throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`
`
`CERTAIN HUMAN MILK
`OLIGOSACCHARIDES AND METHODS
`OF PRODUCING THE SAME
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1120
`
`COMMISSION ORDER
`
`On May 19, 2020, the Commission issued a final determination finding a violation of
`
`section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337) (“section 337”), based on
`
`the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
`
`States after importation of certain bacterial strains and 2’-fucosyllactose oligosaccharides
`
`produced therefrom that infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,970,018 (“the ’018 patent”).
`
`See 85 Fed. Reg. 31549 (May 26, 2020); see also 83 Fed. Reg. 28865 (June 21, 2018) (defining
`
`the scope of the investigation as “2’-fucosyllactose oligosaccharides”). The Commission also
`
`adjudicated infringement with respect to a TTFL12 bacterial strain imported by the named
`
`respondent and determined that it does not infringe the ’018 patent. See id. The Commission
`
`issued a limited exclusion order (“LEO”) barring entry of 2’-fucosyllactose (“2’-FL”)
`
`oligosaccharides that infringe the asserted patent claims but also including an explicit carve-out
`
`for 2’-fucosyllactose oligosaccharides made with the non-infringing TTFL12 bacterial strain.
`
`On June 2, 2020, complainant Glycosyn LLC (“Glycosyn”) filed a petition for
`
`Commission reconsideration of part III(B) of the Commission Opinion (i.e., “Adjudication of
`
`Infringement with Respect to the TTFL12 Strain”). Having considered Glycosyn’s petition, the
`
`responses thereto, and the record in this investigation, the Commission has determined to deny
`
`Glycosyn’s petition for reconsideration.
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`A.
`
`Procedural Background
`
`The Commission instituted this investigation on June 21, 2018, based on a complaint, as
`
`amended and supplemented, filed by Glycosyn of Waltham, Massachusetts. See 83 Fed. Reg.
`
`28865 (June 21, 2018). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 based upon the
`
`importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
`
`after importation of certain human milk oligosaccharides, by reason of infringement of certain
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,453,230 (“the ’230 patent”) and the ’018 patent. See id. The notice
`
`of investigation named Jennewein of Rheinbreitbach, Germany as respondent in this
`
`investigation. See id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also a party to this
`
`investigation. See id.
`
`The Commission partially terminated the investigation as to certain claims of the ’018
`
`patent and all asserted claims of the ’230 patent based on the withdrawal of the allegations
`
`pertaining to those patent claims. See Order No. 5 (Aug. 9, 2018), unreviewed, Comm’n Notice
`
`(Aug. 29, 2018); Order No. 15 (Oct. 30, 2018), unreviewed, Comm’n Notice (Nov. 29, 2018);
`
`Order No. 17 (Nov. 19, 2018), unreviewed, Comm’n Notice (Dec. 12, 2018); Order No. 25 (Feb.
`
`8, 2019), unreviewed, Comm’n Notice (Feb. 28, 2019). Claims 1-3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 23-28
`
`of the ’018 patent remained pending in this investigation.
`
`On September 9, 2019, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) issued a final initial
`
`determination (“FID”) finding a violation of section 337 based on the infringement of claims 1-3,
`
`5, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 24-28, but not claim 23 of the ’018 patent based on non-infringement of that
`
`claim. See FID at 35. On May 19, 2020, the Commission affirmed the FID’s finding of
`
`infringement and issued a final determination finding a violation by certain bacterial strains.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`See 85 Fed. Reg. 31549 (May 26, 2020). In particular, the Commission reversed the FID’s
`
`decision not to adjudicate the TTFL12 bacterial strain and determined that it does not infringe
`
`any of the asserted claims. See id. The Commission issued an LEO barring entry of 2’-FL
`
`oligosaccharides that infringe the Asserted Claims but also including an explicit carve-out for 2’-
`
`FL oligosaccharides made with the non-infringing TTFL12 bacterial strain.1 The Commission
`
`also set a bond in the amount of five (5) percent of the entered value of Jennewein’s 2’-FL
`
`product during the period of Presidential review.
`
`On June 2, 2020, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.47 (19 C.F.R. § 210.47), Glycosyn
`
`petitioned for reconsideration of part III(B) of the Commission Opinion (i.e., “Adjudication of
`
`Infringement with Respect to the TTFL12 Strain”).2 On June 8 and 9, 2020, respectively,
`
`Jennewein and the Commission’s Investigative Attorney opposed Glycosyn’s petition.3
`
`II.
`
`STANDARD FOR RECONSIDERATION
`
`Commission Rule 210.47 governs petitions for reconsideration and provides that:
`
`Within 14 days after service of a Commission determination, any
`party may file with the Commission a petition for reconsideration of
`such determination or any action ordered to be taken thereunder,
`setting forth the relief desired and the grounds in support thereof.
`Any petition filed under this section must be confined to new
`questions raised by the determination or action ordered to be taken
`thereunder and upon which the petitioner had no opportunity to
`submit arguments. . . .
`
`See 19 C.F.R. § 210.47.
`
`
`1 Complainant did not request, and the Commission did not issue, a cease and desist order.
`2 See Complainant Glycosyn LLC’s Petition for Reconsideration of Part III(B) of the
`Commission Opinion (June 2, 2020).
`3 See Respondent Jennewein Biotechnologie GmbH’s Opposition to Complainant Glycosyn
`LLC’s Petition for Reconsideration of Part III(B) of the Commission Opinion (June 8, 2020);
`Response of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations to Complainant’s Petition for
`Reconsideration of Part III(B) of the Commission Opinion (June 9, 2020).
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`III. DISCUSSION
`
`Glycosyn’s petition for reconsideration does not identify new questions raised by the ALJ’s FID
`
`or the Commission’s final determination or present arguments that Glycosyn did not have the
`
`opportunity to address in previous filings before either the ALJ or the Commission. As such,
`
`the Commission has determined that Glycosyn’s petition for reconsideration does not satisfy the
`
`requirements of Commission Rule 210.47.4
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`Accordingly, upon consideration of the record and the submissions in this matter, the
`
`Commission hereby ORDERS that:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Glycosyn’s petition for reconsideration is DENIED.
`
`The Secretary will serve this Order on all parties to the investigation.
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Issued: October 1, 2020
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`
`4 Commissioner Schmidtlein respectfully dissents. In light of the particular facts (including the
`new evidence cited by Glycosyn in its petition for reconsideration) and the procedural history of
`this investigation, and given the rationale provided in her dissent, in her view, Glycosyn’s
`petition should be granted and Part III(B) of the majority’s opinion should be reconsidered.
`
`4
`
`

`

`CERTAIN HUMAN MILK OLIGOSACCHARIDES AND
`METHODS OF PRODUCING THE SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1120
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached COMMISSION ORDER has
`been served via EDIS upon the Commission Investigative Attorney, Lisa Murray, Esq., and
`the following parties as indicated, on October 1, 2020
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Complainant Glycosyn LLC:
`
`Michael C. Newman, Esq.
`MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, PC
`1 Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`Email: MCNewman@mintz.com
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability to Download
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Jennewein Biotechnologie GmbH:
`
`Gary M. Hnath
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Email: ghnath@mayerbrown.com
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability to Download
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket