`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN INFOTAINMENT SYSTEMS,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND
`AUTOMOBILES CONTAINING THE SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1119
`
`ORDER NO. 52: GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF
`USPTO DECISIONS INSTITUTING INTER PAR TES REVIEWS
`
`(September 23, 2019)
`
`On September 19, 2019, Respondent u-blox AG ("u-blox") filed a motion for judicial
`
`notice of two decisions instituting inter partes review proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 8,902,104
`
`("the '104 patent") (Motion Docket No. 1119-053). There is no opposition to the motion from
`
`Complainant or any other party.
`
`The motion seeks judicial notice of decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`
`("PTAB") of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") to institute inter partes review
`
`proceedings in Cases IPR2019-00737 and IPR2019-00816, which relate to the '104 patent.
`
`Copies of the institution decisions were attached to the motion as Exhibits A and B.
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, judicial notice is appropriate for "a fact that is
`
`not subject to reasonable dispute because it (1) is generally known within the trial court's
`
`territorial jurisdiction; or (2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose
`
`accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned." Fed. R. Evid. 201 (2011). Judicial notice is
`
`appropriate for USPTO decisions related to an asserted patent. See, e.g., Certain Semiconductor
`
`Devices, Semiconductor Device Packages, and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-
`
`1010, Order No. 98 (May 31, 2017) (granting judicial notice for PTAB decisions); Certain
`
`
`
`Movable Barrier Operator Systems and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1118, Order
`
`No. 23 (Apr. 16, 2019) (granting judicial notice for PTAB decisions). These USPTO decisions
`
`"are matters of public record and 'capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to
`
`sources whose accuracy could not reasonably be questioned." Zurich Am. Ins. v. Southern-
`
`Owners Ins. Co., 314 F. Supp. 3d 1284, 1299-300 (M.D. Fla. 2018) (quoting Home v. Potter,
`
`392 Fed. Appx. 800, 802 (11th Cir. 2010)).
`
`Accordingly, Motion Docket No. 1119-053 is hereby GRANTED.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`-)et 1/-644ki
`Dee Lord
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`2
`
`
`
`CERTAIN INFOTAINMENT SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS
`THEREOF, AND AUTOMOBILES CONTAINING THE
`SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1119
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDER has been served by hand upon
`the following parties as indicated, on September 23, 2019.
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Complainants Broadcom Corporation:
`
`John M. Caracappa, Esq.
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
`Washington, DC 20036
`
`O Via Hand Delivery
`▪ y,ii Express Delivery
`LVVia First Class Mail
`0 Other:
`
`On Behalf of Respondents Toyota Motor Corporation,
`Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales,
`U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing
`North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana,
`Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc., Toyota
`Motor Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc., Toyota Motor
`Manufacturing, Texas, Inc., Panasonic Corporation,
`Panasonic Corporation of North America, Denso Ten
`Limited, Denso Ten America Limited, Denso Corporation,
`Denso International America, Inc., Denso Manufacturing
`Tennessee, Inc., Denso Wireless Systems America, Inc., and
`Japan Radio Co., Ltd.:
`
`Paul Steadman, Esq.
`DLA PIPER LLP
`444 West Lake Street, Suite 900
`Chicago, IL 60606
`
`O Via Hand Delivery
`• yia Express Delivery
`VVia First Class Mail
`O Other:
`
`
`
`CERTAIN INFOTAINMENT SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS
`THEREOF, AND AUTOMOBILES CONTAINING THE
`SAME
`
`Certificate of Service — Page 2
`
`On Behalf of Respondents Renesas Electronics
`Corporation, and Renesas Electronics America, Inc.:
`
`Daniel P. Muino, Esq.
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 6000
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`On Behalf of Respondents Pioneer Corporation and
`Pioneer Automotive Technologies:
`
`Lora A. Brzezyski, Esq.
`DRINKER BIDDLE & REATHLLP
`1500 K Street, NW, Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`On Behalf of Respondents Socionext, Inc.:
`
`G. Brian Busey, Esq.
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 6000
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1119
`
`O Via Hand Delivery
`▪ V)a Express Delivery
`VVia First Class Mail
`El Other:
`
`El Via Hand Delivery
`EliVia Express Delivery
`Ei Via First Class Mail
`O Other:
`
`O Via Hand Delivery
`
`leia Express Delivery
`
`Via First Class Mail
`O Other:
`
`On Behalf of Respondents u-blox, u-blox America, Inc.,
`and u-blox San Diego, Inc.:
`
`Smith Brittingham IV, Esq.
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT
`& DUNNER LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`)1 Delivery
`
`O Via Hand Delivery
`0 a Express Delive
`Via First Class Mail
`O Other:
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
