purchased Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered
`
`injury as a result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`
`1 Pursuant to the Court’s orders in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig., 1:16-cv-08637, the Direct-
`Action Plaintiffs filed “a consolidated complaint” [ECF Nos. 3778, 3653, 3525] containing “all the
`allegations the Direct-Action Plaintiffs make against all Defendants” on October 23, 2020 [ECF Nos. 3924,
`3922]. On October 27, 20202, this Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay Obligation to
`Answer Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint [ECF No. 3942], ordered that “any additional
`DAP complaints filed prior to the resolution of DAP’s Motion to Amend and not already included in the
`consolidated amended complaint filed on October 23,2020 be included in any amended complaint filed.”
`Based on these Orders it appears that new DAP complaints are to ultimately be consolidated, even if filed
`after the October 23, 2020 consolidated complaint. In an effort to promote efficiency, McLane files this
`abbreviated pleading that incorporates by reference and adopts the allegations set forth in Direct Action
`Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial, as amended. If the Court prefers a different
`form or process, McLane will withdraw this pleading and proceed according to the Court’s direction.
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:5
`
`
`
`5.
`
`McLANE NEW JERSEY, INC. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place
`
`of business in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It
`
`purchased Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered
`
`injury as a result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`6.
`
`McLANE/EASTERN,
`
`INC., d/b/a McLane/Northeast, McLane/Northeast-
`
`Concord, and McLane PA is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Temple,
`
`Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It purchased Broilers
`
`directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered injury as a result of
`
`the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`7.
`
`McLANE/SUNEAST, INC., d/b/a McLane/Pacific, McLane/Southern California,
`
`McLane/Sunwest, McLane Sunwest, McLane/Suneast, and McLane Ocala is a Texas corporation
`
`with its principal place of business in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE
`
`COMPANY, INC. It purchased Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant
`
`Period and suffered injury as a result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`8.
`
`McLANE OHIO, INC. is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business
`
`in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It purchased
`
`Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered injury as a
`
`result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`9.
`
`McLANE/SOUTHERN, INC. is a Mississippi corporation with its principal place
`
`of business in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It
`
`purchased Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered
`
`injury as a result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:6
`
`
`
`10. McLANE/WESTERN, INC. is a Colorado corporation with its principal place of
`
`business in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It
`
`purchased Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered
`
`injury as a result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`11. McLANE EXPRESS, INC., d/b/a C.D. Hartnett Company, Inc. is a Texas
`
`corporation with its principal place of business in Weatherford, Texas. It is a wholly-owned
`
`subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It purchased Broilers directly from one or more
`
`Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered injury as a result of the violations alleged in
`
`this Complaint.
`
`12.
`
`KINEXO, INC. is a North Carolina corporation with its principal place of business
`
`in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC.
`
`It purchased Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and
`
`suffered injury as a result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`13. McLANE FOODSERVICE DISTRIBUTION, INC.
`
`is a North Carolina
`
`corporation with its principal place of business in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. It is a wholly-
`
`owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It purchased Broilers directly from one or more
`
`Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered injury as a result of the violations alleged in
`
`this Complaint.
`
`14. McLANE FOODSERVICE, INC. is a Texas corporation with its principal place of
`
`business in Temple, Texas. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of McLANE COMPANY, INC. It
`
`purchased Broilers directly from one or more Defendants during the Relevant Period and suffered
`
`injury as a result of the violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`15.
`
`Collectively, Plaintiffs are referred to as “McLane.”
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:7
`
`
`
`16.
`
`On October 15, 2018, McLane Company, Inc. and various other foodservice-related
`
`subsidiaries opted out of the Settlement Class as it related to the Settlement Agreement with
`
`Fieldale Farms Corporation in In re: Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation.
`
`17.
`
`On March 9, 2020, McLane Company, Inc. and various other foodservice-related
`
`subsidiaries and affiliates opted out of the Settlement Class as it related to Settlement Agreements
`
`with Peco Foods, Inc., George’s, Inc. and George’s Farms, Inc., and Amick Farms, LLC in In re:
`
`Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation.
`
`18.
`
`During the time relevant to McLane’s claims, McLane directly purchased Broiler
`
`chicken in the United States from one or more of the Defendants and/or their co-conspirators and
`
`sustained injury and damage to its business as a proximate result of the antitrust violations and
`
`other unlawful activities alleged in this Complaint.
`
`19. McLane brings this action for damages under the federal antitrust laws, Georgia
`
`RICO laws, and Federal RICO laws against the defendants identified below and incorporates by
`
`reference Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial [ECF Nos.
`
`3924, 3922], filed in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation, 1:16-cv-08637 (N.D. Ill.) on
`
`October 23, 2020, and Certain Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Their
`
`Complaints [ECF 3897], filed in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation, 1:16-cv-08637 (N.D.
`
`Ill.), on October 20, 2020, and the Proposed Amended Complaint contemplated2 by Certain Direct
`
`Action Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Their Complaints.
`
`20.
`
`In addition, McLane joins Section II of the Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Consolidated
`
`Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial [ECF Nos. 3924, 3922] and Section III(D) of Certain Direct
`
`
`2 The Motion to Amend does not appear to attach a proposed amended complaint.
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:8
`
`
`
`Action Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Their Complaints [ECF 3897], adding the following
`
`to specify McLane’s causes of action and the Defendants and Co-Conspirators in McLane’s action:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Name
`
`McLane
`
`
`
`
`
`Named Defendants
`(Not Previously
`Dismissed)
`
`Agri Stats; Case;
`Claxton; Foster
`Farms; Harrison;
`
`Operative
`Complaint
`(Reference is
`to Sealed
`Version, if
`applicable)
`Direct Action
`Plaintiffs’
`Consolidated
`Complaint and House of Raeford;
`Demand for Jury Keystone Foods;
`Trial [ECF Nos. Koch; Mar-Jac;
`Mountaire;
`3924, 3922],
`O.K. Foods; Perdue
`along with any
`Pilgrim’s Pride;
`subsequent
`Sanderson; Simmons;
`amendments
`Tyson; Wayne;
`
`Amick; Fieldale;
`
`George’s; Peco
`
`Rabobank
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Named-Co-
`Conspirators (if
`any)
`
`Causes of Action
`
`Allen Harim;
`Marshall Durbin;
`Defendant Family Co-
`Conspirators
` Tip Top
` Southern Hens
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Count I (Sherman Act
`Claim for all
`Anticompetitive Conduct);
`
`Count II (Sherman Act
`Claim for Output
`Restriction, Pled in the
`Alternative to Count I);
`Count III (Sherman Act
`Claim for GA Dock
`Manipulation, Pled in the
`Alternative to Count I);
`Count IV (GA RICO
`Based on 16-14-4(a));
`Count V (GA RICO Based
`on 16-14-4(b));
`Count VI (Federal RICO)
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, McLane respectfully requests that the Court:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Enter joint and several judgments against Defendants in favor of McLane;
`
`Award McLane damages against Defendants in a joint and several judgment for an
`
`amount to be determined at trial to the maximum extent allowed under the claims stated above as
`
`well as treble damages, any other enhancement of damages, attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs
`
`as provided by law;
`
`C.
`
`Award McLane damages in an amount to be determined at trial to the maximum
`
`extent allowed under Georgia RICO (Ga. Code Ann. § 16-14-1 et seq.), Federal RICO (18
`
`U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.), and enter a judgment in favor of McLane against the Georgia Dock
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:9
`
`
`
`Defendants, with the judgment being for joint and several liability, in an amount to be trebled to
`
`the extent such laws permit;
`
`D.
`
`E.
`
`Award McLane punitive damages as appropriate under applicable law;
`
`Award McLane its pre- and post-judgment interest as provided by law, with such
`
`interest to be awarded at the highest legal rate;
`
`F.
`
`Award McLane its attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and costs, as provided by
`
`law, including the federal antitrust laws, Georgia RICO, and Federal RICO;
`
`G.
`
`Award McLane the costs of investigation and litigation pursuant to Ga. Code Ann.
`
`§ 16-14-6(c); and
`
`H.
`
`Grant McLane such other and further relief that the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`I.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`McLane demands a trial by jury, pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, of all issues so triable.
`
`
`
`
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case: 1:20-cv-07831 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/31/20 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:10
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 31, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`s/ Adam A. Hachikian
`Kathryn A. Reilly (application in process)
`Marissa S. Ronk (ARDC #6306862)
`Judith P. Youngman (application in process)
`Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell LLP
`370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4500
`Denver, Colorado 80202
`Telephone: 303.244.1800
`Facsimile: 303.244.1879
`Email: ronk@wtotrial.com
`
`Adam A. Hachikian (ARDC # 6283021)
`Fox Swibel Levin & Carroll LLP
`200 W. Madison Street, Suite 3000
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone: 312-224-1200
`Facsimile: 312-224-1201
`Email: ahachikian@foxswibel.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs McLANE COMPANY,
`INC., McLANE/MID-ATLANTIC, INC.
`McLANE/MIDWEST, INC., McLANE
`MINNESOTA, INC.; McLANE NEW JERSEY,
`INC; McLANE/EASTERN, INC.,
`McLANE/SUNEAST, INC., McLANE OHIO,
`INC., McLANE/SOUTHERN, INC.,
`McLANE/WESTERN, INC., McLANE
`EXPRESS, INC., KINEXO, INC., McLANE
`FOODSERVICE DISTRIBUTION, INC., and
`McLANE FOODSERVICE INC.
`
`
`4079440 v1 -
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket