throbber
Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, DC 20436
`
`October 16,2017
`
`Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
`222 Stanford Ave.
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Tel: 650-690-0995
`
`Re:
`
`Complaint of Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam Concerning Certain loT Devices and
`Components Thereof (Io'T, the Internet of Things - Web Applications Displayed
`on a Web Browser, (Dkt. No. 337-TA-3263)
`
`Dear Dr. Arunachalam:
`
`("OUll") with
`I am writing on behalf of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`respect to the Complaint
`that was filed with the Commission with an official date of receipt f
`October 3, 2017. OUll reviews all complaints filed with the Commission for their compliance
`See 19 U.S.C. § 1337; 19 C.F.R. Part 210.
`with the statutory and regulatory requirements.
`During the pre-institution period of a complaint, which is often 30 days from the date a
`is received, but which can be extended beyond 30 days (see 19 C.F.R. § 210.10), OUll
`complaint
`often asks parties that have filed a complaint
`for additional
`information and supplementation.
`We are also available to answer questions about the pre-institution process and regulatory
`requirements that apply to complaints that have been filed.
`
`Based upon our review thus far, we have identified at least the following areas, which are
`discussed below, where the Complaint does not appear to comply with the Commission's
`rules:
`
`(1) The Commission rules require that a complaint describe "specific instances of alleged
`unfair importations."
`19 C.F.R. § 210.12(a)(3). For 29 of the 30 proposed respondents,
`the Complaint does not identify any specific instances of alleged unfair importations. By
`way of example only, the Complaint does not identify any specific instance of a product
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`

`

`imported, sold for importation or sold after importation into the United States by Hertz
`Global Holdings,
`Inc. Please provide the required information.
`
`With respect to proposed respondent Apple, Inc., the specific instance of
`importation identified in the Complaint
`is the purchase of an iPhone 7 by the complainant
`in Inv. No. 337·TA·I06S.
`To the extent you have additional evidence of specific
`instances of importation, please provide it.
`
`include "a reference to the specific claims
`(2) The Commission rules require that a complaint
`in each patent that allegedly cover the article imported or sold by each named
`[respondent]." 19 C.F.R. § 210. 12(a)(9)(vii). For 29 of the 30 proposed respondents the
`Complaint does not identify an article that is imported or sold by each proposed
`respondent, and thus also does not identify the particular patent claims that allegedly
`cover such an article. Please provide the required information.
`
`(3) The Commission rules state in part that a complaint should include "[a] showing that
`each [respondent]
`is importing or selling the article covered by ...
`the above specific
`claims of each involved U.S. patent. When practicable a complainant shall [include] a
`chart that applies each asserted independent claim of each involved U.S. patent to a
`representative involved article of each named [respondent]."
`19 C.F.R. §
`210. 12(a)(9)(viii). For 29 of the 30 proposed respondents identified,
`the Complaint and
`the single claim chart do not include the required showing. Please provide additional
`information identifying products imported into the United States by each proposed
`respondent
`that allegedly infringe the asserted independent claims of the '340 patent.
`
`With respect to proposed respondent Apple, Inc., the article that is compared to
`the asserted independent claims of the '340 patent is not the same article on which the
`Complaint
`relies for evidence of a specific instance of importation (the iPhone 7
`purchased by the complainant
`in Inv. No. 337-TA-I065).
`Please provide additional
`information showing that the allegedly imported product allegedly infringes the asserted
`independent claims of the '340 patent.
`
`include "[a] showing that an industry in
`(4) The Commission rules require that a complaint
`the United States, relating to the patent exists. When practicable [include] a chart that
`applies an exemplary claim of each involved U.S. patent to a representative involved
`domestic article." 19 C.F.R. § 210.12(a)(9)(ix). The Complaint does not identify a
`representative involved domestic article with any particularity. The Complaint also does
`not compare any representative involved domestic article to any claim of the '340 patent.
`Please identify the particular domestic articles, and please provide the requisite
`identifying the particular domestic industry articles, and please also show that they
`practice at least one claim of the '340 patent by including,
`in particular, a claim chart.
`
`the
`With respect to the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement,
`Commission rules state that relevant
`information in a complaint
`includes, but is not
`limited to, significant
`investments in plant and equipment, or labor and capital; or
`substantial
`investment
`in the exploitation of the subject patent including engineering,
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`

`- (C). The
`19 C.F.R. §§ 210. 12(a)(6)(i)(A)
`research and development or licensing.
`Complaint and exhibits do not appear to quantify the investments made in plant and
`equipment, or labor and capital, related to the domestic industry articles, or investments
`in the exploitation of the '340 patent. Please provide additional details concerning the
`investments made in plant and equipment, and/or labor and capital, or investments in the
`exploitation of the '340 patent.
`
`(5) The Commission rules require "[t]he identification of the ownership of each involved
`patent and a certified copy of each assignment
`(a legible copy will suffice for each
`required copy ofthe Complaint)."
`19 C.F.R. § 210.12(a)(9)(ii). While you have attached
`a printout from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website, and while we understand
`you have ordered copies of the assignment
`records for the '340 patent, we do not yet have
`the assignments themselves. Please provide copies of the assignments, and certified
`copies of the assignments as soon as they are available.
`
`(6) The Commission rules require that a complaint provide public versions of confidential
`exhibits. 19 C.F.R. § 210.4(f)(7)(i). There do not appear to be public versions of
`Confidential Exhibits 1C, 2C, 3C, 4C or 5C. Please provide public versions of all
`confidential exhibits.
`
`(7) With respect to any allegations in the Complaint of "unfair methods of competition and
`unfair acts in the importation of articles (other than articles provided for in subparagraphs
`(B), (C), (D), and (E)) ...
`" under 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(A),
`the Complaint
`(including
`the exhibits and appendices) does not comply with the applicable statutory requirements
`or Commission rules. See, e.g., 19 C.F.R. §§ 210.12(a)(6)(iii),
`(8).
`
`the Complaint
`During the pre-institution period you have the opportunity to supplement
`(and exhibits) with additional
`information in order to comply with the Commission rules. You
`can also file an amended complaint
`to address any deficiencies. Please correct the above-
`identified deficiencies by the close of business October 23,2017.
`If you are unable to meet this
`deadline, please submit a letter to the Secretary of the Commission (Lisa Barton) stating the date
`by which these deficiencies will be corrected and request postponement of the decision on
`whether to institute an investigation. We recommend that any request for postponement
`extend
`to a date that is two weeks after the date on which you expect these deficiencies to be corrected
`(e.g., if you expect to be able to file any additional
`information by October 31, 2017 correcting
`deficiencies, your request for postponement of the Commission vote on whether to institute
`would be November 14,2017).
`
`Please be advised that the Commission's determination to institute an investigation based
`on the allegations in the Complaint may be impacted by your response(s) and supplementation
`addressing the requested information.
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`

`'
`
`.
`
`j /
`
`.
`Sincerely,
`~IU(~f)l--I~
`Margarei?Macdonal/~
`Director
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`u.S.
`International Trade Commission
`Tel: (202) 205-2561
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket