`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
` Inv. No. 337-TA-1373
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES,
`INCLUDING SMARTPHONES,
`COMPUTERS, TABLET COMPUTERS,
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`ORDER NO. 26:
`GRANTING COMMISSION INVESTIGATIVE STAFF’S
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ITS
`AMENDED MARKMAN PRE-HEARING STATEMENT OUT
`OF TIME (MOTION DOCKET NO. 1373-020)
`(February 6, 2024)
`On February 5, 2024, counsel for the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“Staff”)
`
`filed an unopposed motion (“Motion”) for leave to file its amended Markman pre-hearing
`
`statement out of time. (Motion Docket No. 1373-020 (Feb. 5, 2024).). The Motion contains a
`
`G.R. 2.2 certification representing that none of the following opposes the Motion: Complainants
`
`InterDigital, Inc., InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc., InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc., and
`
`InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS (collectively, “InterDigital” or “Complainants”) and
`
`Respondents Lenovo Group Limited, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC
`
`(collectively, “Respondents” and, with Complainants, the “Private Parties”). (Mot. at 1.).
`
`The Motion states that, due to travel and travel-related issues, Staff failed to timely file its
`
`amended Markman pre-hearing statement on February 2, 2024, as specified by Order No. 18.
`
`(Id.). The Motion further states that Staff is of the view that, given that initial Markman pre-
`
`hearing statements and briefs have already been filed, there is little to no prejudice to the Private
`
`Parties as a result of the delayed finding.
`
`For good cause shown, and because there is no opposition, the Motion is GRANTED.
`
`The amended Markman pre-hearing statement attached as Exhibit A to the Motion is hereby
`
`accepted as if it were timely filed on February 2, 2024.
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`