throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, DC
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN ELECTROCHEMICAL
`
`GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEMS
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1075
`
`NOTICE OF COMMISSION DETERMINATION TO EXTEND THE TARGET DATE
`
`AGENCY: US. International Trade Commission.
`
`ACTION:
`
`Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, in View of the shutdown of the Federal Government,
`the US. International Trade Commission has determined to extend the target date for completion
`of the above-captioned investigation until April 4, 2019.
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the
`General Counsel, US. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Washington, DC
`20436, telephone 202-205-3438. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with
`this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 am.
`to 5:15 pm.) in the Office of the Secretary, US. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
`SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the
`Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (hflsz/wwwusitcgov). The
`public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket
`(EDIS) at hflpsM/edisusitcgov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this
`matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on
`October 25, 2017, based on a complaint filed on September 18, 2017, on behalf of Dexcom, Inc.
`of San Diego, California (“Dexcom”). 82 Fed. Reg. 49420 (Oct. 25, 2017). The complaint
`alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, based
`upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the
`United States after importation of certain electrochemical glucose monitoring systems and
`components thereof by reason of infringement of one or more of claims of US. Patent Nos.
`9,724,045 and 9,750,460. The notice of investigation named as a respondent AgaMatrix, Inc. of
`Salem, New Hampshire (“AgaMatrix”). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations Was not
`named as a party in the investigation.
`
`On May 10, 2018, the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) issued Order No. 26, granting—
`in—part a motion by AgaMatrix to strike portions of Dexcom’s expert reports. Order No. 26
`
`

`

`struck, in relevant part, certain portions of an expert report relating to whether the accused
`products meet the “film” term of the “enzyme-containing film” limitation of the asserted claims
`and precluded Dexcom from relying on the arguments and theories described in the struck
`portions of the expert report during the investigation.
`
`On May 17, 2018, AgaMatrix filed a motion for summary determination of non-infringement of
`the asserted patents on the basis that Dexcom cannot prove that the accused products directly or
`indirectly infringe any of the asserted claims. On May 29, 2018, Dexcom opposed the motion.
`On June 1, 2018, AgaMatrix moved for leave to file a reply in support of its motion. On June 6,
`2018, Dexcom opposed the motion for leave.
`
`On June 7, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject initial determination (“11)”) (Order No. 33), granting
`AgaMatIix’s motion for summary determination of non-infringement with respect to direct
`infringement but denying the motion with respect to indirect infringement. The ID also denied
`AgaMatrix’s motion for leave to file a reply in support of its motion and stayed the procedural
`schedule pending review of the ID.
`
`On June 18, 2018, Dexcom filed a petition for review of the ID’s findings on direct infringement
`and Order No. 26. On June 25, 2018, AgaMatrix filed its opposition.
`
`On July 23, 2018, the Commission determined to review the subject ID in its entirety, as well as
`the underlying orders. Notice (July 23, 2018).
`
`In View of the shutdown of the Federal Government, the Commission has determined to extend
`the target date for completion of the investigation until April 4, 2019.
`
`The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of
`1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
`Procedure (19 CPR. Part 210).
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`Issued: February 25 , 2019
`
`

`

`CERTAIN ELECTROCHEMICAL GLUCOSE
`
`Inv. No. 337—TA—1075
`
`MONITORING SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached NOTICE has been served to the
`following parties as indicated, on February 26, 2019.
`
`7%
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`US. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`l:| Via Hand Delivery
`|:| Via Express Delivery
`Via First Class Mail
`El Other'
`
`CI Via Hand Delivery
`[:1 Via Express Delivery
`Via First Class Mail
`[3 Other'
`
`On Behalf of Complainants Dexcom, Inc.:
`
`Kirk R. Ruthenberg, Esq.
`DENTON US LLP
`1900 K Street, NW
`_
`Washlngton, DC 20006
`
`On Behalf of Respondents AgaMatrix, Inc.:
`
`Ira Jay Levy
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue, 25th Floor
`New York, NY 10018
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket