`
`
`EXHIBIT 8
`EXHIBIT 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BoxInterferences@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-9797
`
`
`Entered: December 31, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`Anatoli Ledenev
`and
`Robert M. Porter,
`Junior Party
`(Patent 8,004,116),
`
`v.
`
`Meir Adest,
`Guy Sella, Lior Handelsman, Yoav Galin,
`Amir Fishelov, Meir Gazit, Yaron Binder
`and
`Nikolay Radimov,
`Senior Party
`(Application 13/430,388).
`
`
`Patent Interference No. 106,054 (JTM)
`(Technology Center 2800)
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY G. LANE, JAMES T. MOORE, and DEBORAH KATZ,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`
`JUDGMENT - Bd. R. 127(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`Interference 106,054 (JTM) – Ledenev v. Adest
`Judgment
`
`
`A decision granting Motion 1 of senior party Meir Adest, Guy Sella, Lior
`
`Handelsman, Yoav Galin, Amir Fishelov, Meir Gazit, Yaron Binder and
`
`Nikolay Radimov has been entered. (Decision, Paper 186). As a result of this
`
`Decision, all the involved claims of senior party Anatoli Ledenev and Robert M.
`
`Porter are unpatentable to Ledenev and Ledenev lacks standing to continue in the
`
`interference. Bd. R. 201. Accordingly, we enter judgment against Ledenev.
`
`It is
`
`Order
`
`ORDERED that judgment on priority is entered against junior party Ledenev
`
`as to Count 1, the sole Count of the interference (Declaration, Paper 1, 4);
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that claims 1–29 of Ledenev patent 8,004,116,
`
`which correspond to Count 1, are CANCELED. (Declaration, Paper 1, 4); 35
`
`U.S.C. § 135(a);1
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to 35 USC § 135(c) and
`
`Bd. R. 205 regarding the filing of settlement agreements;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that a party seeking judicial review timely serve
`
`notice on the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office;
`
`37 C.F.R. §§ 90.1 and 104.2. See also Bd. R. 8(b). Attention is directed to Biogen
`
`Idec MA, Inc., v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 785 F.3d 648,
`
`
`1
`Any reference to a statute in this Judgment is to the statute that was in effect
`on March 15, 2013 unless otherwise indicated. See Pub. L. 112-29, § 3(n), 125
`Stat. 284, 293 (2011).
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`Interference 106,054 (JTM) – Ledenev v. Adest
`Judgment
`
`654–57 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (determining that pre-AIA § 146 review was eliminated
`
`for interference proceedings declared after September 15, 2012); and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be entered into the
`
`administrative records of the involved Ledenev patent and involved Adest
`
`application.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`Interference 106,054 (JTM) – Ledenev v. Adest
`Judgment
`
`Attorney for Ledenev
`
`Luke Santangelo
`Alfred K. Wiedmann, Jr.
`SANTANGELO LAW OFFICES, P.C.
`luke@idea-asset.com
`alw@idea-asset.com
`
`W. Todd Baker
`OBLON, McCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P.
`tbaker@oblon.com
`
`
`Attorney for Adest
`
`Frederic M. Meeker
`Michael S. Cuviello
`Joseph M. Skerpon
`BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.
`fmeeker@bannerwitcoff.com
`mcuviello@bannerwitcoff.com
`jskerpon@bannerwitcoff.com
`
`-4-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
