`
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`
`Before the Honorable David P. Shaw
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`In the Matter of
`CERTAIN BOTULINUM TOXIN
`PRODUCTS, PROCESSES FOR
`MANUFACTURING OR RELATING TO
`SAME AND CERTAIN PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1145
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 26 and Ground Rule 7, Complainants Medytox Inc.
`
`(“Medytox”) and Allergan plc and Allergan, Inc. (together with their subsidiaries, “Allergan”)
`
`(collectively, “Complainants”) submit this Pre-hearing Statement. Complainants are filing
`
`concurrently a Pre-hearing Brief that sets forth in detail the legal, factual, and equitable bases for the
`
`arguments they will present at the hearing.
`
`I.
`
`OPENING STATEMENT
`
`Complainants intend to present a brief opening statement prior to presenting our case
`
`in chief. The purpose of the opening statement will be to orient the Administrative Law Judge to the
`
`technology and concepts in dispute, as well as the issues that are anticipated to consume the majority
`
`of the evidentiary hearing time in light of the Parties’ respective Pre-hearing Briefs. Complainants
`
`have estimated 36 minutes for their opening statement.
`
`II.
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ ANTICIPATED HEARING WITNESSES
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 26 and Ground Rule 7(a), Complainants identify the following
`
`known fact and expert witnesses they expect to appear at the hearing. A brief summary of each
`
`witness’s proposed testimony is included below. Copies of the curriculum vitae for Complainants’
`
`expert witnesses are attached as Attachments A - C.
`
`A.
`
`Complainants’ Case In Chief
`
`Complainants will call the following witnesses as part of their case in chief:
`
`i. Dr. Paul Keim
`
`Dr. Keim is the leading expert in the United States on genetic tracing of the
`
`evolutionary origin of pathogens. He is a Regents Professor of Biology at Northern Arizona
`
`University (“NAU”), where he also holds the E. Raymond and Ruth Reed Endowed Chair in Food
`
`Microbiology and serves as the Executive Director of the Pathogen and Microbiome Institute. He is
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 1
`
`
`
`
`
`also jointly employed at The Translational Genome Research Institute (“TGen”), where he holds the
`
`rank of Distinguished Professor. He founded the Pathogen Genome Division at TGen in 2003 and
`
`has directed or co-directed the division since. He is also affiliated with the BioSciences Division at
`
`Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and is an elected fellow of the American Academy
`
`of Microbiology and the American Academy for the Advancement of Science. Dr. Keim has devoted
`
`his career to tracing evolutionary relationships in bacteria and other pathogens. He has pioneered
`
`the field of using DNA fingerprinting to identify the source of toxic organisms and infectious agents
`
`and has worked with the Department of Justice, FBI, FDA, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and
`
`Department of Homeland Security (DHS). He has published over 450 scientific research articles that
`
`have been cited over 30,000 times. This includes articles on botulism neurotoxin producing bacteria.
`
`Dr. Keim will testify regarding his DNA analysis of the Clostridium botulinum (“C.
`
`botulinum”) strains used by Daewoong and Medytox, and in particular that (a) the Medytox strain is
`
`derived from the Hall A-hyper strain, and (b) the Daewoong strain is derived from the Medytox
`
`strain, and not – as Daewoong has long maintained in false submissions to Korean and U.S.
`
`authorities (including in this case) – from a strain that it independently isolated from soil in South
`
`Korea. Dr. Keim will also respond to the analysis put forth by Respondents’ expert, Dr. David
`
`Sherman, a professional witness with a history of providing outcome-oriented opinions that at least
`
`two federal district courts have excluded on credibility grounds, and whose analysis in this case has
`
`repeatedly been discredited.
`
`Dr. Keim’s curriculum vitae is attached to this Statement as Attachment A.
`
`ii. Dr. Hyun Ho Jung
`
`Dr. Jung is a former university professor and one of the leading experts in South Korea
`
`on C. botulinum. In 2000, as part of a government effort to encourage academics to pursue
`
`entrepreneurship, Dr. Jung founded Medytox – initially a three-person company, which has now
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`grown to over 600 employees and become one of the most dynamic biotechnology firms in South
`
`Korea. Dr. Jung has served as the CEO of Medytox since its founding.
`
`Dr. Jung will testify regarding the founding of Medytox and Medytox’s development
`
`of many of the trade secrets at issue in this Investigation, specifically, the process by which Medytox
`
`developed its manufacturing for Meditoxin, Medytox’s first and leading botulinum neurotoxin
`
`product, and its continued innovation regarding the manufacture of botulinum neurotoxin products
`
`after obtaining regulatory approval for the sale of Meditoxin in Korea (and other countries outside
`
`the United States). The manufacturing processes that Dr. Jung will address are reflected in the
`
`documents that Medytox’s former employee, Byung Kook Lee, misappropriated from Medytox and
`
`include the manufacturing know-how that Daewoong used to develop the botulinum neurotoxin
`
`products currently known as DWP-450 and planned to be marketed under the name Jeuveau
`
`(“Accused Products”). Dr. Jung will also testify to the facts and circumstances that caused Medytox
`
`to become aware of Daewoong’s misappropriation of its bacterial strain and manufacturing process,
`
`as well as the steps that Medytox undertook to protect its trade secrets against misappropriation.
`
`iii. Hack Woo Kim
`
`Hack Woo Kim is one of the earliest employees of Medytox, having joined the
`
`company in March 2001 soon after receiving his master’s degree in biotechnology. Since 2018, Mr.
`
`Kim has been a director of Medytox, and he is also the head of a production business department and
`
`the team lead for one of Medytox’s manufacturing facilities. Early in his career at Medytox, Mr.
`
`Kim was directly involved in Medytox’s development of its manufacturing process for the drug
`
`substance of Meditoxin, and in Medytox’s subsequent research and development.
`
`Like Dr. Jung, Mr. Kim will testify regarding the process by which Medytox
`
`developed its manufacturing process for Meditoxin and its continued innovation regarding the
`
`manufacture of botulinum neurotoxin products after obtaining regulatory approval for the sale of
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`Meditoxin. In that sense, Mr. Kim’s testimony will concern Medytox’s development of the trade
`
`secrets at issue in this Investigation, as well as to their independent economic value to Medytox. Mr.
`
`Kim will also testify regarding Medytox’s application for various patents, and specifically how the
`
`trade secrets at issue in this Investigation differ from the information disclosed in Medytox’s patents,
`
`as well as Medytox’s business and document retention practices.
`
`iv. Dr. Seong Hun Chang
`
`Dr. Chang is a longstanding employee of Medytox, having joined the company in
`
`June 2002. Dr. Chang currently serves as the Head of Quality System Management at Medytox, a
`
`position which he has held since 2016. His earlier roles at the company included research and
`
`development regarding Medytox’s C. botulinum strain and the manufacturing process for Medytox’s
`
`products, including Meditoxin. Dr. Chang will testify regarding Medytox’s development of the trade
`
`secrets at issue in this Investigation and their independent economic value to Medytox. Since mid-
`
`2002, Dr. Chang has also had responsibility for Medytox’s confidentiality policies and security, and
`
`has been responsible for the implementation of Medytox’s IT security systems since approximately
`
`2007. Accordingly, in addition to his testimony concerning Medytox’s research and development of
`
`the trade secrets at issue, Dr. Chang will testify regarding Medytox’s security systems and its efforts
`
`to safeguard those trade secrets, as well as concerning Medytox’s use of its information security
`
`system to identify Byung Kook Lee’s printing and emailing of documents containing trade secrets.
`
`v. Dr. Chang Hoon Rhee
`
`Dr. Rhee is the head of the Biopharmaceutical Development Department at Medytox,
`
`a position he has held since 2012. He joined Medytox in November 2007 and has been a Director at
`
`Medytox since 2016. Dr. Rhee was the head of the Drug Form Development and Analysis Team
`
`(also known as the Formulation and Analysis Team) at the Microbial Toxin R&D Center from 2007
`
`to 2014. In 2012, Dr. Rhee also became the head of the Biopharmaceutical Development department.
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Dr. Rhee will testify as to the attributes of Medytox’s Hall A-hyper strain, one of the
`
`trade secrets asserted in this Investigation, including the independent economic value of the strain to
`
`Medytox, how Medytox stores and safeguards its strain, and how Medytox propagated Medytox’s
`
`cell banks, certain of which were the subject of testing and analysis by the experts in this
`
`Investigation. Dr. Rhee will also testify concerning Medytox’s drug substance manufacturing
`
`process, including the significance and independent economic value of various of the manufacturing
`
`process trade secrets to Medytox. Finally, Dr. Rhee will testify concerning aspects of Byung Kook
`
`Lee’s work at Medytox and the knowledge gained by Byung Kook Lee regarding Medytox’s
`
`manufacturing process through his work at Medytox.
`
`vi. Dr. Andrew Pickett
`
`Dr. Pickett is one of the foremost experts in the area of commercial botulinum toxin
`
`(“BTX”). He has worked on a wide range of biological products since joining the industry in 1979.
`
`In the course of his career, Dr. Pickett has been associated with Dista Products Limited (the UK
`
`production company for Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd.), Biogen SA (where he became Head of Process
`
`Development), Porton Products (where he was Head of Fermentation Production and Development
`
`(Large Scale) at the Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Director of Production, and later
`
`Director of Technical Affairs), Ipsen Limited (where he was Director of Technical Affairs and later
`
`Senior Director, Biologicals Science and Technology), and Galderma S.A., where he was Head of
`
`Development. Dr. Pickett is a member of the British Pharmacopoeia Panel of Experts BIO
`
`(Biological and Biotechnical products) and a Board Member of the Botulinum Research Center,
`
`Institute for Advanced Studies. Over his career, he has worked with and managed many teams
`
`involved with research, development, production, quality control, regulatory affairs, technical
`
`support, and project management with respect to botulinum toxin products (as well as other
`
`biological and chemical products). Dr. Pickett began working with botulinum toxin in the mid-1980s
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 5
`
`
`
`
`
`while working at Porton Products, with responsibility for obtaining the first marketing authorization
`
`for the product now called Dysport®. Dr. Pickett has some 90 publications in learned journals,
`
`magazines, and books (as chapters), mainly dedicated to botulinum toxin, and holds a number of
`
`patents and patent applications related to botulinum toxin. Dr. Pickett is regularly invited to
`
`participate in national and international conferences and to give updates on the science and clinical
`
`uses of botulinum toxins, and has given over 500 lectures to the worldwide clinical community,
`
`including department heads, relating to the science of botulinum toxin and how to interpret these
`
`matters for clinical applications.
`
`Dr. Pickett will testify to his opinions on the implausibility of Daewoong’s assertion
`
`regarding having isolated the strain of C. botulinum used in its manufacturing process from soil in
`
`South Korea, the extent to which Medytox’s Hall A-hyper strain has commercial value and would
`
`not be publicly available, the evidence showing Daewoong misappropriated information from
`
`Medytox in developing its botulinum product DWP-450, and the advantages gained and time saved
`
`by Daewoong for its development of DWP-450 as a result of its improper acquisition and use of
`
`Medytox’s C. botulinum strain and manufacturing process.
`
`Dr. Pickett’s curriculum vitae is attached to this Statement as Attachment B.
`
`vii. Dr. Seshadri Neervannan
`
`Dr. Neervannan is Senior Vice President of Pharmaceutical Development within the
`
`Research and Development Division of Allergan. Dr. Neervannan has worked at Allergan since
`
`2007, and he presently oversees Allergan’s development of its small molecule and biologics drug
`
`products, including BOTOX®. Dr. Neervannan also plays a leadership role in Allergan’s partnership
`
`with Medytox for the development, regulatory approval, and commercialization of MT10109L, a
`
`neurotoxin product that Allergan is licensing from Medytox. Dr. Neervannan is expected to testify
`
`about BOTOX®, including providing a general overview of BOTOX®, its manufacturing and
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 6
`
`
`
`
`
`research and development, as well as the domestic Allergan facilities where such activities occur.
`
`Dr. Neervannan also is expected to testify about Allergan’s partnership with Medytox and Allergan’s
`
`role, activities, and investment in the development, regulatory approval, and commercialization of
`
`MT10109L.
`
`viii. Mr. Ben Marzouk
`
`Ben Marzouk is an Executive Director of Finance at Allergan, where he is responsible
`
`for directing the planning, forecasting, analysis, and reporting for Allergan’s U.S. Medical Aesthetics
`
`Business, which includes BOTOX® Cosmetic. Mr. Marzouk joined Allergan in December 2004.
`
`Mr. Marzouk is expected to testify about topics relating to BOTOX® (comprising BOTOX®
`
`Cosmetic and BOTOX® therapeutic) and BOTOX® Cosmetic alone, including Allergan’s related
`
`domestic investments, activities, and sales. He is also expected to testify regarding Allergan’s
`
`foreign investments relating to BOTOX®. Mr. Marzouk further is expected to testify about
`
`Allergan’s domestic and foreign investments and activities relating to MT10109L, the neurotoxin
`
`product licensed by Allergan (and being jointly developed by Allergan and Medytox).
`
`ix. Ms. Colleen McKenna
`
`Colleen McKenna is the Vice President of Marketing for Facial Aesthetics at
`
`Allergan. She has worked at Allergan for thirteen years and served in her current position for four
`
`years. Ms. McKenna is responsible for marketing and promotional activities for Allergan’s facial
`
`aesthetic products, including BOTOX® Cosmetic, and has knowledge and involvement in analyzing
`
`the competitive landscape for such products and pricing decisions.
`
`Ms. McKenna is expected to testify about topics relating to the neurotoxin market,
`
`including market research and the competitive landscape, as well as the BOTOX® product (and
`
`BOTOX® Cosmetic alone), including its pricing and marketing. Ms. McKenna further is expected
`
`to testify about the impact of Respondents’ Jeuveau on BOTOX® and the BTX market in the United
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 7
`
`
`
`
`
`States. Ms. McKenna also is expected to testify regarding the MT10109L neurotoxin product
`
`licensed by Allergan from Medytox (and being jointly developed by Allergan and Medytox),
`
`including current expectations regarding marketing of, potential pricing of, and impact of Jeuveau
`
`on MT10109L.
`
`x. Mr. James Malackowski
`
`Mr. Malackowski is an expert in the areas of economic and market analysis, injury
`
`analysis, and the valuation and analysis of intellectual property and licenses, among other topics.
`
`Mr. Malackowski, who has provided valuation, transaction, and financial advisory assistance for
`
`more than 30 years and frequently instructs on IP management and markets, as well as emerging
`
`technology markets, has served as an expert witness on more than 50 occasions in cases in the U.S.
`
`International Trade Commission and numerous federal and state courts on questions relating to the
`
`economics and valuation of intellectual property, and specifically trade secrets and patents.
`
`Mr. Malackowski is expected to testify regarding the domestic industry for BTX
`
`products in the United States, Complainants’ products comprising such domestic industry, and the
`
`injury that will be and already has been suffered due to the importation and sale of the Accused
`
`Products and Respondents’ activities. Mr. Malackowski also is expected to testify regarding the
`
`appropriateness, duration, and reach of the remedies that should be entered in this matter, as well as
`
`the amount of bond that should be posted during the presidential review period.
`
`Mr. Malackowski’s curriculum vitae is attached to this Statement as Attachment C.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`In addition to these witnesses, Complainants anticipate that their adverse examination
`
`of witnesses proffered by Respondents Daewoong Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. (“Daewoong”) and
`
`Evolus, Inc. (“Evolus”) will exceed the scope of those witnesses’ written witness statements, certain
`
`of which omit critical topics relevant to this Investigation – such as, for example, testimony
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 8
`
`
`
`
`
`concerning the supposed discovery of Daewoong’s C. botulinum strain from the soil in South Korea,
`
`a cover-story that has been disproven and which Daewoong has omitted from the presentation of its
`
`case.
`
`Complainants will further rely on deposition testimony, subject to designation before
`
`the hearing and any agreements reached by the parties. Specifically, Complainants intend to rely on
`
`the deposition testimony of witnesses deposed in this matter, including those identified in
`
`Complainants’ Pre-hearing Brief, filed concurrently. Complainants may seek leave to call any
`
`deposition witness live in the event that individual’s deposition testimony is not admitted into the
`
`record.
`
`B.
`
`Complainants’ Rebuttal Case
`
`Complainants intend to move in limine to preclude Respondents from introducing
`
`arguments and evidence that are irrelevant to the issues on which the Commission has instituted this
`
`Investigation. The Investigation concerns Respondents’ unfair acts in violation of Section 337 of the
`
`Tariff Act of 1930. Respondents have sought to distract from that focus by attempting to litigate a
`
`myriad of other allegations against Complainants unrelated to that subject matter. But Respondents
`
`lack standing to, for example, mount a hypothetical challenge to Medytox’s legal ownership of its C.
`
`botulinum strain on behalf of third parties who themselves have never asserted the rights that
`
`Daewoong purports to advance. Nor is it a defense to a Section 337 case to rely on other unrelated,
`
`alleged bad acts by Complainants under the guise of an “unclean hands” defense.
`
`In the event that the Administrative Law Judge does not grant Complainants’ motions
`
`in limine and intends to take evidence on these so-called defenses at the evidentiary hearing,
`
`Complainants would rely on the testimony of the following witnesses, who submitted contingent
`
`written rebuttal statements.1 In that eventuality, Complainants believe that witnesses whose
`
`
`1
`Complainants’ submission of those rebuttal statements is contingent on the Administrative
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
` 9
`
`
`
`
`
`testimony is also part of Complainants’ affirmative case should be questioned as part of Respondent’s
`
`cross examination of these witnesses, rather than being required to appear twice, and have provided
`
`their time estimates on that basis.
`
`i. Dr. Hyun Ho Jung
`
`As described above, Dr. Jung is the founder and CEO of Medytox. On rebuttal, Dr.
`
`Jung will address various of Respondents’ asserted affirmative defenses, including specifically their
`
`unfounded allegations concerning Medytox’s “unclean hands,” Medytox’s alleged lack of legal title
`
`to its C. botulinum strain, and Complainants’ alleged unjustifiable delay in filing this Investigation.
`
`ii. Dr. Hack Woo Kim
`
`As discussed above, Dr. Kim is a director of Medytox and head of its production
`
`business department. On rebuttal, Dr. Kim will address various of Respondents’ asserted affirmative
`
`defenses, including specifically their unfounded allegations concerning Medytox’s “unclean hands,”
`
`as well as Respondents’ arguments that Medytox employees other than Byung Kook Lee printed or
`
`emailed documents containing Medytox trade secrets.
`
`iii. Dr. Seong Hun Chang
`
`As discussed above, Dr. Chang is a Head of Quality Systems Management and head
`
`of information technology security at Medytox. On rebuttal, Dr. Chang will address various of
`
`Respondents’ asserted affirmative defenses, including specifically their unfounded allegations
`
`concerning Medytox’s “unclean hands,” as well as Respondents’ arguments that Medytox employees
`
`other than Byung Kook Lee printed or emailed documents containing Medytox trade secrets.
`
`iv. Dr. Kyu Hwan Yang
`
`Dr. Yang is among the founding generation of modern botulinum researchers, an
`
`
`Law Judge’s denial of Complainants’ motion in limine, and Complainants would seek leave to
`withdraw them in the event that the motion is granted.
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
` 10
`
`
`
`
`
`academic mentor of Medytox’s founder, Dr. Hyun Ho Jung, and a former senior South Korean
`
`government official. His work in C. botulinum toxins stretches back to his time as a graduate student
`
`in the 1970s, in the early stages of academic research related to botulinum. His professional
`
`achievements include serving as the commissioner of the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety
`
`and as the president of the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology.
`
`On rebuttal, Dr. Yang will respond to Respondents’ unfounded allegations that Dr.
`
`Jung and Medytox lack legal title or ownership of Medytox’s Hall A-hyper strain, one of the trade
`
`secrets that Daewoong misappropriated. Dr. Yang will testify to this matter from his personal
`
`knowledge, having personally obtained the strain from Dr. Hiroshi Sugiyama at the University of
`
`Wisconsin Food Research Institute, brought it to Korea, provided it to Dr. Jung, and given his
`
`approval for Dr. Jung to use the strain to develop Medytox’s products.
`
`III.
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Pursuant to Order No. 26 and Ground Rule 7(b), Respondents identify the exhibits
`
`expected to be introduced at the hearing as set out in Attachment D.
`
`IV.
`
`STATEMENT REGARDING SETTLEMENT
`
`Pursuant to Ground Rule 3, Complainants certify that good faith efforts were
`
`undertaken to attempt to settle the remaining disputed issues to be presented at the evidentiary
`
`hearing. The Parties have been unable to resolve those issues.
`
`V.
`
`STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED AND CONTENTIONS
`
`With respect to Complainants’ statement of the issues to be considered at the hearing
`
`and their contentions with respect thereto, as required by Ground Rule 7(c), Complainants refer to
`
`their Pre-hearing Brief filed contemporaneously herewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 11
`
`
`
`
`
`VI.
`
`TABLE OF WITNESSES AND TIME ESTIMATES
`
`The Parties have jointly prepared the following table describing the projected order
`
`of anticipated witnesses and time estimates:
`
`Openings
`Complainants
`Respondents
`Staff
`
`
`
`Subtotal
`Complainants’ Case
`
`Paul Keim
`Hyun Ho Jung
`Hack Woo Kim
`Seong Hun Chang
`Chang Hoon Rhee
`Andrew Pickett
`Sesha Neervannan
`Ben Marzouk
`Colleen McKenna
`James Malackowski
`Subtotal
`Respondents’ Case
`
`
`
`Byung Kook Lee
`Brenda Wilson
`Chung Se Kim
`Kyoung Yoon Kim
`Chris Marmo
`David Sherman
`BalRam Singh
`Chang Woo Suh
`Ryan Sullivan
`David Moatazedi
`Carla Mulhern
`Subtotal
`Complainants’
`Rebuttal Case
`Kyu Hwan Yang
`Subtotal
`TOTAL TIMES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`36
`
`
`36
`Complainants’
`Direct/Redirect
`50
`15
`12
`12
`12
`35
`12
`12
`12
`20
`192
`Complainants’
`Cross
`30
`25
`35
`20
`20
`45
`20
`30
`20
`25
`30
`300
`Complainants’
`Direct/Redirect
`12
`12
`540
`
`
`
`
`30
`
`30
`Respondents’
`Cross
`60
`45
`20
`20
`20
`30
`10
`10
`10
`15
`240
`Respondents’
`Direct/Redirect
`70
`22
`25
`15
`10
`37
`12
`25
`12
`10
`12
`250
`Respondents’
`Cross
`20
`20
`540
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30
`30
`Staff’s Cross
`
`30
`15
`6
`6
`6
`15
`10
`10
`5
`15
`118
`Staff’s Cross
`
`15
`15
`15
`10
`6
`30
`15
`15
`7
`6
`13
`147
`Staff Cross
`
`5
`5
`300
`
`
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 10, 2020
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
`
`
`By: /s/ Jeffrey T. Thomas .
`
`Jeffrey T. Thomas
`Joshua A. Jessen
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`3161 Michelson Drive
`Irvine, CA 92612-4412
`Telephone: (949) 551-3967
`Facsimile: (949) 451-4220
`AllerganITC3359@gibsondunn.com
`
`Brian M. Buroker
`Haley S. Morrisson
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036-5306
`Telephone: (202) 955-8541
`Facsimile: (202) 467-0539
`AllerganITC3359@gibsondunn.com
`
`Michael A. Sitzman
`DLA PIPER LLP
`555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
`San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
`Telephone: (415) 615-6175
`Facsimile: (415) 659-7411
`AllerganITC3359@gibsondunn.com
`
`Attorneys for Allergan plc and Allergan, Inc.
`
`By: /s/ Nowell D. Bamberger .
`
`Nowell D. Bamberger
`Elsbeth Bennett
`Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
`2112 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20037
`Telephone: (202) 974-1500
`Facsimile: (202) 974-1999
`Team-ITC-Medytox-1145@cgsh.com
`
`David H. Herrington
`Arminda B. Bepko
`Charity E. Lee
`Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
`One Liberty Plaza
`New York, NY 10006
`Telephone: (212) 225-2000
`Team-ITC-Medytox-1145@cgsh.com
`
`T. Spence Chubb
`Law Office of T. Spence Chubb
`1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1000
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone: (703) 623-7739
`Facsimile: (703) 563-6055
`Team-ITC-Medytox-1145@cgsh.com
`
`Attorneys for Medytox Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Complainants’ Pre-Hearing Statement
`
`
`
` 13
`
`
`
`
`Certain Botulinum Toxin Products, Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same and
`Certain Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1145
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Natalie Noble, certify that on January 10 and 13, 2020, copies of the foregoing
`
`document were served on the following in the manner so indicated:
`
`
`The Honorable Lisa Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, S.W.,
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`The Honorable David P. Shaw
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Brian Koo
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`500 E Street, S.W., Suite 401
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`Telephone: (202) 205-2580
`
`Counsel for Respondent Daewoong
`Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
`
`David F. Nickel (Lead Attorney)
`FOSTER, MURPHY, ALTMAN & NICKEL, PC
`1150 18th St., NW
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone: (202) 822-4104
`
`
`Via EDIS
`
`Via Courier (1 copy)
`Via E-Mail:
`Shaw337@usitc.gov
`Joseph.Speyer@usitc.gov
`
`Via E-mail:
`Brian.Koo@usitc.gov
`
`Via E-mail:
`FM-Daewoong-
`1145@fostermurphy.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Via E-mail:
`KK-Daewoong-1145@kobrekim.com
`
`Counsel for Respondent Daewoong
`Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
`
`Michael Kim
`Benjamin J. A. Sauter
`Benjamin Sirota
`Jeffrey Newton
`800 3rd Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`Telephone: (212) 488-1200
`Fax: (212) 488-1220
`
`Daniel Zaheer
`150 California St.
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 582-4800
`Fax: (415) 582-4811
`
`Won Joon Lee
`Daniel Lee
`9F, Tower B, The-K Twin Towers
`50, Jong-ro l-gil, Jongno-gu
`Seoul, 03142 South Korea
`Telephone: +82 2-369-1212
`Fax: +82 2-369-1220
`
`Matthew Boucher
`1919 M. Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`Telephone: (202) 664-1950
`Fax: (202) 664-1920
`
`Matthew I. Menchel
`201 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1900
`Miami, Florida 33131
`Telephone: (305) 967-6100
`Fax: (305) 967-6120
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Via E-mail:
`grp-evolus-itc@paulweiss.com
`
`
`Via Email:
`AllerganITC3359@gibsondunn.com
`michael.sitzman@us.dlapiper.com
`
`Counsel for Respondent Evolus, Inc.
`
`Nicholas Groombridge
`Joseph J. Bial
`Josephine Young
`Ariane Rockoff-Kirk
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
`GARRISON LLP
`1285 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY
`Telephone: (212) 373-3000
`Counsel for Complainants Allergan plc and
`Allergan, Inc.
`
`Brian M. Buroker (Lead Attorney)
`Haley Morrisson
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036-5306
`Telephone: (202) 955-8500
`
`Jeffrey T. Thomas
`Joshua A. Jessen
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`3161 Michelson Drive
`Irvine, CA 92612-4412
`Telephone: (949) 451-3800
`
`Soolean Choy
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
`San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
`Telephone: (415) 393-8200
`
`Nathan R. Curtis
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2100 McKinney Avenue
`Dallas, TX 75201-6912
`Telephone: (214) 698-3100
`
`Lori C. Arakaki
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
`Telephone: (213) 229-7000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Michael Sitzman
`DLA PIPER LLP
`555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
`San Francisco, California 94105-2933
`Telephone: (415) 615-6175
`
`Date:
`
`January 13, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Natalie Noble
`Natalie Noble
`Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
`One Liberty Plaza
`New York, NY 10006
`Telephone: (212) 225-2000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attachment A
`
`Attachment A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paul S. Keim, Ph.D.
`Curriculum vitae
`
`Table of Contents
`
`
`
`
`Section Description
`
`Short Summary CV ..............................................................................................................2
`Education, Training and Professional Experience ...............................................................3
`Honors and Awards..............................................................................................................4
`Professional Societies (Past and Present) ............................................................................4
`Professional Service .............................................................................................................4
`Advisory and Policy Committees .......................................................................................5
`Scholarship and Award Selection Committees ....................................................................6
`Journal Editorial Boards ......................................................................................................6
`Chaired Sessions ..................................................................................................................6
`Competitive Grants Review Panel Member ........................................................................6
`Ad Hoc Grant Reviewer ......................................................................................................7
`Ad Hoc Paper Reviewer ......................................................................................................7
`Competitive Grants Review Panel Member: .......................................................................7
`Expert Witness Testimony ...................................................................................................7
`Patents Issued .......................................................................................................................7
`Patents Pending ....................................................................................................................8
`Publications ..........................................................................................................................9
`Published Reports .............................................................................................................49
`Invited Seminars/Lectures .................................................................................................50
`Extramural Research ..........................................................................................................64
`Students and faculty trained ..........................................................



