`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN CASUAL FOOTWEAR AND
`PACKAGING THEREOF
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1270
`
`
`
`ORDER NO. 59:
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT AND UNOPPOSED MOTION OF
`GRANTING
`COMPLAINANT AND CERTAIN RESPONDENTS TO EXTEND
`EXPERT DISCOVERY BY ONE DAY TO TAKE ONE
`DEPOSITION
`
`(May 25, 2022)
`
`On May 24, 2022, Complainant Crocs, Inc. (“Crocs”) and Respondents Walmart Inc.,
`
`Orly Shoe Corporation, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., and Quanzhou ZhengDe Network Corp. d/b/a
`
`Amoji (collectively, “Respondents”) (together, the “Moving Parties”) jointly moved for leave
`
`(Mot. 1270-052) to extend the expert discovery period by one business day to enable
`
`Respondents to take one deposition. The Commission Investigative Staff does not oppose. Mot.
`
`at 1.
`
`Expert discovery closes on Friday, June 3, 2022. Order No. 36 (Nov. 17, 2021). The
`
`Moving Parties explain that “[t]o allow Staff to attend every expert deposition, [they] seek to
`
`conduct the deposition of Crocs’ expert witness, Melissa Pittaoulis, on Monday June 6, 2022.”
`
`Mot. at 1. Because this date falls after the close of expert discovery, the Moving Parties request
`
`that expert discovery be extended by one business day to June 6, 2022 “solely so Respondents
`
`can take Dr. Pittaoulis’ deposition.” Id. at 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`There being no opposition and for good cause shown, Motion Docket No. 1270-052 is
`
`hereby GRANTED.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
