throbber
Case: 1:23-cv-03147 Document #: 25 Filed: 03/14/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:66
`
`United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
`
`Case Title:
`
`Candace Morgan
`
`GOOGLE, LLC and JEAN DOES 1-2
`
`VS.
`
`Plantiff(s)
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`Case Number:
`
`1:23-cv-3147
`
`Judge:
`
`Hon. John Robert Blakey
`
`Lisa D. Zang
`
`I,
`
`hereby apply to the Court
`
`under Local Rule 83.14 for permission to appear and participate in the above-entitled action on behalf of
`
`Google, LLC
`
`by whom I have been retained.
`
`I am a member in good standing and eligible to practice before the following courts:
`
`Title of Court
`
`Supreme Court of the United States
`
`USDC - Eastern District of Michigan
`
`USDC - Central District of California
`
`USDC - Northern District of California
`
`Date Admitted
`
`8/25/2017
`
`04/08/2019
`
`01/02/2014
`
`06/23/2015
`
`I have currently, or within the year preceding the date of this application, made pro hac vice applications to this
`Court in the following actions:
`
`Case Number
`
`Case Title
`
`Date of Application
`(Granted or Denied)*
`
`1:23-cv-02793
`
`MaiBo (Shenzhen) ke ji you xian gong si v. Whaleco, Inc.
`
`6/14/2023 (Granted)
`
`1:22-cv-07119
`
`Roadget Business PTE. Ltd. v. Whaleco, Inc., et al.
`
`7/31/2023 (Granted)
`
`1:23-cv-04785
`
`1:23-cv-04786
`
`Tavia Milburn v. PDD Holdings, Inc. et al.
`
`8/23/2023 (Granted)
`
`Vincent Trinidad v. PDD Holdings, Inc. et al.
`
`8/23/2023 (Granted)
`
`*If denied, please explain:
`(Attach additional form if
`necessary)
`
`N/A
`
`

`

`Case: 1:23-cv-03147 Document #: 25 Filed: 03/14/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:67
`Has the applicant ever been:
`
`censured, suspended, disbarred, or otherwise disciplined by any court?
`
`Yes
`
`or is the applicant currently the subject of an investigation of the
`applicant’s professional conduct?
`
`transferred to inactive status, voluntarily withdrawn, or resigned from the
`bar of any court?
`
`denied admission to the bar of any court?
`
`held in contempt of court?
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`No
`
`NOTE: If the answer to any of the above questions is yes, please attach a brief description of the incident(s) and the applicant’s current
`status before any court, or any agency thereof, where disciplinary sanctions were imposed, or where an investigation or investigations
`of the applicant’s conduct may have been instituted.
`
`I have read the Rules of Professional Conduct for the Northern District of Illinois and the Standards for Professional Conduct within
`the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit, and will faithfully adhere to them. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`correct.
`
`03/14/2024
`
`Lisa D. Zang
`
`S/
`
`Date
`
`Electronic Signature of Applicant
`
`Applicant’s Name
`
`Last Name
`Zang
`
`First Name
`Lisa
`
`Middle Name/Initial
`D
`
`Applicant’s Law Firm
`
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
`
`Applicant’s Address
`
`Street Address
`1900 Avenue of the Stars
`
`Room/Suite Number
`28th Floor
`
`City
`Century City
`
`State
`CA
`
`ZIP Code
`90067
`
`Work Phone Number and Email
`424-446-6927;lzang@wsgr.com
`
`(The pro hac vice admission fee is $150.00 and shall be paid to the Clerk. No admission under Rule 83.14 is effective until such
`time as the fee has been paid.)
`
`NOTE: Attorneys seeking to appear pro hac vice may wish to consider filing a petition for admission to the general bar of this Court.
`The fee for admission to the General Bar is $181.00 The fee for pro hac vice admission is $150.00. Admission to the general bar permits
`an attorney to practice before this Court. Pro hac vice admission entitles an attorney to appear in a particular case only. Application for
`such admission must be made in each case; and the admission fee must be paid in each case.
`
`Rev. 08/16/2023
`
`

`

`Case: 1:23-cv-03147 Document #: 25 Filed: 03/14/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:68
`
`United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
`
`Lisa D. Zang
`
`(Continued)
`
`I am a member in good standing and eligible to practice before the following courts:
`
`Title of Court
`Supreme Court of the State of California
`
`Date Admitted
`11/27/2013
`
`I have currently, or within the year preceding the date of this application, made pro hac
`vice applications to this Court in the following actions:
`
`Case Number
`
`1:23-cv-04760
`
`1:23-cv-04729
`
`1:23-cv-04824
`
`Case Title
`
`Zhihan Wang v. PDD
`Holdings, Inc. et al.
`Tim Lord v. PDD Holdings,
`Inc. et al.
`Illustrata Servicos Design,
`Ltda v. PDD Holdings, Inc. et
`al.
`
`Date of Application
`(Granted or Denied)*
`8/23/2023 (Granted)
`
`8/24/2023 (Granted)
`
`8/23/2023 (Granted)
`
`Explanation of answer “yes” to “Has the applicant ever been denied admission to the bar of
`any court”:
`
`My application for pro hac vice appearance in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
`Texas was denied on 10/19/2023 due to the application missing a page. The case was SZ DJI
`Technology Co. Ltd. v. Bell Textron Inc. et al, Case No. 4:23-cv-01025-O.
`
`Because the application was missing a page, the docket text stated: “Upon review, the
`application provides no local counsel of record to be associated with Plaintiff's counsel Lisa D.
`Zang in this matter.”
`
`The application was resubmitted with the missing page, and granted on 11/16/2023.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket