throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`
`Before the Honorable David P. Shaw
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`In the Matter of
`CERTAIN BOTULINUM TOXIN
`PRODUCTS, PROCESSES FOR
`MANUFACTURING OR RELATING TO
`SAME AND CERTAIN PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1145
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 26 and Ground Rule 7, Complainants Medytox Inc.
`
`(“Medytox”) and Allergan plc and Allergan, Inc. (together with their subsidiaries, “Allergan”)
`
`(collectively, “Complainants”) submit this Pre-hearing Statement. Complainants are filing
`
`concurrently a Pre-hearing Brief that sets forth in detail the legal, factual, and equitable bases for the
`
`arguments they will present at the hearing.
`
`I.
`
`OPENING STATEMENT
`
`Complainants intend to present a brief opening statement prior to presenting our case
`
`in chief. The purpose of the opening statement will be to orient the Administrative Law Judge to the
`
`technology and concepts in dispute, as well as the issues that are anticipated to consume the majority
`
`of the evidentiary hearing time in light of the Parties’ respective Pre-hearing Briefs. Complainants
`
`have estimated 36 minutes for their opening statement.
`
`II.
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ ANTICIPATED HEARING WITNESSES
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 26 and Ground Rule 7(a), Complainants identify the following
`
`known fact and expert witnesses they expect to appear at the hearing. A brief summary of each
`
`witness’s proposed testimony is included below. Copies of the curriculum vitae for Complainants’
`
`expert witnesses are attached as Attachments A - C.
`
`A.
`
`Complainants’ Case In Chief
`
`Complainants will call the following witnesses as part of their case in chief:
`
`i. Dr. Paul Keim
`
`Dr. Keim is the leading expert in the United States on genetic tracing of the
`
`evolutionary origin of pathogens. He is a Regents Professor of Biology at Northern Arizona
`
`University (“NAU”), where he also holds the E. Raymond and Ruth Reed Endowed Chair in Food
`
`Microbiology and serves as the Executive Director of the Pathogen and Microbiome Institute. He is
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 1
`
`

`

`
`
`also jointly employed at The Translational Genome Research Institute (“TGen”), where he holds the
`
`rank of Distinguished Professor. He founded the Pathogen Genome Division at TGen in 2003 and
`
`has directed or co-directed the division since. He is also affiliated with the BioSciences Division at
`
`Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and is an elected fellow of the American Academy
`
`of Microbiology and the American Academy for the Advancement of Science. Dr. Keim has devoted
`
`his career to tracing evolutionary relationships in bacteria and other pathogens. He has pioneered
`
`the field of using DNA fingerprinting to identify the source of toxic organisms and infectious agents
`
`and has worked with the Department of Justice, FBI, FDA, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and
`
`Department of Homeland Security (DHS). He has published over 450 scientific research articles that
`
`have been cited over 30,000 times. This includes articles on botulism neurotoxin producing bacteria.
`
`Dr. Keim will testify regarding his DNA analysis of the Clostridium botulinum (“C.
`
`botulinum”) strains used by Daewoong and Medytox, and in particular that (a) the Medytox strain is
`
`derived from the Hall A-hyper strain, and (b) the Daewoong strain is derived from the Medytox
`
`strain, and not – as Daewoong has long maintained in false submissions to Korean and U.S.
`
`authorities (including in this case) – from a strain that it independently isolated from soil in South
`
`Korea. Dr. Keim will also respond to the analysis put forth by Respondents’ expert, Dr. David
`
`Sherman, a professional witness with a history of providing outcome-oriented opinions that at least
`
`two federal district courts have excluded on credibility grounds, and whose analysis in this case has
`
`repeatedly been discredited.
`
`Dr. Keim’s curriculum vitae is attached to this Statement as Attachment A.
`
`ii. Dr. Hyun Ho Jung
`
`Dr. Jung is a former university professor and one of the leading experts in South Korea
`
`on C. botulinum. In 2000, as part of a government effort to encourage academics to pursue
`
`entrepreneurship, Dr. Jung founded Medytox – initially a three-person company, which has now
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 2
`
`

`

`
`
`grown to over 600 employees and become one of the most dynamic biotechnology firms in South
`
`Korea. Dr. Jung has served as the CEO of Medytox since its founding.
`
`Dr. Jung will testify regarding the founding of Medytox and Medytox’s development
`
`of many of the trade secrets at issue in this Investigation, specifically, the process by which Medytox
`
`developed its manufacturing for Meditoxin, Medytox’s first and leading botulinum neurotoxin
`
`product, and its continued innovation regarding the manufacture of botulinum neurotoxin products
`
`after obtaining regulatory approval for the sale of Meditoxin in Korea (and other countries outside
`
`the United States). The manufacturing processes that Dr. Jung will address are reflected in the
`
`documents that Medytox’s former employee, Byung Kook Lee, misappropriated from Medytox and
`
`include the manufacturing know-how that Daewoong used to develop the botulinum neurotoxin
`
`products currently known as DWP-450 and planned to be marketed under the name Jeuveau
`
`(“Accused Products”). Dr. Jung will also testify to the facts and circumstances that caused Medytox
`
`to become aware of Daewoong’s misappropriation of its bacterial strain and manufacturing process,
`
`as well as the steps that Medytox undertook to protect its trade secrets against misappropriation.
`
`iii. Hack Woo Kim
`
`Hack Woo Kim is one of the earliest employees of Medytox, having joined the
`
`company in March 2001 soon after receiving his master’s degree in biotechnology. Since 2018, Mr.
`
`Kim has been a director of Medytox, and he is also the head of a production business department and
`
`the team lead for one of Medytox’s manufacturing facilities. Early in his career at Medytox, Mr.
`
`Kim was directly involved in Medytox’s development of its manufacturing process for the drug
`
`substance of Meditoxin, and in Medytox’s subsequent research and development.
`
`Like Dr. Jung, Mr. Kim will testify regarding the process by which Medytox
`
`developed its manufacturing process for Meditoxin and its continued innovation regarding the
`
`manufacture of botulinum neurotoxin products after obtaining regulatory approval for the sale of
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 3
`
`

`

`Meditoxin. In that sense, Mr. Kim’s testimony will concern Medytox’s development of the trade
`
`secrets at issue in this Investigation, as well as to their independent economic value to Medytox. Mr.
`
`Kim will also testify regarding Medytox’s application for various patents, and specifically how the
`
`trade secrets at issue in this Investigation differ from the information disclosed in Medytox’s patents,
`
`as well as Medytox’s business and document retention practices.
`
`iv. Dr. Seong Hun Chang
`
`Dr. Chang is a longstanding employee of Medytox, having joined the company in
`
`June 2002. Dr. Chang currently serves as the Head of Quality System Management at Medytox, a
`
`position which he has held since 2016. His earlier roles at the company included research and
`
`development regarding Medytox’s C. botulinum strain and the manufacturing process for Medytox’s
`
`products, including Meditoxin. Dr. Chang will testify regarding Medytox’s development of the trade
`
`secrets at issue in this Investigation and their independent economic value to Medytox. Since mid-
`
`2002, Dr. Chang has also had responsibility for Medytox’s confidentiality policies and security, and
`
`has been responsible for the implementation of Medytox’s IT security systems since approximately
`
`2007. Accordingly, in addition to his testimony concerning Medytox’s research and development of
`
`the trade secrets at issue, Dr. Chang will testify regarding Medytox’s security systems and its efforts
`
`to safeguard those trade secrets, as well as concerning Medytox’s use of its information security
`
`system to identify Byung Kook Lee’s printing and emailing of documents containing trade secrets.
`
`v. Dr. Chang Hoon Rhee
`
`Dr. Rhee is the head of the Biopharmaceutical Development Department at Medytox,
`
`a position he has held since 2012. He joined Medytox in November 2007 and has been a Director at
`
`Medytox since 2016. Dr. Rhee was the head of the Drug Form Development and Analysis Team
`
`(also known as the Formulation and Analysis Team) at the Microbial Toxin R&D Center from 2007
`
`to 2014. In 2012, Dr. Rhee also became the head of the Biopharmaceutical Development department.
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
` 4
`
`

`

`
`
`Dr. Rhee will testify as to the attributes of Medytox’s Hall A-hyper strain, one of the
`
`trade secrets asserted in this Investigation, including the independent economic value of the strain to
`
`Medytox, how Medytox stores and safeguards its strain, and how Medytox propagated Medytox’s
`
`cell banks, certain of which were the subject of testing and analysis by the experts in this
`
`Investigation. Dr. Rhee will also testify concerning Medytox’s drug substance manufacturing
`
`process, including the significance and independent economic value of various of the manufacturing
`
`process trade secrets to Medytox. Finally, Dr. Rhee will testify concerning aspects of Byung Kook
`
`Lee’s work at Medytox and the knowledge gained by Byung Kook Lee regarding Medytox’s
`
`manufacturing process through his work at Medytox.
`
`vi. Dr. Andrew Pickett
`
`Dr. Pickett is one of the foremost experts in the area of commercial botulinum toxin
`
`(“BTX”). He has worked on a wide range of biological products since joining the industry in 1979.
`
`In the course of his career, Dr. Pickett has been associated with Dista Products Limited (the UK
`
`production company for Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd.), Biogen SA (where he became Head of Process
`
`Development), Porton Products (where he was Head of Fermentation Production and Development
`
`(Large Scale) at the Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Director of Production, and later
`
`Director of Technical Affairs), Ipsen Limited (where he was Director of Technical Affairs and later
`
`Senior Director, Biologicals Science and Technology), and Galderma S.A., where he was Head of
`
`Development. Dr. Pickett is a member of the British Pharmacopoeia Panel of Experts BIO
`
`(Biological and Biotechnical products) and a Board Member of the Botulinum Research Center,
`
`Institute for Advanced Studies. Over his career, he has worked with and managed many teams
`
`involved with research, development, production, quality control, regulatory affairs, technical
`
`support, and project management with respect to botulinum toxin products (as well as other
`
`biological and chemical products). Dr. Pickett began working with botulinum toxin in the mid-1980s
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 5
`
`

`

`
`
`while working at Porton Products, with responsibility for obtaining the first marketing authorization
`
`for the product now called Dysport®. Dr. Pickett has some 90 publications in learned journals,
`
`magazines, and books (as chapters), mainly dedicated to botulinum toxin, and holds a number of
`
`patents and patent applications related to botulinum toxin. Dr. Pickett is regularly invited to
`
`participate in national and international conferences and to give updates on the science and clinical
`
`uses of botulinum toxins, and has given over 500 lectures to the worldwide clinical community,
`
`including department heads, relating to the science of botulinum toxin and how to interpret these
`
`matters for clinical applications.
`
`Dr. Pickett will testify to his opinions on the implausibility of Daewoong’s assertion
`
`regarding having isolated the strain of C. botulinum used in its manufacturing process from soil in
`
`South Korea, the extent to which Medytox’s Hall A-hyper strain has commercial value and would
`
`not be publicly available, the evidence showing Daewoong misappropriated information from
`
`Medytox in developing its botulinum product DWP-450, and the advantages gained and time saved
`
`by Daewoong for its development of DWP-450 as a result of its improper acquisition and use of
`
`Medytox’s C. botulinum strain and manufacturing process.
`
`Dr. Pickett’s curriculum vitae is attached to this Statement as Attachment B.
`
`vii. Dr. Seshadri Neervannan
`
`Dr. Neervannan is Senior Vice President of Pharmaceutical Development within the
`
`Research and Development Division of Allergan. Dr. Neervannan has worked at Allergan since
`
`2007, and he presently oversees Allergan’s development of its small molecule and biologics drug
`
`products, including BOTOX®. Dr. Neervannan also plays a leadership role in Allergan’s partnership
`
`with Medytox for the development, regulatory approval, and commercialization of MT10109L, a
`
`neurotoxin product that Allergan is licensing from Medytox. Dr. Neervannan is expected to testify
`
`about BOTOX®, including providing a general overview of BOTOX®, its manufacturing and
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 6
`
`

`

`
`
`research and development, as well as the domestic Allergan facilities where such activities occur.
`
`Dr. Neervannan also is expected to testify about Allergan’s partnership with Medytox and Allergan’s
`
`role, activities, and investment in the development, regulatory approval, and commercialization of
`
`MT10109L.
`
`viii. Mr. Ben Marzouk
`
`Ben Marzouk is an Executive Director of Finance at Allergan, where he is responsible
`
`for directing the planning, forecasting, analysis, and reporting for Allergan’s U.S. Medical Aesthetics
`
`Business, which includes BOTOX® Cosmetic. Mr. Marzouk joined Allergan in December 2004.
`
`Mr. Marzouk is expected to testify about topics relating to BOTOX® (comprising BOTOX®
`
`Cosmetic and BOTOX® therapeutic) and BOTOX® Cosmetic alone, including Allergan’s related
`
`domestic investments, activities, and sales. He is also expected to testify regarding Allergan’s
`
`foreign investments relating to BOTOX®. Mr. Marzouk further is expected to testify about
`
`Allergan’s domestic and foreign investments and activities relating to MT10109L, the neurotoxin
`
`product licensed by Allergan (and being jointly developed by Allergan and Medytox).
`
`ix. Ms. Colleen McKenna
`
`Colleen McKenna is the Vice President of Marketing for Facial Aesthetics at
`
`Allergan. She has worked at Allergan for thirteen years and served in her current position for four
`
`years. Ms. McKenna is responsible for marketing and promotional activities for Allergan’s facial
`
`aesthetic products, including BOTOX® Cosmetic, and has knowledge and involvement in analyzing
`
`the competitive landscape for such products and pricing decisions.
`
`Ms. McKenna is expected to testify about topics relating to the neurotoxin market,
`
`including market research and the competitive landscape, as well as the BOTOX® product (and
`
`BOTOX® Cosmetic alone), including its pricing and marketing. Ms. McKenna further is expected
`
`to testify about the impact of Respondents’ Jeuveau on BOTOX® and the BTX market in the United
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 7
`
`

`

`
`
`States. Ms. McKenna also is expected to testify regarding the MT10109L neurotoxin product
`
`licensed by Allergan from Medytox (and being jointly developed by Allergan and Medytox),
`
`including current expectations regarding marketing of, potential pricing of, and impact of Jeuveau
`
`on MT10109L.
`
`x. Mr. James Malackowski
`
`Mr. Malackowski is an expert in the areas of economic and market analysis, injury
`
`analysis, and the valuation and analysis of intellectual property and licenses, among other topics.
`
`Mr. Malackowski, who has provided valuation, transaction, and financial advisory assistance for
`
`more than 30 years and frequently instructs on IP management and markets, as well as emerging
`
`technology markets, has served as an expert witness on more than 50 occasions in cases in the U.S.
`
`International Trade Commission and numerous federal and state courts on questions relating to the
`
`economics and valuation of intellectual property, and specifically trade secrets and patents.
`
`Mr. Malackowski is expected to testify regarding the domestic industry for BTX
`
`products in the United States, Complainants’ products comprising such domestic industry, and the
`
`injury that will be and already has been suffered due to the importation and sale of the Accused
`
`Products and Respondents’ activities. Mr. Malackowski also is expected to testify regarding the
`
`appropriateness, duration, and reach of the remedies that should be entered in this matter, as well as
`
`the amount of bond that should be posted during the presidential review period.
`
`Mr. Malackowski’s curriculum vitae is attached to this Statement as Attachment C.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`In addition to these witnesses, Complainants anticipate that their adverse examination
`
`of witnesses proffered by Respondents Daewoong Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. (“Daewoong”) and
`
`Evolus, Inc. (“Evolus”) will exceed the scope of those witnesses’ written witness statements, certain
`
`of which omit critical topics relevant to this Investigation – such as, for example, testimony
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 8
`
`

`

`
`
`concerning the supposed discovery of Daewoong’s C. botulinum strain from the soil in South Korea,
`
`a cover-story that has been disproven and which Daewoong has omitted from the presentation of its
`
`case.
`
`Complainants will further rely on deposition testimony, subject to designation before
`
`the hearing and any agreements reached by the parties. Specifically, Complainants intend to rely on
`
`the deposition testimony of witnesses deposed in this matter, including those identified in
`
`Complainants’ Pre-hearing Brief, filed concurrently. Complainants may seek leave to call any
`
`deposition witness live in the event that individual’s deposition testimony is not admitted into the
`
`record.
`
`B.
`
`Complainants’ Rebuttal Case
`
`Complainants intend to move in limine to preclude Respondents from introducing
`
`arguments and evidence that are irrelevant to the issues on which the Commission has instituted this
`
`Investigation. The Investigation concerns Respondents’ unfair acts in violation of Section 337 of the
`
`Tariff Act of 1930. Respondents have sought to distract from that focus by attempting to litigate a
`
`myriad of other allegations against Complainants unrelated to that subject matter. But Respondents
`
`lack standing to, for example, mount a hypothetical challenge to Medytox’s legal ownership of its C.
`
`botulinum strain on behalf of third parties who themselves have never asserted the rights that
`
`Daewoong purports to advance. Nor is it a defense to a Section 337 case to rely on other unrelated,
`
`alleged bad acts by Complainants under the guise of an “unclean hands” defense.
`
`In the event that the Administrative Law Judge does not grant Complainants’ motions
`
`in limine and intends to take evidence on these so-called defenses at the evidentiary hearing,
`
`Complainants would rely on the testimony of the following witnesses, who submitted contingent
`
`written rebuttal statements.1 In that eventuality, Complainants believe that witnesses whose
`
`
`1
`Complainants’ submission of those rebuttal statements is contingent on the Administrative
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
` 9
`
`

`

`
`
`testimony is also part of Complainants’ affirmative case should be questioned as part of Respondent’s
`
`cross examination of these witnesses, rather than being required to appear twice, and have provided
`
`their time estimates on that basis.
`
`i. Dr. Hyun Ho Jung
`
`As described above, Dr. Jung is the founder and CEO of Medytox. On rebuttal, Dr.
`
`Jung will address various of Respondents’ asserted affirmative defenses, including specifically their
`
`unfounded allegations concerning Medytox’s “unclean hands,” Medytox’s alleged lack of legal title
`
`to its C. botulinum strain, and Complainants’ alleged unjustifiable delay in filing this Investigation.
`
`ii. Dr. Hack Woo Kim
`
`As discussed above, Dr. Kim is a director of Medytox and head of its production
`
`business department. On rebuttal, Dr. Kim will address various of Respondents’ asserted affirmative
`
`defenses, including specifically their unfounded allegations concerning Medytox’s “unclean hands,”
`
`as well as Respondents’ arguments that Medytox employees other than Byung Kook Lee printed or
`
`emailed documents containing Medytox trade secrets.
`
`iii. Dr. Seong Hun Chang
`
`As discussed above, Dr. Chang is a Head of Quality Systems Management and head
`
`of information technology security at Medytox. On rebuttal, Dr. Chang will address various of
`
`Respondents’ asserted affirmative defenses, including specifically their unfounded allegations
`
`concerning Medytox’s “unclean hands,” as well as Respondents’ arguments that Medytox employees
`
`other than Byung Kook Lee printed or emailed documents containing Medytox trade secrets.
`
`iv. Dr. Kyu Hwan Yang
`
`Dr. Yang is among the founding generation of modern botulinum researchers, an
`
`
`Law Judge’s denial of Complainants’ motion in limine, and Complainants would seek leave to
`withdraw them in the event that the motion is granted.
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
` 10
`
`

`

`
`
`academic mentor of Medytox’s founder, Dr. Hyun Ho Jung, and a former senior South Korean
`
`government official. His work in C. botulinum toxins stretches back to his time as a graduate student
`
`in the 1970s, in the early stages of academic research related to botulinum. His professional
`
`achievements include serving as the commissioner of the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety
`
`and as the president of the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology.
`
`On rebuttal, Dr. Yang will respond to Respondents’ unfounded allegations that Dr.
`
`Jung and Medytox lack legal title or ownership of Medytox’s Hall A-hyper strain, one of the trade
`
`secrets that Daewoong misappropriated. Dr. Yang will testify to this matter from his personal
`
`knowledge, having personally obtained the strain from Dr. Hiroshi Sugiyama at the University of
`
`Wisconsin Food Research Institute, brought it to Korea, provided it to Dr. Jung, and given his
`
`approval for Dr. Jung to use the strain to develop Medytox’s products.
`
`III.
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 26 and Ground Rule 7(b), Respondents identify the exhibits
`
`expected to be introduced at the hearing as set out in Attachment D.
`
`IV.
`
`STATEMENT REGARDING SETTLEMENT
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 3, Complainants certify that good faith efforts were
`
`undertaken to attempt to settle the remaining disputed issues to be presented at the evidentiary
`
`hearing. The Parties have been unable to resolve those issues.
`
`V.
`
`STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED AND CONTENTIONS
`
`With respect to Complainants’ statement of the issues to be considered at the hearing
`
`and their contentions with respect thereto, as required by Ground Rule 7(c), Complainants refer to
`
`their Pre-hearing Brief filed contemporaneously herewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 11
`
`

`

`
`
`VI.
`
`TABLE OF WITNESSES AND TIME ESTIMATES
`
`The Parties have jointly prepared the following table describing the projected order
`
`of anticipated witnesses and time estimates:
`
`Openings
`Complainants
`Respondents
`Staff
`
`
`
`Subtotal
`Complainants’ Case
`
`Paul Keim
`Hyun Ho Jung
`Hack Woo Kim
`Seong Hun Chang
`Chang Hoon Rhee
`Andrew Pickett
`Sesha Neervannan
`Ben Marzouk
`Colleen McKenna
`James Malackowski
`Subtotal
`Respondents’ Case
`
`
`
`Byung Kook Lee
`Brenda Wilson
`Chung Se Kim
`Kyoung Yoon Kim
`Chris Marmo
`David Sherman
`BalRam Singh
`Chang Woo Suh
`Ryan Sullivan
`David Moatazedi
`Carla Mulhern
`Subtotal
`Complainants’
`Rebuttal Case
`Kyu Hwan Yang
`Subtotal
`TOTAL TIMES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`36
`
`
`36
`Complainants’
`Direct/Redirect
`50
`15
`12
`12
`12
`35
`12
`12
`12
`20
`192
`Complainants’
`Cross
`30
`25
`35
`20
`20
`45
`20
`30
`20
`25
`30
`300
`Complainants’
`Direct/Redirect
`12
`12
`540
`
`
`
`
`30
`
`30
`Respondents’
`Cross
`60
`45
`20
`20
`20
`30
`10
`10
`10
`15
`240
`Respondents’
`Direct/Redirect
`70
`22
`25
`15
`10
`37
`12
`25
`12
`10
`12
`250
`Respondents’
`Cross
`20
`20
`540
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30
`30
`Staff’s Cross
`
`30
`15
`6
`6
`6
`15
`10
`10
`5
`15
`118
`Staff’s Cross
`
`15
`15
`15
`10
`6
`30
`15
`15
`7
`6
`13
`147
`Staff Cross
`
`5
`5
`300
`
`
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 10, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
`
`
`By: /s/ Jeffrey T. Thomas .
`
`Jeffrey T. Thomas
`Joshua A. Jessen
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`3161 Michelson Drive
`Irvine, CA 92612-4412
`Telephone: (949) 551-3967
`Facsimile: (949) 451-4220
`AllerganITC3359@gibsondunn.com
`
`Brian M. Buroker
`Haley S. Morrisson
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036-5306
`Telephone: (202) 955-8541
`Facsimile: (202) 467-0539
`AllerganITC3359@gibsondunn.com
`
`Michael A. Sitzman
`DLA PIPER LLP
`555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
`San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
`Telephone: (415) 615-6175
`Facsimile: (415) 659-7411
`AllerganITC3359@gibsondunn.com
`
`Attorneys for Allergan plc and Allergan, Inc.
`
`By: /s/ Nowell D. Bamberger .
`
`Nowell D. Bamberger
`Elsbeth Bennett
`Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
`2112 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20037
`Telephone: (202) 974-1500
`Facsimile: (202) 974-1999
`Team-ITC-Medytox-1145@cgsh.com
`
`David H. Herrington
`Arminda B. Bepko
`Charity E. Lee
`Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
`One Liberty Plaza
`New York, NY 10006
`Telephone: (212) 225-2000
`Team-ITC-Medytox-1145@cgsh.com
`
`T. Spence Chubb
`Law Office of T. Spence Chubb
`1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone: (703) 623-7739
`Facsimile: (703) 563-6055
`Team-ITC-Medytox-1145@cgsh.com
`
`Attorneys for Medytox Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 13
`
`

`

`
`Certain Botulinum Toxin Products, Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same and
`Certain Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1145
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Natalie Noble, certify that on January 10 and 13, 2020, copies of the foregoing
`
`document were served on the following in the manner so indicated:
`
`
`The Honorable Lisa Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, S.W.,
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`The Honorable David P. Shaw
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Brian Koo
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, S.W., Suite 401
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`Telephone: (202) 205-2580
`
`Counsel for Respondent Daewoong
`Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
`
`David F. Nickel (Lead Attorney)
`FOSTER, MURPHY, ALTMAN & NICKEL, PC
`1150 18th St., NW
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone: (202) 822-4104
`
`
`Via EDIS
`
`Via Courier (1 copy)
`Via E-Mail:
`Shaw337@usitc.gov
`Joseph.Speyer@usitc.gov
`
`Via E-mail:
`Brian.Koo@usitc.gov
`
`Via E-mail:
`FM-Daewoong-
`1145@fostermurphy.com
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Via E-mail:
`KK-Daewoong-1145@kobrekim.com
`
`Counsel for Respondent Daewoong
`Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
`
`Michael Kim
`Benjamin J. A. Sauter
`Benjamin Sirota
`Jeffrey Newton
`800 3rd Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`Telephone: (212) 488-1200
`Fax: (212) 488-1220
`
`Daniel Zaheer
`150 California St.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 582-4800
`Fax: (415) 582-4811
`
`Won Joon Lee
`Daniel Lee
`9F, Tower B, The-K Twin Towers
`50, Jong-ro l-gil, Jongno-gu
`Seoul, 03142 South Korea
`Telephone: +82 2-369-1212
`Fax: +82 2-369-1220
`
`Matthew Boucher
`1919 M. Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone: (202) 664-1950
`Fax: (202) 664-1920
`
`Matthew I. Menchel
`201 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1900
`Miami, Florida 33131
`Telephone: (305) 967-6100
`Fax: (305) 967-6120
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Via E-mail:
`grp-evolus-itc@paulweiss.com
`
`
`Via Email:
`AllerganITC3359@gibsondunn.com
`michael.sitzman@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Counsel for Respondent Evolus, Inc.
`
`Nicholas Groombridge
`Joseph J. Bial
`Josephine Young
`Ariane Rockoff-Kirk
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON LLP
`1285 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY
`Telephone: (212) 373-3000
`Counsel for Complainants Allergan plc and
`Allergan, Inc.
`
`Brian M. Buroker (Lead Attorney)
`Haley Morrisson
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036-5306
`Telephone: (202) 955-8500
`
`Jeffrey T. Thomas
`Joshua A. Jessen
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`3161 Michelson Drive
`Irvine, CA 92612-4412
`Telephone: (949) 451-3800
`
`Soolean Choy
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
`San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
`Telephone: (415) 393-8200
`
`Nathan R. Curtis
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2100 McKinney Avenue
`Dallas, TX 75201-6912
`Telephone: (214) 698-3100
`
`Lori C. Arakaki
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
`Telephone: (213) 229-7000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Michael Sitzman
`DLA PIPER LLP
`555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
`San Francisco, California 94105-2933
`Telephone: (415) 615-6175
`
`Date:
`
`January 13, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Natalie Noble
`Natalie Noble
`Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
`One Liberty Plaza
`New York, NY 10006
`Telephone: (212) 225-2000
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Attachment A
`
`Attachment A
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paul S. Keim, Ph.D.
`Curriculum vitae
`
`Table of Contents
`
`
`
`
`Section Description
`
`Short Summary CV ..............................................................................................................2
`Education, Training and Professional Experience ...............................................................3
`Honors and Awards..............................................................................................................4
`Professional Societies (Past and Present) ............................................................................4
`Professional Service .............................................................................................................4
`Advisory and Policy Committees .......................................................................................5
`Scholarship and Award Selection Committees ....................................................................6
`Journal Editorial Boards ......................................................................................................6
`Chaired Sessions ..................................................................................................................6
`Competitive Grants Review Panel Member ........................................................................6
`Ad Hoc Grant Reviewer ......................................................................................................7
`Ad Hoc Paper Reviewer ......................................................................................................7
`Competitive Grants Review Panel Member: .......................................................................7
`Expert Witness Testimony ...................................................................................................7
`Patents Issued .......................................................................................................................7
`Patents Pending ....................................................................................................................8
`Publications ..........................................................................................................................9
`Published Reports .............................................................................................................49
`Invited Seminars/Lectures .................................................................................................50
`Extramural Research ..........................................................................................................64
`Students and faculty trained ..........................................................

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket