throbber
Office of the Secretary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, DC 20436
`
`September 20, 2023
`
`
`
`Via email: michael.berta@arnoldporter.com
`Michael Berta, Esq.
`Arnold and Porter
`One Embarcadero Center
`22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`
`
`
`Re: Exclusion Order in Certain Casual Footwear and Packaging Thereof, Inv.
`No. 337-TA-1270
`
`
`Dear Mr. Berta:
`
`
`On September 14, 2023, the Commission, having found certain defaulting respondents in
`violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the above-
`referenced investigation, issued a limited exclusion order. The exclusion order directs U.S.
`Customs and Border Protection to exclude certain casual footwear and packaging thereof from
`entry into the United States while U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 5,149,328 and 3,836,415
`757,156 in use. A copy of the order is attached to this letter.
`
`
`Should the Complainant, Crocs, Inc., have questions about the administration of this
`order, they may contact the Intellectual Property Rights Branch of U.S. Customs and Border
`Protection at (202) 325-0020. Although Customs will be administering the exclusion order, you
`may also contact Megan Valentine, the Commission’s Assistant General Counsel for Section 337
`investigations, at (202) 708-2301, if you have questions pertaining to the exclusion order.
`
`Since FY 2000, the Commission has conducted four surveys of exclusion order holders to
`help assess the effectiveness of such orders, and the Commission anticipates conducting another
`such survey in the future. To facilitate future communications with Complainant about the
`anticipated survey, the Commission requests that Complainants identify a person at Crocs, Inc.
`with knowledge of the order who may be contacted in the future regarding the survey. It would
`be particularly helpful if Complainants would provide an e-mail address, along with a name and
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mailing address, for this contact. The requested contact information may be e-mailed to
`337_email@usitc.gov or provided by mail to Margaret D Macdonald, Director, Office of Unfair
`Import Investigations.
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Enclosure
`
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`Mr. Berta, Esq.
`September 20, 2023
`Page 2
`
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN CASUAL FOOTWEAR
`AND PACKAGING THEREOF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1270
`
`LIMITED EXCLUSION ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`The United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) has found
`
`respondents La Modish Boutique of West Covina, California (“La Modish”), Star Bay Group
`
`Inc. of Hackensack, New Jersey (“Star Bay”), Huizhou Xinshunzu Shoes Co., Ltd. of Huizhou
`
`City, China (“Huizhou”), and Jinjiang Anao Footwear Co., Ltd. of Jinjiang City, Fujian, China
`
`(“Anao”) (collectively, “Defaulting Respondents”) in default. Order No. 58 (May 20, 2022),
`
`unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (June 10, 2022).
`
`The First Amended Complaint, filed by Complainant Crocs, Inc. of Broomfield,
`
`Colorado, alleged a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1337, in the unlawful importation, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after
`
`importation of certain casual footwear and packaging thereof that infringe one or more of U.S.
`
`Trademark Registration Nos. 5,149,328; 5,273,875; and 3,836,415 (collectively, the “Asserted
`
`Trademarks”). Because the conditions in 19 U.S.C. § 1337(g)(1)(A)-(E) have been satisfied, the
`
`Commission, upon the request of the Complainant, issues a limited exclusion order, based on the
`
`allegations regarding a violation of section 337 in the First Amended Complaint that are
`
`presumed to be true as to the Defaulting Respondents.
`
`Having reviewed the record in this investigation, including the written submissions of the
`
`parties, the Commission has made its determinations on the issues of remedy, the public interest,
`
`

`

`and bonding. The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief is a limited
`
`exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of infringing casual footwear and packaging
`
`thereof manufactured by or on behalf of Defaulting Respondents or any of their affiliated
`
`companies, parents, subsidiaries, agents, or other related business entities, or its successors or
`
`assigns.
`
`The Commission has also determined that the public interest factors enumerated in
`
`19 U.S.C. § 1337(g)(1) do not preclude the issuance of the limited exclusion order, and that the
`
`bond during the period of Presidential review shall be in the amount of one hundred percent
`
`(100%) of the entered value of the entered value of the articles subject to this Order.
`
`
`
`Accordingly, the Commission hereby ORDERS that:
`
`1.
`
`Certain casual footwear and packaging thereof that infringe one or more of the
`
`Asserted Trademarks and are manufactured abroad by, or on behalf of, or imported by or on
`
`behalf of Defaulting Respondents or any of their affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries,
`
`agents, or other related business entities, or its successors or assigns, are excluded from entry for
`
`consumption into the United States, entry for consumption from a foreign-trade zone, or
`
`withdrawal from a warehouse for consumption, except under license of the trademark owner or
`
`as provided by law until such date as the trademarks have been abandoned, canceled, or rendered
`
`invalid or unenforceable.
`
`2.
`
`The casual footwear and packaging thereof subject to this exclusion order (i.e.,
`
`“covered articles”) are as follows: casual footwear with holes in the upper and such footwear’s
`
`packaging.
`
`3.
`
`For the purpose of assisting U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) in the
`
`enforcement of this order, and without in any way limiting the scope of this Order, the
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Commission has attached to this Order a copy of the relevant trademark registrations as Exhibits
`
`A-C.
`
`4.
`
`Notwithstanding paragraph 1 of this Order, covered articles are entitled to entry
`
`into the United States for consumption, entry for consumption from a foreign trade zone, or
`
`withdrawal from a warehouse for consumption, under bond in the amount of one hundred
`
`percent (100%) of their entered value, pursuant to subsection (j) of section 337 (19 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1337(j)) and the Presidential Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative of July
`
`21, 2005 (70 Fed. Reg. 43,251), from the day after this Order is received by the United States
`
`Trade Representative until such time as the United States Trade Representative notifies the
`
`Commission that this Order is approved or disapproved but, in any event, not later than sixty (60)
`
`days after the receipt of this Order. All entries of covered articles made pursuant to this
`
`paragraph are to be reported to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”), in advance of the
`
`date of the entry, pursuant to procedures CBP establishes.
`
`5.
`
`At the discretion of CBP and pursuant to the procedures it establishes, persons
`
`seeking to import articles may be required to certify that they are familiar with the terms of this
`
`Order, that they have made appropriate inquiry, and thereupon state that, to the best of their
`
`knowledge and belief, the products being imported are not excluded from entry under paragraph
`
`1 of this Order. At its discretion, CBP may require persons who have provided the certification
`
`described in this paragraph to furnish such records or analyses as are necessary to substantiate
`
`the certification.
`
`6.
`
`Complainant shall file a written statement with the Commission, made under oath,
`
`each year on the anniversary of the issuance of this Order stating whether Complainant
`
`continues to use each of the Asserted Trademarks in commerce in the United States in
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`connection with the products at issue and whether any of the Asserted Trademarks have been
`
`abandoned, canceled, or rendered invalid or unenforceable.
`
`7.
`
`The Commission may modify this Order in accordance with the procedures
`
`described in Rule 210.76 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R.
`
`§ 210.76).
`
`8.
`
`The Secretary shall serve copies of this Order upon each party of record in this
`
`investigation that has retained counsel or otherwise provided a point of contact for electronic
`
`service and upon CBP. While temporary remote operating procedures are in place in response to
`
`COVID-19, the Office of the Secretary is not able to serve parties that have not retained counsel
`
`or otherwise provided a point of contact for electronic service. Accordingly, pursuant to
`
`Commission Rules 201.16(a) and 210.7(a)(1) (19 C.F.R. §§ 201.16(a), 210.7(a)(1)), the
`
`Commission orders that the Complainant complete service of this Order for any party without a
`
`method of electronic service noted on the attached Certificate of Service and shall file proof of
`
`service on the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS).
`
`9.
`
`Notice of this Order shall be published in the Federal Register.
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Issued: September 14, 2023
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket