throbber
Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`
`COOLAB FOODS, LLC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`CREAMALICIOUS, INC.,
`ELIZABETH ROGERS, RICHARD WHITE,
`and ROGER CUNNINGHAM,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff CooLab Foods, LLC, for its Complaint against defendants Creamalicious, Inc.,
`
`Elizabeth Rogers, Richard White, and Roger Cunningham states as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff CooLab Foods, LLC (“CooLab”) is a Delaware limited liability company
`
`with its principal place of business located at 3220 Manheim Road, Franklin Park, IL 60131.
`
`2.
`
`The sole member of CooLab is Western Skies Food Holdings LLC, (“Western
`
`Skies”). The members of Western Skies are Nicholas Kuneman, Michael Kenefick, and Cody
`
`Miller. Nicholas Kuneman is a citizen of the state of Colorado. Michael Kenefick is a citizen of
`
`the state of Florida. Cody Miller is a citizen of the state of Kentucky.
`
`3.
`
`For purposes of diversity, CooLab is a citizen of the states of Colorado, Florida,
`
`and Kentucky.
`
`4.
`
`Defendant Creamalicious, Inc. (“Creamalicious”) is a Delaware Corporation with
`
`its principal place of business at 6953 Tarrago CT, Liberty Township, Ohio 45011.
`
`5.
`
`For purposes of diversity, Creamalicious is a citizen of the states of Delaware and
`
`Ohio.
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 2 of 11 PageID #:2
`
`6.
`
`Defendant Elizabeth Rogers is a principal of Creamalicious and is a citizen of the
`
`state of Ohio.
`
`7.
`
`Defendant Richard White is a principal of Creamalicious and is a citizen of the state
`
`of Hawaii.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant Roger Cunningham is a principal of Creamalicious and is a citizen of
`
`the state of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`9.
`
`This Court has diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332
`
`as the parties are completely diverse in citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
`
`10.
`
`Venue in this judicial district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 as a substantial
`
`portion of the events or omissions giving rise to this action occurred in this district.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`CooLab collaborates with its customers to co-manufacture frozen desserts.
`
`Creamalicious is a brand of artisan ice cream.
`
`Creamalicious was in need of assistance with the manufacturing of its ice cream.
`
`In the spring of 2022, CooLab and Creamalicious entered into an agreement,
`
`whereby CooLab would purchase supplies and manufacture Creamalicious’s ice cream.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`services.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`Creamalicious agreed to pay CooLab for the goods and services provided.
`
`CooLab fulfilled its obligations under the agreement by providing the goods and
`
`CooLab issued invoices to Creamalicious for the goods and services rendered.
`
`Until the end of May 2022, Creamalicious paid the invoices issued by CooLab.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 3 of 11 PageID #:3
`
`19.
`
`On May 26, 2022, CooLab issued Invoice # 1660 for goods and services provided
`
`to Creamalicious in the amount of $69,552.00. (A true and correct copy is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 1.)
`
`20.
`
`On May 31, 2022, CooLab issued Invoice # 1665 for goods and services provided
`
`to Creamalicious in the amount of $25,149.10. (A true and correct copy is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 2.)
`
`21.
`
`On June 1, 2022, CooLab issued Invoice # 1675 for goods and services provided to
`
`Creamalicious in the amount of $3,859.31. (A true and correct copy is attached hereto as Exhibit
`
`3.)
`
`22.
`
`On June 3, 2022, CooLab issued Invoice # 1684 for goods and services provided to
`
`Creamalicious in the amount of $510.94. (A true and correct copy is attached hereto as Exhibit 4.)
`
`23.
`
`On June 3, 2022, CooLab also issued Invoice # 1692 for goods and services
`
`provided to Creamalicious in the amount of $1,225.00. (A true and correct copy is attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit 5.)
`
`24.
`
`On June 13, 2022, CooLab issued Invoice # 1703 for goods and services provided
`
`to Creamalicious in the amount of $19,678.90. (A true and correct copy is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 6.)
`
`25.
`
`On June 13, 2022, CooLab also issued Invoice # 1707 for goods and services
`
`provided to Creamalicious in the amount of $1,858.83. (A true and correct copy is attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit 7.)
`
`26.
`
`On June 14, 2022, CooLab issued Invoice # 1706 for goods and services provided
`
`to Creamalicious in the amount of $28,980.00. (A true and correct copy is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit 8.)
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 4 of 11 PageID #:4
`
`27.
`
`Creamalicious failed to fulfill its obligation under the agreement by refusing to pay
`
`for the goods and services set forth in Invoice # 1660, Invoice # 1665, Invoice # 1675, Invoice #
`
`1684, Invoice # 1692, Invoice #1703, Invoice # 1707, and Invoice # 1706.
`
`28.
`
`Creamalicious has also failed to fulfill its obligation under the agreement by
`
`refusing to pay for approximately $10,000 in finished products that remain in CooLab freezers and
`
`approximately $800 of FedEx shipping costs.
`
`29.
`
`To address Creamalicious’s failure to pay the amounts owed to CooLab, CooLab
`
`and Creamalicious began negotiating a settlement pursuant to which Creamalicious would pay the
`
`outstanding amounts owed to CooLab and CooLab would release the goods, packaging, and
`
`ingredients that CooLab had prepared and procured for defendants.
`
`30.
`
`On June 10, 2022, CooLab and Creamalicious entered into a Settlement Agreement
`
`and Release of Claim (the “Settlement Agreement”). (A true and correct copy is attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit 9.)
`
`31.
`
`The Settlement Agreement provided that,
`
`the parties have agreed that the amount of One Hundred Forty Nine
`Thousand Three Hundred Eighty Three and 75/100 Dollars ($149,383.75)
`representing invoice numbers 1660, 1665, 1675, 1694 [sic] and 1692, un-
`invoiced amounts of $23,184 for finished goods to be verified with a bill of
`lading provided to Elizabeth Rogers, $28,980.00 for ice cream mix,
`$1,858.53 for third party testing fees, and $800 for fedex charges are owed
`by Creamalicious, Inc. to Coolab Foods, LLC.
`
`
`(Ex. 9 at 1.)
`
`32.
`
`The Settlement Agreement also provided that,
`
`The parties mutually agree as follows (a) Creamalicious, Inc. shall cause to
`be paid to Coolab Foods, LLC the following: (1) Fifty Seven Thousand and
`Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($57,500.00) on 06/10/2022; and (2) the
`balance owing as in three equal payments of Thirty Thousand Six Hundred
`Twenty Seven Dollars and 92/100 ($30,627.92) on 06/24/2022, on
`07/01/2022, and a final payment on 07/08/2022, as full and final settlement
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 5 of 11 PageID #:5
`
`of this matter (the “settlement payment”). Payments will be made via ACH.
`Any outstanding amounts owed at the time of a failure to make a payment
`in accordance with this agreement will be subject to a default interest of
`eight percent (8%) per annum. In the event of a default in payment which
`has not been remedied within three (3) business days, Creamalicious. Inc.
`will also be responsible for Coolab Foods, LLC reasonable legal costs
`associated with enforcing this agreement . . . (c) Coolab Foods LLC will
`release the finished goods, packaging and ingredients for pickup, the same
`day as receipt of wire confirmation of the first settlement payment of Fifty
`Seven Thousand and Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($57 ,500.00). These
`items will be documented on a bill of lading provided to Elizabeth Rogers.
`
`
`The following additional terms were also included in the Settlement Agreement:
`
`
`(Id. ¶ 2.)
`
`33.
`
`a. CooLab’s
`release of Creamalicious was “conditioned upon
`Cremalicious, Inc. [sic] making all of the settlement payments to Coolab
`Foods, LLC. If Creamalicious, Inc. fails to make all of the settlement
`payments, Coolab Foods LLC is free to avail themselves of all legal
`remedies available to them including, but not limited to, a lawsuit to
`enforce this agreement.” (Id. ¶ 3(c).)
`
`
`b. “If this agreement is breached, the breaching party will indemnify and
`hold the other harmless from any resulting claims, including attorney
`fees and costs.” (Id. ¶ 5(a).)
`
`c. “The party representatives executing this agreement warrant that they
`are the duly authorized representatives of the respective entities
`designated below and are fully empowered to execute this agreement on
`behalf of the respective parties.” (Id. ¶ 5(e).)
`
`d. “This agreement must be construed in accordance with the laws of the
`State of Illinois.” (Id. ¶ 5(g).)
`
`
`e. Creamalicious, Inc., shall at Coolab Foods, LLC’s option, be in default
`under this Agreement upon the happening of any of the following events
`or conditions (each, an “Event of Default”): (a) a failure to pay any
`amount due under the Note or this Agreement the date the same is due;
`(b) the failure by Creamalicious, Inc. to perform any of its other
`obligations under this Agreement within ten (10) days of notice from
`Coolab Foods, LLC of the same;” (Id. ¶ 6.)
`
`On June 9, 2022, the day before the Settlement Agreement was executed, Richard
`
`
`
`
`
`
`34.
`
`White sent an email to CooLab in which he provided the schedule for the trucks that would arrive
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 6 of 11 PageID #:6
`
`at CooLab’s facility the following day to pick up the goods prepared for Creamalicious. The email
`
`also provided that Elizabeth Rogers would be at the CooLab facility and that she would transfer
`
`the initial settlement payment of $57,500 once she confirmed all packing and ingredients were
`
`available to load on the trucks.
`
`35.
`
`On June 10, 2022, Elizabeth Rogers sent an email to CooLab showing the ACH
`
`payment confirmation for the first payment under the Settlement Agreement.
`
`36.
`
`CooLab worked into the night preparing the trucks for shipment, and once Roger
`
`Cunningham sent a copy of the Settlement Agreement signed on behalf of Creamalicious, CooLab
`
`released the goods to Creamalicious.
`
`37.
`
`On June 15, 2022, after Creamalicious had received all of the goods, CooLab was
`
`informed that Creamalicious had reversed the ACH payment for the initial settlement payment.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`CooLab issued a notice of default to Creamalicious on June 15, 2022.
`
`Creamalicious has failed to pay the outstanding amounts due to CooLab and has
`
`refused to honor its obligations under the Settlement Agreement.
`
`COUNT I
`(Breach of Settlement Agreement against Creamalicious)
`
`40.
`
`CooLab incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 39 of the Complaint
`
`as though fully set forth herein.
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`The Settlement Agreement is a valid, enforceable and binding contract.
`
`CooLab performed all of its obligations under the Settlement Agreement.
`
`Creamalicious materially breached the Settlement Agreement by failing to pay the
`
`amounts to CooLab by the dates required by the Settlement Agreement.
`
`44.
`
`Creamalicious is in default under the Settlement Agreement.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 7 of 11 PageID #:7
`
`45.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Creamalicious’s material breach of the
`
`Settlement Agreement, CooLab has suffered damages in the amount of $149,383.75, plus default
`
`interest of 8%, and attorneys’ fees and costs.
`
`COUNT II
`(Breach of Contract against Creamalicious)
`
`46.
`
`CooLab incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 39 of the Complaint
`
`as though fully set forth herein.
`
`47.
`
`CooLab and Creamalicious entered into a valid and enforceable agreement whereby
`
`CooLab would purchase supplies and manufacture Creamalicious’s ice cream and Creamalicious
`
`would pay CooLab for the goods and services provided.
`
`48.
`
`CooLab fully performed all of its obligations under the agreement by providing the
`
`agreed upon goods and services.
`
`49.
`
`Defendant Creamalicious breached its obligations under the agreement by failing
`
`and refusing to pay for the goods and services provided by CooLab, including those set forth in
`
`Invoice # 1660, Invoice # 1665, Invoice # 1675, Invoice # 1684, Invoice # 1692, Invoice #1703,
`
`Invoice # 1707, and Invoice # 1706, among others.
`
`50.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the breach by defendant Creamalicious, CooLab
`
`has been damaged in excess of $150,000, plus pre-judgment and post-judgment interest.
`
`COUNT III
`(Unjust Enrichment against All Defendants – In the Alternative to Count I and II)
`
`51.
`
`In the event that the Court finds that there is no enforceable agreement between
`
`CooLab and Creamalicious, CooLab pleads the following allegations in the alternative.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 8 of 11 PageID #:8
`
`52.
`
`As set forth in paragraphs 1 to 39, defendants requested and CooLab provided
`
`goods and services to defendants. In particular, CooLab purchased supplies and manufactured
`
`Creamalicious’s ice cream.
`
`53.
`
`Defendants accepted the goods, packaging, and ingredients that CooLab had
`
`prepared and procured for defendants.
`
`54.
`
`In consideration for those goods and services, CooLab expected defendants to
`
`compensate them as set forth in invoices issued by CooLab. To date, however, defendants have
`
`failed to compensate CooLab for the goods and services set forth in Invoice # 1660, Invoice #
`
`1665, Invoice # 1675, Invoice # 1684, Invoice # 1692, Invoice #1703, Invoice # 1707, and Invoice
`
`# 1706, among others.
`
`55.
`
`Defendants have therefore been enriched and received benefits at Plaintiffs’
`
`expense.
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`Defendants receipt and retention of these benefits was unjust and wrongful.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of defendants’ conduct, CooLab has suffered injury
`
`for which compensation is sought in the form of monetary damages in an amount in excess of
`
`$150,000, plus pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and that will be established at trial by
`
`jury.
`
`COUNT IV
`(Promissory Fraud against All Defendants)
`
`58.
`
`CooLab incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 39 of the Complaint
`
`as though fully set forth herein.
`
`59.
`
`Defendants engaged in unlawful promissory fraud. Specifically, defendants
`
`engaged in an unlawful scheme to defraud CooLab into releasing to defendants the goods,
`
`packaging, and ingredients that CooLab had prepared and procured for defendants.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 9 of 11 PageID #:9
`
`60.
`
`In June 2022, defendants knew that CooLab would not release the goods,
`
`packaging, and ingredients that CooLab had prepared and procured for defendants unless
`
`defendants represented that they would enter into the Settlement Agreement in good faith and that
`
`they would make an initial settlement payment of $57,500.
`
`61.
`
`On June 9, 2022, Richard White sent an email in which he falsely represented that
`
`the defendants intended to make the initial settlement payment the following day after confirming
`
`what was available to load on the trucks.
`
`62.
`
`On June 10, 2022, Elizabeth Rogers sent an email to CooLab showing the ACH
`
`payment confirmation for the first payment under the Settlement Agreement to induce CooLab to
`
`release the goods, packaging, and ingredients that CooLab had prepared and procured for
`
`defendants.
`
`63.
`
`Also on June 10, 2022, Roger Cunningham sent a copy of the Settlement
`
`Agreement purportedly signed on behalf of Creamalicious to CooLab to induce CooLab to release
`
`the goods, packaging, and ingredients that CooLab had prepared and procured for defendants.
`
`64.
`
`Defendants intentionally misrepresented and concealed their intent to withdraw the
`
`ACH payment for the initial settlement payment after receipt of the goods from CooLab.
`
`65.
`
`On June 10, 2022, in reasonable reliance on defendants false representations,
`
`CooLab released to defendants the goods, packaging, and ingredients that CooLab had prepared
`
`and procured for defendants.
`
`66.
`
`After receipt of the goods from CooLab, Creamalicious reversed the ACH payment
`
`for the initial settlement payment.
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 10 of 11 PageID #:10
`
`67.
`
`Defendants had no intention of keeping their promises in the Settlement
`
`Agreement, and almost immediately upon receiving the goods and services from CooLab, violated
`
`them.
`
`68.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of defendants’ conduct, CooLab has suffered injury
`
`for which compensation is sought in the form of monetary damages in an amount in excess of
`
`$150,000, plus punitive damages and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and that will be
`
`established at trial by jury.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff CooLab Foods LLC, requests the following relief:
`
`A.
`
`An Order awarding CooLab actual and compensatory damages, with default
`
`interest and attorneys’ fees and costs, for Creamalicious’s breach of the Settlement Agreement;
`
`B.
`
`An Order awarding CooLab actual and compensatory damages, with pre-judgment
`
`and post-judgment interest, for Creamalicious’s breach of contract by failing to pay the CooLab
`
`invoices;
`
`C.
`
`In the alternative, an Order awarding CooLab damages in the amount by which
`
`defendants were unjustly enriched;
`
`D.
`
`An Order awarding CooLab actual, compensatory and punitive damages, with pre-
`
`judgment and post-judgment interest, for defendants’ promissory fraud; and
`
`E.
`
`All such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Plaintiff CooLab Foods LLC hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case: 1:22-cv-03355 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/27/22 Page 11 of 11 PageID #:11
`
`COOLAB FOODS LLC
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael J. Grant
`One of Their Attorneys
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 27, 2022
`
`
`
`Michael J. Grant (ARDC #6275028)
`Ashley Crettol Insalaco (ARDC #6305680)
`TABET DIVITO & ROTHSTEIN LLC
`209 S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor
`Chicago, IL 60604
`Telephone: (312) 762-9450
`mgrant@tdrlaw.com
`ainsalaco@tdrlaw.com
`
`
`
`11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket