`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1118
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN MOVABLE BARRIER
`OPERATOR SYSTEMS AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
`
`ORDER NO. 48:
`
`
`
`
`
`GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`TO RESPOND TO AND FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER
`NO. 46 [MOTION DOCKET NO. 1118-045]
`
`(January 23, 2024)
`
`On January 18, 2024, Complainant The Chamberlain Group, Inc. (“Chamberlain”) and
`
`Respondents GTO Access Systems, LLC f/k/a Gates That Open, LLC, Nortek Security &
`
`Control LLC f/k/a Linear, LLC and Nortek, Inc. (collectively, “Respondents” and with
`
`Chamberlain “the Parties”) filed a joint motion (“Joint Motion”) for a one-week extension of
`
`time to respond to Order No. 46 and for clarification on the procedure for responses called for by
`
`Order No. 46. (Motion Docket No. 1118-045; Joint Mot. at 1.).
`
` The Parties submit that, due to limited availability of personnel during the shortened
`
`January 16, 2024 holiday week, Respondents require additional time to gather the information
`
`requested, including sales and inventory data for currently imported models. (Joint Mot. at 1.).
`
`The Parties represent that they have met and conferred and have agreed to a one-week extension
`
`of the deadline provided by Order No 46, through Monday, January 29, 2024.
`
`The Joint Motion also requests clarification with respect to the format of the responses,
`
`and additional briefing, if any. (Mot. at 2.).
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`If either party wishes to respond to the other party’s position or submission in response to
`
`the initial submissions in response to questions posed in Order No. 46, a party may do so in a
`
`separate filing within seven (7) days of the initial filing. Even if a question is directed to one
`
`party only, the other party may respond to the question posed. However, all information that is
`
`contested should be documented. Moreover, if the Parties are able to stipulate to any of the
`
`information, they should do so.
`
`Motion Docket No. 1118-045 is granted. The deadline for the Parties to file their initial
`
`responses required by Order No. 46 is January 29, 2024. Again, each party will have seven (7)
`
`days thereafter to respond to the other party’s position.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTAIN MOVABLE BARRIER OPERATOR SYSTEMS
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1118
`(Remand)
`
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDER has been served upon the
`following parties as indicated, on January 23, 2024.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On Behalf of The Chamberlain Group, Inc.:
`
`David C. Marcus, Esq.
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Email: David.marcus@wilmerhale.com
`
`On Behalf of Nortek, Inc., Nortek Security & Control, LLC
`f/k/a Linear, LLC, and GTO Access Systems LLC. f/k/a Gates
`That Open, LLC:
`
`Matthew C. Bernstein, Esq.
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11452 El Camino Real, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Email: MBernstein@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
