throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN FLOCKED SWABS,
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING FLOCKED
`SWABS, AND METHODS OF USING
`SAME
`
`
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1279
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF A COMMISSION DETERMINATION EXTENDING THE DATE FOR
`THE COMMISSION’S DECISION ON WHETHER TO REVIEW A FINAL INITIAL
`DETERMINATION AND THE TARGET DATE
`
`U.S. International Trade Commission.
`
`Notice.
`
`
`AGENCY:
`
`ACTION:
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has
`determined to extend the date for the Commission’s decision on whether to review a final initial
`determination (“ID”) finding no violation of section 337 to March 17, 2023, and the target date
`to May 17, 2023, in the above-captioned investigation.
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General
`Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436,
`telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this
`investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at
`https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
`information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
`https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
`can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 2, 2021, the Commission instituted
`this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337,
`based on a complaint filed by Copan Italia S.p.A. and Copan Industries, Inc. (“Copan,” or
`“Complainants”). 86 FR 49343-44 (Sept. 2, 2021). The complaint alleged a violation of
`section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within
`the United States after importation of certain flocked swabs, products containing flocked swabs,
`and methods of using same by reason of infringement of claims 1, 6-9, 11-14, 16-19, and 21-22
`of U.S. Patent No. 9,011,358 (“the ’358 patent”); claims 1, 4-6, 8, 9, 11-13, 16-20, and 22-24 of
`U.S. Patent No. 9,173,779 (“the ’779 patent”); and claims 1, 3, 5, 7-10, 18, and 20 of U.S. Patent
`No. 10,327,741 (“the ’741 patent”). The complaint also alleged the existence of a domestic
`
`

`

`industry.
`
`
`The notice of investigation named as respondents Han Chang Medic of Chungnam,
`Republic of Korea (“HCM”); Wuxi NEST Biotechnology Co., Ltd. of Wuxi, Jiangsu, China;
`NEST Scientific Inc. and NEST Scientific USA, both of Rahway, New Jersey; Miraclean
`Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, Guangdong, China; Vectornate Korea Ltd. of Jangseong,
`Republic of Korea and Vectornate USA, Inc. of Mahwah, New Jersey (collectively,
`“Vectornate”); Innovative Product Brands, Inc. of Highland, California (“IPB”); Thomas
`Scientific, Inc. of Swedesboro, New Jersey (“Thomas Inc.”); Thomas Scientific, LLC (“Thomas
`LLC”) and Stellar Scientific, LLC (“Stellar”), both of Owings Mills, Maryland; Cardinal Health,
`Inc. of Dublin, Ohio (“Cardinal”); KSL Biomedical, Inc. and KSL Diagnostics, Inc., both of
`Williamsville, New York (collectively, “KSL”); Jiangsu Changfeng Medical Industry Co., Ltd.
`of Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China; No Borders Dental Resources, Inc., dba MediDent Supplies of
`Queen Creek, Arizona (“MediDent”); BioTeke Corporation (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. of Wuxi, Jiangsu,
`China; Fosun Pharma USA Inc. (“Fosun”) of Princeton, New Jersey; Hunan Runmei Gene
`Technology Co., Ltd. of Changsha, Hunan, China (“Runmei”); VWR International, LLC of
`Radnor, Pennsylvania (“VWR”); and Slmp, LLC dba StatLab Medical Products of McKinney,
`Texas (StatLab). Id. at 49343-44. The Commission’s Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`(“OUII”) is also named as a party in this investigation. Id. at 49344. Huanchenyang
`(Shenzhen) Technology Co., Ltd. (“HCY”) and HCY USA, LLC were allowed to intervene as
`respondents in this investigation. Order No. 30 (Dec. 7, 2021), unreviewed by Notice (Jan. 6,
`2021).
`
`
`Subsequently, the investigation was terminated as to the KSL respondents, Thomas Inc.,
`Thomas LLC, Cardinal, VWR, Vectornate, IPB, Stellar, HCY, StatLab, and Fosun. Order No.
`20 (Nov. 15, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Dec. 6, 2021); Order Nos. 21-25 (all issued
`on Nov. 15, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Dec. 6, 2021); Order No. 33, unreviewed by
`Comm’n Notice (Jan. 10, 2022); Order No. 35 (Jan. 24, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice
`(Feb. 16, 2022); Order No. 46 (May 3, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 27, 2022);
`Order No. 47 (May 4, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 27, 2022). Furthermore,
`respondents Runmei; HCM; and MediDent were found in default. Order No. 27 (Nov. 15,
`2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Dec. 6, 2021); Order No. 31, unreviewed by Comm’n
`Notice (Jan. 10, 2022).
`
`
`The Commission also subsequently terminated the investigation as to claim 7 of the ’358
`patent, claims 5 and 19 of the ’779 patent, and claim 8 of the ’741 patent. Order No. 32 (Dec.
`15, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Jan. 10, 2022). The Commission also terminated the
`investigation as to claims 9 and 21 of the ’358 patent and claim 11 of the ’779 patent. Order
`No. 37 (Jan. 28, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Feb. 16, 2022). The Commission
`likewise subsequently terminated the investigation as to claim 11 of the ’358 patent and claim 7
`of the ’741 patent. Order No. 68 (Jul. 11, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Aug. 1, 2022).
`The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) extended the target date for completion of this
`investigation to February 21, 2023, see Order No. 73 (Sep. 30, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Notice (Oct. 21, 2022) and, subsequently, to February 28, 2023, see Order No. 77 (Oct. 20,
`2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (November 10, 2022).
`
`
`On October 28, 2022, the ALJ issued a final ID finding no violation of section 337 in
`this investigation. On November 14, 2022, the ALJ issued a recommended determination on
`remedy and bond. On the same day, Complainants filed a petition for review of the final ID.
`Also, on the same day, respondents Wuxi NEST Biotechnology Co., Ltd., NEST Scientific
`Inc., NEST Scientific USA, Jiangsu Changfeng Medical Industry Co., Ltd., BioTeke
`Corporation (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Huachenyang (Shenzhen) Technology Co., Ltd., and Miraclean
`Technology Co., Ltd. filed a contingent petition for review of the final ID. Likewise, on the
`same day, OUII filed a petition for review of the final ID.
`
`On November 22, 2022, Copan filed a response to Respondents’ and OUII’s petitions.
`On the same day, Respondents filed their response to Copan’s and OUII’s petitions for
`review. Likewise on the same date, OUII filed its combined response to Complainants’ and
`Respondents’ petitions for review.
`
`The Commission has determined to extend the date for determining whether to review
`the final ID to March 17, 2023, and the target date to May 17, 2023.
`
`The Commission vote for this determination took place on February 3, 2023.
`
`The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR Part 210.
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`
`
` Issued: February 3, 2023
`
`
`
`
`Katherine M. Hiner
`Acting Secretary to the Commission
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket