`
`WASHINGTON, DC.
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`
`
`
`_
`CERTAIN LTE- AND 3G-COMPLIANT
`CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS
`
`
`
`DEVICES
`
`'
`
`v Inv. No. 337-TA-1138
`
`ORDER NO. 50:
`
`NOTICE OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE .
`(August 13, 2019)
`A
`
`A telephone conference (“Teleconference”) was held last week on Wednesday, August
`
`15, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., during which a number of issues were addressed, including, but not
`
`limited to, the Parties’ request for receipt of evidence without a sponsoring witness. 1
`
`(See Order
`
`Nos. 45 and 49.).
`Another Teleconference will be held on August 27, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. That
`
`Teleconference replaces the tentatively, previously scheduled Teleconference for August 20,
`2019. . (See Order No. 49.). In other words, there will not be a Teleconference on August 20,
`2019. The August 27, 2019 Teleconference will deal with all outstanding Motions in Limine
`
`(“MIL”) and High Priority Objections (“HPO”) that are ready for decision. Any other motions
`that are ready for decision may also be discussed.
`
`Consistent with my method used for holding Teleconferences, Complainant and
`
`Respondents should decide which of them will arrange for a court reporter. Also, by 12 o’clock '
`
`noon on Monday, August 26, 2019, the Parties should send a joint email to my Attorney
`
`Advisors AND to McNamara337@usitc.gov. The joint email should identify one individual who
`
`' A Teleconference transcript from the August 15, 2019 Teleconference has not been posted on EDIS at this time,
`so no reference thereto can be provided.
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`will be speaker and one person who will be listener for each Party, together with the name of the
`
`court reporter and dial-in information.
`
`If there are any new issues the Parties wish to raise on the upcoming Teleconference,
`
`please identify those issues a joint email that should be sent to my Attorney Advisors AND to
`
`McNamara337@usitc.gov .
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`amara
`MaryJo
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`CERTAIN LTE- AND 3G-COMPLIANT CELLULAR
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1138
`
`COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES
`
`.1
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`1, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDER has been served by hand upon the
`Commission Investigative Attorney, Reginald Lucas, Esq., and to the following parties as
`indicated, on August 19, 2019.
`
`./
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`US. International Trade Commission
`
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Complainant INVT SPE LLC:
`
`Bryan J. Vogel, Esq.
`£15331“: IAAPLANSLEP 3600
`New York, NY 10022
`
`venue m e
`’
`
`ar
`
`’
`
`*
`
`.
`
`E] Via Hand Delivery
`1:] Via Express Delivery
`ggfiefirs
`lass
`a“
`
`.
`
`F
`
`t C
`
`.
`M 1
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Apple Inc.:
`
`Robert A. Appleby, P.C.
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lex1ngton Avenue
`'
`New York, NY 10022
`
`_
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`I] Via'Hand Delivery
`C1. Via Express Delivery
`“fiVia First Class Mail
`C] Other'
`
`On Behalf of Respondents HTC Corporation and HTC
`America, Inc.:
`'
`
`Stephen S. Korniczky, Esq.
`
`,
`
`D Via Hand Delivery
`
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
`
`122-75 El Camino Real, Suite 200
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`Ema Express Delivery
`
`Via First Class Mail
`
`D Other:
`
`On Behalf of Respondents ZTE Corporation and ZTE {USA}
`Inc.:
`
`Jay H. Reiziss, Esq.
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`
`500 North Capitol Street, NW
`
`Washmgton, DC 20001
`
`El Via Hand Delivery
`' Via Express Delivery
`
`‘iVia First Class Mail
`
`C] Other:
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
