`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN WIRELESS FRONT-END MODULES
`AND DEVICES CONTAINING THE SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1413
`
`COMPLAINANTS’ MOTION TO PARTIALLY TERMINATE
`THE INVESTIGATION AS TO PATENT NO. 9,148,194
`
`For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities,
`
`Complainants Skyworks Solutions, Inc., Skyworks Solutions Canada, Inc., and Skyworks Global
`
`Pte. Ltd. (collectively, “Skyworks”) respectfully move pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a) to
`
`terminate the Investigation in part as to U.S. Patent No. 9,148,194 (the “’194 patent”).
`
`Commission Rule 210.21(a) provides in relevant part that: “Any party may move at any
`
`time prior to the issuance of an initial determination on violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act
`
`of 1930 to terminate an investigation in whole or in part as to any or all respondents, on the basis
`
`of withdrawal of the complaint or certain allegations contained therein[.]” This Motion seeks to
`
`withdraw certain allegations contained in Skyworks’ Complaint and thus comports with
`
`Commission Rule 210.21(a). Further, this Motion reduces the number of issues to be decided in
`
`this Investigation by reducing the number of patents at issue. Pursuant to Commission Rule
`
`210.21(a)(1), Complainants state there are two agreements between the parties, a Representative
`
`Products Stipulation and Joint Discovery and Procedural Stipulation. See Representative Products
`
`Stipulation, EDIS DocID 834988 (Oct. 17, 2024); Joint Discovery Stipulation, EDIS DocID
`
`
`
`835713 (Oct. 28, 2024). In addition, there are no extraordinary circumstances that would justify
`
`denying partial termination.
`
`Skyworks has met and conferred with the Commission Investigative Staff and Respondents
`
`regarding this motion, and neither the Staff nor Respondents oppose.
`
`Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Points
`
`and Authorities in support hereof, Skyworks requests that the Administrative Law Judge grant the
`
`Motion, terminating in part the Investigation with respect to the one asserted claim of the ’194
`
`patent.
`
`Dated: November 27, 2024
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC., SKYWORKS
`SOLUTIONS CANADA, INC. AND SKYWORKS
`GLOBAL PTE. LTD.
`
`By: /s/ James M. Dowd
`James M. Dowd
`Derek A. Gosma
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Tel: +1 213 443 5300
`
`Joseph F. Haag
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Tel: +1 650 858 6000
`
`Kate Saxton (MA SBN 655903)
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Tel: +1 617 526 6000
`
`Inv. No. 337-1413: Complainants’ Motion to
`Partially Terminate the Investigation
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`Before the Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN WIRELESS FRONT-END MODULES
`AND DEVICES CONTAINING THE SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1413
`
`MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINANTS’ MOTION TO PARTIALLY
`TERMINATE THE INVESTIGATION AS TO PATENT NO. 9,148,194
`
`COMPLAINANTS
`
`Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
`5260 California Avenue
`Irvine, CA 92617
`Telephone: (949) 231-3000
`
`Skyworks Solutions Canada, Inc.
`1135 Innovation Drive
`Ottawa, Ontario K2K 3G7
`Canada
`Telephone: +1 613-287-4945
`
`Skyworks Global Pte. Ltd.
`3 Bedok South Rd.
`Singapore 469269
`Telephone: +65 6450 7181
`
`COUNSEL FOR COMPLAINANTS
`
`James M. Dowd
`Derek A. Gosma
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`350 S. Grand Ave, Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 443-5300
`
`Joseph F. Haag
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`
`RESPONDENTS
`
`Kangxi Communication Technologies
`(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
`5th Floor, Building 10, No.399 Keyuan Road
`Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China
`Telephone: +86 2168386910
`
`Grand Chip Labs, Inc.
`14151 Newport Ave., Suite 204
`Tustin, CA 92780
`Telephone: 949-331-8998
`
`D-Link Corporation
`4F 289 Sinhu 3rd Road,
`Neihu District, Taipei, 114 Taiwan
`Telephone: +886-2-6600-0123
`
`D-Link Systems Inc.
`14420 Myford Road, Suite 100
`Irvine, CA 92606
`Telephone: 714-885-6000
`
`Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd.
`Building 19, Juyuanzhou Industrial Park, No.
`618
`Jinshan Road, Cangshan District, Fuzhou,
`Fujian, China
`Telephone: (86)0591-28053888-6729/6267.
`
`
`
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`2600 El Camino Real Suite 400
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Telephone: (650) 858-6031
`
`Kate Saxton
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Telephone: (617) 526 6000
`
`COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS
`
`Timothy R. Shannon
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`100 High Street, Suite 2400
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`Counsel for Respondent Kangxi
`Communication Technologies (Shanghai)
`Co., Ltd. and Grand Chip Labs, Inc.
`
`Ric Macchiaroli
`PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
`7900 Tysons One Place, Suite 500
`Tysons, VA 22102
`
`Counsel for Respondent D-Link Corporation
`and D-Link Systems Inc.
`
`S. Alex Lasher
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
`LLP
`1300 I Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Counsel for Respondent Ruijie Networks Co.,
`Ltd.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a), Complainants Skyworks Solutions, Inc.,
`
`Skyworks Solutions Canada, Inc., and Skyworks Global Pte. Ltd. (collectively, “Skyworks”) move
`
`to partially terminate the Investigation as to the one asserted claim of U.S. Patent No. 9,148,194
`
`(the “’194 patent).
`
`Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) provides in relevant part that:
`
`“Any party may move at any time prior to the issuance of an initial determination
`on violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to terminate an investigation
`in whole or in part as to any or all respondents, on the basis of withdrawal of the
`complaint or certain allegations contained therein[.]”
`
`This motion complies with the Commission Rules and narrows the issues in this
`
`Investigation by removing one Asserted Patent, thus streamlining the Investigation and permitting
`
`the parties and the Commission to focus their resources going forward on the remaining asserted
`
`claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,717,101, 9,917,563, and 9,450,579. Skyworks has met and conferred
`
`with the Commission Investigative Staff and Respondents. No party opposes this motion.
`
`Moreover, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1), Complainants state there are two
`
`agreements between the parties, a Representative Products Stipulation and Joint Discovery and
`
`Procedural Stipulation. See Representative Products Stipulation, EDIS DocID 834988 (Oct. 17,
`
`2024); Joint Discovery Stipulation, EDIS DocID 835713 (Oct. 28, 2024). In addition, there are
`
`no extraordinary circumstances that would justify denying partial termination.
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`Skyworks filed its Complaint in this Investigation on July 16, 2024, asserting against
`
`Respondents a single claim of the ’194 patent (claim 4), among other patents and claims. The ALJ
`
`issued Order No. 10 on September 25, 2024, setting the procedural schedule for this Investigation
`
`and setting the Target Date as February 23, 2026. The Investigation is currently in the pre-hearing,
`
`fact discovery stage where the parties are presently preparing for fact depositions. On November
`1
`Inv. No. 337-1413: Complainants’ Memorandum ISO Motion
`to Partially Terminate the Investigation
`
`
`
`1, 2024, Skyworks moved to amend the Complaint to add claims 2, 3, 8, and 9 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,450,579 (the “’579 patent”) and to partially terminate the investigation as to all asserted claims
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,409,200 (the “’200 patent”). Skyworks’ motion to terminate the Investigation
`
`as to the ’200 patent was granted on November 8, 2024. Skyworks’ motion to amend remains
`
`pending.
`
`The ’194 and ’579 patents both generally relate to the design of and methods of operation
`
`for “a radio-frequency (RF) switch system” having improved intermodulation distortion
`
`performance as implemented in wireless Front-End Module (“FEM”). These patents share
`
`overlapping specifications, both claim priority to Provisional Application No. 61/669,045 filed on
`
`July 7, 2012, and the application leading to the ’579 patent was a division of the application leading
`
`to the ’194 patent. As stated in Skyworks’ Complaint, all asserted claims of the ’579 patent and
`
`the single asserted claim of the ’194 patent are asserted against the same infringing KCT FEMs
`
`and products containing same.
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`Under Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1), “[a]ny party may move at any time prior to the
`
`issuance of an initial determination on violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to
`
`terminate an investigation in whole or in part [.]” “[I]n the absence of extraordinary circumstances,
`
`termination of the investigation will be readily granted to a complainant during the prehearing
`
`stage of an investigation.” Certain Omega-3 Extracts From Marine or Aquatic Biomass and
`
`Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-877, Order No. 11 (Initial Determination), EDIS
`
`Doc ID 514365, at 2 (July 24, 2013) (citations omitted); see also Certain Oscillating Sprinklers,
`
`Sprinkler Components, and Nozzles, Inv. No. 337-TA-448, Order No. 26 (Initial Determination),
`
`EDIS Doc ID 60430, at 2 (Sept. 25, 2001) (same); Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless
`
`2
`Inv. No. 337-1413: Complainants’ Memorandum ISO Motion
`to Partially Terminate the Investigation
`
`
`
`Communication Devices, Tablet Computers, Media Players, and Televisions, and Components
`
`Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-862, Order No. 63 (Initial Determination), EDIS Doc ID 517807, at 1-
`
`2 (Sept. 9, 2013) (same); Certain Laminated Floor Panels, Inv. No. 337-TA-545, Order No. 30
`
`(Initial Determination), EDIS Doc ID 251272, at 2 (Apr. 3, 2006) (same).
`
`Skyworks’ request to terminate the Investigation with respect to the ’194 patent satisfies
`
`the Commission’s standard. As outlined above, the Investigation remains in the pre-hearing stage.
`
`Certain Oscillating Sprinklers, Inv. No. 337-TA-448, Order No. 26 at 2. As a result, termination
`
`now will serve the public interest by conserving both judicial and party resources. Id. Moreover,
`
`Skyworks is aware of no extraordinary circumstance that would prohibit termination of the ’194
`
`patent from this Investigation. Indeed, the Staff and Respondents have all confirmed that they
`
`support termination of the ’194 patent.
`
`III.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the reasons discussed above, Skyworks respectfully requests that its Motion to Partially
`
`Terminate the Investigation as to the ’194 Patent be granted.
`
`3
`Inv. No. 337-1413: Complainants’ Memorandum ISO Motion
`to Partially Terminate the Investigation
`
`
`
`Dated: November 27, 2024
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC., SKYWORKS
`SOLUTIONS CANADA, INC. AND SKYWORKS
`GLOBAL PTE. LTD.
`
`By: /s/ James M. Dowd
`James M. Dowd
`Derek A. Gosma
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Tel: +1 213 443 5300
`
`Joseph F. Haag
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Tel: +1 650 858 6000
`
`Kate Saxton
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
`HALE AND DORR LLP
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Tel: +1 617 526 6000
`
`4
`Inv. No. 337-1413: Complainants’ Memorandum ISO Motion
`to Partially Terminate the Investigation
`
`
`
`IN THE MATTER OF CERTAIN WIRELESS FRONT-END MODULES AND
`DEVICES CONTAINING THE SAME
`INV. NO. 337-TA-1413
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lanta M. Chase, hereby certify that on November 27, 2024 I caused a copy of the
`foregoing, COMPLAINANTS’ MOTION TO PARTIALLY TERMINATE THE
`INVESTIGATION AS TO PATENT NO. 9,148,194 to be served upon the following parties as
`indicated below:
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W.
`Washington, DC 20436
`The Honorable MaryJoan McNamara
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 317
`Washington, DC 20436
`Linda Chang, Esq.
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, S.W., Room 401
`Washington, DC 20436
`Timothy R. Shannon
`Duane Morris LLP
`100 High Street, Suite 2400
`Boston, MA 02110
`
`Counsel for Kangxi Communication Techs
`(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Grand Chip Labs, Inc.
`S. Alex Lasher
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`1300 I Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Counsel for Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd.
`
` Via Electronic Filing
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Facsimile
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`
` Via Electronic Filing
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Mail:
`McNamara337@usitc.gov
` Via Hand Delivery (2 Copies)
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Mail:
`Linda.chang@usitc.gov
` Via Hand Delivery (2 Copies)
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Mail:
`DM_KCT_ITC_1413@duanemorrris.com
`FM-KCT-1413@fostermurphy.com
`
` Via Hand Delivery (2 Copies)
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Mail:
`alexlasher@quinnemanuel.com
`qeruijie@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`
`Ric Macchiaroli
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`7900 Tysons One Place, Suite 500
`Tysons, VA 22102
`
`Counsel for D-Link Corp. and D-Link Systems,
`Inc.
`
` Via Hand Delivery (2 Copies)
` Via Overnight Delivery
` Via Facsimile
` Via Electronic Mail:
`DLINK-1413@pillsburylaw.com
`
`/s/ Lanta M. Chase
`Lanta M. Chase
`
`



