PUBLIC VERSION
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON,D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-
`
`EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY
`
`MODULES AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1378
`
`COMPLAINANT SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.“S MOTION SEEKING
`
`RECOMMENDATION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
`
`DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO ISSUE A LETTER OF REQUEST
`
`Pursuant to Commission Rules 210.32 and 210.26, Complainant Samsung Display Co.,
`
`Ltd., (“SDC”or “Complainant’’) respectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge issue the
`
`attached Recommendation (Appendix A), which recommends that the District Court for the
`
`District of Columbia issue a Letter of Request pursuant to the Hague Convention of 18 March
`
`1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (the “Hague Convention”)
`
`on behalf of SDC to obtain documents and deposition testimony from the following foreign third
`
`party:
`
`
`
`The Letter ofRequest toee (Appendix B)solicits the
`
`assistance of the Republic of Korea’s Central Authority to obtain documents and deposition
`
`testimony relevant to this Investigation that cannot be obtained through other means for use at the
`
`hearing in this Investigation. SDC respectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge grant
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`1
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`this application so that it may initiate a civil proceeding in the District Court of the District of
`
`Columbia’s miscellaneous docket and obtain issuance of the attached Letter of Request.
`
`Attached to the Letter of Request, SDC has included a set of requests for the production of
`
`documents and other things; a set of deposition topics; the Protective Order; the Ground Rules;
`
`and the Complaint (Attachments A, B, C, D, and E, respectively to the Letter of Request). In
`
`addition, SDC has included certified translations of these documents into Korean as attachments
`
`to the certified translation of the Letter of Request (Appendix C).
`
`Given the expediency of this Investigation prescribed by statute, SDC further respectfully
`
`requests that the ALJ recommend that the Letter of Request be issued as soon as practicable.
`
`GROUND RULE 5.1 CERTIFICATION. Pursuant to Ground Rule 5.1, SDC hereby
`
`certifies it has made reasonable, good-faith efforts to resolve this matter with the other parties prior
`
`to filing this motion. Respondents BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., Mianyang BOE
`
`Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd., Ordos Yuansheng Optoelectronics Co., Ltd., Chengdu BOE
`
`Optoeletronics Technology Co., Ltd., Chongqing BOE Optoeletronics Technology Co., Ltd.,
`
`Wuhan BOE Optoeletronics Technology Co., Ltd., BMOT f/k/a Kunming BOE Display
`
`Technology, and BOE Technology America, Inc. (collectively “Respondents” or “BOE”) indicate
`
`that they will take a position after reviewing the moving papers. Commission Investigative Staff
`
`(“Staff”) takes no position on this motion.
`
`
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`2
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`
`
`Dated: January 12, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ S. Alex Lasher
`S. Alex Lasher
`K. Kevin Chu
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`1300 I Street, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Tel.: (202) 538-8000
`
`Sean S. Pak
`James D. Judah
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel.: (415) 875-6600
`
`D. James Pak
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`865 S Figueroa St, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Tel.: (213) 443-3000
`
`David A. Nelson
`Marc L. Kaplan
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 2700
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel.: (312) 705-7400
`
`Counsel for Complainant Samsung Display Co.,
`Ltd.
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`3
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1378
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-
`EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY
`MODULES AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`
`
`COMPLAINANT SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.’S MEMORANDUM
`
` IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION SEEKING RECOMMENDATION
`
` TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
`
` TO ISSUE A LETTER OF REQUEST
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`On October 30, 2023, SDC filed a Complaint against the Respondents alleging violations
`
`of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, based on their unlawful
`
`importation into the United States, sale for importation into the United States, and/or sale within
`
`the United States after importation of certain organic light-emitting diode (“OLED”) display
`
`modules and components thereof (“Accused Products”) manufactured by Respondents using trade
`
`secrets owned by and misappropriated (“Misappropriated Trade Secrets”) from SDC. See EDIS
`
`Doc. ID Nos. 807335 (Public); 807334 (Confidential). On November 30, 2023, the Commission
`
`instituted this Investigation. See EDIS Doc. ID No. 809571.
`
`As set forth in the Complaint, SDC asserts BOE has used its relationship with supply chain
`
`vendors, potential vendors, and/or third parties—including but not limited to —to steal and
`
`misuse SDC’s trade secrets related to OLED display panels and modules. Specifically,
`
` was
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`1
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`in possession of, in whole or in part, SDC’s trade secrets, which were ultimately used to develop,
`
`commercialize, and support products used in a wide variety of downstream devices, such as mobile
`
`phones, televisions, monitors, AR and VR devices, imaging devices, thermal scopes, night vision
`
`googles, and many more devices.
`
`For the reasons set forth below, SDC respectfully requests that the Administrative Law
`
`Judge recommend that the District Court for the District of Columbia issue the attached Letter of
`
`Request for International Assistance compelling
`
` to produce relevant and responsive
`
`documents and testimony concerning SDC’s claims of unfair methods of competition. SDC is
`
`moving now—at the early stages of the Investigation—to maximize the likelihood that this
`
`relevant evidence is received before the close of fact discovery in this Investigation.
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`A.
`
`A. The District Court Has the Authority to Issue a Letter of Request
`
`The Hague Convention provides that “[i]n civil or commercial matters a judicial authority
`
`of a Contracting State may, in accordance with the provisions of the law of that State, request the
`
`competent authority of another Contracting State, by means of a Letter of Request, to obtain
`
`evidence, or to perform some other judicial act.” Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence
`
`Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, Art. 1, opened for signature, Mar. 18, 1970, 23 U.S.T.
`
`2555 (hereinafter “Hague Convention”). Both the United States and the Republic of Korea are
`
`parties to the Hague Convention. The United States ratified the Hague Convention on August 8,
`
`1972, and the Republic of Korea acceded in December 2009, which was accepted by the United
`
`States in January 2010 and entered into force in February 2010. See Hague Conf. on Private Int’l
`
`Law, Status Table: Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or
`
`Commercial
`
`Matters,
`
`available
`
`at
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`2
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/statustable/?cid=82 (last accessed Mar. 15,
`
`2023).
`
`The Hague Convention authorizes the District Court for the District of Columbia to issue
`
`the Letter of Request to the Republic of Korea. See Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v.
`
`U.S. Dist. Court, 482 U.S. 522, 535 (1987) (“a Judicial authority in one contracting state ‘may’
`
`forward a letter of request to the competent authority in another contracting state for the purpose
`
`of obtaining evidence”); Certain Filament Light-Emitting Diodes & Prods. Containing Same (II)
`
`(“Light-Emitting Diodes”), Inv. No. 337-TA-1220, Order No. 20, 2020 WL 7640164, at *1 (Dec.
`
`3, 2020) (“A Letter of Request is the appropriate method for seeking discovery from . . . the
`
`Republic of Korea” which is a party “to the Hague Evidence Convention.”); 8 U.S.C. § 1781(b)(2)
`
`(permitting “the transmittal of a letter rogatory or request directly from a tribunal in the United
`
`States to the foreign or international tribunal, officer, or agency to whom it is addressed and its
`
`return in the same manner.”). And under the Hague Convention, evidence can be compelled
`
`pursuant to a Letter of Request transmitted directly from a court in the United States to the Central
`
`Authority of the Republic of Korea. See U.S. Department of State—Bureau of Consular Affairs,
`
`Republic of Korea Country Information, Obtaining Evidence in Civil and Commercial Matters,
`
`https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/Judicial-Assistance-Country-
`
`Information/KoreaRepublicof.html (last accessed Mar. 15, 2023).
`
`“Administrative law judges may issue recommendations to the United States District Court
`
`for the District of Columbia to issue such letters,” and have done so in previous investigations.
`
`Light-Emitting Diodes, Order No. 20, 2020 WL 7640164, at *1 (citing Certain Wireless Audio Sys.
`
`& Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1071, Order No. 6 (Oct. 5, 2017) (EDIS Doc. ID
`
`624890)). See, e.g., Certain Video Processing Devices & Prods. Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`3
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`TA-1323, Order No. 7, 2022 WL 3716247 (Aug. 25, 2022) (granting motion seeking a
`
`recommendation to issue letters of request to obtain evidence in Korea); Certain Graphics Sys.,
`
`Components Thereof, & Digital Televisions Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1318, Order
`
`No. 34, 2022 WL 15497110 (Oct. 21, 2022) (same); Certain Elec. Devices Having Wireless
`
`Commc’n. Capabilities & Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1284, Order No. 6, 2021 WL
`
`5881611 (Dec. 8, 2021) (same).
`
`B.
`
` Engineering Corporation May Be in Possession of Relevant Documents
`and Information in the Republic of Korea
`
`SDC seeks this Letter of Request to
`
` because it likely has documents and testimony
`
`relevant to SDC’s trade secret misappropriation claims that are not within the possession, custody,
`
`or control of any United States-based entity.
`
`
`
`
`
` As set forth in the Complaint,
`
`SDC alleges that Respondents have wrongfully obtained SDC’s trade secrets by (among other
`
`means) wrongfully soliciting and stealing the information from SDC’s suppliers,
`
`.
`
`See, e.g., Complaint at ¶ 36 (“BOE wrongfully took the trade secrets by unfair means, including
`
`by soliciting and stealing this information from SDC’s vendors who were under confidentiality
`
`obligations to SDC[].”). Indeed, there is substantial evidence that Respondents have used this
`
`channel to misappropriate SDC trade secrets from
`
`, which has
`
`resulted in criminal investigations and convictions. See Complaint at ¶ 5 (“The Suwon High Court
`
`in Korea recently found 11 Toptec executives and employees guilty of intentionally stealing these
`
`trade secrets and leaking them to SDC’s Chinese competitors like BOE”); see also id. at ¶¶ 38-94.
`
`Accordingly,
`
` is likely to have information relevant to SDC’s trade secret misappropriation
`
`claims – information not within SDC’s possession, custody, or control.
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`4
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`C.
`
`The Letter of Request is Necessary to Obtain the Documents and
`Information from
` Engineering Corporation and Conforms to the
`Required Procedural Safeguards
`
`The attached Letter of Request should issue for several reasons. First, SDC is mindful that
`
`the foreign discovery process is often a lengthy one working at odds with the compressed schedule
`
`of a Section 337 Investigation. With at least five months likely still remaining in the discovery
`
`period in this Investigation, SDC believes that its diligence in filing this Letter of Request as early
`
`as practicably possible will provide enough time for the requested information to be gathered from
`
`.
`
`Second, SDC recognizes that in accordance with Article 21 of the Hague Convention, the
`
`Republic of Korea will not execute a Letter of Request issued for the purpose of obtaining pretrial
`
`discovery of documents where the Letter of Request requires a person:
`
`a. to state what documents relevant to the proceedings to which the Letter of
`Request relates are, or have been, in his or her possession custody or power; or
`
`b. to produce any documents other than particular documents specified in the
`Letter of Request as being documents appearing to the requested court to be, or to
`be likely to be, in his or her possession, custody, or power.1
`
`Consistent with this reservation, the Letter of Request does not require
`
` to indicate which
`
`relevant documents are or have been within its possession, custody, or power, nor does the Letter
`
`of Request require
`
` to produce documents other than those specifically requested.
`
`Third, the requested information, or its substantial equivalent, could not be obtained
`
`without undue hardship by alternate means because the documents and knowledgeable witnesses
`
`are in the Republic of Korea, which is beyond the Commission’s subpoena powers.
`
`
`1 Republic of Korea’s Declaration Reservations, available at
`https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/statustable/notifications/?csid=1057&disp=res
`dn (last accessed Mar. 15, 2023).
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`5
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Fourth, the documents produced pursuant to the Letter of Request would be subject to the
`
`Protective Order in this Investigation (which will be attached to the Letter of Request), thereby
`
`ensuring that the confidentiality interests of
`
` are adequately protected.
`
`Fifth, SDC is fully prepared to comply with the procedural requirements involved in
`
`obtaining the requested documents and testimony from
`
` through the Letter of Request. The
`
`necessary steps to receive judicial assistance are:
`
`1. Obtain a Letter of Request for
`
` bearing the signature of a District Court judge and
`
`the seal of the District Court, and a copy thereof translated into Korean.
`
`2. Include in the Letter of Request the identities of the parties, the nature of the proceedings,
`
`the discovery sought, any special procedures, the identity of the party that will bear any costs, and
`
`other information as recommended by the Hague Convention.2
`
`3. Transmit the Letter of Request to the Central Authority of the Republic of Korea,
`
`submitted in duplicate with Korean translations, for enforcement in a Korean court. The Korean
`
`court will serve the requests on
`
`.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, SDC respectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge
`
`grant its motion and recommend to the District Court for the District of Columbia issuance of
`
`SDC’s Letter of Request to the Central Authority of the Republic of Korea, and further recommend
`
`that the Letter of Request be issued as soon as practicable.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 See Hague Convention, Model for Letters of Request recommended for use in applying
`the Hague Evidence Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or
`Commercial Matters, available at https://assets.hcch.net/upload/actform20e.pdf (last accessed
`Mar. 15, 2023).
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`6
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`
`
`Dated: January 12, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ S. Alex Lasher
`S. Alex Lasher
`K. Kevin Chu
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`1300 I Street, NW, Suite 900
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Tel.: (202) 538-8000
`
`Sean S. Pak
`James D. Judah
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Tel.: (415) 875-6600
`
`D. James Pak
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`865 S Figueroa St, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`Tel.: (213) 443-3000
`
`David A. Nelson
`Marc L. Kaplan
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 2700
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel.: (312) 705-7400
`
`Counsel for Complainant Samsung Display Co.,
`Ltd.
`
`09833-00003/14622162.3
`
`7
`
`Complainant's Motion Requesting L.O.R.
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY MODULES AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1378
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Box
` Via EDIS
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Box
` Via EDIS
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
`I, Jeffrey Matthews, hereby certify that on January 12, 2024 copies of the foregoing
`
`documents were served upon the following parties as indicated:
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`The Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`McNamara337@usitc.gov
`Aaron D. Rauh, Esq.
`The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII)
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`Aaron.Rauh@usitc.gov
`Gary M. Hnath
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006-1101
`Tel.: 202-263-3040
`Facsimile: 202-263-5340
`ghnath@mayerbrown.com
`Service Email:
`BOE-MB-ITC1378@mayerbrown.com
`
`A. John P. Mancini
`Brian Nolan
`Gregory J. Apgar
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10020-1001
`Tel.: 212-506-2295
`Facsimile: 212-849-5895
`jmancini@mayerbrown.com
`bnolan@mayerbrown.com
`gapgar@mayerbrown.com
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY MODULES AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1378
`
`
`
`Nicholas J. Ronaldson
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606-4637
`Tel.: 312-782-0600
`Facsimile: 312-701-7711
`nronaldson@mayerbrown.com
`
`Shen Wang
`Hao Tan
`ARCH & LAKE LLP
`203 N. LaSalle St., Ste. 2100
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Phone: (312) 558-1369
`Facsimile: (312) 614-1873
`ShenWang@archlakelaw.com
`HaoTan@archlakelaw.com
`Service Email: boe-al-itc1378@archlakelaw.com
`
`Bas de Blank, Esq.
`Elaine Ke, Esq.
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015
`Tel: (650) 614-7400
`Fax: (650) 614-7401
`basedeblank@orrrick.com
`eke@orrick.com
`Service Email: BOE-1378_OHS@orrick.com
`
`Richard F. Martinelli, Esq.
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`51 West 52nd Street
`New York, NY 10019
`Tel: (212) 506-5000
`Fax: (212) 506-5151
`
`Johannes Hsu, Esq.
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`Tel: (949) 567-6700
`Fax: (949) 567-6710
`
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY MODULES AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1378
`
`
`johanneshsu@orrick.com
`
`Counsel for BOE Respondents
`
` /s/ Jeffrey Matthews
`Jeffrey Matthews
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY MODULES AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1378
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Box
` Via EDIS
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via Box
` Via EDIS
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Express Delivery
` Via Electronic Mail
`
`I, Jeffrey Matthews, hereby certify that on January 23, 2024 copies of the foregoing
`
`documents were served upon the following parties as indicated:
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`The Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`McNamara337@usitc.gov
`Aaron D. Rauh, Esq.
`The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII)
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`Aaron.Rauh@usitc.gov
`Gary M. Hnath
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20006-1101
`Tel.: 202-263-3040
`Facsimile: 202-263-5340
`ghnath@mayerbrown.com
`Service Email:
`BOE-MB-ITC1378@mayerbrown.com
`
`A. John P. Mancini
`Brian Nolan
`Gregory J. Apgar
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10020-1001
`Tel.: 212-506-2295
`Facsimile: 212-849-5895
`jmancini@mayerbrown.com
`bnolan@mayerbrown.com
`gapgar@mayerbrown.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY MODULES AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1378
`
`
`
`Nicholas J. Ronaldson
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`71 South Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606-4637
`Tel.: 312-782-0600
`Facsimile: 312-701-7711
`nronaldson@mayerbrown.com
`
`Shen Wang
`Hao Tan
`ARCH & LAKE LLP
`203 N. LaSalle St., Ste. 2100
`Chicago, IL 60601
`Phone: (312) 558-1369
`Facsimile: (312) 614-1873
`ShenWang@archlakelaw.com
`HaoTan@archlakelaw.com
`Service Email: boe-al-itc1378@archlakelaw.com
`
`Bas de Blank, Esq.
`Elaine Ke, Esq.
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`1000 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015
`Tel: (650) 614-7400
`Fax: (650) 614-7401
`basedeblank@orrrick.com
`eke@orrick.com
`Service Email: BOE-1378_OHS@orrick.com
`
`Richard F. Martinelli, Esq.
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`51 West 52nd Street
`New York, NY 10019
`Tel: (212) 506-5000
`Fax: (212) 506-5151
`
`Johannes Hsu, Esq.
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
`Irvine, CA 92614-8255
`Tel: (949) 567-6700
`Fax: (949) 567-6710
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY MODULES AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1378
`
`
`johanneshsu@orrick.com
`
`Counsel for BOE Respondents
`
` /s/ Jeffrey Matthews
`Jeffrey Matthews
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`