`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before The Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1051
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN LTE WIRELESS
`COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ INITIAL EXPERT DISCLOSURE
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 10 and the Final Procedural Schedule set forth at Appendix A to
`
`Order No. 8 (EDIS Doc. ID: 616783), Complainants LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics
`
`Alabama, Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “LGE”), through its
`
`undersigned attorneys, hereby respectfully submit this Identification of Expert Witnesses,
`
`including a description of each witness’s area of expertise and curriculum vitae, whom the
`
`Complainants may offer in this investigation.
`
`LGE reserves the right to supplement this identification in response to information,
`
`contentions, or allegations not currently known to LGE. If Respondents BLU Products, Inc. or
`
`CT Miami, LLC (collectively “Respondents”) object to any of LGE’s expert witnesses identified
`
`below as inconsistent with the language or intent of the Protective Order (Order No. 1) or on
`
`other grounds, LGE reserves the right to identify a substitute.
`
`Dr. Robert Akl
`
`Dr. Akl is an expert in technical matters in this investigation, including, without
`
`limitation, wireless communication systems and networks, mobile communication devices,
`
`telecommunication standards (e.g., 3GPP LTE standard), and related technologies. Dr. Akl may
`
`provide expert testimony regarding the design, structure, function, operation, and hardware and
`
`1
`
`
`
`software components of the accused products and the domestic industry products, the technical
`
`specifications and requirements of relevant telecommunication standards and network carriers,
`
`the compatibility and compliance with those specifications and requirements, the knowledge and
`
`qualifications of a person of ordinary skill in the art, claim construction, infringement, prior art,
`
`validity, and enforceability of the asserted patents, as well as technical domestic industry and
`
`technical backgrounds relating to the asserted patents, essentiality of the asserted patents to
`
`relevant telecommunication standards, and any other technical issue that may arise. Dr. Akl may
`
`also rebut the expert witness report(s), statement(s) and testimony of Respondents’ expert(s) and
`
`fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same. Dr. Akl’s qualifications are set
`
`forth in his curriculum vitae, attached as Exhibit A.
`
`Dr. Zhi Ding
`
`Dr. Ding is an expert in technical matters in this investigation, including, without
`
`limitation, wireless communication systems and networks, mobile communication devices,
`
`telecommunication standards (e.g., 3GPP LTE standard), and related technologies. Dr. Ding
`
`may provide may provide expert testimony regarding the design, structure, function, operation,
`
`and hardware and software components of the accused products and the domestic industry
`
`products, the technical specifications and requirements of relevant telecommunication standards
`
`and network carriers, the compatibility and compliance with those specifications and
`
`requirements, the knowledge and qualifications of a person of ordinary skill in the art, claim
`
`construction, infringement, prior art, validity, and enforceability of the asserted patents, as well
`
`as technical domestic industry and technical backgrounds relating to the asserted patents,
`
`essentiality of the asserted patents to relevant telecommunication standards, and any other
`
`technical issue that may arise. Dr. Ding may also rebut the expert witness report(s), statement(s)
`
`2
`
`
`
`and testimony of Respondents’ expert(s) and fact witnesses, should any be presented, regarding
`
`the same. Dr. Ding’s qualifications are set forth in his curriculum vitae, attached as Exhibit B.
`
`Mr. John Jarosz, J.D.
`
`Mr. Jarosz is an expert in the economics of intellectual property protection in this
`
`investigation, including, without limitation, fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”)
`
`licensing. Mr. Jarosz may provide expert testimony relating to whether LGE’s offer to
`
`Respondents to license its LTE patent portfolio complied with any FRAND obligation that LGE
`
`has. Mr. Jarosz may also provide expert testimony relating to the range of FRAND-compliant
`
`royalty rates for each asserted patent. Mr. Jarosz may also rebut the expert witness report(s),
`
`statement(s) and testimony of Respondents’ expert(s) and fact witnesses, should any be
`
`presented, regarding the same. Mr. Jarosz’s qualifications are set forth in his curriculum vitae,
`
`attached as Exhibit C.
`
`Mr. W. Todd Schoettelkotte
`
`Mr. Schoettelkotte is an expert in economic, valuation, and remedies issues relating to
`
`intellectual property rights. Mr. Schoettelkotte may provide expert testimony regarding matters
`
`relating to, at least, economic issues with respect to domestic industry, the appropriateness and
`
`scope of remedy in this investigation, bonding, public interest factors, and any other related
`
`issues relevant to LGE’s domestic industry, the remedy in this investigation, bonding and public
`
`interest factors for which expert testimony is required or useful. Mr. Schoettelkotte may also
`
`rebut the expert witness report(s), statement(s) and testimony of Respondents’ expert(s) and fact
`
`witnesses, should any be presented, regarding the same. Mr. Schoettelkotte’s qualifications are
`
`set forth in his curriculum vitae, attached as Exhibit D.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 20, 2017
`
`
`
` Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/s/ Smith R. Brittingham IV
`Smith R. Brittingham IV
`Anand K. Sharma
`Aliza George Carrano
`J. Preston (J.P.) Long
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT, &
` DUNNER L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`Tel. (202) 408-4000
`
`Charles H. Suh
`Minjae Kang
`Yi Yu
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT, &
` DUNNER L.L.P.
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Drive
`Reston, VA 20190
`Telephone: (571) 203-2700
`
`Attorneys for Complainants LG Electronics, Inc.,
`LG Electronics Alabama, Inc., and
`LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`CERTAIN LTE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1051
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I, Chris Jason, hereby certify that on July 20, 2017, a copy of the foregoing was served as
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery (2 Copies)
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
`indicated to the parties listed below:
`
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, SW, Room 112A
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`The Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`500 E. Street, S.W., Room 317
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`E-mail: patricia.chow@usitc.gov
`
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Office of
`Unfair Imports Investigations
`Commission Investigative Attorney
`500 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20436
`E-mail: reginald.lucas@usitc.gov
`
`Counsel for Respondents BLU Products, Inc. and
`CT Miami LLC
`
`Barry P. Golob, Esq.
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`1200 19th Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`Email: bgolob@cozen.com
`
`James A. Gale, Esq.
`Jonathan E. Gale, Esq.
`Samuel A. Lewis, Esq.
`Javier Sobrado, Esq.
`Victor J. Castellucci, Esq.
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3000
`Miami, FL 33131
`Email: mia~blue_itc_matter@cozen.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTAIN LTE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1051
`
`
`
`
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
`/s/ Chris Jason
`Chris R. Jason, Litigation Legal Assistant
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 408-4000 (Telephone)
`(202) 408-4400 (Facsimile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Thomas A. Dye, Esq.
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`One North Clematis Street, 510
`West Palm Beach, FL 33401
`Email: mia~blue_itc_matter@cozen.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`
`
`
`Professional Summary
`
`Dr. Akl has over 20 years of industry and academic experience. He is currently a Tenured
`Associate Professor at the University of North Texas and a Senior Member of IEEE. He has
`designed, implemented, and optimized both hardware and software aspects of several wireless
`communication systems for CDMA, WiFi, and sensor networks. Dr. Akl has broad expertise
`in wireless communication, Bluetooth, CDMA/WCDMA network optimization, GSM, LTE,
`VoIP, telephony, computer architecture, and computer networks. He is a very active
`researcher and is well published and cited. He has been awarded many research grants by
`leading companies in the industry and the National Science Foundation. He has developed and
`taught over 100 courses in his field. Dr. Akl has received several awards and commendation
`for his work, including the 2008 IEEE Professionalism Award and was the winner of the 2010
`Tech Titan of the Future Award.
`
`Dr. Akl has extensive experience with patents in the wireless and networking industry. In the
`past ten years, he has worked as a technical expert in dozens of patent related matters,
`involving thousands of hours of research, investigation, and study. He has repeatedly been
`qualified as an expert by Courts, and has provided numerous technology tutorials to Courts,
`and given testimony by deposition and at trial. He has worked with companies large and
`small, both for and against the validity and infringement of patents, and has also helped
`counsel and Courts to understand technology that often seems complex. In doing so, he has
`become familiar with, and actively worked with, the legal principles that underlie patentability
`and validity and claim interpretation in the wireless and networking industries.
`
`Areas of Expertise
`
`2G, 3G, 4G, CDMA/WCDMA, GSM, UMTS, LTE, Ad-hoc Networks, Bluetooth, Call
`Admission Control, Channel Coding, Computer Architecture, Multi-cell Network
`Optimization, Packet-networks, Telephony, VoIP, Wi-Fi, Wireless Communication, Wireless
`Sensors.
`
`Education
`
`Year College/University
`GPA
`Degree
`2000 Washington University in Saint Louis D.Sc. in Electrical Engineering 4.0 / 4.0
`4.0 / 4.0
`1996 Washington University in Saint Louis M.S. in Electrical Engineering
`4.0 / 4.0
`1994 Washington University in Saint Louis B.S. in Electrical Engineering
`4.0 / 4.0
`1994 Washington University in Saint Louis B.S. in Computer Science
`
`Graduated summa cum laude and ranked first in undergraduate class.
`Dissertation: “Cell Design to Maximize Capacity in Cellular Code Division Multiple
`Access (CDMA) Networks.” Advisors: Dr. Manju Hegde and Dr. Paul Min.
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`
`Litigation Support and Expert Witness Experience
`
`
`L1. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L2. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L3. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L4. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L5. 2017
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L6. 2017
`Case:
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Alston & Bird LLP
`Itron, Inc. and Duke Energy Corp. v. Smart Meter Technologies
`IPR2017-01199
`Inter Partes Review, power meter
`Declaration to support IPR petition
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`Ericsson Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota
`IPR2017-01186, IPR2017-01200, IPR2017-01213
`Inter Partes Review, OFDM and MIMO
`Three declarations to support three IPR petitions
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`GENBAND US, LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:16-cv-582-
`JRG-RSP
`Patent infringement, Internet protocols and VoIP
`Expert report regarding essentiality
`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`Uniloc USA, Inc. et al. v. Avaya Inc., and ShoreTel, Inc., et al.
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler division, Case Nos. 6:15-cv-1168-
`JRG
`Patent infringement, instant messaging and conference calling
`Source code review, non-infringement consulting
`
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, et al. v. Huawei
`Technologies Co. Ltd., et al.
`Eastern District of Texas, Marshal division, Case Nos. 2:16-cv-753-
`JRG-RSP, 2:16-cv-754
`Patent infringement, 4G LTE
`Claim construction, two declarations
`
`Rothwell Figg Ernst & Manbeck, PC
`Samsung v. Rembrandt Wireless
`Ex Parte Reexamination, Bluetooth
`Validity consulting
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`
`
`L7. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L8. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L9. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L10. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L11. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L12. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sidley Austin LLP
`Huawei Technologies Co., et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co, et al. and
`Samsung Research America v. Hisilicon Technologies Co, LTD
`Northern district of California, San Francisco division, Case No. 3:16-
`cv-2787-WHO
`Patent infringement, 3G/4G LTE
`Validity and invalidity consulting
`
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
`CBM2017-00034
`Covered Business Method Review, call monitoring and recording
`Declaration to support CBM petition
`
`Braxton, Hilton & Perrone PLLC
`Biosonix, LLC. v. Hydrowave, LLC et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Case No. 2:16-cv-139-RC
`Patent infringement, underwater transceivers
`Claim construction, Markman hearing testimony
`
`Gray Reed & McGraw
`Optis Cellular Technology, LLC and PanOptis Patent Management,
`LLC. v. Blackberry Corporation, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:16-cv-59-JRG-
`RSP, Case No. 2:16-cv-61-JRG-RSP, Case No. 2:16-cv-62-JRG-RSP
`Patent infringement, LTE
`Claim construction, three declarations regarding claim construction,
`deposition
`
`Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey
`SIPCO, LLC et al v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, Case No. 6:15-cv-907
`Emerson Electric Co. et al v. SIPCO, LLC et al.
`Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta division, Case No. 1:15-cv-
`00319-AT
`Patent infringement, links in wireless networks and remote monitoring
`Invalidity consulting
`
`McKool Smith
`Regents of University of Minnesota v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al.
`District of Minnesota, Case No. 0:14-cv-04666-JRT-TNL
`Patent infringement, LTE and MIMO
`Non-infringement and invalidity consulting, declaration
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`L13. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L14. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L15. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L16. 2016
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L17. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L18. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EIP US LLP
`GENBAND US, LLC et al. v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd
`IPR2015-01456, IPR2015-01457
`Inter Partes Review, media gateways
`Two declarations to support Patent Owner, two depositions
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`Cox Communications, Inc. v. AT&T Intellectual Property I, II, LP
`IPR2015-01187, IPR2015-01227, IPR2015-01273, IPR2015-01536
`Inter Partes Review, cable networks
`Four declarations to support Patent Owner, four depositions
`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`Odyssey Wireless v. Motorola Mobility LLC
`Eastern district of North Carolina, Western division, Case No. 5:14-
`cv-491-D
`Southern district of California, Case No. 3:15-cv-01741-H-RBB
`Patent infringement, LTE
`Source code review, non-infringement consulting
`
`Cooley LLP
`Saint Lawrence Comm. LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC, ZTE (USA)
`Inc.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:15-cv-000351-
`JRG, Case No. 2:15-cv-000349-JRG
`Patent infringement, speech coding and decoding
`Invalidity expert report, expert report regarding AMR-WB standard,
`expert report regarding Opus and Silk, two-day depositions, jury trial
`testimony
`
`Sidley Austin LLP
`Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Microsoft Corp, et al.
`District of Delaware, Case No. 15-cv-546
`Patent infringement, LTE
`Prior art and invalidity consulting
`
`McKool Smith
`Optis Wireless Technology, LLC and PanOptis Patent Management,
`LLC. v. ZTE Corporation and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:15-cv-300-
`JRG-RSP
`Patent infringement, cellular messages and multimedia attachments
`Source code review, claim construction, declaration
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`L19. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L20. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L21. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L22. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L23. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L24. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L25. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fish & Richardson, P.C.
`Saint Lawrence Comm. LLC v. LG Elec., Inc. et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:14-cv-1055-
`JRG
`Patent infringement, speech coding and decoding
`Invalidity expert report
`
`Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP
`LG Electronics, Inc. v. Cellular Communications Equipment LLC
`IPR2016-00178
`Inter Partes Review, LTE
`Declaration to support IPR petition
`
`McKool Smith
`AT&T, et al. v. Cox Communication, Inc., et al.
`District of Delaware, Case No. 14-1106-GMS
`Patent infringement, cable networks
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`McKool Smith
`Ericsson Inc., et al. v. TCL Communication, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:15-cv-00011-
`RSP
`Patent infringement, wireless devices and systems
`Source code review, claim construction, declaration, infringement
`expert report, validity expert report, two-day depositions
`
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`Kyocera Communications, Inc. v. Cellular Communications
`Equipment LLC
`IPR2015-01559, IPR2015-01564
`Inter Partes Review, LTE
`Two declarations to support two IPR petitions
`
`Fish & Richardson, P.C.
`Fairfield Industries Inc. v. Wireless Seismic, Inc.
`Southern district of Texas, Case No. 4:14-cv-02972-KPE
`Patent infringement, wireless sensor networks
`Non-infringement expert report
`
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`GENBAND US, LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Ltd, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:14-cv-33-JRG-
`RSP
`Patent infringement, Internet protocols and VoIP
`Expert report regarding essentiality, non-infringement expert report,
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`
`
`L26. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L27. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L28. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L29. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L30. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L31. 2015
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rebuttal expert report regarding non-practice, supplemental rebuttal
`expert report, three-day depositions, jury trial testimony
`
`Foley & Lardner LLP; Duane Morris LLP
`Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Leap Wireless
`International, Cricket Communications, Inc.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:13-cv-00885-
`RSP
`Patent infringement, OFDM and MIMO
`Non-infringement expert report, deposition
`
`Hogan Lovells US LLP; Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One-E-Way v. Beats Electronics, LLC, Sony Corporation, et al.
`In the Matter of Certain Wireless Headsets, ITC Investigation No.
`337-TA-943
`Patent infringement, wireless communication
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`McKool Smith
`Solocron Media, LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Marshal division, Case No. 2:13-cv-1059-
`JRG
`Patent infringement, ringtone download
`Claim construction, claim invalidity expert report
`
`EIP US LLP
`Good Technology Software, Inc. v. Mobile Iron, Inc.
`IPR2015-00833, IPR2015-00836, IPR2015-01090
`Inter Partes Review, software management in wireless devices
`Three declarations to support three IPR petitions
`
`McKool Smith
`AirWatch LLC v. Good Technology Corp
`Northern District of Georgia, Case No. 1:14-cv-02281-SCJ
`Patent infringement, software management in wireless devices
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
`IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. et al. v. Apple Inc.
`Southern District of New York, Case No. 14-cv-7594-RJS
`Patent infringement, PDA and Bluetooth
`Invalidity consulting
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`L32. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`
`Project:
`
`L33. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L34. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L35. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L36. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L37. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L38. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies, Inc.
`IPR2014-00785, IPR2014-00810, IPR2014-00824, IPR2014-00825,
`IPR2014-01278, IPR2014-01282, IPR2014-01283
`Inter Partes Review, VoIP call monitoring and recording, allocating
`telecommunication resources and information systems
`Seven declarations to support seven Patent Owner’s responses, five
`depositions
`
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
`Shopkick, Inc. v. Novitaz, Inc.
`IPR2015-00277, IPR2015-00278
`Inter Partes Review, wireless customer service management
`Two declarations to support two IPR petitions
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. AT&T, et al.
`Eastern district of Texas, Tyler division, Case No. 6:13-cv-507-LED
`(Lead Case for Consolidation)
`Patent infringement, 3G cellular communication
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`Baker Botts LLP
`Orlando Communications LLC v. AT&T, et al.
`M.D. Florida, Case No. 6:14-cv-01021
`Patent infringement, 3G/4G cellular communication
`Non-infringement and claim construction consulting
`
`EIP US LLP
`Good Technology Software, Inc. v. AirWatch, LLC
`IPR2015-00248, IPR2015-00875
`Inter Partes Review, software management in wireless devices
`Two declarations to support two IPR petitions
`
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corporation
`IPR2015-00153, IPR2015-00155, IPR2015-00156
`Inter Partes Review, VoIP call monitoring and recording
`Three declarations to support three IPR petitions, two depositions
`
`Andrews Kurth LLP
`Sony Mobile Communications (USA) v. Adaptix Inc.
`IPR2014-01524, IPR2014-01525
`Inter Partes Review, subcarrier selection in LTE
`Two declarations to support two IPR petitions, deposition
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7
`
`
`
`L39. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L40. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L41. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L42. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L43. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L44. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L45. 2014
`Case:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Baker & McKenzie LLP
`VTech Communications, Inc. and Uniden America Corporations v.
`Spherix Incorporated
`IPR2014-01432
`Inter Partes Review, IP telephony
`Declaration to support IPR petition, deposition, reply declaration,
`deposition
`
`Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Baker & McKenzie LLP
`Spherix Inc. v. VTech Telecommunications Ltd., et al.
`Spherix Inc. v. Uniden Corp, et al.
`Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Case No. 3:13-cv-3494
`and 3:13-cv-3496
`Patent infringement, IP telephony
`Claim construction, declaration, deposition
`
`McKool Smith
`Good Technology Corp. v. MobileIron, Inc.
`Northern District of California, Case No. 5:12-cv-05826-PSG
`Patent infringement, software management in wireless devices
`Claim construction, three declarations, claim invalidity expert report,
`non-infringement expert report, deposition, jury trial testimony
`
`Lee & Hayes
`Broadcom Corp. v. Ericsson, Inc.
`IPR2013-00601, IPR2013-00602, and IPR2013-00636
`Inter Partes Review, ARQ protocols
`Three declarations to support Patent Owner’s Response, two
`declarations to support Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend, deposition,
`two reply declarations
`
`Sidley Austin LLP
`Adaptix, Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co., et al.
`Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:13-cv-00438, 439, 440 and 441
`Patent infringement, subcarrier selection in LTE
`Non-infringement consulting, source code review
`
`Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP
`Cell and Network Selection LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., et al.
`Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:13-cv-00404-LED-JDL
`Patent infringement, base station selection in LTE
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
`DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
`Eastern District of Texas, Tyler division, Case No. 6:13-cv-00919-
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L46. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L47. 2014
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L48. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L49. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L50. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L51. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L52. 2013
`Case:
`
`JDL
`Patent infringement, PDA and Bluetooth
`Claim construction and invalidity consulting
`
`Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
`Digcom Inc. v. ZTE (USA), Inc.
`District of Nevada, Case No. 3:13-cv-00178-RCJ-WGC
`Patent infringement, cellular communication
`Claim construction consulting
`
`Lott & Fischer
`Zenith Electronics, LLC, et al. v. Craig Electronics, Inc.
`Southern District of Florida, Case No. 9:13-cv-80567-DMM/DLB
`Patent infringement, HDTV transmission and reception
`Opening expert report regarding nonessentiality
`
`McKool Smith
`Zenith Electronics, LLC, et al. v. Curtis International Ltd.
`Southern District of Florida, Case No. 9:13-cv-80568-DMM/DLB
`Patent infringement, HDTV transmission and reception
`Claim construction, declaration, deposition
`
`Gibson Dunn
`Straight Path IP Group v. Sharp Corp. and Sharp Electronics Corp.
`In the Matter of Certain Point-to-Point Network Communication
`Devices and Products Containing Same, ITC Investigation No. 337-
`TA-892
`Patent infringement, point-to-point network communication
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et al.
`District of Delaware, Case No. 1:11-cv-798-LPS-SRF
`Patent infringement, displaying books on tablets
`Non-infringement expert report for Motorola, non-infringement expert
`report for HTC, deposition
`
`Gartman Law Group
`Lone Star WiFi LLC v. Legacy Stonebriar Hotel, Ltd; et al.
`Eastern Dist. Of Texas, Tyler, Case No. 6:12-cv-957
`Patent infringement, levels of access in Wi-Fi networks
`Claim validity consulting
`
`White & Case, LLP
`Nokia Corp and Nokia, Inc. v. HTC Corp and HTC America, Inc.
`In the Matter of Certain Portable Electronic Communication Devices,
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L53. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L54. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L55. 2013
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L56. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L57. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L58. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`Including Mobile Phones and Components Thereof, ITC Investigation
`No. 337-TA-885
`Patent infringement, App download and installation
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`Heim, Payne & Chorush, LLP
`Rembrandt Wireless v. Samsung Electronics Co., et al.
`Eastern Dist. of Texas, Marshal, Case No. 2:13-cv-213-JRG-RSP
`Patent infringement, Bluetooth
`Expert report regarding validity, deposition, jury trial
`
`Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP; Baker Hostetler
`Comcast v. Sprint; and Nextel Inc.
`Eastern Dist. of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:12-cv-00859-JD
`Patent infringement, SMS/MMS in Cellular Networks
`Infringement expert report, validity expert report, reply expert report,
`declaration, two-day depositions, jury trial testimony
`
`McKool Smith
`Samsung Electronics America v. Ericsson Inc.
`In the Matter of Certain Wireless Communications Equipment and
`Articles Therein, ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-866
`Patent infringement, LTE uplink and downlink
`Prior art research, source code review, claim construction, claim
`invalidity expert report, non-infringement expert report, ITC hearing
`testimony
`
`DLA Piper US LLP
`CSR Technology Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
`USDC-San Francisco, Case No. 3:12-cv-02619-RS
`Patent infringement, radio transceivers
`Claim construction, declaration
`
`Fish & Richardson PC
`GPNE Corp. v. Apple, Inc.; et al.
`USDC-ND California, Case No. 5:12-cv-02885-LHK
`Patent infringement, resource allocation in wireless networks
`Prior art research consulting
`
`Polsinelli Shughart PC
`Single Touch Interactive, Inc. v. Zoove Corporation
`Northern Dist. of California, Case No. 3:12-cv-00831-JSC
`Patent infringement, abbreviated dialing, information delivery
`Claim construction, Markman hearing testimony, two declarations
`
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 10
`
`
`
`L59. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L60. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L61. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L62. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L63. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L64. 2012
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`L65. 2011
`Case:
`
`Matter:
`Project:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`K & L Gates
`EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Novatel Wireless, Inc.; et al.
`DC-Tyler, Texas, Case No. 6:11-cv-00015-LED-JDL
`Patent infringement, wireless modem and 3G services
`Non-infringement expert report, deposition
`
`Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
`CSR Technology, Inc. v. Bandspeed, Inc.
`Western Dist. of Texas, Case No. 1:12-cv-297-LY
`Patent infringement, packet identification in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz
`Source code review, Markman hearing testimony, infringement expert
`report
`
`Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
`Wi-LAN v. HTC America, Inc., et al.
`Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 6:10-cv-521-LED
`Patent infringement, CDMA, Orthogonal Codes
`Source code review, non-infringement expert report, deposition, jury
`trial testimony
`
`Dechert LLP
`Hitachi v. TPV and Vizio, Inc.; and Vizio v. Hitachi, LTD.
`Eastern Dist. of Texas, Case No. 2:10-cv-260
`Patent infringement, HD television transmission and reception
`Prior art research, claim invalidity consulting
`
`Fish & Richardson PC
`InterDigital Commc’n, LLC v. Huawei Tech. Co. LTD; LG
`Electronics, Inc.; Nokia, Inc.; and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Certain Wireless Devices With 3G Capabilities and Components
`Thereof, ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-800
`Patent infringement, channel coding in UMTS, HSDPA
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`Fish & Richardson PC
`InterDigital Commc’n, LLC v. Huawei Tech. Co. LTD; LG
`Electronics, Inc.; Nokia, Inc.; and ZTE (USA) Inc.
`Dist. of Delaware, Case No. 1:11-cv-00654-UNA
`Patent infringement, channel coding in UMTS, HSDPA
`Non-infringement consulting
`
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
`Dist. of Delaware, Case No. 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT
`Patent infringement, voice control, call rejection in mobile phones
`Source code review, prior art research, declaration, claim invalidity
`
`CV of Robert Akl, D.Sc.
`Printed: 07/20/17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 11
`
`
`
`expert report, non-infringement expert report, deposition, jury trial
`testimony
`
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
`Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
`Northern Dist. of California, Case No. 5:11-cv-01846-LHK
`Patent infringement, channel coding in CDMA, E-AGCH, TFCI
`Prior art research, claim construction consulting
`
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`Vizio, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc.
`ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-789
`Patent infringement, HD television transmission and reception
`Claim invalidity consulting
`
`Shapiro Cohen
`TenXc Wireless Inc. v. Andrew LLC
`TenXc Wireless Inc. v. Mobi Antenna Technologies Ltd.
`Patent infringement, antenna design, sectorized cellular network
`Claim validity consulting
`
`Fish & Richard