throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN PRODUCTS CONTAINING
`PYRACLOSTROBIN AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1303
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONSENT ORDER
`
`The U.S. International Trade Commission (“Commission”) instituted this investigation
`
`based on a complaint filed by BASF SE of Ludwigshafen, Germany and BASF Corporation of
`
`Florham Park, New Jersey (collectively, “Complainants” or “BASF”). 87 Fed. Reg. 11730-31
`
`(Mar. 2, 2022). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`
`amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, based on the importation into the United States, the sale for
`
`importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products containing
`
`pyraclostrobin and components thereof by reason of infringement of claims 1-17 (collectively,
`
`“the Asserted Claims”) of U.S. Patent No. 7,816,392 (“the ’392 patent” or “the Asserted
`
`Patent”).
`
`Respondent has executed a Consent Order Stipulation in which it agrees to the entry of
`
`this Consent Order and to all waivers and other provisions required by the Commission’s Rules
`
`of Practice and Procedure, 210.21(c) (19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)).
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
`
`1.
`
`The Complainants in this Investigation are BASF SE, a German societas europaea
`
`company organized under the laws of the European Union with headquarters and
`
`principal place of business at Carl-Bosch- Str. 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany, and
`
`BASF Corporation, a Delaware corporation with headquarters and principal place of
`
`business at 100 Campus Drive, Florham Park, New Jersey 07932.
`
`2.
`
`The Respondent covered by this Consent Order is Sharda USA LLC (“Sharda USA”), a
`
`limited liability company organized in Delaware with headquarters and principal place
`
`of business at 34 E, Germantown Pike #227, Norristown, PA 19401.
`
`3.
`
`The Commission instituted this investigation to determine whether certain “products
`
`containing crystalline modification IV of pyraclostrobin and components thereof”
`
`(collectively, the “Subject Articles”) imported into the United States, sold for
`
`importation into the United States, and/or sold within the United States after
`
`importation infringe the Asserted Claims of the ’392 patent.
`
`4.
`
`Sharda USA has executed a Consent Order Stipulation and stipulates to the entry of this
`
`Consent Order.
`
`5.
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(4)(iii), upon the entry of this Consent Order, Sharda
`
`USA shall not sell for importation, import, or sell after importation Subject Articles,
`
`directly or indirectly, and shall not aid, abet encourage, participate in, or induce the sale
`
`for importation, the importation, or the sale after importation of Subject Articles except
`
`under consent or license from BASF.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`6.
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(4)(iv), upon entry of this Consent Order, Sharda
`
`USA shall not sell within the United States or otherwise transfer (except exportation)
`
`any remaining inventory of imported Subject Articles in the United States.
`
`7.
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(4)(v), Sharda USA shall cease and desist from
`
`importing and distributing the Subject Articles in the United States.
`
`8.
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(4)(vi), Sharda USA shall be precluded from seeking
`
`judicial review or otherwise challenging or contesting the validity of this Consent
`
`Order.
`
`9.
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(4)(vii), Sharda USA shall cooperate with and shall
`
`not seek to impede by litigation or other means the Commission’s efforts to gather
`
`information under Subpart I of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19
`
`C.F.R. Part 210.
`
`10. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(4)(viii), Sharda USA and its officers, directors,
`
`employees, agents, and any entity or individual acting on its behalf and with its
`
`authority shall not seek to challenge the validity or enforceability of the Asserted
`
`Claims in any administrative or judicial proceeding to enforce the Consent Order.
`
`11. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(4)(ix), when the ’392 patent expires, this Consent
`
`Order shall become null and void as to such.
`
`12. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(x), if any claim of the ’392 patent is held invalid or
`
`unenforceable by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction or if any article has been
`
`adjudicated not to infringe the asserted right in a final decision, no longer subject to
`
`appeal, this Consent Order shall become null and void as to such invalid or
`
`unenforceable claim or adjudicated article.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`13. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(4)(xi), Sharda USA has admitted that the
`
`Commission has in rem jurisdiction over Subject Articles that are the basis of this
`
`Investigation, in personam jurisdiction over Sharda USA for the purposes of this
`
`Consent Oder, and subject matter jurisdiction over this Investigation.
`
`14. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(c)(xii), this Investigation is hereby terminated;
`
`provided, however, that enforcement, modification, or revocation of the Consent Order
`
`shall be carried out pursuant to Subpart I of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
`
`Procedure, 19 C.F.R. part 210.
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Issued: April 12, 2022
`
` Lisa R. Barton
` Secretary to the Commission
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket