`Address:
`
`Writer’s Direct Dial No;
`Writer’s Email Address:
`
`October 12, 2017
`
`Rosemary J. Dudley
`230 Monroe Drive, Apt. l2
`MountainView, CA 94040
`(650) 948-4230
`Smritidudley@yahoo.com
`
`FILED ELECTRONICALLY AND 8 COPIES SENT VIA FEDEX
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW - Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Re:
`
`DOCKET NO. 3263: Certain IoTDevices And Components Thereof (loT, The
`Internet of Things WebApplications Displayed on a Webbrowser)
`
`ROSEMARY J. DUDLEY‘S STATEMENT ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST
`
`Dear Secretary Barton:
`
`Pursuant
`
`to Commission Rules, 1, Rosemary J. Dudley,
`
`a member of the public,
`
`respectfully submit this Statement on the Public Interest in support of the issuance of the relief
`
`specifically requested by the complainant, Dr. Lakslnni Armiachalam,
`
`in the public’s interest in
`
`this investigation with regard to violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
`
`1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the
`
`United States after importation of certain loT devices and components thereof (loT, the lnternet
`
`of Things (loT) —Web applications displayed on a Web browser).
`
`I highly recommend that the Commission grant Dr. Arunacha1a1n‘srequest for remedial
`
`orders, because it serves the public interest.
`
`I strongly support protecting domestic intellectual
`
`property rights against infringing imports. Dr. An1nachalam’s patent
`
`is critical to American
`
`innovation, because she invented the Internet of Things (IOT) ——Web applications displayed on
`
`a Web browser, used ubiquitously.
`
`1
`
`
`
`I believe granting the request raises no public interest concerns because:
`
`(l) U.S.
`
`consumers would not face any potential shortage of like or directly competitive products,
`
`because they can be produced in the United States, promoting the domestic industry, contributing
`
`to job creation; (2) Respondents can take a license and then import it; (3)If the Commission does
`
`not grant the remedial Order. it would only be perpetuating
`
`Anti-Trust violation by the
`
`Respondents, killing competition from small businesses and individual
`
`inventors like Dr.
`
`Arunachalam and allowing fraudulent imports into the country; and (4) The Commission should
`
`grant the request to encourage innovation.
`
`The accused products are common consumer goods and devices used in businesses that
`
`do not present public health, safety or welfare concerns. Competitive production in the USA will
`
`not be negatively impacted, by granting the request. Substitute products can be made instantly
`
`available by production in the United States. Domestic manufacturers can readily satisfy any
`
`demand created by the Commission granting Dr. Artmachalam’s request.
`
`CONCLUSION: The Commission should grant the request.
`
`Dated: October 12, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`L'f{\/£'_\lti"vItt’(.’1,%,]
`lit»‘<c'/it/'.»"~~'j
`Rosemary J. Dudley
`Address: 230 Monroe Drive, Apt. 12
`Mountain View. CA 94040
`(650) 948-4240
`
`Email: Smritidudley@yahoo.com
`Afember ofthe Public, Rosemary Dudley
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
