`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1378
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN ORGANIC LIGHT-
`EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY
`MODULES AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`ORDER NO. 12
`
`GRANTING OFFICE OF UNFAIR IMPORT
`INVESTIGATIONS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND
`THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
`(February 21, 2024)
`On February 12, 2024, counsel for the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“Staff”) filed
`
`
`
`an unopposed motion to amend the procedural schedule (“Motion”). (Motion Dkt. No. 1378-013.).
`
`The Motion represents that, in accordance with Ground Rule 2.2, at least two business days before
`
`filing the Motion Staff contacted Respondents BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., Mianyang BOE
`
`Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd., Ordos Yuansheng Optoelectronics Co., Ltd., Chengdu BOE
`
`Optoeletronics Technology Co., Ltd., Chongqing BOE Optoeletronics Technology Co., Ltd.,
`
`Wuhan BOE Optoeletronics Technology Co., Ltd., BMOT f/k/a Kunming BOE Display
`
`Technology, and BOE Technology America, Inc. (collectively, “Respondents” or “BOE”) and
`
`Complainant Samsung Display Co., Ltd.’s (“SDC’s”) concerning the subject matter of the Motion.
`
`The Motion represents that neither Respondents nor SDC opposes the Motion. (Motion at 1.).
`
`The Motion asserts that Staff has a conflict with the management conference currently
`
`scheduled for April 9, 2024 at 2:00 pm. (Id.). Staff promptly brought this to the attention of
`
`Respondents and SDC by discussing it during the discovery committee meetings held on January
`
`17, 2024 and January 31, 2024. (Id. at 1-2.). Staff requests the management conference be
`
`rescheduled to the week of April 15, 2024 or the week of April 22, 2024. (Id. at 2.).
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Having considered the Motion, and for good cause shown, it is determined that the Motion
`
`should be, and hereby is, GRANTED. The April 9, 2024 management conference is rescheduled
`
`to April 15, 2024 at 2:00 pm.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
