throbber
wr-u—g
`
`"ml
`
`1-...
`
`_
`
`-_
`
`M
`
`3)
`
`En Hwa‘w
`
`y
`
`E fimflfi MAM I 0mm b&wflfis To
`(\‘Q‘ W4 Vflefi Rd’hwvfi
`EEfi’Ok/ILQQ, Hsm W’H/v A (LMM
`ERG? Elem M2 (M The DWAS 63d) 13w 990mg
`IS» TWA ”Eat flmfih‘fig Cam («Ade
`”Elms
`Kai”:-
`(3% Thé Emcemge,
`52$§an¢$5
`HFQMPAnfleVde
`?fdduflq A ?(AMP (365 cflw fledged M Cm)
`’Y‘mfl’
`“WMMM;81_lcknlm g NA) GA
`E‘EBA NA’V
`QLJJJH V aims L&Sq
`'wjlkiamlmflhsgsw.@fl,a%.gwkdmimb_
`Lana (Hag) mug
`RWWG> UAW ?(dm‘kgg Hmkmn b&m {’P<W13<‘£u{(j
`EemmA“ fins 6mm? “macaw”
`«21$ (‘emschsX
`h 31¢ m1 ('1 Wm mama!» 4a Tmmuse
`
`”1g:
`
`Uys
`
`+5.2;
`
`Q&mw—z
`
`mgmlzxf SQR
`
`V‘Edueé’k’fg
`h‘?
`
`Vgg-EA ?Ad’k‘ah‘ae
`
`3g
`
`HtckmeLd’me/k
`
`i E
`
`Ebb
`
`:Cm “THE
`SMLle/AM Q‘ IBQLLLLCM R T
`Mm 'lqflm" 1364’ ( T“ maMM
`mlkfluébe‘ D ”.chfi;nofibcmj\7$gflm >
`pcminlrzfafl V
`>
`’ V3”
`>
`5 ”Ufifiggmfla Kfikoefl'
`flunkLegs ”Dawn; e ‘%' 3K
`began QqnjfiS
`"éwgafiz.
`
`a
`
`I
`
`quggm [RT
`'2 76m
`ugw
`jg. Efilwq
`m
`
`

`

`o? emckjfijmwfififl. _-%.a_&m€¢;c2__i_bm;flzs> (3.4) 52%
`(“e Vfl‘eu/ ”QMM) 0mg
`62MMahxhgnflmrkzfik£-»_MCKQ.LQULQem/.<e_w_
`mw kg Wwa ithQKLMchLJaAA/Adiacfl 7- em ry D 05%
`«ml "Howe gggqréfudmfi- $44. QAdfia‘b .m.
`W, «Liking
`WM WM?»
`ThinEfigflgfii--_J33§;Qg_«z_§:¥_s__V_u_/9LLflaw“A_m‘
`T'Wd flank
`?_MJM{21-9%,ég‘ewfizflifilfl"CL a4: +??_o__;g>_rmw._
`
`jML/I <99
`
`Ge
`
`/
`
`‘T‘m‘x ($5
`
`<1;
`
`_
`
`fl.
`
`I
`
`gié
`
`,
`
`‘*
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`l
`
`(1% a-
`
`.
`
`«£9 “UNA 4rd
`X/qfl‘é
`A’rlrdmeg‘__:9qxgfl§egen$anlm
`IANe913250.fiwéafimms‘ggiithfihéw.<9_&.¢L’QB5*_JEM/m‘_fivm;
`Wmfilrifi d? ’9wmflawfiuvgmwfi4m WJARQis’firggfih.Rcowflgkw
`V&Mfl'fifijyfléfiag EXHIKLT A aJr 4:935 .9; h JLQ
`éi- W____
`3(szqu «A&ASLKAJANNZMC
`{m 14.9..“3.3.,“zgmqfigz.>w+b_¢._$¢y_¢m_zmdgWA;L;944.423:th59..
`-
`{?.CQLMWMWM.;.fiw’»;%éwé$a&e..fizflw{€&dLfia},kq¢4.4___.(’§gzgegifi_flWWW».
`La..V7,613.Lu.‘5_._¢.<amkeja,émas,>2 w; 99mg
`é (/4 «96m a
`??mgmibjnobwqmmuflamab&wgaaamuyulfimflé a «L
`Ma'irfi/LEAI :flflLRH M \{anhmgnjh A gmflj
`V40§w§§én
`aMAu V’s when: ()3 edi «Qéhga_l§_'§gy1&£¢££z_fim.fifa€_am5£5fl__
`Evolsta pr §S&ESML{£®,@IWFG.C...‘3mfi.g_angjnél__@)~_§dj&5mm WW
`mwméwgyimngvmwkJfi_wfi~68ic_<fimul. e: w UM m w}
`4L,
`inGggx/Eflf‘qmfij; (mg C?) {Vflflutgfimfl ?msufig.
`v_gamuggfihxhaaLuQifiEED‘ chmél v.
`:5 a
`1’3 'imggmfishk
`eds‘gqngv,
`Y‘agéfléLKAHE
`mioabils’lfljbgk <0§sqms¢9<D M9 *Hn‘zflev} 96M? wawO iqm/Q/
`
`WEE ELM f
`mflgfim‘ékfimma afi 3mg ?rmsimblv; 4Mg%jgl..fil‘iw
`
`i’?
`
`(\Ihmava
`
`5
`
`n
`
`a
`P<-
`
`‘
`
`(W‘
`
`lw
`
`

`

`Ilkfiffifiwfiwt;
`
`21in3nawn"awmwa
`
`'é’m's‘fi?
`
`H
`
`g
`
`wmfiwjgwwfimvcWPVMDR69:90‘+9a9PO693+3"]:
`
`“5““?
`
`L????fi’wa‘)
`
`’IQJ13AIAOR.
`
`afiwmvsvw/V5362fa;
`'5);Ego)arcfin
`mt,1&3)7)fihsq,“{W217—WWWigmum
`wSawmfivm—me—m‘m—v——
`WWWyxfiWWWWKWmmL,W».ar__._
`UPfi-g“WW9”?!FMQ73'V’25JXW5
`L1»m26'nVIJ—‘ngip‘fl—WwfiVWLTWVEJQ:
`gbwafimIr
`wyawmfilm.@363waXWWKE23%“BWWM
`$1)uwwmg}:
`3&6,‘woy+M©Wé~bfiumuam)T&w,41r5‘
`fiQj’pqurvw6mg2&3?)
`0oz)
`méppTS’r?
`Irv?uvcl/gzojbnpw
`5:1M)TrMfflm"
`WW)“SW'6”
`Vdo‘fi9%3.?MWV
`nma-ua3Q3)!»
`(fjhvm
`gimp“aowaawnafiucxnwwfl
`rmgfmwgfi/wam’Owner)
`9133)?)qu
`’SVI;OHV‘LfiW
`swamp“
`fUaWQbQ’T-T
`h/fpwvufg’
`wJWF”KTW‘”6“”WNW?6m
`0fwagMIWOufi—gum?!)SW13,
`?Ydhwvi
`WWPPVWHWfUa-wa-(novhrwnwrwzng‘Pjgg,\Mlwpffiufijm?
`(rimVWHJDMHmpS05asn%W7abmwifi—Q‘a’Oi’A
`wfi,opmfid
`giny
`9.8!)23m)?v/LK
`deigupflgJ
`*3»th
`6,?flLI/D
`’W?[Qsdf
`Ja?Jx/‘Wd
`
`'11
`
`l
`
`IE
`
`74913,)?90'3v
`
`$761“:sz
`
`0+
`
`,5
`
`IE
`
`‘
`
`c
`
`.
`
`3‘.st
`
`

`

`w?"
`
`7‘
`
`V.
`
`#607st Y‘QQWMH4A
`(covfl'wégmmmm*&w<Dq~emPr}f
`3065
`Wfl/vwk’ deH? érwlxm
`(‘rvdnsWP/[Qe/cmy arcmi’lm
`m)?
`«k mfilm eawm¢o%m~|ggath_d§; sin mui fmmk
`Mnn/YV’SGL DMJMH’YM‘ 6mg ENC 64(10
`mafigmfl MM$6; 3&9 umasbflszszhs '3 :th bx 7s Cmsfl
`CL/Lnnnnfikdm
`{‘AMC/gMm bid
`Ws‘k’imbfihw Wswdrgafli yeqaeié‘
`I ”Thrmgsv’gflmfl ainJmW
`444d? W13 ,MQW? ”Haw. am &_~m<qfifi§§~?m5vlwgwa‘
`”’er Tins
`_.:§r)<9,”T{. K .36; 252V C1229 gimflflfllflmwwflmmbi 3'73
`J
`ukéifiazfigflimezb.
`
`_
`
`.
`
`.
`
`m.
`
`AM H /é/ 20
`a 66w
`?(??Mg
`
`fasédME
`
`_
`
`,
`
`§?AA/ILAQA
`fldfinmgzl quéxivflnnh (Jew (Stn/eE
`
`[/49 M médu/E mAIAALmfifiurs‘umanggfié;qm;
`emmwm aggmlrkfl M
`um r
`F
`KI] ££ng
`wmyfighjfi 5mm
`
`_
`
`@ffllg
`
`mam} é. Hawk
`d"? $757 Pyengmfl
`:r .(M. c3. 5m fl
`Inflimupasgs, m mm:
`wlmssfififiw (33$
`
`.
`
`

`

`7
`
`\m/
`
`g
`
`’
`
`.1
`
`.L
`
`02666 0’9
`
`>
`
`'
`
`rw—m
`
`WV Rjrm
`:1 retgldmv Wduw Qem‘w‘ <3? mul Y‘eytLu‘ES’k
`:Lm ,Y‘fiquz‘fi‘}? %E Eddy]
`9M1 §€¥Hlmi¢n¥
`$61.4sz {)fifiey‘fil,
`Mal gab c9611 R&hkksk/E
`lWW“ W5)“ Efim meu me Faxm
`
`"Z—geo
`
`JUL," q)"‘lq:
`
`§Q’FA‘Q’P‘L‘5’K r2724“,
`$434M
`EMA: flak ?nY-KD
`Vidgw §§de og'
`em
`Z
`"Wig JADM figmwcfl
`I‘Eeavh CDWR+
`I6? RWs'mJ FMMA.
`w‘w‘fi W6
`@n ’fiI-Mk 905L135 rfiqefi.
`”Hard‘
`"Pviwii
`iLJm
`____A _Y‘$U_|3W5¢_ ___
`
`i
`
`'
`
`.
`
`_
`
`£3 I’M 86 m1 'Jgirfi fir SanQ infiewgqhhw
`:nflw Emapwazq.
`
`‘
`
`50.9—
`
`f(gfixl-I‘Da, qu ‘
`amia-
`wifix
`“L Aka 3w ~a~r4§ Ar,
`Lfikvfiv ?flswggls
`A819 ch'gm QIAM ’
`VE/i-¥§~a~
`rm ”Ha.
`”Hm Lew QHQ CM" C&Vufluinxé
`thwczk i
`“Pnb‘i 4° LN?" M&—
`.ZQA-uak" fiaafiin 4H3 wd‘H’W)
`WUWUS. fimfi W‘swwi)
`ErtcggV‘ED Sufi
`wifii'va Ck) SW5
`mJJmOaux?
`:64“ fink 26/1463}.
`"ng-«JY Vida.
`dé '
`
`_,
`
`’%(> '
`
`..
`
`EXHIBIT”
`
`7
`
`Sq
`
`

`

`STATE OF INDIANA
`COUNTY 0F SULLIVAN
`
`SULLIVAN COUNTY CIRCUITCOURTI
`CAUSE N0. 77001-1904-CT—000204
`
`)
`) ss:
`)
`
`MICHAEL 1). HICKINGBOTTOM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`ROBERT E. CARTER, ct aL,
`Defendants.
`
`V
`
`DEFENDANTS RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS
`FOR PRODUCTION OF-DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
`Defendants: Robefi E. Carter,_ Richard Brown, Charles Dugan', Randall Purcell, and Jerry
`
`Snyder (collectively, “-Defendants'”), by- c0u1‘1’sel, pursuant to Rul'es-Zé and 34 0f the-Indiana
`
`Rules of Trial. Procedure; responds to Plaintiff‘s Request for Production, received on July 12,
`
`2019, as follows:
`
`GENERAL STATEMENT
`By responding to the Plaintiff‘s Requast for Production, the Defendants do not waive their
`
`right to object to the use’ of the following responses at anytime, and 'on any groUnd in 'this or'in
`
`any other proceeding. Defendants have not completed preparation for trial. Thus the Defendants’
`responses are limited to documents known t0 Defendants at this time and do not constitute a waiver
`
`of their right t0 introduce additional documents at trial.
`GENERAL OBJECTIONS
`The following genera]. obj actions apply to each individual Request, and shall have the
`
`samec'ffect as if set fully in response t0 each Request.
`
`

`

`'1.
`
`Defendants obj ect to each Request to the extent that such Request seeks to impose
`
`any greater obligation than otherwise provided under .the-rules of discovery-‘se’t forth in the Federal
`
`Rulgsgajf Civ'il-VvProc'ed-ua‘e 0r any ch'gr applicable law.
`
`2.
`
`Defendants object to each. Request 'to the extent that’such Request calls for the
`
`tidentifiCatiOH or disclosure of any information that is protected by the deliberative process
`
`privilege, the attorneywlient privilege: the work product doctrinq or any Other applicable
`
`privilege.
`
`3.
`
`Defendants object ‘to each Request 'to the extent, that such Request seeks the
`
`productiqn of documents 'and/or materialsnot within their possession, custody or control.
`
`4.
`
`Defendants Object t0 each ‘Requ‘ea t0 the extent .that such Request seeks the
`
`production o'f documents-and/for materials that arenof relevant or t0 the extant'that th'e Reques'tiis
`
`overbrpad, unduly burdensome, oppressive, and/or not reasonably calculated f0 lead to the
`
`discovaly of adiniésibl'e evidence.
`
`‘5.
`
`Dafendants expressly resewe thezrightl'o object to the admission into“ evidence of
`any and all information and, documents that maybe made ava’ilable-Ain responsc t0 any Request on
`
`any ground, .inchiding without limitation, the ground that'informétiorl and document's responsive
`
`t_o the Request are irrslevant and'immaterial to thexi'ssues in this litigation.
`
`6-.
`
`To the extent that; Defendants produce documents in response to any Request to
`
`which it has obj ceted, suchproduCtiqn i's without waiv‘er'of any su'c'h obj ection.
`
`.7;
`
`Inadvgrtentdisclosure: if- any', ofdorcum‘ents or'informafion subjectto anyvpl‘ilvilegg
`
`.or protection? in'cIuding- wi'thOut' limitation; the-deliber'ative process privilege, the attorneykclient
`
`privilege 0r wjork product doctrine, 'sha'llgnout constitute waiver of any such:priv.ilege.
`
`"
`K g
`31m? -
`
`

`

`8.
`
`Defendants. object to each Request t0 the extent that it seeks, documents and/or
`
`materials that are publicly available, already in thepossession of Plaintiff, or equally accessible to
`
`Plaintiff and Defendant.
`
`9.
`
`Neither an indicaii'on'that documents will be produced nor an obj action to a Request
`
`indicates that Defendants possessesthe documents and/or materials I‘ésponsive-to such Request.
`
`10.
`
`Defendant specifically assumes no obligation to amend or supplement its responses?
`
`beyond that set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Indiana Trial Rules. These
`responses and any subsequent responses are madé solely for the pumose of this action. No
`representations of .1televa110y or materiality are‘ made with respect t0 any response herein. A11
`
`appropriate objections to the use of'this information at any hearing or trial 0r for any other purpose
`
`are, reserved and maybe interposed a't the time of any hearing or trial or any other time.
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1:
`review forms frOm SeptembEr :12, 2Q 18 — July 9:2019.
`
`Copies of any 30 day» restrictive housing
`
`RESPONSE: See attached document's, bates' stamped DEFSOOOOOI — DEFSOOOOZ9.
`
`“X
`
`REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION N0. 2: Video footage 0f each date signed on each
`(DWRH) Review Fonn.
`RESPONSE: Objection. Plaintiff’s Request is vague, overbroad and unduly burdensome.
`
`The request fails t0 be sufficiently specific to identify which video. footage, {fit even exists,.that
`
`the Plaintiff is seeking; The request also is not sufficiently narrow to permit the Defendants to
`
`engage ‘in meaningful review to identify the time frames within which to search for responsive
`Video. As is visible inthie documents provided» to Plaintiff in response t'o Request f0r Production
`
`6U
`
`

`

`No. 1, the 30-day restrictive housing review forms do not indicate a time at which the reviews
`
`wefe completed.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`CURTIS T. HILL, Jr.
`Attorney General 0f Indiana
`Atty. No. 13999—20
`
`By:
`
`Ilene M. Smitfi
`Deputy Attorney General
`Atty. No. 2281 8-02
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE 0F SERVICE
`I certify that on August 9, 2-0192 the foregoing document was sewed upon the following
`person(s) 'via IEFS, if RegisteredUsers, 0r by depositing the foregoing deeumem in the U.S. Mail;
`
`first class, postage prepaid, if exempt 0r non-registered user.
`
`Michael D. Hickingboflom
`DOC # 147099
`Wabash. Valley Correctional Facility
`P.O. Box 1111
`Carlisle, IN 47838
`
`OFFICE 0F THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
`Indiana Government Center South, 5th Floor
`302, West Washington Street
`Indianapolis: Indiana 46204-2770
`Telephone: (317) 2333-1033
`Facsimile: (317) 232—7979
`E—mail: IIene.Smith@atE.in.gov
`Kathleen.Schaffer'FcDatgingg
`
`Hem; M. Smith
`Deputy Attorney General
`
`LG.
`
`

`

`
`

`

`SULLIVAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 1
`STATE OF INDIANA
`SS: CAUSE NO. 77C01-1904—CT-000204
`COUNTY OF SULLIVAN
`MICHAEL D. HICIGNGBOTTOM,
`
`)
`
`g
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`ROBERT E. CARTER, et aL,
`Defendants.
`
`vvvvvvvvv
`
`REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE
`Defendants, by counsel, respectfully submit this Repiy in Support 0f the Motion to Strike
`Plaintiff s improper second attempt at summary judgment. In support, Defendants provide the
`
`following:
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff provides no arguments, and therefore concedes, that his second summary
`
`judgment motion is filed in violation of Ind. R. Trial P. 56 Which contemplates the
`
`filing of a single summary judgment motion. Mr. Hickingbottom made his at
`
`summary judgment oh August 30, 2019. This summary judgment was briefed and
`denied. Mr. Hickingbottom cannot now seek another bite at the apple. As such, his
`
`subsequent summary judgment motion should be summarily denied.
`
`2. Mr. Hickingbottom aéserts that discovery closed over a year ago. This too is
`incorrect. No case management plan was put in place in this litigation Which set a
`close for discovery. Mr. Hickingbottom is not tasked with determining when
`
`‘
`
`defendants have completed discovery in this case. His overreaching attempt to d0 so
`
`should not be well—taken by this Court.
`
`

`

`3. Defendants therefore renew their request for a case management plan for res\olution of
`
`this pending action. Defendants suggest the close of discovery as December 28, 2020
`
`With dispositive motions being due February 21, 2020. This time would allow the
`
`parties to conduct written discovery, depositions and gather affidavits in support of
`
`their respective positions.
`
`OFFICE 0F ATTORNEY GENERAL
`Indiana Government Center South, 5th Floor
`302 West Washington Street
`Indianapolis, IN 46204-2770
`Telephone: (3 1 7) 232-6287
`Facsimile: (3 17) 232-7979
`E-mail: Marley.Hancock@atg.in.gov
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`CURTIS T. HILL, Jr.
`Indiana Attorney General
`Atty. N0. 13999-20
`
`/s/Marle}g G. Hancock
`Marley G. Hancock
`Deputy Attorney General
`Attorney No. 34617—32
`
`Y2
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on September 28, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing With the
`Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. Further, I certify that a copy of the foregoing has
`been duly served upon the party of record listed below by United States mail, first—class postage
`
`r
`
`prepaid, on September 28, 2020:
`
`Michael Hickingbottom
`DOC # 147099
`Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
`‘ 6908- S.‘ Old US Highway 41
`Carlisle, IN 47838
`
`OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
`Indiana Government Center South, 5th Floor
`302 West Washington Street
`Indianapolis, IN 46204—2770
`Telephone: (3 17) 232—6287
`Facsimile: (317) 232-7979
`E—mail: MarlevHancocMflgingg
`
`/S/Marley G. Hancock
`Marley G. Hancock
`Deputy Attorney General
`
`l3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket