`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable Doris Johnson Hines
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN VAPORIZER DEVICES,
`CARTRIDGES USED THEREWITH,
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1372
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OMNIBUS MOTION TO FILE OUT OF TIME OMNIBUS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
`THIRD PARTIES’ MICHAEL J. MEDLEY’S, THOMAS H. MARTIN’S, AND MARTIN &
`FERRARO LLP’S MOTIONS TO QUASH
`
`Third Parties’ Michael J. Medley, Thomas H. Martin, and Martin & Ferraro LLP, pursuant
`
`to 19 C.F.R. § 210.15, respectfully move the ALJ for leave to file its Omnibus Reply Brief in
`
`Support of Third Parties’ Michael J. Medley’s, Thomas H. Martin’s, and Martin & Ferraro LLP’s
`
`Motions to Quash Respondent’s Subpoenas Ad Testificandum and Duces Tecum (“Omnibus Reply
`
`Brief in Support of Motions to Quash”) one day out of time. The Commission Investigative Staff
`
`and Counsel for Respondent JUUL Labs, Inc.’s (“Respondent” or “JLI”) do not oppose.
`
`The procedural schedule in this Investigation requires that the Omnibus Reply Brief in
`
`Support of Motions to Quash be filed and served on April 4, 2024. See Order No. 2, Ground Rule
`
`6.6.2. Despite Counsel’s best efforts to file the Omnibus Reply Brief in Support of Motions to
`
`Quash before 5:15 p.m. Eastern time on April 4, the EDIS document submission interface
`
`experienced a technical issue that caused a delay in filing the Omnibus Reply Brief in Support of
`
`Motions to Quash until 34 minutes after this deadline. Counsel’s inability to file the Omnibus
`
`Reply Brief in Support of Motions to Quash on time did not prejudice the Staff or JLI: the Omnibus
`
`Reply Brief in Support of Motions to Quash was served on the Staff and JLI at 6:09 p.m. Third
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`parties’ Mr. Medley, Mr. Martin, and Martin & Ferraro LLP did not receive any unfair advantage
`
`due to its time of filing because the Omnibus Reply Brief in Support of Motions to Quash was
`
`filed and served within an hour of the deadline.
`
`Thus, Mr. Medley, Mr. Martin, and Martin & Ferraro LLP respectfully request that the ALJ
`
`grant the omnibus motion and allow Mr. Medley, Mr. Martin, and Martin & Ferraro LLP to file
`
`the Omnibus Reply Brief in Support of Motions to Quash out of time.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Dated: April 5, 2024
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/s/ Anish R. Desai
`Anish R. Desai
`Elizabeth S. Weiswasser
`Adam B. Banks
`Kathryn E. Leicht
`Ian Moore
`Barry Zhang
`Tom Yu
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`767 Fifth Avenue
`New York, NY 10153
`Telephone: (212) 310-8000
`
`W. Sutton Ansley
`Christopher M. Pepe
`Amanda K. Branch
`Matthew D. Sieger
`Eric C. Westerhold
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2001 M Street NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20036
`Telephone: (202) 682-7000
`
`Adrian C. Percer
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`201 Redwood Shores Parkway
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 802-3000
`
`Beth Wilkinson
`Brian L. Stekloff
`James Rosenthal
`Alysha Bohanon
`Wilkinson Stekloff LLP
`2001 M Street N.W., 10th Floor
`Washington, DC 20036
`Telephone: (202) 847-4000
`
`Counsel for Michael J. Medley, Thomas H.
`Martin, and Martin & Ferraro LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify the foregoing OMNIBUS MOTION TO FILE OUT OF TIME
`OMNIBUS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THIRD PARTIES’ MICHAEL J. MEDLEY’S,
`THOMAS H. MARTIN’S, AND MARTIN & FERRARO LLP’S MOTIONS TO QUASH, was
`served on this 5th day of April, 2024, upon the following, by the indicated means:
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`Vu.Bui@usitc.gov
`
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`Mintz-JUUL-ITC-2@mintz.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`qe-jli-njoy-itc-1372@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`Vu Bui, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`Counsel for Respondent JUUL Labs, Inc.
`
`Michael T. Renaud
`Adam S. Rizk
`Marguerite McConihe
`Matthew A. Karambelas
`Catherine Xu
`James Thomson
`Tianyi Tan
`Hannah Edge
`Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`
`David Hollander
`Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`555 12th Street NW, Suite 1100
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`
`Reza Dokhanchy
`Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`3580 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`S. Alex Lasher
`K. Kevin Chu
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`1300 I Street, N.W., Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`Victoria F. Maroulis
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Andrew M. Holmes
`Iman Lordgooei
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ryan Sotnick
`Ryan Sotnick
`IP Paralegal
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2001 M Street, N.W., Suite 600
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`ryan.sotnick@weil.com
`202.682.7000
`
`6
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
