`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`Before the Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN AMORPHOUS METAL AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1078
`
`
`
`
`NON-PARTY LAKEVIEW METAL, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AND/OR MOVE TO
`QUASH OR LIMIT COMPLAINANTS’ SUBPOENAS
`
`Pursuant to Commission Rules 210.15 and 210.32 and the Ground Rule 1.10.3, non-party
`
`Lakeview Metal, Inc. (“Lakeview”) moves the Court to extend the deadline for responding to
`
`and/or moving to quash or limit the subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum (“the
`
`Subpoenas”) served on it by Complainants Metglas, Inc., and Hitachi Metals, Ltd.
`
`(“Complainants”) on December 5, 2017.
`
`Pursuant to the Subpoenas, Lakeview must produce documents by December 15, 2017
`
`(or at another mutually agreed upon time), and must present a witness for deposition on
`
`December 21, 2017 (or at another mutually agreed upon time). Moreover, the Subpoenas require
`
`that any motion to limit or quash shall be filed within ten (10) days after receipt of the
`
`Subpoenas, which were served on December 5, 2017, making the original deadline December
`
`15, 2017. Lakeview requests an extension to December 29, 2017 to respond. There is good
`
`cause to grant the requested extension.
`
`Counsel for Lakeview has begun conferring with counsel for Complainants concerning
`
`the scope of Complainants’ Subpoenas and Lakeview’s efforts to comply. Given the broad
`
`scope and sensitivity of the subject matter of the Subpoenas, Lakeview informed Complainants
`
`that Lakeview needs a more specific scope and certain protections in order meet its obligations
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`under the Subpoenas. Counsel for Lakeview and Complainants continue to negotiate in good
`
`faith a reasonable scope and method for responding to the requests for production. To allow
`
`negotiations to continue and to potentially avoid a motion to limit or quash the Subpoenas,
`
`counsel for Lakeview and Complainants have agreed, subject to approval by the Administrative
`
`Law Judge, that Lakeview be given until December 29, 2017 to respond to the subpoenas.
`
`In light of this agreement, Lakeview respectfully requests that the Administrative Law
`
`Judge extend the deadline for Lakeview to move to limit or quash the Subpoenas, should such a
`
`motion be necessary, to December 29, 2017, and extend the deadline for producing documents
`
`and a deposition to a mutually agreed upon date.
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 5.4, counsel for Lakeview contacted counsel for Advanced
`
`Technology & Materials., AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd., CISRI International Trading
`
`Co., Ltd., Beijing ZLJG Amorphous Technology Co., Ltd., and Qingdao Yunlu Energy
`
`Technology Co, Ltd., and the parties have agreed that they do not oppose the motion.
`
`
`
`Dated: December 14, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jason S. Kray
`Jason S. Kray
`kray@mbhb.com
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
`300 South Wacker Drive – Suite 3100
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone: +1 312 913 0001
`Facsimile:
`+1 312 913 0002
`
`Attorney for Non-Party
`LAKEVIEW METALS, INC.
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`Before the Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN AMORPHOUS METAL AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1078
`
`
`
`
`ORDER NO. ____
`GRANTING NON-PARTY LAKEVIEW METAL, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AND/OR MOVE TO
`QUASH OR LIMIT COMPLAINANTS’ SUBPOENAS
`
`Having considered non-party Lakeview Metal, Inc.’s Motion for an Extension of Time to
`
`Respond to and/or Move to Quash or Limit Complainants’ Subpoenas, and for good cause
`
`shown, it is determined that the motion should be, and hereby is, GRANTED.
`
`SO ORDERED this ___ day of December, 2017.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________________
`The Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`United States International Trade Commission
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`337-TA-1078
`
`It is hereby certified that copies of NON-PARTY LAKEVIEW METAL, INC.’S
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AND/OR
`
`MOVE TO QUASH OR LIMIT COMPLAINANTS’ SUBPOENAS were served on
`
`December 15, 2017, as follows:
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`The Honorable Thomas B. Pender
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Peter Sawert, Esq.
`Investigative Attorney
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Rom 112-A
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Eric S. Namrow, Esq.
`Jeremy D. Peterson, Esq.
`Riccardo S. Macchiaroli, Esq.
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKUS LLP
`1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`Counsel for Complainant Metglas, Inc. & Hitachi
`Metals, Ltd.
`
`Alan J. Neuwirth, Esq.
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`101 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10178-0060
`Counsel for Complainant Metglas, Inc. & Hitachi
`Metals, Ltd.
`
`
`
`By EDIS
`
`By Email
`patricia.chow@usitc.gov
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`peter.sawert@usitc.gov
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`xxMetglas-ITC@morganlewis.com
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`xxMetglas-ITC@morganlewis.com
`
`
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`xxMetglas-ITC@morganlewis.com
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`1078-ATM-OHS@orrick.com
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`1078-ATM-OHS@orrick.com
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`1078-ATM-OHS@orrick.com
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`1078-ATM-OHS@orrick.com
`
`Karon N. Fowler, Esq.
`Thomas Y. Nolan, Esq.
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`2 Palo Alto Square
`3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Counsel for Complainant Metglas, Inc. & Hitachi
`Metals, Ltd.
`
`Jordan Coyle, Esq.
`ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`1152 15th Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Counsel for Respondents Advanced Technology &
`Materials, AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd.,
`CISRI International Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing ZLJG
`Amorporphous Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`L. Scott Oliver, Esq.
`David Medina, Esq.
`ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Counsel for Respondents Advanced Technology &
`Materials, AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd.,
`CISRI International Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing ZLJG
`Amorporphous Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`Xiang Wang, Esq.
`ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`5701 China World Tower A
`No. 1 Jianguomenwai Avenue
`Beijing, 100004
`People’s Republic of China
`Counsel for Respondents Advanced Technology &
`Materials, AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd.,
`CISRI International Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing ZLJG
`Amorporphous Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`Johanna Jacob, Esq.
`ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Counsel for Respondents Advanced Technology &
`Materials, AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd.,
`CISRI International Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing ZLJG
`Amorporphous Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Howard Chen, Esq.
`Harold H. Davis, Jr., Esq.
`K&L GATES LLP
`Four Emarcadero Center, Suite 1200
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Counsel for Respondent Qingdao Yunlu Energy
`Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`Jay C. Chiu, Esq.
`K&L GATES LLP
`1 Park Plaza
`Twelfth Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Counsel for Respondent Qingdao Yunlu Energy
`Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`Henry Wang
`Suite 1009-1011, Tower C1
`Oriental Plaza, No. 1 East Chang Avenue
`Dongcheng District, Beijing 100738
`China
`Counsel for Respondent Qingdao Yunlu Energy
`Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`Jeffrey C. Johnson, Esq.
`K&L GATES LLP
`925 Fourth Ave., Suite 2900
`Seattle, WA 98104
`Counsel for Respondent Qingdao Yunlu Energy
`Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`Christina N. Goodrich, Esq.
`K&L GATES, LLP
`10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 8th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Counsel for Respondent Qingdao Yunlu Energy
`Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`Gina A. Jenero, Esq.
`K&L GATES, LLP
`70 West Madison Street, Suite 3300
`Chicago, IL 60602-4207
`Counsel for Respondent Qingdao Yunlu Energy
`Technology Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`harold.davis@klgates.com
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`jay.chiu@klgates.com
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`Yunlu-ITC@klgates.com
`
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`jeffrey.johnson@klgates.com
`
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`christina.goodrich@klgates.com
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Express Delivery
`( ) Via First Class Mail
`(X) Other: Email:
`gina.jenero@klgates.com
`
`
`
`Date: December 15, 2017
`
`
`
`/s/ Jason S. Kray
`Jason S. Kray
`kray@mbhb.com
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert &
`Berghoff LLP
`300 South Wacker Drive – Suite 3100
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone: +1 312 913 0001
`Facsimile: +1 312 913 0002
`
`Attorney for Non-Party
`LAKEVIEW METALS, INC.
`
`
`
`



