throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`CERTAIN LTE- AND 3G-COMPLIANT
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`DEVICES
`
` Investigation No. 337-TA-1138
`
`COMPLAINANT INVT SPE LLC’S [CORRECTED] EXPEDITED
`MOTION TO QUASH THIRD-PARTY INTEL CORP.’S OBJECTION
`TO COMPLAINANT’S OUTSIDE COUNSEL EMPLOYEE
`JOSEPH (YU) CHEN, PH.D. REVIEWING INTEL CORP.’S
`CBI UNDER THE SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.15, Ground Rule 2 and Paragraph 14 of the
`
`Supplemental Protective Order governing discovery of Non-Party Intel (“SPO”), filed January
`
`28, 2019, Complainant INVT SPE LLC (“Complainant” or “INVT”) hereby moves to quash any
`
`objection by third-party Intel Corp. (“Intel”) to Complainant’s outside counsel employee Joseph
`
`(Yu) Chen, Ph.D. reviewing Intel confidential business information (“CBI”) under the SPO.
`
`Intel improperly suggests that Dr. Chen should not view Intel CBI simply because he is a
`
`Chinese citizen. Nothing under the SPO, the facts or the law supports such an objection.
`
`Accordingly, Complainant files this Motion to Quash. Given Dr. Chen’s critical role in this
`
`Investigation for Complainant in this Investigation, Complainant respectfully requests expedited
`
`consideration of this Motion.1
`
`1 Due to the government shutdown, which ended January 25, 2019, and the
`Commission’s public statement requesting that all parties wait to file documents in any ongoing
`proceeding, INVT had no previous opportunity to request such relief.
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Ground Rule 2.2 Certification
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 2.2, Complainant’s counsel certifies that, prior to filing this
`
`Motion, Complainant met-and-conferred to engage in reasonable, good-faith efforts to resolve
`
`the issues raised in this Motion and accompanying memorandum. Complainant and Intel met-
`
`and-conferred telephonically on December 17, 2018. During this conference, counsel for
`
`Complainant and Intel discussed Intel’s continued delay in approving Dr. Chen to review Intel
`
`CBI under the SPO. To date, Intel has refused to approve Dr. Chen to review Intel CBI, on the
`
`purported ground that Dr. Chen is a Chinese citizen, and therefore opposes this Motion.
`
`Respondents have not taken a position on this Motion, and Staff may take a position after
`
`viewing the filed papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Dated: February 14, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/ Bryan J. Vogel
`
`Bryan J. Vogel
`Derrick J. Carman
`Stephanie A. Diehl
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`399 Park Avenue
`Suite 3600
`New York, NY 10022
`Telephone: (212) 980-7400
`Facsimile: (212) 980-7499
`RK_INVT_ITC@RobinsKaplan.com
`
`Christopher A. Seidl
`John K. Harting
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`800 LaSalle Avenue
`Suite 2800
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 349-8500
`Facsimile: (612) 339-4181
`
`Li Zhu
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`2440 W. El Camino Real
`Suite 100
`Mountain View, CA 94040
`Telephone: (650) 784-4040
`Facsimile: (650) 784-4041
`
`Counsel for Complainant INVT SPE LLC
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Bryan J. Vogel, hereby certify that on February 14, 2019, true and correct copies of
`COMPLAINANT INVT SPE LLC’S [CORRECTED] EXPEDITED MOTION TO
`QUASH THIRD-PARTY INTEL CORP.’S OBJECTION TO COMPLAINANT’S
`OUTSIDE COUNSEL EMPLOYEE JOSEPH (YU) CHEN, PH.D. REVIEWING INTEL
`CORP.’S CBI UNDER THE SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER,
`MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINANT INVT SPE LLC’S
`[CORRECTED] EXPEDITED MOTION TO QUASH, DECLARATION OF JOSEPH
`(YU) CHEN, PH.D. IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINANT INVT SPE LLC’S
`[CORRECTED] EXPEDITED MOTION TO QUASH and DECLARATION OF BRYAN
`J. VOGEL IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINANT INVT SPE LLC’S [CORRECTED]
`EXPEDIATED MOTION TO QUASH were served on the parties listed below:
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, SW
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`The Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`Jae.Lee@usitc.gov; Michael.Buckler@usitc.gov
`Mr. Reginald Lucas, Esq., Investigative Attorney
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, SW, Suite 401
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`Reginald.Lucas@usitc.gov
`For Respondent Apple Inc.
`Robert A. Appleby, P.C.
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`Apple-Inventergy@kirkland.com
`Attorneys for Intel Corporation
`Kourtney Mueller Merrill
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`1900 Sixteenth Street, Suite 1400
`Denver, CO 80202-5255
`KMerrill@perkinscoie.com
`
`Dated: February 14, 2019
`
` Via EDIS
` Via Hand Delivery (2 copies)
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via EDIS
` Via Hand Delivery (2 copies)
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via EDIS
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via EDIS
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`
` Via EDIS
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Federal Express
` Via Electronic Mail
`
`/s/ Bryan J. Vogel
`Bryan J. Vogel
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket