throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN BLOWERS AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1217
`ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDING
`
`
`ORDER NO. 20:
`
`
`
`
`
`GRANTING MOTIONS: MOTION DOCKET NOS.
`1217-008 AND 1217-006
`
`(June 16, 2021)
`
`A. MOTION DOCKET NO. 1217-008
`
`On May 21, 2021, Complainant Regal Beloit America, Inc. (“Regal”), and Respondents
`
`East West Manufacturing LLC and East West Industries (“East West,” and collectively “the
`
`Private Parties”) jointly moved for leave to supplement the proposed Markman Exhibit Lists
`
`(“Joint Motion”) to add JXM-0007C (Transcript of Deposition of Dr. K. Cameron (May 14,
`
`2021)) and JXM-0008C (Transcript of Deposition of Dr. S. Brown (May 18, 2021)). (Motion
`
`Docket No. 1217-008; Joint Motion at 1.). Consistent with Ground Rule 2.2., the Private Parties
`
`state that Commission Investigative Staff (“Staff” and with Regal and East West, “the Parties”)
`
`does not oppose the Private Parties’ Joint Motion. (Id.). The Private Parties explain that
`
`Exhibits JXM-0007C and JXM-0008C are transcripts of expert depositions taken after the parties
`
`submitted their Markman Exhibit Lists. The Private Parties stated that they believe that both
`
`expert deposition transcripts will be helpful in evaluating the parties’ respective claim
`
`construction positions.
`
`For good cause, the Private Parties’ Joint Motion is granted.
`
`If the transcripts have not been filed, they should be filed by close of business on June
`
`17, 2021.
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`B. MOTION DOCKET NO. 1217-006
`
`On May 13, 2021, Regal moved for leave (“Motion for Leave”) to supplement the record
`
`with respect to its sanctions motion with several exhibits, including a lawyer’s opinion letter on
`
`infringement from 2016. (Motion Docket No. 1217-006; Motion at 1; see also Motion for
`
`Sanctions (“Sanctions Motion”), Motion Docket No. 1217-001). Regal explains that certain
`
`documents, which include an attorneys’ opinion letter on infringement, were not available to it
`
`when Regal filed its Sanctions Motion. (Motion at 1.).
`
`On May 14, 2021, East West filed its opposition (“Opposition”) to Regal’s Motion for
`
`Leave. (Doc. ID No. 742452; Opp’n at 1.). East West objects to Regal’s Motion for Leave to
`
`supplement its Sanctions Motion because East West says that the lawyer’s opinion letter, written
`
`five (5) years ago, and other materials Regal seeks to submit, concerns two (2) unaccused
`
`Blowers (i.e. the type of product at issue in this proceeding), and therefore, the lawyer’s opinion
`
`letter and other materials Regal identified for submission are not relevant to this proceeding. (Id.
`
`at 1, 2.).
`
`On May 20, 2021, Staff filed its response to Regal’s Motion for Leave. (Doc. ID No.
`
`743051; Motion for Leave at 1). Staff supports Regal’s Motion for Leave without taking a
`
`position on the merits of the Sanctions Motion or of the opinion letter that Regal seeks to admit
`
`into the record. (Id.).
`
`It is important that as complete a record as possible be developed since Regal’s Sanctions
`
`Motion is a particularly weighty motion. Because Regal’s supplemental materials are necessary
`
`for building the record, Regal’s Motion for Leave, Motion Docket No. 1217-006, is granted.
`
`However, the Parties should not construe the allowance of Regal’s Motion for Leave as a
`
`decision on the merits of Regal’s arguments in its Motion for Leave, including the relevance of
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`the materials that Regal has asked to submit. The merits of Regal’s supplemental documentation
`
`and of Regal’s Sanctions Motion will be decided later after the record has been developed as
`
`completely as possible.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

`

`CERTAIN BLOWERS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1217
`(Enforcement Proceeding)
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDER has been served via EDIS
`upon the Commission Investigative Attorney, Thomas Chen, Esq., and the following parties as
`indicated, on June 16, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On Behalf of Complainant Regal Beloit America, Inc.:
`
`Alan Norman, Esq.
`THOMPSON COBURN LLP
`One U.S. Bank Plaza
`St. Louis, MO, 63101
`Email: anorman@thompsoncoburn.com
`
`On Behalf of Respondents East West Manufacturing, LLC
`and East West Industries:
`
`Adam D. Swain, Esq.
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`950 F Street NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`Email: Adam.Swain@alston.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket