throbber

`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTAIN POWER CONVERTER
`MODULES AND COMPUTING SYSTEMS
`CONTAINING THE SAME
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1370
`
`NOTICE OF COMMISSION DECISION NOT TO REVIEW AN INITIAL
`DETERMINATION GRANTING AN UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PARTIALLY
`TERMINATE THE INVESTIGATION AS TO CERTAIN RESPONDENTS
`
` U.S. International Trade Commission.
`
`Notice.
`
`
`AGENCY:
`
`ACTION:
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has
`determined not to review an initial determination (“ID”) (Order No. 16) of the presiding
`Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) granting an unopposed motion to partially terminate the
`investigation as to respondents Delta Electronics (USA) Inc., Quanta Cloud Technology Inc., and
`Quanta Cloud Technology USA LLC (collectively, the “Terminated Respondents”) based on the
`withdrawal of the complaint as to those respondents.
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General
`Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
`telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this
`investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at
`https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
`information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
`https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can
`be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 17, 2023, the Commission instituted this
`investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (“section
`337”), based on a complaint filed by Vicor Corporation (“Complainant”) of Andover,
`Massachusetts. See 88 FR 56050-51 (Aug. 17, 2023). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges
`a violation of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
`importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain power converter
`modules and computing systems containing the same by reason of the infringement of certain
`claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,166,481; 9,516,761; and 10,199,950. See id. In addition to the
`Terminated Respondents, the notice of investigation names the following respondents: Delta
`Electronics, Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; Delta Electronics (Americas) Ltd. of Fremont, California;
`Cyntec Co., Ltd. of Hsinchu, Taiwan; Quanta Computer Inc. of Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Quanta
`
`

`

`Computer USA Inc. of Fremont, California; Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd. (d/b/a, Foxconn
`Technology Group) of Taipei City, Taiwan; Foxconn Industrial Internet Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen,
`China; FII USA Inc. (a/k/a Foxconn Industrial, Internet USA Inc.) of Milwaukee, Wisconsin;
`Ingrasys Technology Inc. of Taoyuan City, Taiwan; and Ingrasys Technology USA Inc. of
`Fremont, California. See id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also a party to the
`investigation. See id.
`
`
`On December 21, 2023, Complainant filed an unopposed motion to partially terminate
`the investigation as to the Terminated Respondents based on the withdrawal of the complaint as
`to those respondents. No response to the motion was received.
`
`On December 22, 2023, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 16) granting the
`motion. The ID notes that “the Terminated Respondents are not involved with the importation,
`sale for importation, or sale after importation of the Accused Products in the United States.” See
`ID at 1. Thus, the ID finds good cause for termination of the investigation pursuant to
`Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)). See id. In addition, the ID notes that
`“[t]he motion states that there no agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the
`parties concerning the subject matter of the investigation.” See id. at 1-2. Furthermore, the ID
`finds no “extraordinary circumstances” that would preclude granting the motion. See id. at 2.
`
`
`No petition for review of the subject ID was filed.
`
`The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The investigation is
`partially terminated with respect to the Terminated Respondents.
`
`The Commission vote for this determination took place on January 25, 2024.
`
`The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210).
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`
`
`Issued: January 25, 2024
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket