throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN LIGHT-BASED
`PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
`DEVICES AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1276
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF A COMMISSION DETERMINATION NOT TO REVIEW
`AN INITIAL DETERMINATION EXTENDING THE TARGET DATE
`
`
`
`
` U.S. International Trade Commission.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Notice.
`
`
`
`AGENCY:
`
`ACTION:
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has
`determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) initial determination
`(“ID”) (Order No. 59) extending the target date for completion of the above-captioned
`investigation to April 19, 2023.
`
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General Counsel,
`U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone
`202-205-2392. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation
`may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
`accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the
`Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
`Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by
`contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on
`August 18, 2021, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Masimo Corporation and Cercacor
`Laboratories, Inc., both of Irvine, CA. 86 FR 46275 (Aug. 18, 2021). The complaint, as
`amended, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
`1337, based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale
`within the United States after importation of certain light-based physiological measurement
`devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
`10,912,501; 10,912,502; 10,945,648; 10,687,745; and 7,761,127. Id. The amended complaint
`further alleges that an industry in the United States exists and/or is in the process of being
`established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. Id. The notice of investigation named
`Apple Inc. of Cupertino, CA as a respondent. Id. at 46276. The Office of Unfair Import
`Investigations is not participating in this investigation. Id.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`On October 24, 2022, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 59) extending the target
`date by approximately seven weeks to April 19, 2023. Based on this target date, the deadline for
`issuing the final ID is December 19, 2022. The ID states that good cause exists to extend the
`target date because of the complexity of this investigation, the consideration of post-hearing
`motions in this investigation, and the ALJ’s obligations in other investigations. See Order No. 59
`at 1-2. No petitions for review were filed.
`
`The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The target date is now
`April 19, 2023.
`
`
`The Commission vote for this determination took place on November 10, 2022.
`
`The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR Part 210.
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`Issued: November 10, 2022
`
`
` Katherine M. Hiner
`Acting Secretary to the Commission
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket