throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTAIN MOVABLE BARRIER
`OPERATOR SYSTEMS AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1209
`(Modification)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY RESPONDENT’S
`MOTION TO STAY THE REMEDIAL ORDERS PENDING APPEAL
`
` U.S. International Trade Commission.
`
`Notice.
`
`
`AGENCY:
`
`ACTION:
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has
`determined to deny respondent’s motion to stay the remedial orders pending appeal.
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General
`Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
`telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this
`investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at
`https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
`information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
`https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can
`be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 10, 2020, the Commission instituted this
`investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (“section
`337”), based on a complaint filed by Overhead Door Corporation of Lewisville, Texas and GMI
`Holdings Inc. of Mount Hope, Ohio (collectively, “Complainants”). See 85 FR 48264-65 (Aug.
`10, 2020). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged a violation of section 337 based upon the
`importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
`after importation of certain movable barrier operator systems and components thereof by reason
`of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,970,345 (“the ’345 patent”); 7,173,516 (“the ’516 patent”);
`7,180,260 (“the ’260 patent”); 9,483,935 (“the ’935 patent”); 7,956,718 (“the ’718 patent”); and
`8,410,895 (“the ’895 patent”). See id. The notice of investigation named The Chamberlain
`Group, Inc. (“Respondent”) of Oak Brook, Illinois as the respondent in this investigation. See id.
`The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was not a party to the investigation. See id.
`
`
`On February 10, 2021, the Commission terminated the investigation as to the ’516 patent
`based on the withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint as to that patent. See Order No. 10
`(Jan. 19, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Feb. 10, 2021).
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`On September 14, 2021, the presiding Administrative Law Judge issued a final initial
`determination finding a violation of section 337 with respect to the ’345, ’935, ’260, ’718,
`and ’895 patents.
`
`On February 9, 2022, the Commission issued a final determination finding a violation of
`section 337, based on Respondent’s infringement of the asserted claims of the ’935 patent,
`the ’718 patent, and the ’895 patent, but not the ’345 and ’260 patents. See 87 FR 8605-06 (Feb.
`15, 2022). The Commission further determined to: (1) issue a limited exclusion order against
`Respondent’s infringing products and a cease and desist order against the Respondent
`(collectively, “the remedial orders”) and (2) set a bond during the period of Presidential review
`in the amount of one hundred (100) percent of the entered value of the infringing articles. See id.
`
`On March 30, 2022, the Commission issued modified remedial orders to clarify and
`confirm that the definition of covered products or articles in the remedial orders includes garage
`door openers, gate operators, and commercial operators.
`
`On April 12, 2022, Respondent filed a notice of appeal from the Commission’s final
`determination and modification determination with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
`Circuit (Appeal No. 22-1664). On the same day, Respondent filed with the Commission a
`motion to stay the modified remedial orders pending appeal. On April 20, 2022, Complainants
`filed a response opposing the motion to stay. On April 22, 2022, Respondent filed a motion for
`leave to file a reply in support of its motion to stay. On April 25, 2022, Complainants filed an
`opposition to the motion for leave. The Commission has determined to deny Respondent’s
`motion for leave to file a reply.
`
`For the reasons discussed in the Commission opinion issued concurrently herewith, the
`Commission has determined to deny Respondent’s motion to stay the modified remedial orders
`pending appeal. An Order denying the motion is also issued herewith.
`
`The Commission’s vote on this determination took place on May 13, 2022.
`
`The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210).
`By order of the Commission.
`
`Issued: May 13, 2022
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`2
`
`

`

`CERTAIN MOVABLE BARRIER
`OPERATOR SYSTEMS AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1209
`(Modification)
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached NOTICE has been served to the
`following parties as indicated, on May 13, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On Behalf of Complainants Overhead Door Corporation and
`GMI Holdings Inc:
`
`Bert C. Reiser, Esq.
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`Email: Bert.Reiser@lw.com
`
`On Behalf of Respondent The Chamberlain Group, Inc.:
`
`Eimeric Reig-Plessis, Esq.
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`275 Middlefield Road, Suite 205
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Email: EReigPlessis@winston.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Service to Be
`Completed by Complainants
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket