throbber
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 182 / Thursday, September 21, 2017 / Notices
`
`44217
`
`comments may be limited. The public
`may send written comments to the
`EWRAC at BLM Spokane District, Attn.
`EWRAC, 1103 North Fancher, Spokane
`Valley, WA 99212.
`Before including your address, phone
`number, email address, or other
`personal identifying information in your
`comments, please be aware that your
`entire comment—including your
`personal identifying information—may
`be made publicly available at any time.
`While you can ask us in your comment
`to withhold your personal identifying
`information from public review, we
`cannot guarantee that we will be able to
`do so.
`Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4–2.
`
`Linda Clark,
`Spokane District Manager.
`[FR Doc. 2017–20194 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`[Investigation No. 337–TA–1037]
`
`Certain Graphic Processors, DDR
`Memory Controllers, and Products
`Containing the Same; Termination of
`Investigation on the Basis of
`Settlement
`AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
`the U.S. International Trade
`Commission has determined not to
`review the presiding administrative law
`judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
`(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 26) terminating the
`investigation on the basis of settlement.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
`General Counsel, U.S. International
`Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
`Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
`708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
`documents filed in connection with this
`investigation are or will be available for
`inspection during official business
`hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
`Office of the Secretary, U.S.
`International Trade Commission, 500 E
`Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
`telephone (202) 205–2000. General
`information concerning the Commission
`may also be obtained by accessing its
`Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
`The public record for this investigation
`may be viewed on the Commission’s
`electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
`edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
`persons are advised that information on
`
`this matter can be obtained by
`contacting the Commission TDD
`terminal on (202) 205–1810.
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
`Commission instituted this investigation
`on January 24, 2017, based on a
`complaint filed by ZiiLabs Inc. of
`Hamilton, Bermuda (‘‘ZiiLabs’’). 82 FR
`8207 (Jan. 24, 2017). The complaint
`alleged violations of section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
`U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement
`of certain claims of four United States
`Patents. Id. The notice of investigation
`named seventeen respondents:
`Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. of
`Sunnyvale, California; Lenovo Group
`Ltd. of Beijing, China, Lenovo Holding
`Co., Inc. and Lenovo (United States)
`Inc., both of Morrisville, North Carolina;
`LG Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, Republic
`of Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of
`Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; LG
`Electronics MobileComm U.S.A. of San
`Diego, California; MediaTek, Inc. of
`Hsinchu City, Taiwan; MediaTek USA
`Inc. of San Jose, California; Motorola
`Mobility LLC of Libertyville, Illinois;
`Qualcomm Inc. of San Diego, California;
`Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony
`Corporation of America of New York,
`New York; Sony Electronics, Inc. of San
`Diego, California; Sony Mobile
`Communications (USA) Inc. of San
`Mateo, California; Sony Computer
`Entertainment Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; and
`Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC of
`San Mateo, California. The Office of
`Unfair Import Investigations was also
`named as a party.
`The investigation has previously been
`terminated as to Lenovo Group Ltd. and
`MediaTek USA Inc. Order No. 7 (Feb.
`28, 2017), not reviewed, Notice (Mar. 22,
`2017) (Lenovo Group Ltd.); Order No. 21
`(June 19, 2017), reviewed in part, Notice
`(July 10, 2017) (MediaTek USA Inc.).
`On August 9, 2017, ZiiLabs moved to
`terminate the investigation based upon
`settlement. See 19 CFR 210.21(b). The
`respondents did not oppose the motion,
`and the Commission investigative
`attorney responded in support of the
`motion. On August 28, 2017, the ALJ
`granted the motion as the subject ID
`(Order No. 26). The ID finds that the
`motion complies with Commission
`Rules, and that granting the motion
`would not be contrary to the public
`interest. ID at 2–3; see 19 CFR
`210.50(b)(2).
`No petitions for review of the ID were
`filed. The Commission has determined
`not to review the ID.
`The authority for the Commission’s
`determination is contained in section
`337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
`
`210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
`210).
`By order of the Commission.
`Issued: September 15, 2017.
`Lisa R. Barton,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2017–20100 Filed 9–20–17; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
`
`Notice of Lodging of Proposed
`Consent Decree and Settlement
`Agreement Under the Comprehensive
`Environmental Response,
`Compensation, and Liability Act and
`Chapter 11 of The United States
`Bankruptcy Code
`On September 15, 2017, the
`Department of Justice lodged a proposed
`consent decree with the United States
`District Court for the District of New
`Jersey in the lawsuit entitled United
`States v. Alsol Corporation, SB Building
`Associates, LP, SB Building GP, LLC,
`United States Land Resources, L.P.,
`United States Realty Resources, Inc.,
`Lawrence S. Berger, and 3.60 Acres of
`Land, More or Less, located at Block 58,
`Lot 1.01, at 2 through 130 Ford Avenue
`in Milltown, Middlesex County, New
`Jersey, Civil Action Number 2:13–cv–
`00380. This consent decree incorporates
`terms of a proposed settlement
`agreement lodged on May 15, 2017, with
`the United States Bankruptcy Court for
`the District of New Jersey in three
`jointly administered Chapter 11
`bankruptcy cases, In re S B Building
`Associates Limited Partnership, Case
`No. 13–12682–VFP, In re SB Milltown
`Industrial Realty Holdings, LLC, Case
`No. 13–12685–VFP and In re Alsol
`Corporation, Case No. 13–12689–VFP.
`The proposed settlement agreement is
`incorporated into the proposed consent
`decree and is attached thereto.
`The proposed consent decree and
`proposed settlement agreement would
`resolve claims of the United States
`brought against the Defendants in the
`district court case under Section 107 of
`the Comprehensive Environmental
`Response, Compensation, and Liability
`Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607 (‘‘CERCLA’’),
`seeking reimbursement of response
`costs incurred or to be incurred for
`response actions taken at or in
`connection with the release or
`threatened release of hazardous
`substances at the Michelin Powerhouse
`Site and the Michelin Building 3 Vat
`Site located within Tax Map Block 58,
`Lot 1.01, in the Borough of Milltown,
`Middlesex County, New Jersey. Under
`
`VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Sep 20, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM 21SEN1
`
`asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket