`or;
`14673
`Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 70/ Thursday, April 11, 2019/ Notices
`
`public review, we cannot guarantee that
`we will be able to do so.
`
`Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4—2.
`
`Jeff Kitchens,
`Deschutes District Manager.
`[FR Doc. 2019—07134 Filed 4—10—19; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4310-334
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation No. 337—TA—1 127]
`
`Certain Micropertorated Packaging
`Containing Fresh Produce (ll);
`Commission Determination Not To
`Review an Initial Determination
`
`Granting a Motion To Terminate the
`Investigation With Respect to
`Respondent Growers Express, LLC.;
`Termination of the Investigation
`AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
`the U.S. International Trade
`Commission has determined not to
`review an initial determination (“ID”)
`(Order No. 7) of the presiding
`administrative law judge (“ALI”),
`granting complainant’s motion to
`terminate the investigation as to
`respondent Growers Express, LLC
`(“Growers Express”) based on a
`settlement and license agreement. The
`investigation is terminated in its
`entirety.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`
`Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General
`Counsel, U.S. International Trade
`Commission, 500 E Street SW,
`Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
`205—2392. Copies of non-confidential
`documents filed in connection with this
`
`investigation are or will be available for
`inspection during official business
`hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
`Office of the Secretary, U.S.
`International Trade Commission, 500 E
`Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
`telephone (202) 205—2000. General
`information concerning the Commission
`may also be obtained by accessing its
`internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
`The public record for this investigation
`may be viewed on the Commission’s
`electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
`edis.us1'tc.g0V. Hearing-impaired
`persons are advised that information on
`this matter can be obtained by
`contacting the Commission’s TDD
`terminal on (202) 205—1810.
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
`
`Commission instituted this investigation
`on August 16, 2018, based on a
`
`complaint filed on behalf of Windham
`Packaging, LLC (“Windham”) of
`Windham, New Hampshire. 83 FR
`40787 (Aug. 16, 2018). The complaint
`alleges violations of section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
`U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the
`United States, the sale for importation,
`or the sale within the United States after
`
`importation of certain microperforated
`packaging containing fresh produce by
`reason of infringement of certain claims
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,083,837. Id. The
`complaint further alleges that a
`domestic industry exists. Id. The
`Commission’s notice of investigation
`named as respondents CH. Robinson
`Worldwide, Inc. (“CH Robinson”) of
`Eden Prairie, Minnesota and Growers
`Express of Salinas, California. Id. at
`40788.
`
`Respondent CH. Robinson has been
`terminated from the investigation based
`on Windham’s withdrawal of the
`
`allegations of the complaint pursuant to
`Commission Rule 210.21(a) (19 CFR
`210.21(a)). See Order No. 6 at 1 (Feb. 25,
`2019), Comm’n Notice (Mar. 11, 2019).
`
`On February 19, 2019, Windham filed
`an unopposed motion to terminate the
`investigation as to Growers Express
`based on a settlement and license
`
`agreement between Windham and
`Growers Express.
`On March 14, 2019, the AL) issued
`the subject ID granting the motion
`pursuant to Commission Rule
`210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)).
`Order No. 7 at 2 (Mar. 14, 2019). The
`AL) found that the motion complies
`with the Commission’s rules, and there
`is no evidence that terminating this
`investigation as to Growers Express
`based on a settlement and license
`
`agreement would be contrary to the
`public interest. Id. at 1—2. The subject ID
`indicates that Growers Express is the
`last remaining respondent. Id. at 2 n.1.
`No petitions for review were filed.
`The Commission has determined not
`
`to review the subject ID. The
`investigation is terminated in its
`entirety.
`The authority for the Commission’s
`determination is contained in section
`337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended (19 U.S.C. 1337], and in Part
`210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`
`Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
`2 1 0).
`
`By order of the Commission.
`Issued: April 8, 2019.
`Lisa Barton,
`Secretazy to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2019—07190 Filed 4—10—19; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 1020—02—P
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation Nos. 731 —TA—1 435—1 440
`(Preliminary)]
`
`Acetone From Belgium, Korea, Saudi
`Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, and
`Spain
`Determination
`
`On the basis of the record 1 developed
`in the subject investigations, the United
`States International Trade Commission
`
`(“Commission”) determines, pursuant
`to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”),
`that there is a reasonable indication that
`
`an industry in the United States is
`materially injured by reason of imports
`of acetone from Belgium, Korea,
`Singapore, South Africa, and Spain,
`provided for in subheading 2914.11.10
`and 2914.11.50 of the Harmonized Tariff
`Schedule of the United States, that are
`alleged to be sold in the United States
`at less than fair value (“LTFV”).2 In
`addition, the Commission terminates
`the antidumping duty investigation on
`acetone from Saudi Arabia.
`
`Commencement of Final Phase
`
`Investigation
`Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
`Commission’s rules, the Commission
`also gives notice of the commencement
`of the final phase of its investigations.
`The Commission will issue a final phase
`notice of scheduling, which will be
`published in the Federal Register as
`provided in section 207.21 of the
`Commission’s rules, upon notice from
`the U.S. Department of Commerce
`(“Commerce”) of an affirmative
`preliminary determination in the
`investigation under section 733(b) of the
`Act, or, if the preliminary determination
`is negative, upon notice of an
`affirmative final determination in that
`
`investigation under section 735(a) of the
`Act. Parties that filed entries of
`
`appearance in the preliminary phase of
`the investigations need not enter a
`separate appearance for the final phase
`of the investigation. Industrial users,
`and, if the merchandise under
`investigation is sold at the retail level,
`representative consumer organizations
`have the right to appear as parties in
`Commission antidumping and
`countervailing duty investigations. The
`Secretary will prepare a public service
`list containing the names and addresses
`
`1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
`Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
`CFR 207.2(fl).
`2 Acetone from Belgium, the Republic of Korea,
`the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the
`Republic of South Africa, and Spain: Initiation of
`Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 84 FR 9755
`(March 18, 2019).
`
`