throbber
Case: 1:21-cv-00261 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/15/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`RED BIRD FARMS DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION; AGRI STATS,
`INC.; CASE FOODS, INC.; CASE FARMS, LLC;
`CASE FARMS PROCESSING, INC.; CLAXTON
`POULTRY FARMS, INC.; NORMAN W. FRIES,
`INC.; FOSTER FARMS, LLC; FOSTER POULTRY
`FARMS; HARRISON POULTRY, INC.; HOUSE OF
`RAEFORD FARMS, INC.; KEYSTONE FOODS LLC;
`EQUITY GROUP EUFAULA DIVISION, LLC;
`EQUITY GROUP KENTUCKY DIVISION LLC;
`EQUITY GROUP—GEORGIA DIVISION LLC;
`KOCH FOODS, INC.; JCG FOODS OF ALABAMA,
`LLC; JCG FOODS OF GEORGIA, LLC; KOCH
`MEAT CO., INC.; MAR-JAC POULTRY, INC.; MAR-
`JAC POULTRY MS, LLC; MAR-JAC POULTRY AL,
`LLC; MAR-JAC AL/MS, INC.; MAR-JAC POULTRY,
`LLC; MAR-JAC HOLDINGS, LLC; MOUNTAIRE
`FARMS, INC.; MOUNTAIRE FARMS, LLC;
`MOUNTAIRE FARMS OF DELAWARE, INC.; O.K.
`FOODS, INC.; O.K. FARMS, INC.; O.K.
`INDUSTRIES, INC.; PERDUE FARMS, INC.;
`PERDUE FOODS, LLC; SANDERSON FARMS,
`INC.; SANDERSON FARMS, INC. (FOODS
`DIVISION); SANDERSON FARMS, INC.
`(PRODUCTION DIVISION; SANDERSON FARMS,
`INC. (PROCESSING DIVISION); SIMMONS
`FOODS, INC.; SIMMONS PREPARED FOODS, INC.;
`TYSON FOODS, INC.; TYSON CHICKEN, INC.;
`TYSON BREEDERS, INC.; TYSON POULTRY,
`INC.; UTRECT-AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC.; RABO
`AGRIFINANCE LLC; RABOBANK USA
`FINANCIAL CORPORATION; UTRECT-AMERICA
`FINANCE CO.; and WAYNE FARMS, LLC
`Defendants.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
`AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`

`

`Case: 1:21-cv-00261 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/15/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2
`
`Plaintiff Red Bird Farms Distribution Company (“Red Bird”) brings this action for
`
`damages under the antitrust laws of the United States against the above-captioned Defendants and
`
`alleges as follows:.
`
`1.
`
`Red Bird is a Colorado corporation with its principal place of business in
`
`Englewood, Colorado. Red Bird processes chicken for distribution to retail grocers and restaurants.
`
`2.
`
`Red Bird has purchased millions of dollars’ worth of Broilers directly from certain
`
`Defendants and co-conspirators throughout the conspiracy period. Red Bird has suffered antitrust
`
`injury and damages as a result of the antitrust violations alleged in this Complaint.
`
`3.
`
`Red Bird brings this action for damages under the federal antitrust laws against the
`
`defendants identified below and incorporates by reference Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Consolidated
`
`Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial [ECF Nos. 3924, .3922] filed in In re Broiler Chicken
`
`Antitrust Litigation, 1:16-cv-08637-TD (N.D. Ill.) on October 23, 2020.1
`
`4.
`
`Red Bird joins Section II of the Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint
`
`and Demand for Jury Trial [ECF Nos. 3924, 3922], adding the following to specify Red Bird’s
`
`causes of action and the Defendants and Co-Conspirators in Red Bird’s Action:
`
`1 Pursuant to the Court’s Orders in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig., 1:16-cv-08637 (“the
`Broilers Case”), the Direct Action Plaintiffs filed “a consolidated complaint” [ECF Nos. 3778,
`3652, 3525] containing “all
`the allegations the Direct-Action Plaintiffs make against all
`Defendants” on October 23, 2020 [ECF Nos. 3924, 3922]. Red Bird files this abbreviated pleading
`that incorporates by reference and adopts the allegations set forth in the Direct Action Plaintiffs’
`Consolidated Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial to streamline the pleadings in accordance with
`the Court’s direction in the Broilers Case. See ECF No. 4139 at 5.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 1:21-cv-00261 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/15/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3
`
`Operative
`Complaint
`(Reference is to
`Sealed Version, if
`applicable)
`TBD
`
`Plaintiff Name
`
`Red Bird Farms
`Distribution
`Company
`
`Named Defendants
`(Not Previously
`Dismissed)
`
`Named Co-
`Conspirators (if
`any)
`
`Allen Harim;
`Amick; Fieldale;
`George’s; Marshall
`Durbin; Peco; Tip
`Top; Southern Hens
`
`Agri Stats; Case;
`Claxton; Foster
`Farms; Harrison;
`House of Raeford;
`Keystone; Koch;
`Mar-Jac; Mountaire;
`O.K. Foods; Perdue;
`Pilgrim’s;
`Rabobank;
`Sanderson;
`Simmons; Tyson;
`Wayne
`
`Causes of Action
`
`Count I (Sherman
`Act Claim for all
`Anticompetitive
`Conduct); Count II
`(Sherman Act Claim
`for Output
`Restriction, Pled in
`the Alternative to
`Count I)
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court:
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Enter joint and several judgments against Defendants in favor of Plaintiff;
`
`Award Plaintiff damages against Defendants in a joint and several judgment for an
`
`amount to be determined at trial to the maximum extent allowed under the claims stated above as
`
`well as treble damages, any other enhancement of damages, attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs
`
`as provided by law;
`
`C.
`
`Award Plaintiff its post-judgment interest as provided by law, with such interest to
`
`be awarded at the highest legal rate;
`
`D.
`
`Award Plaintiff its attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and costs, as provided by
`
`law, including the federal antitrust laws; and
`
`E.
`
`Enter an order prohibiting and permanently enjoining Defendants, their affiliates,
`
`successors, transferees, assignees and other officers, directors, partners, agents and employees
`
`thereof, and all other persons acting or claiming to act on their behalf or in concert with them, from
`
`in any manner continuing, maintaining or renewing the conduct, conspiracy, or combination
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case: 1:21-cv-00261 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/15/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4
`
`alleged herein, or from entering into any other conspiracy or combination having a similar purpose
`
`or effect, and from adopting or following any practice, plan, program, or device having a similar
`
`purpose or effect; and
`
`F.
`
`Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief that the Court may deem just and proper.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38, Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all
`
`issues so triable.
`
`Dated: January 15, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`RED BIRD FARMS DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
`
`By: /s/ Paul J. Ripp
`
`Paul J. Ripp
`WILLIAMS MONTGOMERY & JOHN LTD.
`233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 6800
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone: (312) 443-3200
`Facsimile: (312) 630-8500
`pjr@willmont.com
`
`Charles E. Tompkins (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`WILLIAMS MONTGOMERY & JOHN LTD.
`1607 22nd Street, NW, Suite 300
`Washington D.C. 20008
`Telephone: (202) 791-9951
`Facsimile: (312) 630-8586
`cet@willmont.com
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case: 1:21-cv-00261 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/15/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5
`
`W. Lawrence Deas (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`LISTON & DEAS PLLC
`605 Crescent Boulevard, Suite 200
`Ridgeland, MS 39157
`Telephone: (601) 981-1636
`Facsimile: (601) 982-0371
`Lawrence@listondeas.com
`
`Michael Gratz, Jr. (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`GRATZ & GRATZ, P.A.
`312 N. Green Street
`Tupelo, MS 38804
`Telephone: (662) 844-5531
`Facsimile: (662) 844-8747
`michael@gratzandgratz.com
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket