`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
` FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`NORTHERN DIVISION
`
`CANDACE MORGAN,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC, JEAN DOES 1-2,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-03147
`
`
`Hon. John R. Blakey
`
`
`NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL INTERNAL DOCUMENTS FROM
`GOOGLE IN RESPONSE TO REQUESTS SERVED IN NOVEMBER 2023
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on Wednesday March 27, 2023 at 11:00 a.m., Plaintiff
`
`Candace Morgan (“Ms. Morgan”) will appear before the Honorable John R. Blakey, in the
`
`United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 219 S. Dearborn Street,
`
`Chicago, IL, Room 1203, and present Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Internal Documents from
`
`Google in Response to Requests Served in November 2023, copies of which are hereby served
`
`upon you.
`
`In support of the Motion, Plaintiff states as follows:
`
`
`1.
`
`The Complaint alleges that starting in 2022 and continuing into early 2023,
`
`individuals that remain unidentified began a campaign of on-line harassment of the Plaintiff by
`
`leaving a series of negative reviews about businesses affiliated with the Plaintiff on a website
`
`controlled by Defendant Google, Google Maps.
`
`2.
`
`The Complaint further alleges that while the harassment started under a
`
`presumably fictitious username (“Mike Hunt”), Google allowed the harasser to change the
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case: 1:23-cv-03147 Document #: 27 Filed: 03/22/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:71
`
`username from Mike Hunt to Candace Morgan, such that the harasser was now impersonating
`
`Ms. Morgan, appearing to leave reviews in her name not only about the businesses with which
`
`she is affiliated, but also about other third-party businesses.
`
`3.
`
`The Complaint alleges that Google maintains an “anti-impersonation” policy
`
`under which Google represents that it will not permit impersonation of others on its website
`
`properties. Ms. Morgan reported the impersonation to Google, but Google declined to take
`
`action and continued to allow the impersonation of the Plaintiff.
`
`4.
`
`The Complaint further alleges that the harasser then further escalated the
`
`impersonation by obtaining a photo of Ms. Morgan and changing the image associated with the
`
`photo. Ms. Morgan took the image of herself and owns the copyright for the photo.
`
`5.
`
`Using Google’s copyright take-down procedure, Ms. Morgan requested that
`
`Google take down her copyrighted image. Google acknowledged it had received the request
`
`assigned the request case number 1-5722000033816:
`
`6.
`
`On April 23, 2023 removals@google.com, following up on Google case number
`
`1-5722000022816, indicating it would not “consider the request” including action to stop the
`
`infringement, unless Ms. Morgan provided a court order that mandates the removal of the
`
`“allegedly infringing content.”
`
`7.
`
`In response to Google’s refusal to stop the infringement of her copyright absent a
`
`court order, Ms. Morgan filed this action.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Shortly after the action was filed, the user profile of the harasser disappeared.
`
`On November 24, 2023, Plaintiff served 7 requests for production of documents
`
`on Google. The first request asked for documents referring or relating to Ms. Morgan.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case: 1:23-cv-03147 Document #: 27 Filed: 03/22/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:72
`
`10.
`
`On March 4, 2024, Google served objections and responses to the document
`
`request and produced documents limited entirely to printouts from various Google website.
`
`Among other objections, Google objected to the first request as overly broad.
`
`11.
`
`On March 6, 2024, the parties met and conferred about Google objections, and
`
`Plaintiff agreed to narrow the first request (documents referring or relating to Ms. Morgan) to:
`
`(a) documents from or to Ms. Morgan concerning her requests; and (b) any internal Google
`
`communications about those requests. There are shortcomings in other aspects of Google’s
`
`production but the production of these central documents is the most pressing.
`
`12.
`
`To date, Google has not produced a single non-public document relevant to Ms.
`
`Morgan’s complaints, has provided no date when it will do so, and has not explicitly agreed to
`
`produce any of Google’s internal communications about her requests.
`
`13.
`
`Fact discovery in this matter closes on April 26, and the deposition of the sole
`
`witness identified by Google in its initial disclosures and who Google also designated as its
`
`30(b)(6) witness is scheduled for April 10.
`
`14. WHEREFOR, Plaintiff seeks and order compelling Google to produce, no later
`
`than April 5, 2024: (a) documents from or to Ms. Morgan concerning her requests; and (b) any
`
`internal Google communications about those requests.
`
`
`March 22, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`By: /s/ David Berten
`David Berten
`Alison A. Richards
`Global IP Law Group, LLC
`55 W. Monroe St., Ste. 3400
`Chicago, Illinois 60603
`Phone: 312.241.1502
`dberten@giplg.com
`
`arichards@giplg.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff, Candace Morgan
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case: 1:23-cv-03147 Document #: 27 Filed: 03/22/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:73
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 22, 2024 I filed the above paper using the CM/ECF
`
`system, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic
`
`service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E) and Local Rule 5.9.
`
`/s/ David Berten
`David Berten
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`