`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`WASHINGTON, DC 20436
`
`
`November 3, 2023
`
`Via email: Hal.Davis@gtlaw.com
`Harold H. Davis, Esq.
`Greenberg Traurig LLP
`101 Second Street, Suite 2200
`San Francisco, CA 94105-3668
`
`
`Re: Complaint Filed by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and R.J.
`Reynolds Vapor Company Concerning Certain Disposable Vaporizer
`Devices and Components and Packaging Thereof (Docket No. 3700)
`
`
`Dear Mr. Davis:
`
`
`The Commission is in receipt of your November 2, 2023, letter requesting a
`postponement of the deadline by which the Commission must decide whether to institute
`a Section 337 investigation based on the above-referenced complaint.
`
`Under Commission Rule 210.10(a)(1), 19 C.F.R. § 210.10(a)(1), the Commission
`may extend the 30-day deadline for voting on institution of an investigation based upon a
`request by complainant that the Commission extend the deadline. Rule 210.10(a)(4)
`authorizes the Commission to reschedule the determination on institution “for whatever
`date is appropriate in light of the facts.” 19 C.F.R. § 210.10(a)(4).
`
`Your letter requests an extension of the vote on institution “due in part to the
`belated submission from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘CBP’) that was received
`yesterday, November 1, 2023. Complainants intend to address CBP’s submission and
`file a response no later than November 6, 2023.” In view of this request, the Commission
`has determined to postpone the vote on institution until November 21, 2023.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
