throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before The Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1051
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN LTE WIRELESS
`COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ INITIAL EXPERT DISCLOSURE
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 10 and the Final Procedural Schedule set forth at Appendix A to
`
`Order No. 8 (EDIS Doc. ID: 616783), Complainants LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics
`
`Alabama, Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “LGE”), through its
`
`undersigned attorneys, hereby respectfully submit this Identification of Expert Witnesses,
`
`including a description of each witness’s area of expertise and curriculum vitae, whom the
`
`Complainants may offer in this investigation.
`
`LGE reserves the right to supplement this identification in response to information,
`
`contentions, or allegations not currently known to LGE. If Respondents BLU Products, Inc. or
`
`CT Miami, LLC (collectively “Respondents”) object to any of LGE’s expert witnesses identified
`
`below as inconsistent with the language or intent of the Protective Order (Order No. 1) or on
`
`other grounds, LGE reserves the right to identify a substitute.
`
`Dr. Robert Akl
`
`Dr. Akl is an expert in technical matters in this investigation, including, without
`
`limitation, wireless communication systems and networks, mobile communication devices,
`
`telecommunication standards (e.g., 3GPP LTE standard), and related technologies. Dr. Akl may
`
`provide expert testimony regarding the design, structure, function, operation, and hardware and
`
`1
`
`

`

`software components of the accused products and the domestic industry products, the technical
`
`specifications and requirements of relevant telecommunication standards and network carriers,
`
`the compatibility and compliance with those specifications and requirements, the knowledge and
`
`qualifications of a person of ordinary skill in the art, claim construction, infringement, prior art,
`
`validity, and enforceability of the asserted patents, as well as technical domestic industry and
`
`technical backgrounds relating to the asserted patents, essentiality of the asserted patents to
`
`relevant telecommunication standards, and any other technical issue that may arise. Dr. Akl may
`
`also rebut the expert witness report(s), statement(s) and testimony of Respondents’ expert(s) and
`
`fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same. Dr. Akl’s qualifications are set
`
`forth in his curriculum vitae, attached as Exhibit A.
`
`Dr. Zhi Ding
`
`Dr. Ding is an expert in technical matters in this investigation, including, without
`
`limitation, wireless communication systems and networks, mobile communication devices,
`
`telecommunication standards (e.g., 3GPP LTE standard), and related technologies. Dr. Ding
`
`may provide may provide expert testimony regarding the design, structure, function, operation,
`
`and hardware and software components of the accused products and the domestic industry
`
`products, the technical specifications and requirements of relevant telecommunication standards
`
`and network carriers, the compatibility and compliance with those specifications and
`
`requirements, the knowledge and qualifications of a person of ordinary skill in the art, claim
`
`construction, infringement, prior art, validity, and enforceability of the asserted patents, as well
`
`as technical domestic industry and technical backgrounds relating to the asserted patents,
`
`essentiality of the asserted patents to relevant telecommunication standards, and any other
`
`technical issue that may arise. Dr. Ding may also rebut the expert witness report(s), statement(s)
`
`2
`
`

`

`and testimony of Respondents’ expert(s) and fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding
`
`the same. Dr. Ding’s qualifications are set forth in his curriculum vitae, attached as Exhibit B.
`
`Mr. John Jarosz, J.D.
`
`Mr. Jarosz is an expert in the economics of intellectual property protection in this
`
`investigation, including, without limitation, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”)
`
`licensing. Mr. Jarosz may provide expert testimony relating to whether LGE’s offer to
`
`Respondents to license its LTE patent portfolio complied with any FRAND obligation that LGE
`
`has. Mr. Jarosz may also provide expert testimony relating to the range of FRAND-compliant
`
`royalty rates for each asserted patent. Mr. Jarosz may also rebut the expert witness report(s),
`
`statement(s) and testimony of Respondents’ expert(s) and fact witnesses, should any be
`
`presented, regarding the same. Mr. Jarosz’s qualifications are set forth in his curriculum vitae,
`
`attached as Exhibit C.
`
`Mr. W. Todd Schoettelkotte
`
`Mr. Schoettelkotte is an expert in economic, valuation, and remedies issues relating to
`
`intellectual property rights. Mr. Schoettelkotte may provide expert testimony regarding matters
`
`relating to, at least, economic issues with respect to domestic industry, the appropriateness and
`
`scope of remedy in this investigation, bonding, public interest factors, and any other related
`
`issues relevant to LGE’s domestic industry, the remedy in this investigation, bonding and public
`
`interest factors for which expert testimony is required or useful. Mr. Schoettelkotte may also
`
`rebut the expert witness report(s), statement(s) and testimony of Respondents’ expert(s) and fact
`
`witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same. Mr. Schoettelkotte’s qualifications are
`
`set forth in his curriculum vitae, attached as Exhibit D.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`Dated: July 20, 2017
`
`
`
` Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/s/ Smith R. Brittingham IV
`Smith R. Brittingham IV
`Anand K. Sharma
`Aliza George Carrano
`J. Preston (J.P.) Long
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT, &
` DUNNER L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`Tel. (202) 408-4000
`
`Charles H. Suh
`Minjae Kang
`Yi Yu
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT, &
` DUNNER L.L.P.
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone: (571) 203-2700
`
`Attorneys for Complainants LG Electronics, Inc.,
`LG Electronics Alabama, Inc., and
`LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`CERTAIN LTE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1051
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I, Chris Jason, hereby certify that on July 20, 2017, a copy of the foregoing was served as
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery (2 Copies)
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
`indicated to the parties listed below:
`
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, SW, Room 112A
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`The Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`500 E. Street, S.W., Room 317
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`E-mail: patricia.chow@usitc.gov
`
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Office of
`Unfair Imports Investigations
`Commission Investigative Attorney
`500 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20436
`E-mail: reginald.lucas@usitc.gov
`
`Counsel for Respondents BLU Products, Inc. and
`CT Miami LLC
`
`Barry P. Golob, Esq.
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`1200 19th Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`Email: bgolob@cozen.com
`
`James A. Gale, Esq.
`Jonathan E. Gale, Esq.
`Samuel A. Lewis, Esq.
`Javier Sobrado, Esq.
`Victor J. Castellucci, Esq.
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3000
`Miami, FL 33131
`Email: mia~blue_itc_matter@cozen.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`CERTAIN LTE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1051
`
`
`
`
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
`/s/ Chris Jason
`Chris R. Jason, Litigation Legal Assistant
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 408-4000 (Telephone)
`(202) 408-4400 (Facsimile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thomas A. Dye, Esq.
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`One North Clematis Street, 510
`West Palm Beach, FL 33401
`Email: mia~blue_itc_matter@cozen.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`
`
`
`Professional Summary
`
`Dr. Akl has over 20 years of industry and academic experience. He is currently a Tenured
`Associate Professor at the University of North Texas and a Senior Member of IEEE. He has
`designed, implemented, and optimized both hardware and software aspects of several wireless
`communication systems for CDMA, WiFi, and sensor networks. Dr. Akl has broad expertise
`in wireless communication, Bluetooth, CDMA/WCDMA network optimization, GSM, LTE,
`VoIP, telephony, computer architecture, and computer networks. He is a very active
`researcher and is well published and cited. He has been awarded many research grants by
`leading companies in the industry and the National Science Foundation. He has developed and
`taught over 100 courses in his field. Dr. Akl has received several awards and commendation
`for his work, including the 2008 IEEE Professionalism Award and was the winner of the 2010
`Tech Titan of the Future Award.
`
`Dr. Akl has extensive experience with patents in the wireless and networking industry. In the
`past ten years, he has worked as a technical expert in dozens of patent related matters,
`involving thousands of hours of research, investigation, and study. He has repeatedly been
`qualified as an expert by Courts, and has provided numerous technology tutorials to Courts,
`and given testimony by deposition and at trial. He has worked with companies large and
`small, both for and against the validity and infringement of patents, and has also helped
`counsel and Courts to understand technology that often seems complex. In doing so, he has
`become familiar with, and actively worked with, the legal principles that underlie patentability
`and validity and claim interpretation in the wireless and networking industries.
`
`Areas of Expertise
`
`2G, 3G, 4G, CDMA/WCDMA, GSM, UMTS, LTE, Ad-hoc Networks, Bluetooth, Call
`Admission Control, Channel Coding, Computer Architecture, Multi-cell Network
`Optimization, Packet-networks, Telephony, VoIP, Wi-Fi, Wireless Communication, Wireless
`Sensors.
`
`Education
`
`Year College/University
`GPA
`Degree
`2000 Washington University in Saint Louis D.Sc. in Electrical Engineering 4.0 / 4.0
`4.0 / 4.0
`1996 Washington University in Saint Louis M.S. in Electrical Engineering
`4.0 / 4.0
`1994 Washington University in Saint Louis B.S. in Electrical Engineering
`4.0 / 4.0
`1994 Washington University in Saint Louis B.S. in Computer Science
`
`Graduated summa cum laude and ranked first in undergraduate class.
`Dissertation: “Cell Design to Maximize Capacity in Cellular Code Division Multiple
`Access (CDMA) Networks.” Advisors: Dr. Manju Hegde and Dr. Paul Min.
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`
`Litigation Support and Expert Witness Experience
`
`
`L1. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L2. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L3. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L4. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L5. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L6. 2017
`Case:
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Alston & Bird LLP
`Itron, Inc. and Duke Energy Corp. v. Smart Meter Technologies
`IPR2017-01199
`Inter Partes Review, power meter
`Declaration to support IPR petition
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`Ericsson Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota
`IPR2017-01186, IPR2017-01200, IPR2017-01213
`Inter Partes Review, OFDM and MIMO
`Three declarations to support three IPR petitions
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`GENBAND US, LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:16-cv-582-
`JRG-RSP
`Patent infringement, Internet protocols and VoIP
`Expert report regarding essentiality
`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`Uniloc USA, Inc. et al. v. Avaya Inc., and ShoreTel, Inc., et al.
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler division, Case Nos. 6:15-cv-1168-
`JRG
`Patent infringement, instant messaging and conference calling
`Source code review, non-infringement consulting
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, et al. v. Huawei
`Technologies Co. Ltd., et al.
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshal division, Case Nos. 2:16-cv-753-
`JRG-RSP, 2:16-cv-754
`Patent infringement, 4G LTE
`Claim construction, two declarations
`
`Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck, PC
`Samsung v. Rembrandt Wireless
`Ex Parte Reexamination, Bluetooth
`Validity consulting
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`L7. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L8. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L9. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L10. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L11. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L12. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sidley Austin LLP
`Huawei Technologies Co., et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co, et al. and
`Samsung Research America v. Hisilicon Technologies Co, LTD
`Northern district of California, San Francisco division, Case No. 3:16-
`cv-2787-WHO
`Patent infringement, 3G/4G LTE
`Validity and invalidity consulting
`
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
`CBM2017-00034
`Covered Business Method Review, call monitoring and recording
`Declaration to support CBM petition
`
`Braxton, Hilton & Perrone PLLC
`Biosonix, LLC. v. Hydrowave, LLC et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Case No. 2:16-cv-139-RC
`Patent infringement, underwater transceivers
`Claim construction, Markman hearing testimony
`
`Gray Reed & McGraw
`Optis Cellular Technology, LLC and PanOptis Patent Management,
`LLC. v. Blackberry Corporation, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:16-cv-59-JRG-
`RSP, Case No. 2:16-cv-61-JRG-RSP, Case No. 2:16-cv-62-JRG-RSP
`Patent infringement, LTE
`Claim construction, three declarations regarding claim construction,
`deposition
`
`Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey
`SIPCO, LLC et al v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Case No. 6:15-cv-907
`Emerson Electric Co. et al v. SIPCO, LLC et al.
`Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta division, Case No. 1:15-cv-
`00319-AT
`Patent infringement, links in wireless networks and remote monitoring
`Invalidity consulting
`
`McKool Smith
`Regents of University of Minnesota v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al.
`District of Minnesota, Case No. 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL
`Patent infringement, LTE and MIMO
`Non-infringement and invalidity consulting, declaration
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`L13. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L14. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L15. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L16. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L17. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L18. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EIP US LLP
`GENBAND US, LLC et al. v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd
`IPR2015-01456, IPR2015-01457
`Inter Partes Review, media gateways
`Two declarations to support Patent Owner, two depositions
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`Cox Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Intellectual Property I, II, LP
`IPR2015-01187, IPR2015-01227, IPR2015-01273, IPR2015-01536
`Inter Partes Review, cable networks
`Four declarations to support Patent Owner, four depositions
`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`Odyssey Wireless v. Motorola Mobility LLC
`Eastern district of North Carolina, Western division, Case No. 5:14-
`cv-491-D
`Southern district of California, Case No. 3:15-cv-01741-H-RBB
`Patent infringement, LTE
`Source code review, non-infringement consulting
`
`Cooley LLP
`Saint Lawrence Comm. LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC, ZTE (USA)
`Inc.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:15-cv-000351-
`JRG, Case No. 2:15-cv-000349-JRG
`Patent infringement, speech coding and decoding
`Invalidity expert report, expert report regarding AMR-WB standard,
`expert report regarding Opus and Silk, two-day depositions, jury trial
`testimony
`
`Sidley Austin LLP
`Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Microsoft Corp, et al.
`District of Delaware, Case No. 15-cv-546
`Patent infringement, LTE
`Prior art and invalidity consulting
`
`McKool Smith
`Optis Wireless Technology, LLC and PanOptis Patent Management,
`LLC. v. ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:15-cv-300-
`JRG-RSP
`Patent infringement, cellular messages and multimedia attachments
`Source code review, claim construction, declaration
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`L19. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L20. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L21. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L22. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L23. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L24. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L25. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fish & Richardson, P.C.
`Saint Lawrence Comm. LLC v. LG Elec., Inc. et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:14-cv-1055-
`JRG
`Patent infringement, speech coding and decoding
`Invalidity expert report
`
`Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP
`LG Electronics, Inc. v. Cellular Communications Equipment LLC
`IPR2016-00178
`Inter Partes Review, LTE
`Declaration to support IPR petition
`
`McKool Smith
`AT&T, et al. v. Cox Communication, Inc., et al.
`District of Delaware, Case No. 14-1106-GMS
`Patent infringement, cable networks
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`McKool Smith
`Ericsson Inc., et al. v. TCL Communication, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:15-cv-00011-
`RSP
`Patent infringement, wireless devices and systems
`Source code review, claim construction, declaration, infringement
`expert report, validity expert report, two-day depositions
`
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`Kyocera Communications, Inc. v. Cellular Communications
`Equipment LLC
`IPR2015-01559, IPR2015-01564
`Inter Partes Review, LTE
`Two declarations to support two IPR petitions
`
`Fish & Richardson, P.C.
`Fairfield Industries Inc. v. Wireless Seismic, Inc.
`Southern district of Texas, Case No. 4:14-cv-02972-KPE
`Patent infringement, wireless sensor networks
`Non-infringement expert report
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`GENBAND US, LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:14-cv-33-JRG-
`RSP
`Patent infringement, Internet protocols and VoIP
`Expert report regarding essentiality, non-infringement expert report,
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`L26. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L27. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L28. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L29. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L30. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L31. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rebuttal expert report regarding non-practice, supplemental rebuttal
`expert report, three-day depositions, jury trial testimony
`
`Foley & Lardner LLP; Duane Morris LLP
`Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Leap Wireless
`International, Cricket Communications, Inc.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:13-cv-00885-
`RSP
`Patent infringement, OFDM and MIMO
`Non-infringement expert report, deposition
`
`Hogan Lovells US LLP; Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One-E-Way v. Beats Electronics, LLC, Sony Corporation, et al.
`In the Matter of Certain Wireless Headsets, ITC Investigation No.
`337-TA-943
`Patent infringement, wireless communication
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`McKool Smith
`Solocron Media, LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:13-cv-1059-
`JRG
`Patent infringement, ringtone download
`Claim construction, claim invalidity expert report
`
`EIP US LLP
`Good Technology Software, Inc. v. Mobile Iron, Inc.
`IPR2015-00833, IPR2015-00836, IPR2015-01090
`Inter Partes Review, software management in wireless devices
`Three declarations to support three IPR petitions
`
`McKool Smith
`AirWatch LLC v. Good Technology Corp
`Northern District of Georgia, Case No. 1:14-cv-02281-SCJ
`Patent infringement, software management in wireless devices
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
`IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. et al. v. Apple Inc.
`Southern District of New York, Case No. 14-cv-7594-RJS
`Patent infringement, PDA and Bluetooth
`Invalidity consulting
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`L32. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`
`Project:
`
`L33. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L34. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L35. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L36. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L37. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L38. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2014-00785, IPR2014-00810, IPR2014-00824, IPR2014-00825,
`IPR2014-01278, IPR2014-01282, IPR2014-01283
`Inter Partes Review, VoIP call monitoring and recording, allocating
`telecommunication resources and information systems
`Seven declarations to support seven Patent Owner’s responses, five
`depositions
`
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`Shopkick, Inc. v. Novitaz, Inc.
`IPR2015-00277, IPR2015-00278
`Inter Partes Review, wireless customer service management
`Two declarations to support two IPR petitions
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. AT&T, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Tyler division, Case No. 6:13-cv-507-LED
`(Lead Case for Consolidation)
`Patent infringement, 3G cellular communication
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`Baker Botts LLP
`Orlando Communications LLC v. AT&T, et al.
`M.D. Florida, Case No. 6:14-cv-01021
`Patent infringement, 3G/4G cellular communication
`Non-infringement and claim construction consulting
`
`EIP US LLP
`Good Technology Software, Inc. v. AirWatch, LLC
`IPR2015-00248, IPR2015-00875
`Inter Partes Review, software management in wireless devices
`Two declarations to support two IPR petitions
`
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
`IPR2015-00153, IPR2015-00155, IPR2015-00156
`Inter Partes Review, VoIP call monitoring and recording
`Three declarations to support three IPR petitions, two depositions
`
`Andrews Kurth LLP
`Sony Mobile Communications (USA) v. Adaptix Inc.
`IPR2014-01524, IPR2014-01525
`Inter Partes Review, subcarrier selection in LTE
`Two declarations to support two IPR petitions, deposition
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`L39. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L40. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L41. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L42. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L43. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L44. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L45. 2014
`Case:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Baker & McKenzie LLP
`VTech Communications, Inc. and Uniden America Corporations v.
`Spherix Incorporated
`IPR2014-01432
`Inter Partes Review, IP telephony
`Declaration to support IPR petition, deposition, reply declaration,
`deposition
`
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Baker & McKenzie LLP
`Spherix Inc. v. VTech Telecommunications Ltd., et al.
`Spherix Inc. v. Uniden Corp, et al.
`Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Case No. 3:13-cv-3494
`and 3:13-cv-3496
`Patent infringement, IP telephony
`Claim construction, declaration, deposition
`
`McKool Smith
`Good Technology Corp. v. MobileIron, Inc.
`Northern District of California, Case No. 5:12-cv-05826-PSG
`Patent infringement, software management in wireless devices
`Claim construction, three declarations, claim invalidity expert report,
`non-infringement expert report, deposition, jury trial testimony
`
`Lee & Hayes
`Broadcom Corp. v. Ericsson, Inc.
`IPR2013-00601, IPR2013-00602, and IPR2013-00636
`Inter Partes Review, ARQ protocols
`Three declarations to support Patent Owner’s Response, two
`declarations to support Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend, deposition,
`two reply declarations
`
`Sidley Austin LLP
`Adaptix, Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co., et al.
`Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:13-cv-00438, 439, 440 and 441
`Patent infringement, subcarrier selection in LTE
`Non-infringement consulting, source code review
`
`Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP
`Cell and Network Selection LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., et al.
`Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:13-cv-00404-LED-JDL
`Patent infringement, base station selection in LTE
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
`DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler division, Case No. 6:13-cv-00919-
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L46. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L47. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L48. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L49. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L50. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L51. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L52. 2013
`Case:
`
`JDL
`Patent infringement, PDA and Bluetooth
`Claim construction and invalidity consulting
`
`Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
`Digcom Inc. v. ZTE (USA), Inc.
`District of Nevada, Case No. 3:13-cv-00178-RCJ-WGC
`Patent infringement, cellular communication
`Claim construction consulting
`
`Lott & Fischer
`Zenith Electronics, LLC, et al. v. Craig Electronics, Inc.
`Southern District of Florida, Case No. 9:13-cv-80567-DMM/DLB
`Patent infringement, HDTV transmission and reception
`Opening expert report regarding nonessentiality
`
`McKool Smith
`Zenith Electronics, LLC, et al. v. Curtis International Ltd.
`Southern District of Florida, Case No. 9:13-cv-80568-DMM/DLB
`Patent infringement, HDTV transmission and reception
`Claim construction, declaration, deposition
`
`Gibson Dunn
`Straight Path IP Group v. Sharp Corp. and Sharp Electronics Corp.
`In the Matter of Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication
`Devices and Products Containing Same, ITC Investigation No. 337-
`TA-892
`Patent infringement, point-to-point network communication
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et al.
`District of Delaware, Case No. 1:11-cv-798-LPS-SRF
`Patent infringement, displaying books on tablets
`Non-infringement expert report for Motorola, non-infringement expert
`report for HTC, deposition
`
`Gartman Law Group
`Lone Star WiFi LLC v. Legacy Stonebriar Hotel, Ltd; et al.
`Eastern Dist. Of Texas, Tyler, Case No. 6:12-cv-957
`Patent infringement, levels of access in Wi-Fi networks
`Claim validity consulting
`
`White & Case, LLP
`Nokia Corp and Nokia, Inc. v. HTC Corp and HTC America, Inc.
`In the Matter of Certain Portable Electronic Communication Devices,
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 9
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L53. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L54. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L55. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L56. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L57. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L58. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`Including Mobile Phones and Components Thereof, ITC Investigation
`No. 337-TA-885
`Patent infringement, App download and installation
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`Heim, Payne & Chorush, LLP
`Rembrandt Wireless v. Samsung Electronics Co., et al.
`Eastern Dist. of Texas, Marshal, Case No. 2:13-cv-213-JRG-RSP
`Patent infringement, Bluetooth
`Expert report regarding validity, deposition, jury trial
`
`Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP; Baker Hostetler
`Comcast v. Sprint; and Nextel Inc.
`Eastern Dist. of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:12-cv-00859-JD
`Patent infringement, SMS/MMS in Cellular Networks
`Infringement expert report, validity expert report, reply expert report,
`declaration, two-day depositions, jury trial testimony
`
`McKool Smith
`Samsung Electronics America v. Ericsson Inc.
`In the Matter of Certain Wireless Communications Equipment and
`Articles Therein, ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-866
`Patent infringement, LTE uplink and downlink
`Prior art research, source code review, claim construction, claim
`invalidity expert report, non-infringement expert report, ITC hearing
`testimony
`
`DLA Piper US LLP
`CSR Technology Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
`USDC-San Francisco, Case No. 3:12-cv-02619-RS
`Patent infringement, radio transceivers
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`Fish & Richardson PC
`GPNE Corp. v. Apple, Inc.; et al.
`USDC-ND California, Case No. 5:12-cv-02885-LHK
`Patent infringement, resource allocation in wireless networks
`Prior art research consulting
`
`Polsinelli Shughart PC
`Single Touch Interactive, Inc. v. Zoove Corporation
`Northern Dist. of California, Case No. 3:12-cv-00831-JSC
`Patent infringement, abbreviated dialing, information delivery
`Claim construction, Markman hearing testimony, two declarations
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 10
`
`

`

`L59. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L60. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L61. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L62. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L63. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L64. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L65. 2011
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`K & L Gates
`EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Novatel Wireless, Inc.; et al.
`DC-Tyler, Texas, Case No. 6:11-cv-00015-LED-JDL
`Patent infringement, wireless modem and 3G services
`Non-infringement expert report, deposition
`
`Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
`CSR Technology, Inc. v. Bandspeed, Inc.
`Western Dist. of Texas, Case No. 1:12-cv-297-LY
`Patent infringement, packet identification in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz
`Source code review, Markman hearing testimony, infringement expert
`report
`
`Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
`Wi-LAN v. HTC America, Inc., et al.
`Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 6:10-cv-521-LED
`Patent infringement, CDMA, Orthogonal Codes
`Source code review, non-infringement expert report, deposition, jury
`trial testimony
`
`Dechert LLP
`Hitachi v. TPV and Vizio, Inc.; and Vizio v. Hitachi, LTD.
`Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 2:10-cv-260
`Patent infringement, HD television transmission and reception
`Prior art research, claim invalidity consulting
`
`Fish & Richardson PC
`InterDigital Commc’n, LLC v. Huawei Tech. Co. LTD; LG
`Electronics, Inc.; Nokia, Inc.; and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Certain Wireless Devices With 3G Capabilities and Components
`Thereof, ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-800
`Patent infringement, channel coding in UMTS, HSDPA
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`Fish & Richardson PC
`InterDigital Commc’n, LLC v. Huawei Tech. Co. LTD; LG
`Electronics, Inc.; Nokia, Inc.; and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Dist. of Delaware, Case No. 1:11-cv-00654-UNA
`Patent infringement, channel coding in UMTS, HSDPA
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
`Dist. of Delaware, Case No. 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT
`Patent infringement, voice control, call rejection in mobile phones
`Source code review, prior art research, declaration, claim invalidity
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 11
`
`

`

`expert report, non-infringement expert report, deposition, jury trial
`testimony
`
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
`Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
`Northern Dist. of California, Case No. 5:11-cv-01846-LHK
`Patent infringement, channel coding in CDMA, E-AGCH, TFCI
`Prior art research, claim construction consulting
`
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`Vizio, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc.
`ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-789
`Patent infringement, HD television transmission and reception
`Claim invalidity consulting
`
`Shapiro Cohen
`TenXc Wireless Inc. v. Andrew LLC
`TenXc Wireless Inc. v. Mobi Antenna Technologies Ltd.
`Patent infringement, antenna design, sectorized cellular network
`Claim validity consulting
`
`Fish & Richard

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket