`
`a
`
`011% c7“- c9085
`1A3 "THE
`:muiANA cwm 0F” MEALS
`3 ANWA -‘€vaw ’Wm .54“. 4..
`mzckud “CGKQLNH‘AM.
`> CWA'
`?Lqm’rzfi
`"VS‘
`D Q5. ‘thb 1%!" - CT» good)“
`Chwfleo E5 cud,
`)
`C&E‘ggw
`Démkm s
`‘NSEP 22 202‘
`ummzxza
`mAfi-fi Mm ¢¥ Med
`
`eA- uL’
`
`>
`
`«39¢. uz ?\wv’rifi
`n aw Aka,
`rm fe-A’SLAH
`Came (/33
`454. 4g mfiia h
`"rho 6a “wk 42: aQwA- +9.9,
`Pow u’t
`44R 5 4‘4 A
`Vuud‘b (1;;
`.1- ijf ?tirA-x‘? HfakfiaLgM¢M L5 affmfib ”\‘kz
`3(«n’fir‘r §Mw~mw
`lb Hv%mmwfi*
`é‘g‘ 3/Vq/Q‘
`@RDQR.
`‘m gambk
`$1$en$qn¥$2
`é-‘Q’
`
`q
`
`m.filmf, MAJ; Sawmmb
`(mtuwi' d“
`*Q,\ “@1313?
`ma why).
`a“
`9‘1““; §Ha$ VJ
`ov ws)
`Ak
`unS)
`Sag (qu V&AVE'
`WV, by.
`éfl WWW 5n? d‘Lqé
`{(éx/(Jg/$
`(Hm *m‘ Jvéfis
`MSW £9;
`mega!
`X/nlzl
`
`J
`
`
`
`amdqsx'm
`
`\«Hnwrfiruq HRM-«abéjv‘irém maysfign‘l rulvwé
`dude Mtér-‘an‘
`&tuw\r ”Hi
`Afl
`wwaér
`anLs
`wakag‘nn-L Jw’gm.§‘|‘e]
`WWJud—V §kagiuju‘3.
`
`a9
`
`«his MIN Law
`KW
`‘HBH‘
`64M
`a
`.WWAELJ‘ QL 33%7Dankx baud
`54-1!be 9W3“
`«R’E‘thf-y ?%C.
`M45“)
`$;fo& Cfiaéé
`Mac)
`MM mmggm'z
`645 mfi‘fio
`WM. c. {3,
`”M. 8w nu
`eqnfiam Q; ~m>95>
`
`5-1
`
`Rv.5pe.«_¢¥u\k
`
`murlfi Co- MV'UN-t
`«fink! Q ‘fifid-fl
`§§OV‘d‘
`£14. o. 3.. 5% FL
`3b? We wvwb‘fiq éL
`gégtawvgi‘cfa} g} W¢+
`
`
`
`STATE 0F INDIANA
`) SS:
`COUNTY OF SULLIVAN )
`
`)
`
`.
`
`IN THE SULLIVAN CIRCUIT COURT
`2021 TERM
`CAUSE NO: 7700 1-1904-CT-000204
`
`MICHAEL D. HICIGNGBOTTOM
`Plainfifi'
`
`Vs.
`ROBERT CARTER ET AL.
`Defendant
`
`ORDER
`Comes now the Petitioner, pro—se, and files Plaintiffs Reply To
`Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgnent—And Plaintiffs Cross-Move for
`Summary Judgment on A11 Eighth and fourteenth Amendment Claims. This
`Court granted the Plaintiff an Extension of fime in which to Respond to the
`Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on June 18, 2021 that allowed
`him 30 days in which to respond, making the deadline July 18, 2021. The
`Court notes that the Plaintifi' did not respond in a timely manner and the
`Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment was gamed on July 27, 2021
`making the Plainfifls Reply to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgmnt-And
`Plaintiffs Cross-Move For Summary Judgnent On A11 Eighth and Fourteenth
`Amendment Claims moot.
`
`ALL Is' so ORDEREDMS. ¢ROBERT E HUNLEY n, Judge
`
`Sullivan Circuit Court
`
`



