throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE‘COMMISSION A
`
`washington, DC.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN IOT DEVICES AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF (IOT, THE INTERNET OF THINGS) —-
`WEB APPLICATIONS DISPLAYED ON A WEB
`BROWSER
`
`
`
`ORDER NO. 9:
`GRANTING RESPONDENTS’ REQUEST FOR SHORTENED
`RESPONSE TIME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1094
`
`(February 22, 2018)
`
`,
`
`On February 21, 2018, Respondents Apple Inc., Facebook, Inc}, Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Respondents”) filed a renewed
`
`motion to terminate (1094-004) the Investigation pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a).
`
`Respondents also requested a shortened response time of five days.
`
`The undersigned notes that Respondents filed a substantially identical mot-ion on January
`
`29, 2018, which was denied in Order No. 8 for failure to comply with Commission Rule
`
`210.21(a)(1). Given that this motion is substantively identical to Respondent’s January 29th
`
`motion and does not raise any new issues, Respondents’ request for a shortened response time is
`
`hereby granted. Complainants and the Commission Investigative Staff may rely on their
`
`previously filed responses and should inform the undersigned if they choose to do so.
`In addition, because Order No. 8 denied Respondents’ January 29th motion on procedural
`grounds, the stay imposed by Order No. 7 remains in. effect.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`. f
`
`
`
`harles E. Bullock
`
`Chief Administrative Law Judge
`
`

`

`CERTAIN IOT DEVICES AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`(IOT, THE INTERNET OF THINGS) -WEB
`APPLICATIONS DISPLAYED ON A WEB BROWSER
`
`Inv. N0. 337-TA—1094
`‘
`
`1, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDER NO. 9 has been served by
`hand upon the Commission Investigative Attorney, Jeffrey Hsu, Esq., and the following parties
`as indicated, on February 22, 2018.
`
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`US. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Complainants Lakshmi-Arunachalam, Ph.D.;
`Wechhange, Inc.:
`
`‘
`
`Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
`222 Stanford AVC-
`.
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`-
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Apple Inc.:
`
`,
`Brian E. Ferguson
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`2001 M Street, NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`El Via Hand Delivery
`El Via Express Delivery
`IE/Via First Class Mail
`
`C] Other:
`
`1:] Via Hand Delivery
`E] Via Express Delivery
`IE/Via First Class Mail
`C] Other'
`
`On Behalf of Respondents Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc. and Samsng Electronics Co., Ltd.:
`
`Sturgis M. Sobin
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`[:1 Via Hand Delivery
`[3 Via Express Delivery
`' Mia First Class Mail
`[:| Other
`
`i
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Facebook:
`
`Stephen R. Smith
`COOLEY LLP .
`1299 Pennsylvama Ave, NW
`Washmgton, DC 20004
`
`'
`
`[:1 Via Hand Delivery
`El
`ia Express Delivery
`Via First Class Mail
`C] Other:
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket