AUTHENTICATED
`US. GOVERNMENT,
`INFORMATION,
`GPO,
`
`35996
`Federal Register/Vol. 87, No. 114/Tuesday, June 14, 2022 /Notices
`
`all Respondents other than Realtek are
`namedin the patent license agreement
`and/or release agreements.Id. at 4 n.2.
`For those not named,theID stated that
`“termination by settlement under
`Commission Rule 210.21(b) would not
`be appropriate, as opposed to general
`withdrawal under Commission Rule
`210.21(a).”’ Id. The ID found that
`“[rlegardless, the motion complies with
`all Commission Rules.” Id. The ID also
`found that‘‘there are no extraordinary
`circumstancesthat warrant denying the
`motion’ and‘there is no evidence
`indicating that terminating this
`investigation based on various
`agreements would be contrary to the
`public interest.”Id. at 4, 5. The ID also
`noted that the motion attached
`confidential and public versionsof the
`agreements. Id. at 4. No petition for
`review of the ID wasfiled.
`The Commission has determined not
`to review the subject ID. The
`investigation is terminated inits
`entirety.
`The Commission vote for this
`determination took place on June9,
`2022.
`The authority for the Commission’s
`determination is contained in section
`337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part
`210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part
`210.
`
`By orderof the Commission.
`Issued: June 9, 2022.
`Lisa Barton,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2022-12794 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation No. 337—-TA-1273]
`
`Certain Residential Premises Security
`Monitoring and Automation Panels,
`and Components Thereof; Notice of
`Commission Determination Not To
`Review anInitial Determination of Non-
`Infringement; Termination of the
`Investigation
`AGENCY:U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY:Notice is hereby given that
`the U.S. International Trade
`Commission has determinednotto
`review an initial determination (‘ID’)
`(Order No. 18) of the presiding
`administrative law judge (“‘ALJ”’)
`granting summary determination of no
`violation based on non-infringement of
`
`the asserted patent claims. The
`investigation is terminated.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Robert Needham, Office of the General
`Counsel, U.S. International Trade
`Commission, 500 E Street SW,
`Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
`205-2392. Copies of non-confidential
`documentsfiled in connection with this
`investigation may be viewed on the
`Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
`at hitps://edis.usitc.gov. For help
`accessing EDIS, please email
`EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
`information concerning the Commission
`mayalso be obtained by accessingits
`internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
`Hearing-impaired personsare advised
`that information on this matter can be
`obtained by contacting the
`Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
`205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION: On August
`5, 2021, the Commissioninstituted this
`investigation under section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
`U.S.C. 1337 (“section 337”), based on a
`complaint filed by ADT LLC and the
`ADTSecurity Corporation, both of Boca
`Raton,Florida, (collectively, “ADT”). 86
`FR 42879-80. The complaint, as
`supplemented,alleges a violation of
`section 337 based upon the importation
`into the United States, sale for
`importation, or sale after importation
`into the United States of certain
`residential premises security monitoring
`and automation control panels, and
`components thereof by reason of
`infringementof claims 1 and 12 of U.S.
`Patent No. 8,976,937 (‘the ’937 patent”’)
`and claims 1—4, 7-15, and 18—20 of U.S.
`Patent No. 9,286,772 (‘‘the ’772 patent”’).
`Id. at 42880. The complaintalso alleges
`the existence of a domestic industry.
`Thenotice of investigation names as a
`respondent Vivint, Inc., of Provo, Utah
`(‘Vivint’’). Id. The Office of Unfair
`Import Investigations (“OUII’) is also a
`party to the investigation. 87 FR 476
`(Jan. 5, 2022).
`The Commission subsequently
`terminated the investigation with
`respect to all asserted claims of the 937
`patent and claims 1, 7-12, and 18-20 of
`the ’772 patent based on withdrawalof
`the complaint as to those claims. Order
`No. 10 (Dec. 17, 2021), unreviewed by
`Notice (Jan. 18, 2022); Order No. 15
`(Mar. 21, 2022), unreviewed by Notice
`(Apr. 12, 2022). Claims 2, 3, and 4 of the
`’772 patent are therefore the only claims
`that remain in the investigation.
`On March 10, 2022, Vivint moved for
`a summary determination pursuant to
`Commission Rule 210.18 (19 CFR
`210.18) of no violation of section 337
`based on invalidity, and alternatively,
`
`non-infringement. Vivint argued that the
`‘processor’limitations of the asserted
`claims should be construed to allow
`those limitations to be satisfied by
`multiple processors, and that underthat
`construction, all the asserted claims are
`invalid as anticipated by U.S. Patent
`Pub. No. 2010/0102171. Vivint
`alternatively arguedthat,if the
`processor’limitations of the asserted
`claims are construedto require that a
`single processor mustsatisfy all of the
`“processor” limitations, none of the
`accused products infringe the asserted
`claims because nosingle processor
`satisfies all the ‘‘processor” limitations.
`On March 21, 2022, ADTfiled a
`response opposing the motion, arguing
`that the “processor” limitations require
`a single processor, but contending that
`the accused products contained a
`processorthatsatisfied all the
`limitations. On March 28, OUIfiled a
`response in support of the motion,
`arguing that the “processor” limitations
`require at least one processorthat
`satisfies all the ‘‘processor” limitations
`andthat the accused products do not
`infringe because they do not contain a
`processorthatsatisfies all of the
`“processor” limitations. On March 24,
`2022, and March 31, 2022, Vivintfiled
`replies to ADT’s and OUII’s responses,
`respectively.
`On April 22, 2022, the ALJ issued the
`subject ID (Order No. 18) pursuantto
`Commission Rules 210.18(b) and
`210.42(c) (19 CFR 210.18(b), 210.42(c)),
`granting in part Vivint’s motion and
`finding summary determination of no
`violation because ADTfailed to
`establish that the accused products
`infringe anyasserted claim. TheID finds
`that the “processor” limitations require
`at least one processorthat satisfies all of
`the “processor’’ limitations, and that
`ADTfailed to show that the accused
`products contain a “processor” that
`satisfies all the “‘processor’’ limitations.
`On May 4, 2022, ADT filed a petition
`for review of the ID. Also on May4,
`2022, Vivint filed a contingent petition
`for review of the ID. On May9, 2022,
`Vivint responded to ADT’s petition, and
`on May 11, 2022, ADT responded to
`Vivint’s contingent petition for review.
`Also on May 11, 2022, OUII responded
`to both petitions.
`The Commission has determined not
`to review the subject ID. The
`investigation is hereby terminated with
`a finding of no violation.
`The Commission votefor this
`determination took place on June8,
`2022.
`The authority for the Commission’s
`determination is contained in section
`337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended(19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
`
`

`

`35997
`Federal Register/Vol. 87, No. 114/Tuesday, June 14, 2022 / Notices
`
`210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
`210).
`By orderof the Commission.
`Issued: June 8, 2022.
`Lisa Barton,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2022-12802 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation No. 731—TA-696 (Fifth
`Review)]
`
`Pure Magnesium From China; Notice
`of Commission Determination To
`Conduct a Full Five-Year Review
`
`AGENCY: United States International
`Trade Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
`notice that it will proceed with a full
`review pursuant to the Tariff Act of
`1930 to determine whether revocation of
`the antidumping duty order on pure
`magnesium from China would belikely
`to lead to continuation or recurrence of
`material injury within a reasonably
`foreseeable time. A schedulefor the
`review will be established and
`announcedata later date.
`
`DATES:June 6, 2022.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Charles Cummings (202-708-1666),
`Office of Investigations, U.S.
`International Trade Commission, 500 E
`Street SW, Washington, DC 20436.
`Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
`information on this matter by contacting
`the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202—
`205-1810. Persons with mobility
`impairments who will need special
`assistance in gaining accessto the
`Commission should contact the Office
`
`of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.
`General information concerning the
`Commission mayalso be obtained by
`accessingits internet server (https://
`www.usitc.gov). The public record for
`this review may be viewed on the
`Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
`at hitps://edis.usitc.gov.
`For further information concerning
`the conductof this review andrules of
`general application, consult the
`Commission’s Rules of Practice and
`Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
`E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
`subparts A,D, E, and F (19 CFR part
`207).
`
`SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION: On June 6,
`2022, the Commission determined that
`it should proceedto a full review in the
`subject five-year review pursuant to
`section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930
`(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission
`foundthat the domestic interested party
`group responseto its notice of
`institution (87 FR 11472, March 1, 2022)
`was adequate. The Commission found
`that the respondentinterested party
`group response was inadequate but
`foundthat other circumstances
`warranted conducting a full review.1 A
`record of the Commissioners’ votes will
`be available from the Office of the
`Secretary and at the Commission’s
`website.
`
`Authority: This review is being
`conducted underauthorityof title VII of
`the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
`published pursuantto § 207.62 of the
`Commission’s rules.
`
`Byorder of the Commission.
`Issued: June 9, 2022.
`Lisa Barton,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2022-12815 Filed 6-13-22; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
`
`Employmentand Training
`Administration
`
`Determinations Regarding Eligiblity To
`Apply for Trade Adjustment
`Assistance
`
`In accordance with Sections 223 and
`284 (19 U.S.C. 2273 and 2395) of the
`Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271, et
`seq.) (“Act”), as amended, the
`Department of Labor herein presents
`summaries of determinations regarding
`eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
`assistance under Chapter 2 of the Act
`(“TAA”) for workers by (TA-W)issued
`during the period of May 1, 2022
`through May 31, 2022.
`This notice includes summaries of
`initial determinations such as
`Affirmative Determinations of
`Eligibility, Negative Determinations of
`Eligibility, and Determinations
`Terminating Investigationsof Eligibility
`within the period. If issued in the
`period, this notice also includes
`summaries of post-initial
`determinations that modify or amend
`initial determinations such as
`Affirmative Determinations Regarding
`Applications for Reconsideration,
`Negative Determinations Regarding
`Applications for Reconsideration,
`Revised Certifications of Eligibility,
`Revised Determinations on
`Reconsideration, Negative
`Determinations on Reconsideration,
`Revised Determinations on remand from
`the Court of International Trade, and
`Negative Determinations on remand.
`from the Court of International Trade.
`
`Affirmative Determinations for Trade
`AdjustmentAssistance
`
`The followingcertifications have been
`issued.
`
`
`
`Reason(s)
`
`
` Actual/Likely Increase in Imports following a Shift98,157 Bruker Handheld LLC, Bruker Nano Analytics Divi-|Kennewick, WA.......
`Abroad.
`sion.
`Actual/Likely Increase in Imports following a Shift
`98,206......... Ross Casting and Innovation, LLC ............ eee Sidney, OH.............
`Abroad.
`Increased Aggregate Imports.
`Increased Aggregate Imports.
`Increased Company Imports.
`
`Increased Company Imports.
`Increased CompanyImports.
`Shift in Production to an FTA Country or Bene-
`ficiary.
`Shift in Production to an FTA Country or Bene-
`ficiary.
`
`98,222 Integrated Textile Solutions, INC ........csssseeeseeees Salem, VA w...ececse
`98,2222.......
`Integrated Textile Solutions, INC ..........eceeesseeeeeee South Boston, VA...
`98,231 ......... Woodcrafters Home Products LLC, MasterBrand
`Weslaco, TX ..........-
`Cabinets Inc., Fortune Brands.
`Frederick, CO.........
`98,238 ......4. PCS Ferguson, INC ....c.cccecceccssseeseeeeneseeeeesseseeeenaees
`98,246 ......... Home Products International North America,Inc..... Seymour, IN...
`98,257 ......... NeuWave Medical Inc., Supply Chain/Operations
`Madison, WI............
`Division.
`SchneiderElectric Buildings Americas, Inc., GSC
`NAMElectronics Clovis.
`
`98,258 .........
`
`Clovis, CA .........
`
`1 Vice Chair RandolphJ. Stayin did not
`participate, and Commissioner Rhonda K.
`Schmidtlein voted to conduct an expedited review.
`
`