throbber
Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`Case:1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 2 of 13 PagelD #:14
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:14
`12-Person Jury
`
`FILED
`10/19/2021 7:41 PM
`IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS !RIS Y. MARTINEZ
`,
`CIRCUIT CLERK
`COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION
`COOK COUNTY.IL
`2021L010263
`
`:
`
`15268752
`
`) )
`
`ERICA V. MARTINEZ,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`\
`\ v.
`
`Case No.
`
`) )
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`
`COMPLAINT AT LAW
`
`NOW COMESPlaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,by and throughher attorneys, NOLAN
`
`LAWGROUP, and complaining against Defendants, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a
`
`corporation, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`INC., a corporation, and WALGREEN CO.,
`
`a
`
`corporation, and each of them,states as follows:.
`
`Introduction, Jurisdiction and Venue
`This is an action in which Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, seeks recovery of
`1.
`damages arising from personalinjuries she sustained from a bloodclotin her brain on October20,
`
`2019, which she alleges was caused by defective and dangerous conditionsofa transdermalbirth
`
`contro] patch product known as Xulane®, and the negligent and wrongful conduct of the
`Defendants herein,
`including their conduct related to the design, manufacturing,
`instruction,
`warnings,sale, distribution, and marketing ofthe Xulane® product,
`
`2.
`
`On October 20, 2019, and at all
`
`times relevant herein, Plaintiff, ERICA V.
`
`MARTINEZ,wasand continuesto be a citizen and resident of Cook County,Illinois.
`
`)
`)
`)
`).
`PLAINTIFF DEMANDS
`)
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a
`
`corporation, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,_) TRIAL BY JURY
`a corporation, and WALGREENCO., a
`)
`corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM20211010263
`
`
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:15
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document#: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 3 of 13 PagelD #:15
`
`3,
`
`On October 20, 2019, and at all
`
`times herein relevant, Defendant, MYLAN
`
`PHARMACEUTICALS,INC., was and continues to be a corporation organized and existing under
`the laws ofthe State of West Virginia, with its principal place of business in the State of West .
`Virginia, which did and continues to do substantial business in the State of Illinois, including
`certain business transactions from whichthis action arises.
`4,
`| On October 20, 2019, and at all
`times hereinrelevant, Defendant, MYLAN
`TECHNOLOGIES,INC., was and continuesto be a corporation organized and existing under the
`laws of the State of West Virginia with its principal place of business in the State of Vermont,
`
`which did and continues to do substantial business in the State of Illinois,
`
`including certain
`
`|
`business transactions from whichthis action arises.
`5.
`On October 20, 2019, and at all times herein relevant, Defendant, WALGREEN
`
`CO., was and continues tobe a corporation organized and existing under the laws ofthe State.of0
`
`Illinois, with its principal place of business in the State ofIllinois, and which did and continues to
`
`do substantial business in’Cook County, Illinois, including certain business transactions from
`
`which this action arises.
`
`6.
`
`Venueofthis action is proper in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois under
`
`735 ILCS 5/2-101, as the transactions giving rise to this action, including the commission of the
`
`tort, occurred in Cook County,Illinois and the damages sought exceed the sum offifty thousand
`
`dollars ($50,000.00).
`
`Facts Relating to the Xulane® Product
`On or about December 31, 2009, Defendant, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES,INC.,
`7.
`submitted an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA)for Xulane® (Norelgestrominand Ethinyl
`
`Estradiol Transdermal System), 150 mcg/35 mcg per day, to the United States Food and Drug
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 4 of 13 PagelD #:16
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:16
`
`Administration (“FDA”) pursuant to section 505(j) ofthe Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
`The said ANDA wassponsored by Defendant, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and was
`
`assigned ANDAApplication No. 200910 by the FDA. The ANDAwassubmitted to the FDA by
`
`INC., under the previously approved New Drug
`Defendant, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES,
`Application (“NDA”) for the soins listed drug (“RLD”), Ortho Evra® Transdermal System of
`Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`|
`
`=
`
`8.
`Xulane® is a transdermal birth control patch. The patch contains combination
`hormone medication and is used to prevent pregnancy. It contains two hormones: a pionentn
`(norelgestromin) and an estrogen(ethinylestradiol). It is designed to workbypreventing ovulation
`
`during a woman’s menstrual cycle. It also makes vaginal fluid thicker, in order to help prevent
`sperm from reaching an egg (fertilization) and changes the lining of the uterus to prevent the
`attachmentofa fertilized _
`
`9.
`Following its approval by the FDA in 2001, the labeling for Ortho Evra® was
`edited on . different occasions,
`including changes
`to address
`issues
`related to venous
`
`thromboembolism risk and exposure to contraceptive hormones seen with Ortho Evra®, as
`
`compared with certain combined oral contraceptives.
`10.
`Prior to October 20, 2019, there were numerous adverse events reported associated
`with the use ofOrtho Evra®,including venous thromboembolism and thereafter, the manufacturer
`
`\
`
`of Ortho Evra® voluntarily ceasing marketing Ortho Evra® in the United States, and the FDA
`
`approved the withdrawalof the NDA for Ortho Evra®.
`It.
`| Notwithstanding, on April 16, 201 4, the FDA approved the ANDA Application No.
`
`200910 for Xulane®.
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:17
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document#: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page.5 of 13 PagelD #:17
`
`12.
`
`Following approval of the ANDA for Xulane® by the FDA,
`
`the Defendant,
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., undertook to and did develop and provide packaging,
`
`labeling, warnings, instructions; patient pamphlets, and prescribing information for use by doctors
`
`and patients related to Xulane® products.
`
`13.
`On April 16, 2014, and upon approval of the ANDA for Xulane®, Defendants,
`MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and each of
`
`them, were required to thereafter provide post-marketing reporting for the ANDAsetforth in 21
`
`CFR 314.80-81 and 21 C.F.R. 314.98 and were further required to advise the FDA Office of
`
`Generic Drugs of any change in the marketing status of the drug.
`14.
`Upon information and belief, subsequent to April 16, 2014, but prior to October 20,
`the FDA, as well as Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and MYLAN
`
`2019,
`
`a
`serious
`risk of
`fatal and
`non-fatal venous
`thromboembolism (VTE)
`and arterial
`thromboembolism associated with norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol transdermal patches, and
`the FDA ordered certain post-marketing studies and clinical trials be designed and conducted to
`
`detect increased risk for venous thromboembolism in users of transdermal birth control patches,
`
`especially examining the age, BMI, and smokingstatus of users of the patches.
`15.
`.
`In April 2020, after Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, suffered a venous
`thromboembolism, Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES,
`INC.,
`and MYLAN
`
`PHARMACEUTICALS,
`INC., and each of them, changed the packaging, warnings, and
`prescribing information to include the warning and limitation on use: “Do not use XULANEif
`your Body MassIndex (BMJ)is 30 kg/m2 or more. Women with a BMIof30 kg/m2 or more’who
`
`

`

`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:18
`‘Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document#: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 6 of 13 PagelD #:18
`
`use Xulane may be at a higher risk for developing blood clots compared to women with a BMI
`
`: lower than 30 kg/m*.
`Facts Relating to Plaintiffs Use of the Xulane Product
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, wasfirst prescribed Xulane® by a medical
`
`doctor on April 7, 2017, at which time she had a Body MassIndex (“BMI”) of 29.9 kg/m.
`17,
`Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, purchased and was dispensed the Xulane®
`products that she thereafter used from Defendant, WALGREENCO.,at its Walgreen Drug Store
`No. 215 located at or near 3045 West 26"Street, Chicago,Illinois 60623. The last three purchases
`
`of the Xulane® productprior to October 20, 2019, were on July 24, 2019, September 9, 2019, and
`
`October 16, 2019. The Xulane® product so purchased and dispensed to Plaintiff, ERICA V.
`MARTINEZ,bore National Drug Code (“NDC”) 00378-3340-53.
`18.
`The Xulane® products purchased and dispensed to Plaintiff, ERICA V.
`MARTINEZ,were developed, manufactured, marketed, packaged, labeled, and originally placed
`
`into the stream of commerce by Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and MYLAN
`
`PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and each of them, either directly, or by and through their
`employees and agents.
`.
`- 19.
`At the times Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, purchased and vias dispensed the
`
`Xulane® products by Defendant, WALGREEN CO., she received certain patient counseling,
`
`including directions that she should apply a new patch weekly for three weeks, remove for one
`week, then repeat the cycle. However, she was not informed of the nature and extent of her
`individual risk of developing a venous thromboembolism from her use or continued use of the
`
`Xulane® drug product.
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:19
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document#: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 7 of 13 PagelD #:19
`
`rawa“ee
`On October 20, 2019, and at the time she suffered a venous thromboembotism or
`20.
`clot in her brain while using the Xulane® product, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,had a BMI
`of 28.32 kg/m?.
`
`21.
`
`On October 20, 2019, the physicians treating Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,
`
`following her venous thromboembolism diagnosis wrote: “hypercoagulable state wasfelt to be in
`
`the setting of OCPuse,specifically an estrogen patch,” and “[pJatient had a dural vein thrombosis
`
`that waslikely associated with estrogen use. There were no otherclear precipitating factors for the
`
`thrombosis.”
`
`COUNT I
`PRODUCTLIABILITY —- MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS
`
`1-21. Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,adopts and alleges paragraphs |
`
`through 21,
`
`above, as paragraphs | through 21, inclusive, of Count I as though fully set forth therein.
`
`22.
`
`At the time the Xulane® drug product was placed into the stream of commerce by
`
`Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES,INC., and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS,INC., and
`
`each of them,
`
`it was defective and unreasonably dangerous in one or more of the following
`
`respects:
`
`the Xulane® drug product was developed and manufactured with
`(a)
`concentrations of drugs which hadahigh risk of causing and did cause
`venous thromboembolism in persons of similar age and body mass index
`(BMD) as the Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, when used asdirected;
`
`(b)—the Xulane® drug product lacked proper and adequate warningsofthe risk
`of venous thromboembolism in personsof similar age and body massindex
`(BMI) as the Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, when used as directed;
`
`(c)
`
`the Xulane® drug product lacked proper and adequate instructionsin its
`use.
`
`23.
`
`On October 20, 2019, and as a direct and proximate result of one or more of the
`
`foregoing defective and unreasonably dangerous conditions of the Xulane® drug product,
`
`

`

`“
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:20
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document#: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 8 of 13 PagelD #:20
`
`Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, was causedto and did suffer a blood clot in her brain known as
`
`‘a venous thromboembolism, which further caused an acute,
`
`life-threatening parenchymal
`
`hemorrhagein the right temporal lobe of her brain and other severe and disabling injuries to her
`
`person.
`
`24.
`
`That as a result of the aforesaid injuries, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, was
`
`caused to and will in the future experience great pain and suffering, has suffered and will in the
`
`future suffer disability and disfigurement, has suffered and will in the future suffer from the loss
`
`_ of a normallife, has been caused to incur and will in the future incur expenses for necessary
`
`medical care, treatment, and services, has suffered and will in the future suffer a loss of the value
`of her time, earnings, profits, and salaries, has been and will be damagedin her earning capacity,
`and has otherwise been damagedin a personal and pecuniary nature.
`|
`WHEREFORE,Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,praysthat judgment be entered in her
`favor and against Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation, and MYLAN
`
`PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a corporation, and each of them, in a sum in excess of the minimal
`Jurisdictional amountof the Circuit Courtof Cook County,Illinois, together with attorney fees,
`pre-judgmentinterest, and the costs of bringingthis action.
`|
`COUNT II
`NEGLIGENCE — MYLAN
`
`1-21. Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,adopts and alleges paragraphs |
`
`through 21,
`
`above, as paragraphs | through 21, inclusive, of Count II as though fully set forth herein.
`
`22.
`
`On October 20, 2019, andat all times herein relevant, it was the duty of Defendants,
`
`MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and each of
`
`~
`
`them,to exercise the care of a reasonable pharmaceutical companyin the design, approvalprocess,
`
`manufacture, marketing, packaging, labeling, warning, sale, and instruction in use of the Xulane®
`
`

`

`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:21
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document#: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 9 of 13 PagelD #:21
`
`drug preduct and its post-market pharmacovigilance, so as not to cause injury to the persons of
`
`others, including Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ.
`
`23.
`
`On October 20, 2019, and notwithstanding the aforesaid duty, Defendants,
`
`MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and each of
`
`them, breached their duty of care to Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,in one or more of the
`
`following particulars:
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`(d).
`
`(e)
`
`negligently and carelessly manufactured, marketed, packaged, and sold
`Xulane® when they knew or should have knownof unreasonable dangers
`associated with venous thromboembolism from its intended use, which
`dangers were not obviousto product users;
`
`negligently and carelessly manufactured, marketed, packaged, and sold the
`Xulane® drug product whenit contained concentrations of drugs which had
`a high risk of causing and did cause venous thromboembolism in persons
`of similar age and body mass index (BMI) as the Plaintiff, ERICA V.
`MARTINEZ, whenused as directed;
`
`negligently and carelessly manufactured, marketed, packaged, and sold
`Xulane® whenit lacked proper and adequate warningsofthe risk of venous
`thromboembolism in persons of similar age and body mass index (BMI) as
`the Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, whenusedasdirected;
`
`negligently and carelessly manufactured, marketed, and sold Xulane®
`whenit lacked proper and adequate instructionsin its use; and/or
`
`negligently and carelessly failed to conduct proper and adequate post-
`market monitoring and analysis of Xulane® including pharmacovigilance
`monitoring and analysis and post-market reporting.
`
`24.
`
`On October 20, 2019, and as a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid breach
`
`of duty by Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS,
`
`INC., and each of them, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, wascaused to and did suffer a blood
`
`clot in her brain knownas a venous thromboembolism from her use of the Xulane® drug product,
`
`which further caused an acute,life-threatening parenchymal hemorrhage in the right temporal lobe
`
`of her brain and other severe and disabling injuries to her person.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`a
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:22
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document#: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 10 of 13 PagelD #:22
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`That as a result ofthe aforesaid injuries, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, was
`25.
`caused to and will in the future experience great pain and suffering, has suffered and will in the
`future suffer disability and disfigurement, hassuffered and will inthe future suffer from the loss
`of a normal life, has been caused to incur and will in the future incur expenses for necessary
`medicalcare, treatment, and services, has suffered and will in the future suffer a loss ofthe value -
`
`of her time, earnings,profits, and salaries, has been and will be damagedin her earning capacity,
`
`and has otherwise been damagedin a personal and pecuniary nature.
`
`WHEREFORE,Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,prays that judgment be entered in her
`
`favor and against Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a corporation, and MYLAN
`
`. PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a corporation, and each of them, in a sum in excess of the minimal
`
`jurisdictional amount of the Circuit Court of Cook County,Illinois, together with attorney fees,
`
`pre-judgmentinterest, and the costs of bringing this action.
`
`_ COUNT II
`.
`BREACH OF WARRANTY - MYLAN
`
`through 21,
`1-21. Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, adopts and alleges paragraphs |
`above, as paragraphs | through 21, inclusive, ofCountIII as though fully set forth herein.
`22.
`At all times material, Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES,
`INC., and
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS,
`INC., and each of them, warranted both expressly and
`
`impliedly that the condition of the Xulane® drug product was free of safe and reasonablyfit for
`
`its intended and foreseeable use and purposein persons of similar age and body mass index (BMI)
`as the Plaintiff ERICA V. MARTINEZ, when used asdirected.
`23.
`Notwithstanding the express and implied warranties of fitness for its intended use
`
`and purpose made by Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`INC.,
`
`and MYLAN
`
`PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and each ofthem, the Xulane® drug product wasdefective, unsafe,
`
`

`

`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:23
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document#: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 11 of 13 PagelD #:23
`
`. dangerousand unfit for its foreseeable use and purpose that created an unreasonable hazard when
`
`_
`
`the Xulane® drug product wasused in a foreseeable manner.
`24.
`On Corker 20, 2019, and as a direct and srendtnans result of the breach of
`warranties
`by
`Defendants, MYLAN
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`INC.,
`and MYLAN
`PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and each of them, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, was caused
`to and did suffer a blood clot in her brain known as a venous thromboembolismfrom her use of
`the Xulane® drug product, which further caused an acute,
`life-threatening parenchymal:
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:40/19/20217:41PM=2021L010263
`
`
`
`hemorrhagein the right temporal lobe of her brain and other severe and disabling injuries to her
`person.
`|
`
`25;
`
`That as a result of the aforesaid injuries, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, was
`
`caused to and will in the future experience great pain and suffering, has suffered and will in the
`
`future suffer disability and disfigurement, has sufferedandwill in the future sufferfromthe loss__
`
`of a normallife, has been caused to incur and will in the future incur expenses for necessary
`
`medical care, treatment, and services, has suffered and will in the future suffer a loss of the value
`
`of her time, earnings, profits, and salaries, has been and will be damaged in her earning capacity,
`
`and has otherwise been damagedin a personal and pecuniary- nature.
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,prays that judgment be entered in her
`
`favor and against Defendants, MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES,INC., a corporation, and MYLAN
`PHARMACEUTICALS,INC., a corporation, and each ofthem, in a sum in excess ofthe minimal
`jurisdictional amount of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, together with attorney fees,
`
`pre-judgmentinterest, and the costs of bringing this action.
`
`

`

`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 12 of 13 PagelD #:24
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:24
`
`COUNT IV
`NEGLIGENCE — WALGREENS
`
`1-21. Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, adopts and alleges paragraphs |
`through 21,
`above, as paragraphs | through 21, inclusive, of Count IV as though fully set forth herein.
`22.
`On October 20, 2019, and'at alltimes herein relevant, it was the duty of Defendant,
`
`WALGREENCO., individually and through its employees and agents, to exercise the care of a
`
`reasonable pharmacyand pharmacistin the sale, dispensing, and patient counseling of the drugsit
`sells so as not to cause injury to the person of its customers,
`including Plaintiff, ERICA V.
`MARTINEZ.
`|
`23.
`On October 20, 2019: and notwithstanding the aforesaid duty, Defendant,
`WALGREENCO., breachedits duty of care to Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,in one or more
`
`of the following particulars:
`(a)
`negligently and carelessly sold and dispensed Xulane® product bearing
`NDC 00378-3340-53 to Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, which was
`defective and unreasonably dangerous;
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`negligently and carelessly sold and. dispensed Xulane® product bearing
`NDC 00378-3340-53 to Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, without proper
`and adequate patient counseling including counseling on significant
`potential adverse events;
`,
`
`negligently and carelessly sold and dispensed Xulane® product bearing
`NDC 00378-3340-53 to Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, without proper
`and adequate warningsofthe risk of venous thromboembolism; and/or
`
`negligently and carelessly sold and dispensed Xulane® product bearing
`NDC 00378-3340-53 to Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, without proper
`and adequateinstructions in its use.
`
`24.
`
`On October 20, 2019, and as a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid breach
`
`of duty by Defendant, WALGREENCO., Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, was caused to and
`
`did suffer a blood clot in her brain known as a venous thromboembolism from her use of the
`
`x F
`
`ILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`
`
`
`
`—
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`FILEDDATE:10/19/20217:41PM2021L010263
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filéd: 11/26/21 Page 13 of 13 PagelD #:25
`Case: 1:21-cv-06329 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 11/26/21 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:25
`
`7]
`
`Xulane® drug product, which further caused an acute,life-threatening parenchymal hemorrhage
`in the right temporallobe ofher brain and other severe and disabling injuries to her person.
`25.
`That as a result of the aforesaid injuries, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ, was
`caused to and will in the future experience great pain and suffering, has suffered and will in the
`
`future suffer disability and disfigurement, has suffered and will in the future suffer from the loss
`
`in the future incur expenses for necessary
`of a normallife, has been caused to incur and will
`medical care, treatment and services, has suffered and will in the future suffer a loss of the value
`
`of her time, earnings, profits, and salaries, has been and will be damagedin her earning capacity,
`
`and has otherwise been damagedin a personal and pecuniary nature.
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, ERICA V. MARTINEZ,prays that judgmentbe entered in her
`
`favor and against Defendant, WALGREENCO., a corporation, in a sum in excess of the minimal
`
`jurisdictional amount of the Circuit Court of Cook County,Illinois,togetherwithattorneyfees,
`
`pre-judgmentinterest, and the costs of bringing this action.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`NOLAN LAW GROUP
`
`By:
`
`/
`
`Timothy I. McArdle
`Attorneysfor Plaintiff
`
`Attorney Code #36211
`Timothy I. McArdle, Esq.
`NOLAN LAW GROUP
`20 North Clark Street, 30" Floor
`Chicago,Illinois 60602
`Tel: (312) 630-4000
`Fax: (312) 630-4011
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket