Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
`
`47025
`
`The authority for this action is the
`Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
`U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
`Dated: August 22, 2017.
`John A. Trelease,
`Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
`[FR Doc. 2017–21703 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`Notice of Receipt of Complaint;
`Solicitation of Comments Relating to
`the Public Interest
`AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
`the U.S. International Trade
`Commission has received a complaint
`entitled Certain IoT Devices and
`Components Thereof (IoT, The Internet
`of Things (Iot)—Web Applications
`Displayed on a Web Browser), DN 3263;
`the Commission is soliciting comments
`on any public interest issues raised by
`the complaint or complainant’s filing
`pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
`R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission,
`U.S. International Trade Commission,
`500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
`20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The
`public version of the complaint can be
`accessed on the Commission’s
`Electronic Document Information
`System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov,
`and will be available for inspection
`during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
`to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
`Secretary, U.S. International Trade
`Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
`Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
`205–2000.
`General information concerning the
`Commission may also be obtained by
`accessing its Internet server at United
`States International Trade Commission
`(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The
`public record for this investigation may
`be viewed on the Commission’s
`Electronic Document Information
`System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
`Hearing-impaired persons are advised
`that information on this matter can be
`obtained by contacting the
`Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
`205–1810.
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
`Commission has received a complaint
`and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b)
`of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
`and Procedure filed on behalf of
`
`Lakshmi Arunachalam, Ph.D. on
`October 3, 2017. The complaint alleges
`violations of section 337 of the Tariff
`Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the
`importation into the United States, the
`sale for importation, and the sale within
`the United States after importation of
`certain IoT devices and components
`thereof (IoT, the Internet of Things
`(IoT)—web applications displayed on a
`web browser). The complaint names as
`respondents: International Business
`Machines Corporation of Armonk, NY;
`IBM India Pvt Ltd. of India; SAP
`America, Inc. of Newtown Square, PA;
`SAP SE—Walldorf of Germany; Apple
`Inc. of Cupertino, CA; JPMorgan Chase
`and Company of New York, NY; The
`United States Office of the Attorney
`General, U.S. Department of Justice of
`Washington, DC; U.S.; United States
`Patent and Trademark Office of
`Alexandria, VA; Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board, United States Patent and
`Trademark Office of Alexandria, VA;
`Facebook, Inc. of Menlo Park, CA;
`Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, WA;
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of
`Ridgefield Park, NJ; Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea; Eclipse
`Foundation, Inc., and its Members of
`Canada; Fiserv Inc. of Brookfield, WI;
`Fiserv India Pvt. Ltd. of India; Wells
`Fargo Bank of San Francisco, CA;
`Citigroup, Citibank of New York, NY;
`Citizen’s Financial Group, Inc. of
`Providence, RI; Fulton Financial
`Corporation of Lancaster, PA; J.C. Penny
`Corporation, Inc. and J.C. Penny
`Company, Inc. of Plano, TX; U-Haul
`International, Inc. of Phoenix, AZ; Avis
`Rent A Car System, LLC, Avis Budget
`Group, and Payless Car Rental of
`Parsippany, NJ; Hertz Global Holdings,
`Inc., The Hertz Corporation, Dollar Rent
`A Car, and Thrifty Car Rental of Estero,
`FL; Ace Rent A Car of Indianapolis, IN;
`Enterprise Holdings, Enterprise Rent-A-
`Car, National Car Rental, and Alamo
`Rent A Car of Clayton/St. Louis, MO;
`Presidio Bank of San Francisco, CA;
`Fremont Bancorporation and Fremont
`Bank of Fremont, CA; Heritage Bank of
`Commerce, and Focus Bank of San Jose,
`CA; and Bridge Bank of San Jose, CA.
`The complainant requests that the
`Commission issue a limited exclusion,
`cease and desist orders, and impose a
`bond upon respondents’ alleged
`infringing articles during the 60-day
`Presidential review period pursuant to
`19 U.S.C. 1337(j).
`Proposed respondents, other
`interested parties, and members of the
`public are invited to file comments, not
`to exceed five (5) pages in length,
`inclusive of attachments, on any public
`interest issues raised by the complaint
`
`or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should
`address whether issuance of the relief
`specifically requested by the
`complainant in this investigation would
`affect the public health and welfare in
`the United States, competitive
`conditions in the United States
`economy, the production of like or
`directly competitive articles in the
`United States, or United States
`consumers.
`In particular, the Commission is
`interested in comments that:
`(i) Explain how the articles
`potentially subject to the requested
`remedial orders are used in the United
`States;
`(ii) identify any public health, safety,
`or welfare concerns in the United States
`relating to the requested remedial
`orders;
`(iii) identify like or directly
`competitive articles that complainant,
`its licensees, or third parties make in the
`United States which could replace the
`subject articles if they were to be
`excluded;
`(iv) indicate whether complainant,
`complainant’s licensees, and/or third
`party suppliers have the capacity to
`replace the volume of articles
`potentially subject to the requested
`exclusion order and/or a cease and
`desist order within a commercially
`reasonable time; and
`(v) explain how the requested
`remedial orders would impact United
`States consumers.
`Written submissions must be filed no
`later than by close of business, eight
`calendar days after the date of
`publication of this notice in the Federal
`Register. There will be further
`opportunities for comment on the
`public interest after the issuance of any
`final initial determination in this
`investigation.
`Persons filing written submissions
`must file the original document
`electronically on or before the deadlines
`stated above and submit 8 true paper
`copies to the Office of the Secretary by
`noon the next day pursuant to § 210.4(f)
`of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
`and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)).
`Submissions should refer to the docket
`number (‘‘Docket No. 3263’’) in a
`prominent place on the cover page and/
`or the first page. (See Handbook for
`Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic
`Filing Procedures 1). Persons with
`questions regarding filing should
`contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
`Any person desiring to submit a
`document to the Commission in
`
`1 Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures:
`https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_
`filing_procedures.pdf.
`
`VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Oct 06, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM 10OCN1
`
`sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
`
`

`

`47026
`
`Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2017 / Notices
`
`confidence must request confidential
`treatment. All such requests should be
`directed to the Secretary to the
`Commission and must include a full
`statement of the reasons why the
`Commission should grant such
`treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
`for which confidential treatment by the
`Commission is properly sought will be
`treated accordingly. All such requests
`should be directed to the Secretary to
`the Commission and must include a full
`statement of the reasons why the
`Commission should grant such
`treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
`for which confidential treatment by the
`Commission is properly sought will be
`treated accordingly. All information,
`including confidential business
`information and documents for which
`confidential treatment is properly
`sought, submitted to the Commission for
`purposes of this Investigation may be
`disclosed to and used: (i) By the
`Commission, its employees and Offices,
`and contract personnel (a) for
`developing or maintaining the records
`of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
`internal investigations, audits, reviews,
`and evaluations relating to the
`programs, personnel, and operations of
`the Commission including under 5
`U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
`government employees and contract
`personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity
`purposes. All nonconfidential written
`submissions will be available for public
`inspection at the Office of the Secretary
`and on EDIS.3
`This action is taken under the
`authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
`of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
`and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the
`Commission’s Rules of Practice and
`Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)).
`By order of the Commission.
`Issued: October 4, 2017.
`William R. Bishop,
`Supervisory Hearings and Information
`Officer.
`[FR Doc. 2017–21763 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
`
`Antitrust Division
`
`Notice Pursuant to the National
`Cooperative Research and Production
`Act of 1993—Open Mobile Alliance
`Notice is hereby given that, on
`September 7, 2017, pursuant to Section
`
`2 All contract personnel will sign appropriate
`nondisclosure agreements.
`3 Electronic Document Information System
`(EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov.
`
`6(a) of the National Cooperative
`Research and Production Act of 1993,
`15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Open
`Mobile Alliance (‘‘OMA’’) has filed
`written notifications simultaneously
`with the Attorney General and the
`Federal Trade Commission disclosing
`changes in its membership. The
`notifications were filed for the purpose
`of extending the Act’s provisions
`limiting the recovery of antitrust
`plaintiffs to actual damages under
`specified circumstances. Specifically,
`Cisco Systems, Inc., Seattle, WA; Mind
`Reader, Hangzhou City, PEOPLE’S
`REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Itron, Inc. Fort
`Worth, TX; and NewNet
`Communication Technologies, Inc.,
`Bedford, NS, CANADA have been added
`as parties to this venture.
`Also, Anritsu Ltd., Bedfordshire,
`UNITED KINGDOM has withdrawn as a
`party to this venture.
`No other changes have been made in
`either the membership or planned
`activity of the group research project.
`Membership in this group research
`project remains open, and OMA intends
`to file additional written notifications
`disclosing all changes in membership.
`On March 18, 1998, OMA filed its
`original notification pursuant to Section
`6(a) of the Act. The Department of
`Justice published a notice in the Federal
`Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
`Act on December 31, 1998 (63 FR
`72333).
`The last notification was filed with
`the Department on January 26, 2017. A
`notice was published in the Federal
`Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
`Act on March 6, 2017 (82 FR 12639).
`Patricia A. Brink,
`Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
`Division.
`[FR Doc. 2017–21744 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
`
`Antitrust Division
`
`Notice Pursuant to the National
`Cooperative Research and Production
`Act of 1993—Silicon Integration
`Initiative, Inc.
`Notice is hereby given that, on
`September 7, 2017, pursuant to Section
`6(a) of the National Cooperative
`Research and Production Act of 1993,
`15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
`Silicon Integration Initiative, Inc.
`(‘‘Si2’’) has filed written notifications
`simultaneously with the Attorney
`General and the Federal Trade
`Commission disclosing changes in its
`membership. The notifications were
`
`filed for the purpose of extending the
`Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
`antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
`under specified circumstances.
`Specifically, Analog Rails, Chandler,
`AZ; Avatar Integrated Systems, Inc.,
`Santa Clara, CA; D.E. Shaw Research,
`New York, NY; DXCorr Design, Inc.,
`Sunnyvale, CA; Intento Design, Paris,
`FRANCE; Invecas, Inc., Santa Clara, CA;
`Juspertor GmbH, Unterhaching,
`GERMANY; NVMEngines, Morgan Hill,
`CA; Sage Design Automation, Santa
`Clara, CA; Savarti Company Limited, Ho
`Chi Minh City, VIETNAM; Tower
`Semiconductor, Ltd., Migdal HaEmek,
`ISRAEL; and Google, Inc., Mountain
`View, CA, have been added as parties to
`this venture.
`Also, Concept Engineering GmbH,
`Freiburg, GERMANY; Kenji Morohasi,
`Yokohama, JAPAN; Lumerical
`Solutions, Inc., Vancouver, CANADA;
`SA Magillem Design Services, Paris,
`FRANCE; Monozukuri S.p.A., Rome,
`ITALY; Robust Chip Inc., Pleasanton,
`CA; Silicon Frontline Technology,
`Campbell, CA; and Spectral Design &
`Test Inc., Somerville, NY, have
`withdrawn as parties to this venture.
`No other changes have been made in
`either the membership or planned
`activity of the group research project.
`Membership in this group research
`project remains open, and Si2 intends to
`file additional written notifications
`disclosing all changes in membership.
`On December 30, 1988, Si2 filed its
`original notification pursuant to Section
`6(a) of the Act. The Department of
`Justice published a notice in the Federal
`Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
`Act on March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10456).
`The last notification was filed with
`the Department on May 9, 2016. A
`notice was published in the Federal
`Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
`Act on June 9, 2016 (81 FR 37212).
`Patricia A. Brink,
`Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
`Division.
`[FR Doc. 2017–21746 Filed 10–6–17; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
`[OMB Number 1110–0053]
`
`Agency Information Collection
`Activities; Proposed eCollection
`eComments Requested;
`Reinstatement, With Change, of a
`Previously Approved Collection for
`Which Approval Has Expired: FBI
`eFOIA Form
`AGENCY: Federal Bureau of
`Investigation, Department of Justice.
`
`VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Oct 06, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM 10OCN1
`
`sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
`
`